-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
[snip]
Would you have the key for Debian-Multimedia in the Debian Archive
Keyring?
No, but I might make it a little easier for Debian newbies to find it in
the first place. Something like a simple script that people could use
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY
the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org
separately using
apt-key if you want to use this repo with secure apt, the key is not
included in the default
/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org separately
using
apt-key if you want to use
On Apr 14, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On 4/14/07, Rick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key
Hi Rick,
On Saturday 14 April 2007 19:33, Rick Thomas wrote:
1) How do I import the public key for volatile? (If it's in the fine
manual, then please point me to it so I can RTFM)
To be executed as root:
gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de --recv-keys AC583520
gpg --fingerprint AC583520
/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org separately
using
apt-key if you
? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import the public key
the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import
is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct
On 4/14/07, Rick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You
:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
What does this mean? Should I be concerned? Is anyone else receiving
:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
What does this mean? Should I be concerned? Is anyone else receiving
upgrade of my Etch, I get the following warning:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
What does
This will fix that:
gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1 (gpg --export -a A70DAF536070D3A1 | apt-key add -)
something about keys changing...
Cheers,
Kev
Thanks. That solved it -- the warnings are gone.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hello. After a recent upgrade of my Etch, I get the following warning:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
What does
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 15:08, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Hello. After a recent upgrade of my Etch, I get the following warning:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 03:12:27PM +1100, M-L wrote:
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 15:08, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Hello. After a recent upgrade of my Etch, I get the following warning:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available
... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
What does this mean? Should I be concerned? Is anyone else receiving
this warning?
Thanks,
Mark
I am, and assumed
M-L wrote:
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 15:08, Mark Grieveson wrote:
Hello. After a recent upgrade of my Etch, I get the following warning:
Fetched 30.2kB in 9s (3350B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
A70DAF536070D3A1
W
Hola lista, les escribo porque llevo ya tiempo intentando hacer esto
pero simplemente mi sshd (openssh) no acepta las conexiones de
autentificacion con pubkey. Supongo que es algo en el sshd_config pero
la verdad no se. alguien me puede decir como habilitarlo y cuales son
los pasos que debo
2006/8/27, Hanlle Nicolas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola lista, les escribo porque llevo ya tiempo intentando hacer esto
pero simplemente mi sshd (openssh) no acepta las conexiones de
autentificacion con pubkey. Supongo que es algo en el sshd_config pero
la verdad no se. alguien me puede decir como
El Domingo, 27 de Agosto de 2006 18:55, Cristian Mitchell escribió:
priemro ejecutando
ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 1024
te crea en el directorio del usuario .ssh uns archivos llamados id_rsa
uy id_rsa.pub
Más fácil a partir de aquí:
En el equipo cliente en el que has generado esa clave:
#
te lo solucione
y no me digas que buscante en google, porque no te creo
Results 1 - 10 of about 148,000 for ssh public key howto. (0.16
seconds)
--
.~.
( 0 0 ) Amo la libertad..
/ V \
// \\ Free as freedom
/(( _))\
oo0 0ooMSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bonjour,
j'arrive pas à trouver une solution pour qu'une clef publique soit
importé automatiquement avec mutt dans mon trousseau de clefs.
si quelqu(un pourrait me mettre sur la voie..
merci d'avance
mess-mate
--
Good day for a change of scene. Repaper the
the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need the package debian-archive-keyring. This annoyed me for
about a
month before I got around to looking for the cause. Apparently the
requirement for the above
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 12:25:48PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
Rich Johnson wrote:
snip about apt GPG error
I'm getting the same error for ftp.nerim.net . I installed
debian-archive-keyring, but the error persists. Can anyone tell me what
the problem is, and how to solve it?
ftp.nerim.net
Hi folks--
When I run apt-get update, I get
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
On Saturday 01 April 2006 10:06, Rich Johnson wrote:
Hi folks--
When I run apt-get update, I get
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may
Hi,
wie erfaehrt man zu einem gegebenem ssh schluessel
(/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub) den dazugehorigen Fingerprint, der mir
beim ersten Kontakt von ssh angezeigt wird mit Hilfe von
Kommandozeilenwerkzeugen?
gruesse,
Reinhard
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
am 17.02.2006, um 14:57:09 + mailte Reinhard Tartler folgendes:
Hi,
wie erfaehrt man zu einem gegebenem ssh schluessel
(/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub) den dazugehorigen Fingerprint, der mir
beim ersten Kontakt von ssh angezeigt wird mit Hilfe von
Kommandozeilenwerkzeugen?
ssh-keygen
* Daniel Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060202 22:21]:
[..]
No--the command apt-key doesn't exist in sarge.
Quoting from Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
=
Where does Debian (or debmirror?) store the public key that debmirror
uses to validate Release files?
Take a look at man debmirror, it's
is broken).)
What else?
get debmirror from sarge manually (not apt-get). install with dpkg.
Huh? I already have debmirror from sarge (debmirror version 200502027).
That's the version of debmirror that is complaining about the lack of
a public key.
Did you mean to download something else from
* Daniel B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060201 17:10]:
Where does Debian (or debmirror?) store the public key that debmirror
uses to validate Release files?
Take a look at man debmirror, it's listed in the files-section.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
http://learn.to/quote/
http://www.catb.org/~esr
the lack of
a public key.
OK. I thought you hade upgraded debmirror to unstable and wanted to
downgrade it to the version in sarge.
Did you mean to download something else from Sarge?
Or did you mean to download debian-archive-keyring from something
other than Sarge?
Or something else
Hans Ekbrand wrote:
...Perhaps something like this
would work for you too?
# gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 2D230C5F
# gpg --export -a 2D230C5F | apt-key add -
No--the command apt-key doesn't exist in sarge.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Where does Debian (or debmirror?) store the public key that debmirror
uses to validate Release files?
In upgrading to Sarge, I purged (or upgraded) a few too many things, and
now when I try to run debmirror to keep my local mirror updated, it
says:
...
[0%] Keeping: dists/sarge/Release.gpg
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:10:56AM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
Where does Debian (or debmirror?) store the public key that debmirror
uses to validate Release files?
In upgrading to Sarge, I purged (or upgraded) a few too many things, and
now when I try to run debmirror to keep my local mirror
check signature: public key not found
Release signature does not verify.
...
I can't tell if I deleted a key I had before (in purging and/or
re-installing some things I shouldn't have) or if upgrading debmirror
got me a version that now checks against a key I never had in the first
place.
What can
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 04:50:47PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:10:56AM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
[...]
I can't tell if I deleted a key I had before (in purging and/or
re-installing some things I shouldn't have) or if upgrading debmirror
got me a
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
Release signature does not verify.
...
I can't tell if I deleted a key I had before (in purging and/or
re-installing some things I shouldn't have) or if upgrading debmirror
got me a version that now checks against a key I never had in the first
Hi i'm running debian testing and when i do apt-get update, i get a public
key fail when i update my database to do an upgrade of my debian server
and i the public key fails what do i do then
Thanks very much
Bryan Frechette
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Bryan Frechette wrote:
Hi i'm running debian testing and when i do apt-get update, i get a public
key fail when i update my database to do an upgrade of my debian server
and i the public key fails what do i do then
apt-get --allow-unauthenticated install debian-archive-keyring
--
see shy jo
Hello
Bryan Frechette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi i'm running debian testing and when i do apt-get update, i get a
public key fail when i update my database to do an upgrade of my
debian server and i the public key fails what do i do then
You need to import the archive key for 2006 (man
Hello
Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bryan Frechette wrote:
Hi i'm running debian testing and when i do apt-get update, i get a
public key fail when i update my database to do an upgrade of my
debian server and i the public key fails what do i do then
apt-get --allow-unauthenticated
unstable/main Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
90B descarregats en 1s (56B/s)
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
010908312D230C5F
W: Potser
hola!
wget http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc -O - | apt-key add -
també he tingut aquest problema, i fent el que posa a dalt, seguia donant-me un
avís/error del gpg. he partit la instrucció en dos (primer baixar el .asc i
deprés afegir la clau directament des del fitxer) i com
llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
010908312D230C5F
W: Potser voldreu executar apt-get update per a corregir aquests problemes
niebla:~#
He probat canviant el servidor (ftp.fi.debian.org)
Sabeu com s'arregla? o es que
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
90B descarregats en 1s (56B/s)
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs
://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources90B descarregats en 1s (56B/s)
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... FetW: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:010908312D230C5FW: Potser voldreu executar apt-get update per a corregir aquests problemesniebla:~#
He probat canviant el servidor
://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
90B descarregats en 1s (56B/s)
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
010908312D230C5F
/main Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Obj http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
90B descarregats en 1s (56B/s)
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs:
010908312D230C5F
W: Potser
the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
07DC563D1F41B907
W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the server reported 2970292
3951594
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to add the marillat keys. Check the faq here:
http://debian.video.free.fr/faq.html
On 1/12/06, Richard Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that. It doesn't actually work for me for reasons I'll read
up when I have time.
bordello:/home/richard# gpg --keyserver hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys
1F41B907
gpg: requesting key 1F41B907 from hkp server
package lists... Done
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net sid Release: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
07DC563D1F41B907
W: Bizarre Error - File size is not what the server reported 2970292
3951594
W: You may want to run apt-get update
On 04 Jan 2006, Rick Friedman wrote:
On Wed January 4 2006 12:28 pm, Tom wrote:
[04/01/2006 -- 18:10u] Rick Friedman:
I (as well as others) was having this problem as well untill I saw a
message from a Mr. Joey Hess. As per Mr. Hess' instructions, run the
following command line:
(44B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
I install debian
Richard Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fetched 2972kB in 1m10s (42.4kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net sid Release: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
07DC563D1F41B907
W: Bizarre Error - File
be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
I install debian-keyring, and set up a link for debian-archive so
apt-key update would work. I became root and imported the debian
keyring (all of them
in 8s (44B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
I install
://ftp.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY 010908312D230C5F
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
I install debian-keyring, and set up a link for debian-archive so
apt-key
[04/01/2006 -- 18:10u] Rick Friedman:
I (as well as others) was having this problem as well untill I saw a message
from a Mr. Joey Hess. As per Mr. Hess' instructions, run the following
command line:
wget http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc -O - | sudo apt-key add -
Once I
On Wed January 4 2006 12:28 pm, Tom wrote:
[04/01/2006 -- 18:10u] Rick Friedman:
I (as well as others) was having this problem as well untill I saw a
message from a Mr. Joey Hess. As per Mr. Hess' instructions, run the
following command line:
wget
On 02.12.05 07:49:07, Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:06:40 +0100, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
bei meinen ssh-Eskapaden stellte sich mir grad eine Frage: Wie
unsicher ist Public-Key-Authorisierung wenn man kein Passwort angibt?
Wenn ich das richtig durchblicke ist das nur
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 12:07 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hmm, da muss ich noch ein wenig lesen, Root nur bestimmte Kommandos
erlauben hattest du in einer anderen Mail ja schon erwaehnt (was mit
Force...), aber das ich einem Key sagen kann er ist nur fuer IP X und
Kommando Y gueltig ist mir
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 13:22 schrieb Frank Evers:
Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 12:07 schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hmm, da muss ich noch ein wenig lesen, Root nur bestimmte Kommandos
erlauben hattest du in einer anderen Mail ja schon erwaehnt (was mit
Force...), aber das ich einem Key
Hallo Andreas!
Andreas Pakulat schrieb am Freitag, den 02. Dezember 2005:
Richtig. Und das kann verdammt schnell passieren. Ich benutze für
Keys, die man zur Erlangung einer Shell verwenden kann, _immer_ eine
Passphrase, und weil ich faul bin, benutze ich ssh-agent, um die nicht
immer tippen
Hi,
bei meinen ssh-Eskapaden stellte sich mir grad eine Frage: Wie
unsicher ist Public-Key-Authorisierung wenn man kein Passwort angibt?
Wenn ich das richtig durchblicke ist das nur dann gefaehrlich wenn der
private Schluessel abhanden kommt oder?
Ich hatte naemlich extra fuer den Login auf
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:06:40AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
bei meinen ssh-Eskapaden stellte sich mir grad eine Frage: Wie
unsicher ist Public-Key-Authorisierung wenn man kein Passwort angibt?
Wenn ich das richtig durchblicke ist das nur dann gefaehrlich wenn der
private Schluessel
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:06:40 +0100, Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
bei meinen ssh-Eskapaden stellte sich mir grad eine Frage: Wie
unsicher ist Public-Key-Authorisierung wenn man kein Passwort angibt?
Wenn ich das richtig durchblicke ist das nur dann gefaehrlich wenn der
private Schluessel
/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum incorreto
Lendo Lista de Pacotes... Pronto
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release
W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net sarge Release: The following
Tem outra discussão rolando sobre esse assunto, fique ligado lá.
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib non-free
deb
* Konnichiwa Heitor Mauricio-sama:
Olá todos,
Fiz uma atualização no Etch e após isso, um apt-get update me retornou
esse erro:
Como faço pra resolver esse problema??
Uma coisa que fiz antes de aparecer o erro foi mudar o nome da máquina
no /etc/hosts, mas não sei se tem a ver...
: http://secure-testing.debian.net etch/security-updates
Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the
public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 946AA6E18722E71E
---
O que não estou entendendo é
/security-updates
Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the
public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 946AA6E18722E71E
---
Fiz o seguinte:
desk:/home/mauricio# gpg --keyserver
Hi!
Robert Müller schrieb am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 um 18:31:52 +0100:
Wir ändern gerade auf unserem Server alle Userpasswörter und haben auch die
$USER/.ssh/authorized_keys geleert.
Solchen Admins würde ich als User aber kräftig aufs Dach steigen.
Warum macht man so etwas? Besteht der
Hallo Robert,
ich würde spontan folgenden würgarround versuchen:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:57:54PM +0100, Robert Müller wrote:
automatisierten Weg, zu verhindern, daß $USER diesen Key wieder nutzten
könnte, ohne selber immre wieder $USER/.ssh/authorized_keys checken zu
touch
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Robert Müller wrote:
[Erzwungenes Erneuern von id_rsa.pub und Passwortänderung]
Uns schwebt da irgendwas in Richtung denied_keys vor, ein File wo man
alle verbotenen, veralteten Public Keys speichern kann?
Ich nehme an, es geht um OpenSSH?
japp
On Mit, 29 Dez 2004, Hagen Kuehnel wrote:
automatisierten Weg, zu verhindern, daß $USER diesen Key wieder nutzten
könnte, ohne selber immre wieder $USER/.ssh/authorized_keys checken zu
touch $USER/.ssh/authorized_keys
chown root:adm $USER/.ssh/authorized_keys
chmod 000
Hallo,
Wir ändern gerade auf unserem Server alle Userpasswörter und haben auch die
$USER/.ssh/authorized_keys geleert. Besteht irgend eine Möglichkeit, der
Faulheit der User entgegenzuwirken, die dann einfach nach Ändern Ihres
Passwortes wieder per ssh-copy-id ihre alten Keys nutzen wollen? Uns
am Tue, dem 28.12.2004, um 18:31:52 +0100 mailte Robert Müller folgendes:
$USER/.ssh/authorized_keys geleert.
Passwortes wieder per ssh-copy-id ihre alten Keys nutzen wollen? Uns schwebt
Das geht ja schon mal nicht, wenn $USER/.ssh/authorized_keys gelöscht
wurde nur AUTH via PubKey erlaubt
erlaubt ist, oder? ;-)
Doch $USER kennt ja sein neues Passwort. Wir wollen nur nicht, daß $USER
weiterhin mit seinem alten Public Key, den er ja nun wieder hochladen
könnte, sich wieder authentifizieren kann.
da irgendwas in Richtung denied_keys vor, ein File wo man alle
verbotenen
eine bessere Nachricht. Die gute zuerst: ssh ist
zunächst einmal als Ende-zu-Ende Transport konzipiert und hat daher keine
Public-Key Infrastruktur implementiert mit der man weitläufig Keys revoken
kann.
Die bessere: Mit KRB5 soll es möglich sein, genau dies mit Bordmitteln
auch für Openssh zu
too fast to see.
A name/address search turned up no results.
Backing out to command line, I created a file and attempted to encrypt
it.
e.g.:
$ fortune -l makesecret
$ gpg --armor -e --recipient keyid makesecret
Output was unusable public key.
Hrm.
Solution:
-
I
* Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031126 03:56]:
Re-import the key from a keyserver that didn't mangle the subkey. Why
my primary keyserver (pgp.mit.edu) wasn't doing this properly isn't
clear. More curiously, my corespondant claims to have earlier encrypted
mail from me.
If anyone
On Thursday 25 September 2003 11:18, Ashish Ariga wrote:
Verification is done using the key id of the public key. It doesn't
matter what mail address(es) are attached to it.
If your public key is queried using your mail address, both will be
retrieved. During verification the correct one
, with two unrelated
words with a random two digit number between the words... And I didn't put a
timelimit on the key...:-(
What happens if I just upload a new public key?
Nothing, except that the new one gets uploaded ;-)
Both keys are available then...
Actually, I was more thinking like
a
Tried, won't work. I do remember I mixed words and numbers, with two unrelated
words with a random two digit number between the words... And I didn't put a
timelimit on the key...:-(
What happens if I just upload a new public key?
Nothing, except that the new one gets uploaded
Is there a way to revoke a gpg key if you have lost the password and didn't
create a revocation certificate?
What happens if I just upload a new public key?
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are better to 'get' the
password (So, don't use such easy passwords for your next key... ;-) Im
sure there are some tools out there... I'am not sure if this is really
practicable...
What happens if I just upload a new public key?
Nothing, except that the new one gets uploaded ;-)
Both keys
Witam!
Jak już sygnuje się swoje posty kluczem to może warto umieścić własny
klucz publiczny na jakimś keyserverze (może być bez zdjęcia :)) Jeżeli
ktoś świadomie tego nie robi to zwykle informuje chociaż o tym, gdzie
jego public key jest ,,wystawiony''i daje jakąś możliwość dotarcia do
odcisku
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:41:47PM +0800, Louie Miranda wrote:
How can i have a gpg public key?
See gnupg documentation. I think kgpg is a clicky interface for KDE
GnuPG users, which might help you out if you're new as well.
- --
.''`. Paul
it. GPG, RSA, PGP
take this a bit further they also support the fact that if
you encrypt with B you can decrypt the message with A.
(not all asymmetric systems do B-A)
We'll assume A is private and B is the public key.
Not quite. In the above example, the first scenario (encrypting
)
Is that all related to the pub section?
public key complete with a single name/email address. I think you
have to have at least one subkey on your public key, but I could be wrong.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:48:23PM +0800, Louie Miranda wrote:
I mean, for ex this one.
GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A
Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A
Is this different from the one that i generated?
Yes, it should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:56:16PM -0700, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
What do you do when you switch systems? E.g. I heve
done the key-gen thing and all, but now I want to gen
a new Debian Sarge from scratch. What do you have to
copy to have what you
* Jeff Wiegley, Ph.D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030721 23:28]:
Bah dum ba...
1st: A problem with this list is its huge signal to noise ratio.
Wow, we're doing pretty well if a huge S/N ratio is considered a problem
around here!
Personally, I'd say people fscking up the threads is a real problem
Sorry to be brusque, but:
man gpg
Louie Miranda wrote:
How can i have a gpg public key?
--
Thank you,
Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bah dum ba...
1st: A problem with this list is its huge signal to noise ratio.
If you don't have an answer to give jokes are less than helpful.
2nd: Louie, the answer to your question is:
You don't need just a gpg public key. What you probably want is a
gpg key pair. Having just a public
101 - 200 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
