Re: Listing .PDFs on web site?

On 10/10/22 22:16, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote: Hello Does somebody know how to get a simple list of PDFs in my Buleyes web site, please? The point is that i do hoticulture guides, and i would like that users get them directly from my site. On 10/11/22 01:59, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote: > ht

Re: Listing .PDFs on web site?

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 01:59:55AM -0700, latin...@vcn.bc.ca wrote: > It is exactly what i would like to do thanks; i could not explain it > correctly: > > https://www.vcn.bc.ca/latincom That's an Index generated by Apache. Based on your email address, this appears to be your own site, so it

Re: Listing .PDFs on web site?

> Hello > > Does somebody know how to get a simple list of PDFs in my Buleyes web > site, please? > > The point is that i do hoticulture guides, and i would like that users get > them directly from my site. > > thanks. > Latincom > It is exactly what i would like

Re: Listing .PDFs on web site?

Am 11.10.2022 um 07:16 schrieb latin...@vcn.bc.ca: > Does somebody know how to get a simple list of PDFs in my Buleyes web > site, please? > > The point is that i do hoticulture guides, and i would like that users get > them directly from my site. unclear to me: do you want to gen

Listing .PDFs on web site?

Hello Does somebody know how to get a simple list of PDFs in my Buleyes web site, please? The point is that i do hoticulture guides, and i would like that users get them directly from my site. thanks. Latincom

Re: why i can't play video at some web site?

On 06/11/2021 07:10, Long Wind wrote: http://live.kankanews.com/huikan/ <http://live.kankanews.com/huikan/> click play button at web site above, you shall be able to play video but my firefox 68.10.0esr (32-bit) for buster can't play video Tested on Firefox 78.15.0 ESR 64-bit (new,

Re: why i can't play video at some web site?

On Saturday, November 6, 2021, Long Wind wrote: > > On Saturday, November 6, 2021, 3:14:14 PM GMT+8, Christian Britz < cbr...@t-online.de> wrote: > > Does not work with Google Chrome either. > I have not tried with Firefox 78.15.0esr for security concerns. > > Thank Christian Britz! > i try

Re: why i can't play video at some web site?

On Saturday, November 6, 2021, 3:14:14 PM GMT+8, Christian Britz wrote: Does not work with Google Chrome either. I have not tried with Firefox 78.15.0esr for security concerns. Thank Christian Britz!i try android phone, it doesn't work eithermaybe it doesn't work with any

Re: why i can't play video at some web site?

Am 06.11.21 um 08:10 schrieb Long Wind: > http://live.kankanews.com/huikan/ <http://live.kankanews.com/huikan/> > > > click play button at web site above, you shall be able to play video > but my firefox 68.10.0esr (32-bit) for buster can't play video > Does not

[solved] `wget' web site

>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 5:18 AM Rodolfo Medina >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all. >> > >> > I manage to download an entire website, say www.mysite.com, with simply >> > >> > $ wget -r -l 0 www.mysite.com >> > >> > Af

Re: `wget' web site

>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 5:18 AM Rodolfo Medina >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all. >> > >> > I manage to download an entire website, say www.mysite.com, with simply >> > >> > $ wget -r -l 0 www.mysite.com >> > >> > Af

Re: `wget' web site

simply > > > > $ wget -r -l 0 www.mysite.com > > > > After that, I can surf that web site offline with all its internal links. > > Perfect. > > > > Now the problem comes when I want to copy that stuff into my Android tablet > > and > >

Re: `wget' web site

On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 5:18 AM Rodolfo Medina wrote: > > Hi all. > > I manage to download an entire website, say www.mysite.com, with simply > > $ wget -r -l 0 www.mysite.com > > After that, I can surf that web site offline with all its internal links. > Perfect. >

`wget' web site

Hi all. I manage to download an entire website, say www.mysite.com, with simply $ wget -r -l 0 www.mysite.com After that, I can surf that web site offline with all its internal links. Perfect. Now the problem comes when I want to copy that stuff into my Android tablet and read it offline too

Re: Putting small web site online

On 5/12/2021 11:27 AM, Joel Roth wrote: Hi john, john doe wrote: Debians, I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published where

Re: Putting small web site online

> > > > I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial > link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. > Hi. For the static website you can use github pages: https://pages.github.com/ or use VPS.

Re: Putting small web site online

On 2021-05-12 08:31, john doe wrote: Debians, I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published where it is publickly available. I'm thinking

Re: Putting small web site online

Hi john, john doe wrote: > Debians, > > I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial > link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. > > I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published > where it is publickl

Re: Putting small web site online

On Wed, 12 May 2021 08:31:24 +0200 john doe wrote: > Debians, > > I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial > link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. > > I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published >

Re: Putting small web site online

On 12/05/2021 07:31, john doe wrote: > Debians, > > I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial > link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. > > I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published > where it i

Putting small web site online

Debians, I need to have a small web site online but I don't have a commercial link nor a server at home that can be publickly available. I'm planning to test/build the web site locally then have it published where it is publickly available. I'm thinking of using Gitlab to host my web site do

Re: why flash fails for this web site?

On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:04:27 + (UTC) Long Wind wrote: > my firefox for stretch can display flash, for example: > http://www.10jqka.com.cn/flash/ > but it can't display > https://www.gtja.com/jccy/syhq.htmli can't see any error msg, the page is > blank > > my other stretch can display

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:34:10AM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > iceweasel in jessie really is firefox? You should probably verify what browser you're actually using. Either find the "Help" or "About Something" option in the settings menu, or try going to "about:" in the URL bar. > it's strange

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

Thank Greg Wooledge! I have created a new user, and the problem remain it mean the default setting does not work for the web site iceweasel in jessie really is firefox? it's strange that firefox for XP is ok with the site Thank Brian! On 6/8/17, Greg Wooledge <wool...@eeg.ccf.org>

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

have Javascript enabled by default. If your Javascript web site isn't loading in those browsers, and you're sure you've tried it with the default settings, then the reason is something much too subtle for me. (If you haven't tried it with the default settings yet, that would be the next thing I'd try. Cre

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Thu 08 Jun 2017 at 04:05:33 +0800, Long Wind wrote: > On 6/8/17, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > Why are you using Iceweasel? (You probably said, but I can't find it.) > > > > Lisi > > iceweasel is debian's fork of firefox( which is popular)? > i want to use a popular

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

On 6/8/17, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Why are you using Iceweasel? (You probably said, but I can't find it.) > > Lisi > > iceweasel is debian's fork of firefox( which is popular)? i want to use a popular browser and i think iceweasel is a popular one.

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Wednesday 07 June 2017 01:51:30 Long Wind wrote: > i can visit the web site with firefox 4 xp and android browser. the problem > is with iceweasel > > thanks anyway! > > On Wednesday, June 7, 2017, SDA <marathon.duran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:18:48AM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > really?? > > i just install chromium > it has same problem as iceweasel Works fine here on Firefox on sid (Debian is going back to Firefox), Has button to change to English as someone else mentioned. Paul > > > On 6/7/17, Charlie

Re: why can't I visit this web site

Epiphany-browser can't display it too but Epiphany-game seem to be sth. I can enjoy thank you very much! On 6/7/17, Charlie S wrote: > > > After contemplation, my reply is: > > > It displays with Chromium and offers to translate it. Epiphany displays > it as well. > >

Re: why can't I visit this web site

really?? i just install chromium it has same problem as iceweasel On 6/7/17, Charlie S wrote: > > After contemplation, my reply is: > > > It displays with Chromium and offers to translate it. Epiphany displays > it as well. > > Charlie >

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

i can visit the web site with firefox 4 xp and android browser. the problem is with iceweasel thanks anyway! On Wednesday, June 7, 2017, SDA <marathon.duran...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:30:05AM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > > Thank Thomas! > > I disable jav

Re: (abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:30:05AM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > Thank Thomas! > I disable javascript, but it still display nothing. > > the web site is in Chinese, use Unicode > > my energy is limited,I give up > Thank all those who reply! I posted a link to what the page

(abort)Re: why can't I visit this web site

Thank Thomas! I disable javascript, but it still display nothing. the web site is in Chinese, use Unicode my energy is limited,I give up Thank all those who reply!

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:31:26AM +0800, Long Wind wrote: >i am not at home and can't use debian pc >my problem is like Richard's description >it loads sth., but display nothing >thanks! Here is a screen recording of what that abomination of a web page looks like.

Re: why can't I visit this web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/06/17 08:44 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Just as a data point, it seems to work for me in Wheezy / Iceweasel > / Firefox ESR--I see lots of content, but all in a foreign language > using--what's the right word?--pictographs?--those "picture >

Re: why can't I visit this web site

Jude DaShiell wrote: > I visited the site with lynx and got error 521 which I've never > encountered before. error 500's indicate access is forbidden generally > if memory serves. 500 errors are the server responding that it cannot fulfill your request. Wikipedia[1] shows 521 specifically as a

Re: why can't I visit this web site

an.org Subject: Re: why can't I visit this web site Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:37:47 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org Long Wind <longwind2...@gmail.com> writes: this is really unbelievable I can't visit this site with jessie/iceweasel What happens? A server

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On 06/06/2017 07:54 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: [snip] Firefox developers have decreed that their users are too stupid to cope with an "on/off" switch for Javascript. Sad, but true. In the last decade or so, the overall Firefox policy seems to have become "forget whatever we used to do, let's

Re: why can't I visit this web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:54:49AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:32:21PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > > > iceweasel does not support javascript? > > > > It

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:32:21PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > > iceweasel does not support javascript? > > It doesn't support *disabling* javascript. It's always on. You may want to try the NoScript extension. It disables all

Re: why can't I visit this web site

> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 01:37:22 Ben Finney wrote: > > WA boxing glove on a spring pops out of > > the monitor into your face? > > Sounds like the next step in UI design, in fact, it might be a real "gooey" UI.

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:06:30 +0800 Long Wind wrote: > i can't find options related to javascript in iceweasel/jessie > In about:config. Type that into the address bar, then in the Search box, type javascript. The global disable is called javascript.enable. More

Re: why can't I visit this web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:06:30PM +0800, Long Wind wrote: > i can't find options related to javascript in iceweasel/jessie They have taken it out: it's "always enabled" unless you dig into about:config. Firefox developers have decreed that their

Re: why can't I visit this web site

Hi, Long Wind wrote: > i can't find options related to javascript in iceweasel/jessie > iceweasel does not support javascript? It did for me by default. I rather had to riddle how to disable it. I go to pseudo URL about:config to see a long list of adjustable properties. When i type into the

Re: why can't I visit this web site

i can't find options related to javascript in iceweasel/jessie iceweasel does not support javascript? i think iceweasel makes poor choice XP/firefox and android' browser can visit this site

Re: why can't I visit this web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 07:38:05PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 06/05/2017 07:12 PM, Long Wind wrote: > >this is really unbelievable > >I can't visit this site with jessie/iceweasel > Using Stretch and SeaMonkey 2.46 with JavaScript and cookies

Re: why can't I visit this web site

Long Wind writes: > i am not at home and can't use debian pc That's okay. We can wait until you are able to reply properly. -- \ “Are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “Umm, I think so, Don | `\ Cerebro, but, umm, why would Sophia Loren do a

Re: why can't I visit this web site

i am not at home and can't use debian pc my problem is like Richard's description it loads sth., but display nothing thanks!

Re: why can't I visit this web site

On 06/05/2017 07:12 PM, Long Wind wrote: this is really unbelievable I can't visit this site with jessie/iceweasel http://www.cs.ecitic.com/ I can visit it with XP/firefox can you help me and test the site? Using Stretch and SeaMonkey 2.46 with JavaScript and cookies *DISABLED* It loads

Re: why can't I visit this web site

Long Wind writes: > this is really unbelievable > I can't visit this site with jessie/iceweasel What happens? A server error? A 404 Not Found error? The connection times out? The browser crashes? A boxing glove on a spring pops out of the monitor into your face? > can

why can't I visit this web site

this is really unbelievable I can't visit this site with jessie/iceweasel http://www.cs.ecitic.com/ I can visit it with XP/firefox can you help me and test the site?

web site problems on localhost

Greetings; I found the problem, something had replaced the index.html, which was a link to the front-page.html of my web site with the default apache index.html. Restored that by rm'ing the renamed copy of it, then cp'd the ~ version back to the real one, voila! Web page functions normally

Re: My web site is back

On 09/12/15 02:58, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:50AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > >> Old site: h t t p : / / u s e r s . w o w w a y . c o m / ~ z l i n u >> x m a n / >> >> New site: http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/ >> >> If you have bookmarks set for the old site you

Re: My web site is back

On 10/12/15 01:48, Stephen Powell wrote: > So far, I haven't > yet figured out how to upload files via their control panel, > but the account comes with FTP service, so I was able to upload > my files via FTP. Probably for the better, a superior option of course would be sftp or rsync/ssh if they

Re: My web site is back

On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 10:48:53 Stephen Powell wrote: > On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:55:43 -0500 (EST), Gener Badenas wrote: > > How much is the hosting now and with whom? > > $48 for hosting, $9.00 for domain registration, total $57. > Good for one year. I'll have to pay again next year. > I

Re: My web site is back

On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:55:43 -0500 (EST), Gener Badenas wrote: > > How much is the hosting now and with whom? $48 for hosting, $9.00 for domain registration, total $57. Good for one year. I'll have to pay again next year. I decided to go with debian-hosting.info. So far, I haven't yet figured

My web site is back

Old site: h t t p : / / u s e r s . w o w w a y . c o m / ~ z l i n u x m a n / New site: http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/ If you have bookmarks set for the old site you should update your bookmarks. Some pages from the old site are not on the new site because I judged them to be obsolete.

Re: My web site is back

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:50AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: Old site: h t t p : / / u s e r s . w o w w a y . c o m / ~ z l i n u x m a n / New site: http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/ If you have bookmarks set for the old site you should update your bookmarks. Some pages from the old

Re: My web site is back

On 08/12/15 16:58, Darac Marjal wrote: On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:50AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: If you have bookmarks set for the old site you should update your bookmarks. Some pages from the old site are not on the new site because I judged them to be obsolete. To which, the

Re: My web site is back

Darac Marjal composed on 2015-12-08 16:58 (UTC): > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:50AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: >>Old site: h t t p : / / u s e r s . w o w w a y . c o m / ~ z l i n u x m a n >>/ >>New site: http://www.stevesdebianstuff.org/ >>If you have bookmarks set for the old site you

Re: My web site is back

uot;. > > > > (Also, given the behaviour of search engines, "Pretty much the only good > > reason for a document to disappear from the Web is that the company > > which owned the domain name went out of business or can no longer afford > > to keep the server running

Re: My web site is back

isappear from the Web is that the company > which owned the domain name went out of business or can no longer afford > to keep the server running." is a beautiful theoretical principle with > no grounding in practicality.) Actually, I didn't change my web site name for either reas

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02:51AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: [...] > You're welcome. It's terribly difficult to remember. Or very easy to > forget. > I am over-sensitive to it at the moment, after my recent "discussion" on the > subject of

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:57 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > --  Forwarded Message  -- > > Subject: Re: System craches when browsing a web site > Date: Wednesday 28 October 2015, 01:56:08 > From: Charlie Kravetz <c...@teamcharliesangels.com> > To: debi

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Am 28.10.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Abou Al Montacir: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:57 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > >>> Only tried 3.16.3 so far, would be interesting to know how it works >>> with 3.14 and 3.18, and other browsers using WebKit. >> >> Midori 0.5.11 is using WebKit. It works without crashing.

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Wednesday 28 October 2015 13:26:10 Abou Al Montacir wrote: >On Wednesday 28 October 2015 01:56:08 Charlie Kravetz wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:48:06 +0100 > > Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:30 +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've looked

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 22:02 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > Forwarded to unsubscribed OP > Lisi I keep forgetting, thanks for doing this! -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 6FAB5CD5 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the corrections. To be honest, the install to test this was the first install using tasks I've done in a very, very long time. /peter Am 27.10.2015 um 22:51 schrieb Lisi Reisz: > On Tuesday 27 October 2015 13:30:02 Peter Ludikovsky wrote:

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:39:58PM -0600, Glenn English wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > > What fellow users think? He did ask to be CC'd, your post has fallen on deaf ears. -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Wednesday 28 October 2015 12:54:08 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:02:51AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > [...] > > > You're welcome. It's terribly difficult to remember. Or very easy to > > forget. I am over-sensitive to

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

> > Midori 0.5.11 is using WebKit. It works without crashing. > > > > This means probably that the bug is in epiphany and not webkit. It's a problem with the Gtk+ backend of WebKit. If you follow the bug I filed it was closed with a link here: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126122 --

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:53:53 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: >Am 28.10.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Abou Al Montacir: >> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 10:57 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: >> Only tried 3.16.3 so far, would be interesting to know how it works with 3.14 and 3.18, and other

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Am 28.10.2015 um 20:56 schrieb Charlie Kravetz: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:53:53 +0100 > Michael Biebl wrote: > >> No, midori and ephiphany use different versions of WebKit. >> midori uses WebKit1 (libwebkigtgtk-1.0-0), epiphany the newer WebKit2 >> (libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37) .. >

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Forwarded to unsubscribed OP. On Wednesday 28 October 2015 01:56:08 Charlie Kravetz wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:48:06 +0100 > > Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:30 +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've looked into that issue a bit futher,

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Wednesday 28 October 2015 08:19:50 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 22:02 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Forwarded to unsubscribed OP > > Lisi > > I keep forgetting, thanks for doing this! You're welcome. It's terribly difficult to remember. Or very easy to forget. I am

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 01:16:25 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: >Am 28.10.2015 um 20:56 schrieb Charlie Kravetz: >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:53:53 +0100 >> Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> No, midori and ephiphany use different versions of WebKit. >>> midori uses WebKit1

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 08:15 +0300, moxalt wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:40:10 +0100, Abou Al Montacir > wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I tried to browse the following site multiple times using epiphany browser, > > and each time it makes my hole system crash. Only

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 07:43 +, Lisi Reisz wrote: > --  Forwarded Message  -- > > Subject: Re: System craches when browsing a web site > Date: Tuesday 27 October 2015, 01:39:58 > From: Glenn English <g...@slsware.net> > To: debianUsers <d

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

To me, w3m seems to be the best way to check whether there is a connection problem or not. Bugs if any should be reported at the earliest. Regards, Himanshu Shekhar

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: >> I hear that Google's Chromium works or Opera, to name a couple biggies. > > Both of them are non-free Good point, well taken. But OP doesn't like Mozilla for some reason. Chromium is at least free as in

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 06:39:42 Glenn English wrote: > On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > >> I hear that Google's Chromium works or Opera, to name a couple biggies. > > > > Both of them are non-free > > Good point, well taken. But OP doesn't

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 01:39:58 Glenn English wrote: > On Oct 26, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > What fellow users think? > > Toss the sucker and get one that works. There are billions and billions of > browsers around. Even some that aren't Microsoft

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 01:43:14 Mario Castelán Castro wrote: > > I hear that Google's Chromium works or Opera, to name a couple biggies. > > Both of them are non-free (Chromium has at least unclearly licensed > code). We have many free as in freedom browsers. I have used Iceweasel > since I

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This is not a bug with Debian in particular, but with Epiphany in general. I could reproduce a similar behaviour, but managed to kill the browser process before the system became completely unresponsive. I suggest you file a bug report with

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 09:38 +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > Hello, > > This is not a bug with Debian in particular, but with Epiphany in > general. I could reproduce a similar behaviour, but managed to kill > the browser process before the system became completely unresponsive. > > I suggest

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Hi, > epiphany browser [...] makes my hole system crash. It should not. > My problem is how it happens that a user program make a Linux system freeze. First thing to test is whether it is a crash or a freeze of the desktop. If you have a network with a second computer then log into the

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 09:27 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > It is not about a buggy program, it is about a stable system, I don't > care about > epiphany, I can use an other browser as you said, but just care about > a stable > OS! Debian, and Linux in general, does handle buggy programs. But

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I've looked into that issue a bit futher, and as far as I can test within the confines of a VM I can say that 1) I can still access the TTYs and 2) the OOM killer removes the offending process as soon as both RAM and Swap is full. Since your

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On 2015-10-27, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > If Epiphany starts eating RAM, the OOM-killer should handle it, if it's > a problem with a hang in the GPU, it should be reset.=20 > > Before filing a bug, you, or anyone else who can reproduce the bug need > to investigate. Somebody filed a

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 17:07 +, Curt wrote: > Somebody filed a bug report on October 19th. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802380 > > Sounds similar to the OP's problem (but instead of blinq.com it's > a specific article on reuters.com--go figure). > > Nvidia video card

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Oct 27, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > It is not about a buggy program, it is about a stable system, Ya' know, it might well not be Linux problem, but Gnome that's freezing your computer. Have you tried XFCE or KDE? Or, just to check, lynx from a

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:30 +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > Hello, > > I've looked into that issue a bit futher, and as far as I can test > within the confines of a VM I can say that > 1) I can still access the TTYs and > 2) the OOM killer removes the offending process as soon as both RAM > and

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 13:30:02 Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > as Debian by default installs > Iceweasel, not Epiphany. Do oyu mean "Gnome by default" etc.? Debian certainly doesn't. Lisi

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 13:30:02 Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > (Iceweasel is the > default for Debian for example) It's not. It's desktop dependant. Lisi

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Forwarded to unsubscribed OP Lisi On Tuesday 27 October 2015 17:07:47 Curt wrote: > On 2015-10-27, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > If Epiphany starts eating RAM, the OOM-killer should handle it, if it's > > a problem with a hang in the GPU, it should be reset.=20 > > > > Before filing a

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:59 -0600, Glenn English wrote: > On Oct 27, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > > It is not about a buggy program, it is about a stable system, > > Ya' know, it might well not be Linux problem, but Gnome that's freezing your > computer.

Re: Fwd: Re: System craches when browsing a web site

Forwarded to unsubscribed OP Lisi On Tuesday 27 October 2015 19:53:11 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 17:07 +, Curt wrote: > > Somebody filed a bug report on October 19th. > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802380 > > > > Sounds similar to the OP's

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tuesday 27 October 2015 18:59:59 Glenn English wrote: > And thanks, Lisi, for forwarding things for me before I noticed that Abou > wasn't subscribed. You're welcome - I have been left rather noticing such things after that latest thread. ;-) I have been remiss in the past. Lisi

Re: System craches when browsing a web site

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:48:06 +0100 Sven Arvidsson wrote: >On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:30 +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've looked into that issue a bit futher, and as far as I can test >> within the confines of a VM I can say that >> 1) I can still access the TTYs

  1   2   3   4   >