Saturday 20 September 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Hello,
I am new bee to Debian.
I notice the Security Advisories on the main page of Debian.
Is there an auto-update tool in the debian system
which can auto update software and auto fix some
bugs make me needn't to take care about
[Please don't post in HTML]
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:31:10AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am new bee to Debian.
Welcome.
I notice the Security Advisories on the main page of Debian.
Is there an auto-update tool in the debian system
which can auto update software and
Hello,
I am new bee to Debian.
I notice the Security Advisories on the main page of Debian.
Is there an auto-update tool in the debian system
which can auto update software and auto fix some
bugs make me needn't to take care about the Security Advisories?
Thanks.
Generally, when you see an advisory, run (as root, or using sudo if
you have it installed):
apt-get update apt-get upgrade
and that should update you.
You should generally pay attention to Security Advisories, because as
you learn more about the system, you'll understand them more : ) and
more
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:49:48 -0800
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Hartman wrote:
So down to the simple question. Is this really normal on a PC-based
Laptop to experience such pitfalls in installing Debian?
With the IBM/Lenovo Thinkpads, not usually. With Dell, HP, Acer
Justin Hartman wrote:
So down to the simple question. Is this really normal on a PC-based
Laptop to experience such pitfalls in installing Debian?
With the IBM/Lenovo Thinkpads, not usually. With Dell, HP, Acer, etc, yes,
the experience is typical. This is a result of most laptop vendors
Paul Johnson wrote:
Voting with your money is important when it comes to
compatability on Linux.
I'd be all for getting something other than a Dell, but they were the
only ones I could find that offered a laptop with a screen resolution
meeting or exceeding 1600x1200. Does anybody know of
Steve Lamb wrote:
Justin Hartman wrote:
Wouldn't the Debian Live CD work as a better option?
Not really. Since Debian has so many different release architectures they
really don't push automatic detection and configuration as far as the splinter
distributions which focus mostly
On 17 Feb 2007, Steve Lamb wrote:
Justin Hartman wrote:
So down to the simple question. Is this really normal on a PC-based
Laptop to experience such pitfalls in installing Debian?
Yes. Laptops are notorious for having horrible compatibility with
anything other than the OS
On 2/18/07, Anthony Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really what you want to hear, but try Ubuntu live; if it works, at
least you'll know that it's *possible* to get things running in Linux.
Wouldn't the Debian Live CD work as a better option?
Regards
Justin Hartman
PGP Key ID: 102CC123
Justin Hartman wrote:
Wouldn't the Debian Live CD work as a better option?
Not really. Since Debian has so many different release architectures they
really don't push automatic detection and configuration as far as the splinter
distributions which focus mostly on the x86 architecture. A
On 18 Feb 2007, Steve Lamb wrote:
Justin Hartman wrote:
Wouldn't the Debian Live CD work as a better option?
Not really. Since Debian has so many different release architectures they
really don't push automatic detection and configuration as far as the splinter
distributions which
Justin Hartman wrote:
So down to the simple question. Is this really normal on a PC-based
Laptop to experience such pitfalls in installing Debian?
Yes. Laptops are notorious for having horrible compatibility with
anything other than the OS they are shipped with. This is because to
cram so
)
* Preventing Gnome from crashing almost immediately on startup (only
an upgrade to unstable fixed this)
* Various network related issues (lots of trial and error)
* Not able to print to a SMB network printer (tried everything yet
still can't get there)
So down to the simple question. Is this really
On 1/28/07, Hodgins Family [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firewalling routers are $50 and do a reasonably
good job.
Any recommendations?
What are you using?
I believe that just about any home wireless AP / switch / router these
days does stateful packet inspection and NAT, making it a decent HW
Firewalling routers are $50 and do a reasonably
good job.
Any recommendations?
What are you using?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/28/07 09:08, Hodgins Family wrote:
Firewalling routers are $50 and do a reasonably
good job.
Any recommendations?
What are you using?
I use a Netgear RP614v2, but don't like it.
The Linux geek fave is the Linksys WRT54GL, since it runs
I use a Netgear RP614v2, but don't like it.
The Linux geek fave is the Linksys WRT54GL, since it runs Linux and
can be upgraded with 3rd-party binaries. It's a wireless access
port, but also has 4 RJ45 jacks and has a firewall. US$54 at Newegg.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hodgins Family [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Linux geek fave is the Linksys WRT54GL, since it runs Linux and
can be upgraded with 3rd-party binaries. It's a wireless access
port, but also has 4 RJ45 jacks and has a firewall. US$54 at Newegg.
Thanks!
Make sure you buy v4 or below. v5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/28/07 13:32, John L Fjellstad wrote:
Hodgins Family [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Linux geek fave is the Linksys WRT54GL, since it runs Linux and
can be upgraded with 3rd-party binaries. It's a wireless access
port, but also has 4 RJ45
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:08:55AM -0700, Hodgins Family wrote:
Firewalling routers are $50 and do a reasonably
good job.
Any recommendations?
What are you using?
Get any old (now 486 or newer) box and install basic debian on it. Add
shorewall and you have a totally configurable
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 01/28/07 13:32, John L Fjellstad wrote:
Make sure you buy v4 or below. v5 can't be upgraded (and doesn't run
Linux)
I thought that was the difference between the WRT54GL and WRT54G.
You're right. The WRT54GL is the linux version. From what I can
On 1/28/07, John L Fjellstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make sure you buy v4 or below. v5 can't be upgraded (and doesn't run
Linux)
The WRT54G v4 was re-released as the WRT54GL - the L for Linux.
Zach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 01:28 +, s. keeling wrote:
And I would imagine any of them could be used if you chose to avoid
those three. Try out some of the other wm's. You might like them.
Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are not the only choices available.
There was some discussion about putting a whole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/07 01:44, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:24:33 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't the setup of a firewall be part of the installation
routine? Perhaps prior to running tasksel, some script could query
For console, you can use lokkit:
lokkit - basic interactive firewall configuration tool (console interface)
But I don't think it gives you as much control as iptables.
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:21:36 -0500
Angelo Bertolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For console, you can use lokkit:
lokkit - basic interactive firewall configuration tool (console
interface)
But I don't think it gives you as much control as iptables.
My point was that it would be very difficult
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/26/07 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are not the only choices available.
Yes they are.
Unless you want to be investigated by Them. The NSA the RCMP are
suspicious of anyone running desktop Linux (too many freethinkers),
and are
Sven Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 01:28 +, s. keeling wrote:
And I would imagine any of them could be used if you chose to avoid
those three. Try out some of the other wm's. You might like them.
Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are not the only choices available.
to create a default set of rules that would work for many people.
The default set of rules only needs to get people through the
installation safely. After that, they can alter them with their
favourite program, as needed.
The rules here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/07 17:52, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/26/07 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are not the only choices available.
Yes they are.
Unless you want to be investigated by Them. The NSA the RCMP are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/07 18:00, s. keeling wrote:
Sven Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 01:28 +, s. keeling wrote:
[snip]
Not necessary with any sort of net connection. It doesn't take
long to apt-get/aptitude/synaptic install a wm.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:01:43PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/07 19:03, Hodgins Family wrote:
Many people are installing Debian from the internet. Yet, the Securing
Debian Manual suggests no contact with the internet until the
!--
@media print, projection, embossed {
body {
padding-top:1in;
padding-bottom:1in;
padding-left:1in;
padding-right:1in;
}
}
body {
font-family:'Times New Roman';
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/07 18:08, j Mak wrote:
I intend to install etch with xfce and would like to know how
many cd-s do I have to download that include the base system. I
read somewhere that the first cd doesn't include the entire xfce
desktop. Do the first
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 16:08 -0800, j Mak wrote:
I intend to install etch with xfce and would like to know how many cd-s do
I have to download that include the base system. I read somewhere that the
first cd doesn't include the entire xfce desktop. Do the first and the
second cd include
Many people are installing Debian from the internet. Yet, the Securing
Debian Manual suggests no contact with the internet until the
installation is secure.
The manual states that installing the OS off the web is not the best
idea (Section 3.3 found here:
Sven Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 16:08 -0800, j Mak wrote:
I intend to install etch with xfce and would like to know how many cd-=
s do I have to download that include the base system. I read somewhere that=
the first cd doesn't include the entire xfce desktop.
Hodgins Family wrote:
Are net installs (let's say for a Desktop environment) totally without
vulnerability risks?
When, during an installation, do/should people think about
security/vulnerability issues of the software they are installing?
Well, let's see.. to perform a network install, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/07 19:03, Hodgins Family wrote:
Many people are installing Debian from the internet. Yet, the Securing
Debian Manual suggests no contact with the internet until the
installation is secure.
The manual states that installing the OS off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/07 19:28, s. keeling wrote:
Sven Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 16:08 -0800, j Mak wrote:
[snip]
And I would imagine any of them could be used if you chose to avoid
those three. Try out some of the other wm's. You
Hmmm, every time I do a net install, it installs the base files first,
reboots, and then uses the actual system to install the rest...
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you *read* the link you posted?
Yes, I've read/seen this Appendix F section in various versions.
Up until the last version that I read (version 3.10 of last November)
there has been a FIXME: test this setup to see if it works properly.
Didn't exactly inspire me to use it as an aid for net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/07 01:16, Hodgins Family wrote:
Did you *read* the link you posted?
Yes, I've read/seen this Appendix F section in various versions.
Up until the last version that I read (version 3.10 of last November)
there has been a FIXME: test this
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:24:33 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't the setup of a firewall be part of the installation
routine? Perhaps prior to running tasksel, some script could query
the user about using a firewall and/or help him/her set an
appropriate one up?
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0500, David R. Litwin wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Killall.
Seems like a bad idea, unless the service is hung. Using the proper init
script would make more sense. To simply stop the service, /etc/init.d/gdm
stop
as root would do the
Teilhard Knight wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Formally it's:
invoke-rc.d gdm stop
But everybody (including myself) uses:
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
To stop it permanently use:
update-rc.d gdm remove
Thanks a lot.
Teilhard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Am 2005-12-20 04:04:24, schrieb Teilhard Knight:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
It depends.
1) For killing it the current bootet Computer
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
2) Only from the runlevel 2
rm /etc/rc2.d/??gdm
3) Permanently
apt-get --purge remove gdm
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 17:08 -0500, David R. Litwin wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Killall.
Or '/etc/init.d/gdm stop'
Right, thank you.
Teilhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:05:38PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2005-12-20 04:04:24, schrieb Teilhard Knight:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
It depends.
1) For killing it the current bootet Computer
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
2) Only from the runlevel 2
Am 2005-12-20 04:04:24, schrieb Teilhard Knight:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
It depends.
1) For killing it the current bootet Computer
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
2) Only from the runlevel 2
rm /etc/rc2.d/??gdm
3) Permanently
apt-get --purge remove
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Teilhard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Teilhard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:25:04AM -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?Killall. -- —A watched bread-crumb never boils.—My hover-craft is full of eels.—[...]and that's the he and the she of it.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0500, David R. Litwin wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Killall.
Seems like a bad idea, unless the service is hung. Using the proper init
script would make more sense. To simply stop the service,
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
as root would do
Teilhard Knight wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Formally it's:
invoke-rc.d gdm stop
But everybody (including myself) uses:
/etc/init.d/gdm stop
To stop it permanently use:
update-rc.d gdm remove
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 17:08 -0500, David R. Litwin wrote:
What's the command to stop a service like gdm?
Killall.
Or '/etc/init.d/gdm stop'
--
Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
i'm trying to use gvim options window to set my own display settings,
but i don't understand what this line means:
Hit CR on a set line to execute it.
i tried with Ctrl or Ctrl+R but nothing happened
please help
bye
--
roberto
debian sarge, kernel 2.6.8
On 9/9/05, Jay Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2005 02:53, roberto wrote:
Hit CR on a set line to execute it.
i tried with Ctrl or Ctrl+R but nothing happened
Hi Roberto.
CR usually means Carriage-Return - in other words, hit the ENTER key.
yes, it works,
I used to compile Xorg and mplayer from cvs. For mplayer I generate
the debian package and in the case of Xorg use make install. My
question is: do I need to uninstall the previously installed mplayer
or Xorg before installing the new one, or I can install the new ones
over the old ones?
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:41:29PM +0300, Andras Lorincz wrote:
I used to compile Xorg and mplayer from cvs. For mplayer I generate
the debian package and in the case of Xorg use make install. My
question is: do I need to uninstall the previously installed mplayer
or Xorg before installing the
Thanks, and sorry for that thread thing, it was not intentional :)
On 6/5/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:41:29PM +0300, Andras Lorincz wrote:
I used to compile Xorg and mplayer from cvs. For mplayer I generate
the debian package and in the case of
Can somebody tell me what a kernel_lock()
is?
thanks in advance,
PA
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:57:14PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
Can somebody tell me what a kernel_lock() is?
I suggest try a list that knows about the kernel!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 07:14:04AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:57:14PM +0100, Paul Akkermans wrote:
Can somebody tell me what a kernel_lock() is?
I suggest try a list that knows about the kernel!
Capable of subscribing to debian-user but clueless about Google -
I
Hi guys
I want to install Java based products starting with jdk itself.
But I dont have make installed because it belongs to the developer
package.
questions:
- where to get that package?
- how to install it?
- how to register to this list?
Saludos
Maquina
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:30:25 +, Samuel Ferrer
wrote:
Hi guys
I want to install Java based products starting with
jdk
itself.
But I dont have make installed because it belongs to
the developer
package.
questions:
- where to get that package?
which package jdk or make.
make
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:30:25 +, Samuel Ferrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
I want to install Java based products starting with jdk itself.
But I dont have make installed because it belongs to the developer
package.
questions:
- where to get that package?
- how to install it?
In the /etc/init.d script for smartmontools there is a condition that
checks whether start_smartd is equal to yes. Is there a proper way to
set this variable so that smartmontools starts at boot -- or is the whole
thing a leftover SuSEism and thus a bug that should be reported?
This is with
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:45:50PM +, James Tappin wrote:
In the /etc/init.d script for smartmontools there is a condition that
checks whether start_smartd is equal to yes. Is there a proper way to
set this variable so that smartmontools starts at boot -- or is the whole
thing a leftover
James Tappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the /etc/init.d script for smartmontools there is a condition that
checks whether start_smartd is equal to yes. Is there a proper way to
set this variable so that smartmontools starts at boot
Check /etc/default/smartmontools
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:05:55 -0600
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Tappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the /etc/init.d script for smartmontools there is a condition that
checks whether start_smartd is equal to yes. Is there a proper way to
set this variable so that
Hi all,
I started to play with ldap today. Installed openldapd for potato.
I have a simple domain: animus.com.br and put the following at
sladp.conf
include /etc/openldap/slapd.at.conf
include /etc/openldap/slapd.oc.conf
schemacheck off
loglevel
Greetings Debian Community!
I am currently a computer networking student
researching different flavours of Unix/Linux. From the advice of my
instructor, I have shosen to research Debian. He says it's, "Really
Cool" I find it very appealing and hope to install it as soon as my system
is set
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 07:29, Francis Pineda wrote:
Greetings Debian Community!
I am currently a computer networking student researching different flavours
of Unix/Linux. From the advice of my instructor, I have shosen to research
Debian. He says it's, Really Cool I find it very
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 00:29, Francis Pineda wrote:
Greetings Debian Community!
Greetings!
1. What is the user base targeted? Is it simply geared towards the home-user
looking for a free OS? Or is it geared more towards the power-user?
Supposedly it's the home user, but considering the
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:29:44 -0700
Francis Pineda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. What is the user base targeted? Is it simply geared towards the home-user
looking for a free OS? Or is it geared more towards the power-user?
From professionals to professionals, I don't think Debian is
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:29:44 -0700, Francis Pineda wrote:
Greetings Debian Community!
I am currently a computer networking student researching different flavours of
Unix/Linux. From the advice of my instructor, I have shosen to research
Debian. He says it's, Really Cool I find it very
Greetings Debian
Community!
I am currently a computer networking
student
researching different flavours of Unix/Linux. From the advice of
my
instructor, I have shosen to research Debian. He says it's,
"Really
Cool" I find it very appealing and hope to install it as soon as
my
On Monday 18 February 2002 10:29 pm, Francis Pineda wrote:
Greetings Debian Community!
I am currently a computer networking student researching different flavours
of Unix/Linux. From the advice of my instructor, I have shosen to research
Debian. He says it's, Really Cool I find it very
Em Ter, 2002-02-19 às 04:11, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:29:44 -0700
Francis Pineda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. What is the user base targeted? Is it simply geared towards the
home-user
looking for a free OS? Or is it geared more towards the power-user?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Francis Pineda wrote:
(It's recommended you turn your line wraps on to 72 columns for the
comfort of the people reading your messages)
I am currently a computer networking student researching different
flavours of Unix/Linux. From the advice of my instructor, I have
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:26:29AM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Francis Pineda wrote:
2. Where is Debian located? I understand there are over 800
distrubuters nationwide that communicate via e-mail and message
boards. But is there a specific home to debian?
I
-Original Message-
From:Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:57:58 -0700
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: A simple question about wildcards with tar
Greetings,
I'm trying to make a backup with tar, but there are certain
files that
I don't want
Greetings,
I'm trying to make a backup with tar, but there are certain files that
I don't want to include in the backup. Reading the info documentation
about tar, it says that I can use the --exclude=PATTERN option. So if
I type
tar -cvf backup.tar --exclude='*.fig' *
then it excludes all
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:57:58PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
I'm trying to make a backup with tar, but there are certain files that
I don't want to include in the backup. Reading the info documentation
about tar, it says that I can use the --exclude=PATTERN option. So if
I type
tar
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:16:44PM -0700, Mike Egglestone wrote:
Hi,
I installed magicfilter and setup 2 remote printers.
What would be the best way to add a 3rd printer?
also, how do you set the default printer?
Before, I would just blow away /etc/printcap
and then add all 3 printers at
Hi,
I installed magicfilter and setup 2 remote printers.
What would be the best way to add a 3rd printer?
also, how do you set the default printer?
Before, I would just blow away /etc/printcap
and then add all 3 printers at once.
Is there a better way?
Would it be okay to backup my /etc/printcap
thanks a lot!
philipp
Eric Richardson wrote:
Philipp Bliedung wrote:
hi
I have jdk-1.1.8-3 installed right now. I want to update to jdk-1.2.2 so
I got the tar.gz file.
Now my question: how can I _replace_ the old by the new?
For jdk-1.1.8-3 I uesed apt-get and it told me to get
hi
I have jdk-1.1.8-3 installed right now. I want to update to jdk-1.2.2 so
I got the tar.gz file.
Now my question: how can I _replace_ the old by the new?
For jdk-1.1.8-3 I uesed apt-get and it told me to get the jdk-1.1.8-3
tar.gz file and installed it. How can I replace this version by the
Philipp Bliedung wrote:
hi
I have jdk-1.1.8-3 installed right now. I want to update to jdk-1.2.2 so
I got the tar.gz file.
Now my question: how can I _replace_ the old by the new?
For jdk-1.1.8-3 I uesed apt-get and it told me to get the jdk-1.1.8-3
tar.gz file and installed it. How
MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach Phil Brutsche (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:27:54PM -0600):
The problem that I am encountering is that whenever I reboot, my ISP's
DHCP server re-assigns the nameserver IP addresses, even though the
IP's of my ISP's DNS servers are static!!
if you are using dhcpcd as
also sprach Stefan Srdic (on Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:32:22PM -0700):
I still consider myslef a newbie when it comes to Linux, I've been using
Linux for less then one year. Anyway, I found out that my system is
running pump to configure my host via DHCP. Where would I find
information on pump,
On 09-Mar-2001 MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach Stefan Srdic (on Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:32:22PM -0700):
I still consider myslef a newbie when it comes to Linux, I've been using
Linux for less then one year. Anyway, I found out that my system is
running pump to configure my host via DHCP. Where
I've recently learned how-to configure BIND as an DNS caching-only server.
So far the DNS caching server configuration of BIND has proven to be awesome!!
That combined with a few TCP/IP tweaks in the /proc filesystem and this
Penguin flys :-D
Throughout my testing I've only encountered one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
I've recently learned how-to configure BIND as an DNS caching-only
server. So far the DNS caching server configuration of BIND has proven
to be awesome!! That combined with a few TCP/IP
also sprach Phil Brutsche (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 10:27:54PM -0600):
The problem that I am encountering is that whenever I reboot, my ISP's
DHCP server re-assigns the nameserver IP addresses, even though the
IP's of my ISP's DNS servers are static!!
if you are using dhcpcd as your dhcp
In a galaxy not too far away, Salvador Petit Marti spoke on Thu, Nov 16, 2000
at 09:24:48AM +0100:
Sorry, I am a newbie in debian mailing lists...
Is debian-user a good place to ask questions about usability/problems with
woody? or there is another place?. I am subscribed to debian-testing
Sorry, I am a newbie in debian mailing lists...
Is debian-user a good place to ask questions about usability/problems with
woody? or there is another place?. I am subscribed to debian-testing but it
does not appear to have any traffic...
Anyway, I am in woody cause of kde2. However, my current
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
