On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 13:09, McGillan, Patrick wrote:
> My preferred method, and I've used it twice in recent days, is to unplug
> from the network before the finish of the install. The program crashes out
> with a minimal install. Then I do these steps;
>
> plug the network back in
> edit '/etc/
> A couple of posters have mentioned a network install. Where are the
> details spelled out? Are we talking installing from a running
> machine? Already network enabled? My situation is that I have 2
> desktops before me. A full well used redhat 7.1 on one machine and A
> solaris x86 on anoth
elect part. Switch to another console, point
your /etc/apt/sources to woody or sid, then apt-get update&&apt-get
dist-upgrade. Then install all the rest of the stuff you want.
Geordie.
--
Finally, the number of Unix installations has grown to sixteen,
with more expected.
-Unix Manual, Third Edition, February 1973.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:48:13PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
> new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
> sid?
>
> Is it not that difficult? giving the fact that i
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:48:13PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
> new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
> sid?
>
> Is it not that difficult? giving the fa
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:48:13PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
> new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
> sid?
>
> Is it not that difficult? giving the fa
Hi,
I just wanted to know, as a "normal" user (as in, not completely
new, but no guru either), how hard would it be to move to woody, or
sid?
Is it not that difficult? giving the fact that i have a fair knowledge of
"moving" around in console, editing files, do some twea
On 2001.09.05 13:33 Vittorio wrote:
> First question:
> What are the main differences between the two distros?
Woody will become stable in then next months. Now it is the
distri for testing the newer software till it will be real
stable.
Sid is much more unstable. This is the distri for testing
was thinking of woody or sid.
First question:
What are the main differences between the two distros?
Second question:
How should I modify the following two lines in sources.list to use
with dselect?
deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.it.debian.or
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:16:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's kind of neccesary that my system is stable cause it is running a
> website.
> But my whole problem started when I wanted to install the unstable nmap
> cause I wanted the newest as possible. I'm now thinking of installing s
installing sid
>on my second pc (now running windows cause I'm playing Tombraider) so I can
>run the newest nmap on that one.
>
>
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Should I upgrade to woody or sid from potato?
>>>
>>> Ple
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should I upgrade to woody or sid from potato?
>
> Please give me your opinion.
I've upgraded 3 machines from potato to woody. But each time, there were
packages that were only in sid (some gnome packages, for example). So I
updated
Tombraider) so I can
run the newest nmap on that one.
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Should I upgrade to woody or sid from potato?
>>
>> Please give me your opinion.
>
> That completely depends on your needs. Are you suffering because y
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should I upgrade to woody or sid from potato?
>
> Please give me your opinion.
That completely depends on your needs. Are you suffering because you're
missing the bleeding edge features or software? Do you have the time to
work o
Should I upgrade to woody or sid from potato?
Please give me your opinion.
15 matches
Mail list logo
