On Sun, 22 Feb 1998 17:43:39 EST, wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes:
> The most likely explanation is that nmh has started adding Sender:
> lines; this is in general a good thing - we just need to be careful to
> take them out or rewrite them nicely on the way out. It may be that
>
Daniel Martin wrote:
> I'm drawing up a list of how I'd like a mail program to behave in my
> environment; so far, these are the requirements:
> Local mail is just delivered locally; no fuss or hassle about
> forwarding local mail on to one's ISP unless that's very explicitly
> requested.
> Headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Daniel Martin writes:
> > You may also want to ensure that the visible_name used is something other
> > than "localhost", which is what it appears to be set to. Unfortunately,
> > the only way I've found to do that (without having a name registered with
> > .dyn.ml.org
Daniel Martin writes:
> You may also want to ensure that the visible_name used is something other
> than "localhost", which is what it appears to be set to. Unfortunately,
> the only way I've found to do that (without having a name registered with
> .dyn.ml.org)
I've got a name, but my isp st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes:
> For some unknown reason my Sender: line is no longer being rewritten,
> and most destinations will refuse my mail because it is not DNS
> resolvable (as an aside I'd be interested to hear the basis for such
> refusals). Those that don't refuse it will
On Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:58:15 EST, wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes:
> >
> > Recently I upgraded nmh on hamm from 0.17-1 to 0.22-1 and I just
> > discovered my smail header rewriting is broke, and I think the new nmh
> > is the culprit. smail remains on hold status in dselect. I'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I upgraded nmh on hamm from 0.17-1 to 0.22-1 and I just
> discovered my smail header rewriting is broke, and I think the new nmh
> is the culprit. smail remains on hold status in dselect. I've read
> the bug reports (there are none),
Hi,
Recently I upgraded nmh on hamm from 0.17-1 to 0.22-1 and I just
discovered my smail header rewriting is broke, and I think the new nmh
is the culprit. smail remains on hold status in dselect. I've read
the bug reports (there are none), I've read /usr/doc/nmh/DIFFERENCES.gz,
but there is
8 matches
Mail list logo
