On Fri, Jun 20, 1997 at 12:12:14PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On that linux-raid list I told you about, someone was discussing IDE
performance. Seems that with their testing, which may or may not have
been very accurate, that putting IDE disks on the same or seperate
controllers seemed to
They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a poor-man's
server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
use the other pair as /usr on the second interface. /usr will be NFS
exported. Or would I be better off putting the two /usr drives on
They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a poor-man's
server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
use the other pair as /usr on the second interface. /usr will be NFS
exported. Or would I be better off putting the two /usr drives on
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:
:
: They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a
poor-man's
: server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
: use the other pair as /usr on the second interface. /usr will be NFS
: exported. Or would I
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:
They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a
poor-man's
server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
use the other pair as /usr on the second interface. /usr will be NFS
exported. Or would
Rick Hawkins wrote:
wow, that was fast :)
I've downloaded it, and read the docs. I compiled the kernel with
support for these devices.
They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a poor-man's
server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
Dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Put RAIDed disks on one controller and / and swap on another.
Well, as I understand it, if you're not using hardware raid,
specifically, if you're using IDE, then having the RAIDed disks on the
same IDE controller mostly defeats the purpose of RAID (at least RAID
I've noticed that linux supports volumes across physical devices.
However, I haven't figured out which command to use to set this up. I
would like to mount a pair of hard drives on the second controller
jointly as /usr. THis volume will also be served out by nfs. Could
someone give me a hint
You want mdtools (the package) and md device support in the kernel,
wither compiled in or as a module. Either works well. I have two RAID0
partitions spanned across two 4 GB SCSI drives. Works great.
The md commands actually have useful man pages. If you need more info,
feel free to email.
wow, that was fast :)
I've downloaded it, and read the docs. I compiled the kernel with
support for these devices.
They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a poor-man's
server. My current thinking is to mount / on the first controller, and
use the other pair as /usr
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Rick Hawkins wrote:
:
:wow, that was fast :)
:
:I've downloaded it, and read the docs. I compiled the kernel with
:support for these devices.
:
:They will go on a machine with 3 200m ide drives, which will be a poor-man's
:server. My current thinking is to mount / on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
