On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:28 AM Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> On 7/11/22 21:35, Tixy wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 19:51 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I decided to try a fresh netinstall alongside and Boom:
> >>
> >> ===
> >
On Tue 12 Jul 2022 at 15:44:41 (+0100), Tixy wrote:
> Another idea, is looking for that network name in the logs for the
> current boot.
>
> journalctl -b | grep -B3 enx00e04c534458
>
> That'll give you matches with the three lines before so you can see the
> context.
I'd use grep -B3 -A3 -i
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 05:35 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 19:51 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I decided to try a fresh netinstall alongside and Boom:
> >
> > ===
> > multiple network interfaces
> >
> > eno1: Intel Corpor
On 7/11/22 21:35, Tixy wrote:
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 19:51 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
[...]
I decided to try a fresh netinstall alongside and Boom:
===
multiple network interfaces
eno1: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2) I218-LM
enp5s0: Intel Corporation 1210 Gigabit Network
On Mon, 2022-07-11 at 19:51 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
[...]
>
> I decided to try a fresh netinstall alongside and Boom:
>
> ===
> multiple network interfaces
>
> eno1: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2) I218-LM
> enp5s0: Intel Corporation 1210 Gi
to try a fresh netinstall alongside and Boom:
===
multiple network interfaces
eno1: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2) I218-LM
enp5s0: Intel Corporation 1210 Gigabit Network Connection
enx00e04c534458: Unknown Interface
===
the first two are old hat, I use eno1 and it just works.
bottom
Hi Reco,
works perfectly as you decribe for me.
Many thanks
Rainer
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2019, 05:41:49 CET schrieb Reco:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:09:58PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a system with two network interfaces, connecting to two subnets.
Hi.
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:09:58PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with two network interfaces, connecting to two subnets.
>
> For some reason the default route is going through eth0.3, I would want to
> have it through eth0.7.
Both of your VLANs are
On 1/9/19, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with two network interfaces, connecting to two subnets.
>
> For some reason the default route is going through eth0.3, I would want to
> have it through eth0.7.
further down you've got:
rd@master:~$ ip r
default via 192.168.3.1 dev eno1.3
Hi,
I have a system with two network interfaces, connecting to two subnets.
For some reason the default route is going through eth0.3, I would want to
have it through eth0.7.
Is the default route determined by the order in /etc/network/interface of the
interfaces or is there another
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 05:18, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
El Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:43:07PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt escribió:
2) Linux, iirc, requires a kernel driver for each individual ethernet
card, meaning that if you have two or more identical ethernet cards, you
need the driver
Mark L. Kahnt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Linux, iirc, requires a kernel driver for each individual ethernet
card, meaning that if you have two or more identical ethernet cards, you
need the driver twice. The only way to do that is to compile it as a
module, rather than into the kernel, and
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:58:41AM -0600, Juan dominguez wrote:
| Hello everybody
|
| I have installed debian 3.0 in my PC. After that I
| recompiled the kernel (version 2.4.4). The network
| interface module is part of the kernel. I have a
| network interface working successfull, but I want to
Hello everybody
I have installed debian 3.0 in my PC. After that I
recompiled the kernel (version 2.4.4). The network
interface module is part of the kernel. I have a
network interface working successfull, but I want to
install another one. I edited the
/etc/network/interface file and add the
Hello,
Try ifconfig -a
Do you see both nics?
If not, do modconf and install the second nic
Willem-Jan Meijer
Netherlands
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Juan dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 25 maart 2003 15:59
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Multiple network
Hi
Are you wanting to add another IP to your existing network card? or are
you trying to install another network card to use another IP?
if your wanting to add another IP to an existing network card the eth1
should be eth0:1 otherwise you'll need to load the module for the new
card using
-Original Message-
From: Juan dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple network interfaces
Hello everybody
I have installed debian 3.0 in my PC. After that I
recompiled the kernel (version 2.4.4
TED] wrote:
-Original Message- From: Juan dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple network interfaces Hello everybody I have installed debian 3.0 in my PC. After that I recompiled the kernel (version 2.4.4). T
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 09:58, Juan dominguez wrote:
Hello everybody
I have installed debian 3.0 in my PC. After that I
recompiled the kernel (version 2.4.4). The network
interface module is part of the kernel. I have a
network interface working successfull, but I want to
install another
for yopur cooperation!
deFreese, Barry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Juan dominguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple network interfaces
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 07:26, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
I have two network interfaces:
* eth0 = 100mbps ethernet using 3c59x (subnet 192.168.1.0, gw
192.168.1.1); configured using /etc/init.d/networking
* eth1 = wireless using orinoco_cs on D-Link DWL650 (subnet 192.168.0.0,
gw 192.168.0.1);
I have two network interfaces:
* eth0 = 100mbps ethernet using 3c59x (subnet 192.168.1.0, gw
192.168.1.1); configured using /etc/init.d/networking
* eth1 = wireless using orinoco_cs on D-Link DWL650 (subnet 192.168.0.0,
gw 192.168.0.1); configured using pcmcia_cs
When both interfaces are up,
Subject: Re: Multiple Network Interfaces per host -- possible?
Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:41:55PM -0400
In reply to:Wayne Topa
Quoting Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Subject: Multiple Network Interfaces per host -- possible?
Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:15
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:14:59 Wayne Topa wrote:
In reply to:Lukas Ruf
Just added a 2nd card a few days ago. Here is what I recall doing.
Read through the Net3 and Ethernet howto's first and then
/etc/network/aliases Had this for the first card
^^^ I meant
Dear all,
I installed a second network interface into my host. The problem that
arises: only the old one gets configured even I included the driver for
the new one into the kernel as well.
The one I had before -- that must remain eth0 -- is a 3COM 3c905B.
The new one is an AMD-79c970-based
Subject: Multiple Network Interfaces per host -- possible?
Date: Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 11:15:48AM +0200
In reply to:Lukas Ruf
Quoting Lukas Ruf([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Dear all,
I installed a second network interface into my host. The problem that
arises: only the old one gets
26 matches
Mail list logo
