Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-23 Thread Joost van der Lugt
Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Joost van der Lugt wrote: Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gerd Arlitt wrote: The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-23 Thread Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Joost van der Lugt wrote: *snip* Well, this may be true - but the discussion list exists to help people deal with Debian GNU/Linux AS IT IS, not as you WISH it was. Griping about it DOES NOT HELP. Unless you have a useful suggestion, why not keep it to yourself?

Learning grub - was: RE: rant grub \rant

2001-04-23 Thread Rick Commo
Do a search for grub under the Linux section on developerWorks. It's a tutorial that you'll have to register for. Just a update. I went to www.ibm.com and did a top level search for grub. The top entries were all pointers to the tutorial. None required me to register. Interesting that they

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-22 Thread Gerd Arlitt
The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux tutorials site: http://www.cn.ibm.com/developerWorks/education/linux/l-grub_eng/ This site did not work for me Directory browsing failed - access forbidden

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-22 Thread Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gerd Arlitt wrote: The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux tutorials site: http://www.cn.ibm.com/developerWorks/education/linux/l-grub_eng/ This site did not work for me Directory browsing

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-22 Thread Joost van der Lugt
Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gerd Arlitt wrote: The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux tutorials site: http://www.cn.ibm.com/developerWorks/education/linux/l-grub_eng/ This

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-22 Thread Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Joost van der Lugt wrote: Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gerd Arlitt wrote: The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux tutorials site:

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-22 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 02:33:16AM -0600, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gerd Arlitt wrote: The info pages are fine but i needed more info and found it in the May 2001 Linux Journal and at the IBM linux tutorials site:

rant grub \rant

2001-04-20 Thread Joost van der Lugt
rant OK so the darn thing is called grub, fine. hda1 = hd(0,0) fine to, if it has to be. But why the darn is there not a /etc/grub.conf file (or link) instead of the darn /boot/grub/file??? And why the %*^ does the dos example not work? ( which I had to dig out of PAGE_5 of the html docs!!!

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-20 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:16:28AM +, Joost van der Lugt wrote: But why the darn is there not a /etc/grub.conf file (or link) instead of the darn /boot/grub/file??? This makes sense. Bootloader seems to access to these files during booting. Just think your mobo is old and can access only

Re: rant grub \rant

2001-04-20 Thread mike polniak
Joost van der Lugt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rant OK so the darn thing is called grub, fine. hda1 = hd(0,0) fine to, if it has to be. But why the darn is there not a /etc/grub.conf file (or link) instead of the darn /boot/grub/file??? And why the %*^ does the dos example not work?