ft Speed
> 100 1778 100 17780 0 13268 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 13268
> # ls -l /usr/share/keyrings/anydesk.gpg
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 18 avril 12:37 /usr/share/keyrings/anydesk.gpg
>
> Le fichier DEB-GPG-KEY est au format "PGP public key block Public-Key
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
100 1778 100 17780 0 13268 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 13268
# ls -l /usr/share/keyrings/anydesk.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 18 avril 12:37 /usr/share/keyrings/anydesk.gpg
Le fichier DEB-GPG-KEY est au format "PGP public key block P
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 14:39 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
Thanks, Thomas.
I did get the signers key fingeprints from their personal github pages. I
would go the full security route if it were only my use I'm concerned with,
but I'm working on a Raku module for others and I don't want them to
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tom Browder wrote:
> > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > Rakudo downloadable files.
>
> Do i get it right that you talk about https://rakudo.org/downloads ?
>
> >
Hi,
Tom Browder wrote:
> I found a usable answer. Run "gpg file.asc" and the output shows the two
> fingerprints: the primary key fingerprint and the subkey fingerprint.
Wow, that's surprising.
But indeed the man page says:
COMMANDS
...
gpg may be run with no commands, in which case
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 05:13 Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
> wrote:
> > Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > > Q
Hi,
maybe
gpg --keyid-format long --verify signature_file.asc /some/dummy/file
this gives me the last 16 characters of the fingerprint. Like:
gpg:using key E9CBDFC0ABC0A854
with a matching payload file i get something like:
Primary key fingerprint: 44BC 9FD0 D688
On Oct 08, 2023, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
> wrote:
> > Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > > Questi
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 3:29 AM DdB
wrote:
> Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> > Rakudo downloadable files.
> > Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
> There i
Hi,
Tom Browder wrote:
> I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of Rakudo
> downloadable files.
Do i get it right that you talk about https://rakudo.org/downloads ?
> Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
> The products I dow
Am 08.10.2023 um 01:16 schrieb Tom Browder:
> I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of
> Rakudo downloadable files.
>
> Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
>
> The products I download are (1) the file of interest, (2) a PGP
I'm willing to trust published PGP key fingerprints for signers of Rakudo
downloadable files.
Question: How can I get the fingerprint from the downloads?
The products I download are (1) the file of interest, (2) a PGP signed
checksums file with various shaX hashes for the file, and (3
Hi,
sorry for this german mail which i sent to debian-user by mistake.
(I was asked by the xorriso maintainer of another distro to upload my
public PGP key to the keyserver which the distro uses. Hopefully i was
able to fulfill that wish and did not publish any secrets of mine.)
Have a nice
Hi,
> siehst Du eine Möglichkeit Deinen PGP-Schlüssel auf keys.openpgp.org zu
> verwalten und die E-Mail-Adresse freizugeben?
Ich habe die Ausgabe von
gpg --export scdbac...@gmx.net
hochgeladen. (Ich haette ja gerne inspiziert, was in dem Ausgabefile
steht, aber soweit bringt mich &q
Marco Möller wrote:
> So, unfortunately I am still in need to find more information about the
> two different (or in the end not different?) GUI tools concerning their
> PGP functionality.
>
Focus on kgpg for now and start with PGP and OpenGPG (gnupg)
https://www.openpgp.org/
Th
Kleopatra appears to be kind of a GUI database manager for managing PGP
keys and also X.509 certificates.
But installing them both and comparing there PGP related offers without
understanding too much about the topic, Kleopatra seems, like Kgpg, the
same being a GUI frontend to GnuPG, also
On Lu, 31 mai 21, 22:57:26, deloptes wrote:
>
> gnupg is the mother of all open source pgp stuff. In fact you must know that
> PGP is the commercial implementation of a standard for symetric encryption
> (I hope I am not wrong in my wording while citing from memory)
PGP support
Marco Möller wrote:
> Could someone explain for a raw beginner concerning the usage of PGP the
> difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, what the typical work case is for
> the one and the other, what important feature the one and the other is
> missing?
>
apt-cache show kleopat
Hello,
Could someone explain for a raw beginner concerning the usage of PGP the
difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, what the typical work case is for
the one and the other, what important feature the one and the other is
missing?
Sorry for the related but low specific questions
Hallo,
Vandaag is de nieuwe Thunderbird uitgerold via security met daarin een
eigen PGP implementatie. Deze gebruikt geen PGP van het systeem, maar
een eigen PGP die minder kan.
Met moeite heb ik mijn private keys weten te importeren uit
~/.gnupg/secring.pgp. Hierin stonden verschillende
Para la información de quienes tengan interés.
Mensaje reenviado
Asunto: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced?
Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:42:34 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-secur...@lists.debian.org
Fecha: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:34:47 +0200
De: Stephan Seitz
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, pjw wrote:
Since July ProtonMail is now fully interoperable with
other PGP mail clients.
Now that is a nice piece of news.
--
Fraught with portent
On 2018-07-08 18:18, HP Garcia wrote:
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
Thanks in advance
roundcube with enigma plugin
dunno if it is working
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
0x4BFEBB31.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
On 18-07-08 14:42:54, Jude DaShiell wrote:
If you can live with the configuration mutt or neomutt can fill the
bill.
I can never truly recommend mutt to people who aren't used to terminal
apps.
That said, it's a great piece of software and the PGP handling in
particular is really nice
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, HP Garcia wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 13:18:25
> From: HP Garcia
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: PGP Email Client
> Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 17:18:45 + (UTC)
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Can anyone r
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700,
HP Garcia wrote:
>Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
>using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
>
Why not Claws-Mail? With the correct plugins (claws-mail-pgpinline or
claws-mail-pgpmime) that should be packaged in Debian it handles
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700
HP Garcia wrote:
Hello HP,
>Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
>using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
CM; Install the relevant plugin(s) and you're ready.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindin
On 7/8/2018 7:18 PM, HP Garcia wrote:
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
https://www.claws-mail.org/plugin.php?plugin=gpg
Thunderbird with enigmail.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/digitally-signing-and-encrypting-messages
Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently
using Claws-Mail 3.14.1
Thanks in advance
--
HP Garcia KM6JBI
www.HPGPhotography.com
Hi,
GC wrote:
> I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
For production, see chapter 1 of GPG documentatio,
"Getting Started":
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html
(note the swapping of "g" and "p" in comparison to PGP.)
The manu
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:19:24 -0800
GC <g...@maillr.com> wrote:
Hello GC,
>I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
Wait for somebody to send you one.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately appa
On 18/11/15 18:19, GC wrote:
> I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
Could you be more specific?
If it was just your goal in life to have someone send an OpenPGP signed
email, you can cross that off your "bucket list".
I suspect that was not your aim tho
I would like to get a PGP SIGNED MESSAGE. How do I do that?
Hi Dmitry,
Cc-ing list since answers to questions about how to get started as a Debian
contributor, or working with PGP, might be interesting to others too.
Debian User Dutch-subscribers: excuses dat deze mail in het Engels is. Dmitry
woont in Nederland maar schrijft makkelijker Engels dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hola,
Veo que cuando un mensaje es respondido se rompen las firmas PGP.
Sería normal eso? ¿Es posible conseguir que, o bien se reconozcan las
firmas en los mensajes citados, o bien se quite la firma antes de
responder?
No es demasiado importante
El Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:42:46 -0300, Francisco Del Roio escribió:
Veo que cuando un mensaje es respondido se rompen las firmas PGP.
¿Puedes poner un ejemplo?
Si te refieres a los correos de esta lista, puedes usar el archivo para
indicar algún mensaje.
Sería normal eso? ¿Es posible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hola,
El 04/11/2013 11:57 a.m., Camaleón escribió:
(...)
A los mensajes a los que respondo que llevan firma GnuPG/PGP
integrada les quito manualmente la firma, claro.
Saludos,
MMM...dijo la vaca...
Bueno, entonces no me quedan mas dudas.
Un
El Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:08:15 -0300, Francisco Del Roio escribió:
El 04/11/2013 11:57 a.m., Camaleón escribió:
(...)
A los mensajes a los que respondo que llevan firma GnuPG/PGP integrada
les quito manualmente la firma, claro.
Saludos,
MMM...dijo la vaca...
Bueno, entonces no me
using RSA key ID 6294BE9B
gpg: Good signature from Debian CD signing key debian...@lists.debian.org
pgpmUa8nf05o5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.2.0/amd64/iso-dvd/SHA512SUMS.sign:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABCAAGBQJSWw5jAAoJENqH6A1ilL6bQ80QAOBDh5Sot0bcIPLXE0L7T8kU
KJUSdQRcjTvwpW76BB7ekC6/gAfyHO7hd857vO6SI+78seLlbh3MBJ6swmn3WAcS
.
Wow. How did it happen? Where did he take previous signature?
pgpDyPp3ooIlV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
What is this? The file on official cd mirror is different.
SHA512SUMS
Description: Attachment: SHA512SUMS
SHA512SUMS.sign
Description: Attachment: SHA512SUMS.sign
Bonjour,
Debian vient de mettre à jour le paquet gnupg2.
A ce propos, je n'ai pas vu passer ici l'info concernant tous ceux qui
ont une vieille clé PGP/GPG (genre de plus de 5-10 ans), voici une série
de test à faire sur la votre afin de savoir si vous avez besoin de la
refaire.
https
busy lately.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
[Mika Suomalainen](https://mkaysi.github.com/) ||
[gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
4DB53CFE82A46728](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/key.txt) ||
[Why do I sign my
emails?](http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html) ||
[Please don't
Hopefully not reigniting this...
On Ma, 08 mai 12, 05:43:17, Indulekha wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received
from this list (using mutt):
This part has been solved, but since it is highly unlikely for you to
have a trust path to my key you'll still get
of
my mails, but IMO we should avoid photos as thumbnails, PGP, HTML.
You are entitled to that opinion ☺
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120511132931
This is an interesting thread for me. I can see (I think!) the various
points that have been made, but as it is, I feel, it's mostly trivial.
If I write to this list, or others, or friends, or colleagues, why do
I need to identify myself? Or require someone to find my public key to
read or
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 14:56 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 23:22:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
What is what you understand by dirty?
I can send the same spam, virus-inside or crap message with a signature
or without it.
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:17:17PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Regarding to security. Assumed somebody always sign the mails to a
mailing list. Isn't it possible that somebody hacks the view of a
mailing list archive? Make it look like if a nice guy said odd things
for signed mails. He never
or less true. There's more untruth for notarized papers
than for non-notarized papers. Why should things become better with
openPGP signing?
Again, I don't care, even if I would see cryptic lines at the bottom of
my mails, but IMO we should avoid photos as thumbnails, PGP, HTML.
- Ralf
The Signature from someone else:
Confidence is what you have before you understand a problem
- Woody Allen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Am 08.05.2012 13:11, schrieb Indulekha:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqPsiAAoJECPmYW6gk8JjitcH/RGtSdn39OPewwyXYgebGiUy
Ws29uZkfae4LlD9LRQeGQujHVW7bzMVCW2EXdRsCGIbpU0
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
Bob's key validates his identity - yours does not.
I can verify
-stuff ones). Does PGP/MIME really
protect all headers (beyond the MIME ones)? It really breaks if *any*
headers are modified? Please provide documentation.
Writing off the top of my head, you may wish to verify everything I say ☺
PGP/MIME does not verify the headers, but your mail is a multipart
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:23:06AM +0200, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 08.05.2012 13:11, schrieb Indulekha:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqPsiAAoJECPmYW6gk8JjitcH
On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
All his posts?
Is cutting
09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
Bob's key validates his
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
All his posts?
Is cutting and pasting a hobby?
Do you between some and all?
The ones I've bothered to
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 09:56 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
Bob's
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:39 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
we can then verify his signed messages in the past
Why should anybody be interested in verifying any mailing list mail?
Somebody might change the content of mails without signature?
So we should ensure that somebody really finished the mail
On Wed, 09 May 2012 11:37:23 +0200, Ralf wrote in message
1336556243.2171.373.camel@precise:
Or would it be a good idea t close this thread?
Regards,
Ralf
..+5. ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
On 09/05/12 19:39, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:20:15PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 09/05/12 18:56, Jon Dowland wrote:
In what way? I can verify Mika's signatures just fine. The signatures
are valid.
All his posts?
Is cutting and pasting a hobby?
Do you between some
that was signed... by (Mika).
That's *not* a chain of trust.
I clearly explained that his key was signed by another he owned, which in turn
was signed by *someone else entirely*. You are committing a more serious
mailing list sin than inline-PGP: failing to properly read the thread before
replying
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:37:23AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The signature of Tiberius was trusted by Pilatus and Herodes. The
signature of Philippus wasn't trusted by Lysanias or anybody els.
I couldn't find a key on public servers for Hannas and Kaiphas, but
fortunately the key of
If this discussion can't be stopped, than perhaps we can make it a
useful thread, by not talking about how to behave or not to behave on a
mailing list, by not talking about if we won't signed emails or not.
When the subject was gpg/pgp noise Jon Dowland wrote: I clearly
explained that his key
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Mika Suomalainen
mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote:
09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM -0500, Indulekha wrote:
You must be from up north, LOL!
Now *that's* rude.
Only if you're from up north, and from where I'm sitting that includes
just about everyone. :(=)
--
Religion is
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:20:08PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
09.05.2012 11:56, Jon Dowland kirjoitti:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Bob's PGP signature is valid - yours is not
You waste our time and bandwidth.
In what way? I can verify Mika's
security, than you need to take care about many
things using PGP. I only use openPGP from time to time, to ensure that
just a special person can read this mail, but not to be completely
secure. I don't need knowledge about how to handle PGP correct and I
don't have got this knowledge
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
improve security when reading/posting e-mails ;-)
AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty. So it's secure that nobody
add a word, removed a word or completely edited
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:32:12PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
When the subject was gpg/pgp noise Jon Dowland wrote: I clearly
explained that his key was signed by another he owned, which in turn was
signed by *someone else entirely*.
A chain of unsigned keys for one and the same person
relation to my key, because
of
https://github.com/Mkaysi/mkaysi.github.com/blob/master/PGP/WhyDoISignEmails.html.md#your-signature-doesnt-mean-anything-anyway-because-you-arent-part-of-any-trust-web
.
I will now continue this policy,
https://github.com/Mkaysi/mkaysi.github.com/blob/master/PGP
explicitly view the source:
--enigD875626BE35FED68C9AA150D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-BEGIN PGP
Regarding to security. Assumed somebody always sign the mails to a
mailing list. Isn't it possible that somebody hacks the view of a
mailing list archive? Make it look like if a nice guy said odd things
for signed mails. He never did, the mails were not hacked, just the view
of the web page is
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
improve security when reading/posting e-mails ;-)
AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty.
What is what you
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
improve security when reading/posting e-mails ;-)
AFAIK
Hi,
I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received
from this list (using mutt):
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 May 2012 05:35:27 AM CDT) --]
gpgkeys: key 7356B378DEA22DE9 not found on keyserver
gpg: Signature made Tue 08 May 2012 02:04:44 AM CDT using RSA key ID DEA22DE9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
08.05.2012 13:43, Indulekha kirjoitti:
Hi,
I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received from this
list (using mutt):
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 May 2012 05:35:27 AM
CDT) --] gpgkeys: key 7356B378DEA22DE9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 11:43, Indulekha wrote:
I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received from this
list (using mutt):
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 May 2012 05:35:27 AM
CDT) --] gpgkeys: key 7356B378DEA22DE9 not found
On 08/05/12 20:43, Indulekha wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this with most gog/pgp-signed mails received
from this list (using mutt):
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 May 2012 05:35:27 AM CDT) --]
gpgkeys: key 7356B378DEA22DE9 not found on keyserver
gpg: Signature made Tue 08 May
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf:
keyserver keyserver.pgp.com
Try replacing it with
keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
Thanks!
That fixed the upfront error messages, but I still have to see
this at the end:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
problem but it's more than likely to be people haven't exported their key.
Mine has been exported. See how you view
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 12:11, Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
problem but it's more than likely to be people haven't exported their key.
Mine
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
problem but it's more than likely to be people haven't exported
Indulekha:
Anyone know a way to simply filter out all that annoying gpg/pgp noise?
muttrc:
set display_filter='sed -f ~/.mutt/display-filter'
~/.mutt/display-filter:
/^gpg:/d
J.
--
I no longer believe in father christmas but have no trouble
comprehending a nuclear apocalypse.
[Agree
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:15, Phil Dobbin kirjoitti:
On 08/05/12 12:11, Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate
your problem but it's more than likely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate your
problem but it's more than likely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 12:26, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:15, Phil Dobbin kirjoitti:
On 08/05/12 12:11, Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers that gpg checks may alleviate
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Indulekha:
Anyone know a way to simply filter out all that annoying gpg/pgp noise?
muttrc:
set display_filter='sed -f ~/.mutt/display-filter'
~/.mutt/display-filter:
/^gpg:/d
J.
--
I no longer believe
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/12 12:40, Indulekha wrote:
[snip]
No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete configuration
In what way?
Cheers,
Phil...
- --
currently (ab)using
Debian Squeeze, Fedora Verne, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Oneiric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:40, Indulekha kirjoitti:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: On
08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:29:39PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
Increasing the pool of servers
Indulekha:
No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete configuration
This is inline vs. MIME:
http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
J.
--
I can tell a Whopper[tm] from a BigMac[tm] and Coke[tm] from Pepsi[tm].
[Agree] [Disagree]
http
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:43:11PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:40, Indulekha kirjoitti:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: On
08/05/12 12:29, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:46, Indulekha kirjoitti:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:29:39PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
08.05.2012 14:20, Lisi kirjoitti:
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 12:11:56 Indulekha wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Phil Dobbin
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:45:59PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Indulekha:
No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete configuration
This is inline vs. MIME:
http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
Aha, so yours is inline or MIME?
And is there a recipe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker kirjoitti:
Indulekha:
No, I think you may have an incorrect or incomplete
configuration
This is inline vs. MIME:
http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html
J.
And that page forgets
1 - 100 of 1175 matches
Mail list logo
