asterisk on debian jessie

[s0lid]

Hi list,

I recently installed asterisk by doing apt-get. I noticed that the
app_meetme.so is not part of this package. Is there a way to install
asterisk with app_meetme without compiling from source?

Re: [OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[juansantiago]

Si te mandan un correo pidiendo datos como usuario y contraseña, 
siempre, siempre es phishing, ninguna empresa lo hace, es más se sabe 
que no ha de hacerse para no dar pie al physing, por lo tanto, no, nunca 
ha de respoderse de ninguna manera ni hacer consulta alguna, si se 
recomienda avisar a la empresa con copiapega, que en su nombre se 
intenta pescar incautos, si tu proveedor de servicios te responde que el 
correo el legitimo, abandona ese proveedor de inmediato, o son 
estafadores o invernales.


Posdata, ¡que no soy el pescador he! Solo hice el reporte!!! :)


El 2017-03-01 03:07, Miguel Matos escribió:

El martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, TheFox
 escribió:

Si te piden contraseñas malo. Lo mejor que se puede hacer con este

tipo de mensajes es borrarlos directamente. Y si se tiene dudas (en
algún caso uno puede pensar «a lo mejor es cierto lo que me están
diciendo») lo que se tiene que hacer es llamar a la empresa que nos
ofrece el servicio, en este caso Web-Mail, y preguntarles.


Santiago.
El 28 feb. 2017 23:09, "Ignacio Martirén" 

escribió:


Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó

a

todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...

Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net
para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org

El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista



El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o

recibir

un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema


--
  Ignacio





O en el caso de que estén usando gmail, si no lo hizo ella, pulsar un
botón lateral, y elegir "denunciar suplantación de identidad" y
"marcar como spam", y asunto resuelto. Como llegó a mi correo spam no
me preocupé por ello.

--

Ayuda para hacer preguntas inteligentes: http://is.gd/NJIwRz

Re: [OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[alparkom]

De hecho, el pedir la contraseña no tiene ningún sentido. Si te la 
piden, las posibilidades de fraude es de 100%.



El 28/02/17 a las 22:42, TheFox escribió:
Si te piden contraseñas malo. Lo mejor que se puede hacer con este 
tipo de mensajes es borrarlos directamente. Y si se tiene dudas (en 
algún caso uno puede pensar «a lo mejor es cierto lo que me están 
diciendo») lo que se tiene que hacer es llamar a la empresa que nos 
ofrece el servicio, en este caso Web-Mail, y preguntarles.


Santiago.

El 28 feb. 2017 23:09, "Ignacio Martirén" > escribió:


Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó a
todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...

Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net 
para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org


El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista



El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema


--
  Ignacio

Re: [OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[Miguel Matos]

El martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, TheFox 
escribió:
> Si te piden contraseñas malo. Lo mejor que se puede hacer con este tipo
de mensajes es borrarlos directamente. Y si se tiene dudas (en algún caso
uno puede pensar «a lo mejor es cierto lo que me están diciendo») lo que se
tiene que hacer es llamar a la empresa que nos ofrece el servicio, en este
caso Web-Mail, y preguntarles.
>
> Santiago.
> El 28 feb. 2017 23:09, "Ignacio Martirén"  escribió:
>
> Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó a
> todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...
>
> Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net
> para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
>
> El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista
>
>
>
> El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
> Estimado usuario
>
> Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
> actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
> un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
> continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:
>
> (1) E - mail:
> (2) nombre:
> (3) contraseña:
> (4) Confirmar contraseña:
>
> Gracias
> Administrador del sistema
>
>
> --
>   Ignacio
>
>
>

O en el caso de que estén usando gmail, si no lo hizo ella, pulsar un botón
lateral, y elegir "denunciar suplantación de identidad" y "marcar como
spam", y asunto resuelto. Como llegó a mi correo spam no me preocupé por
ello.

-- 

Ayuda para hacer preguntas inteligentes: http://is.gd/NJIwRz

Re: [OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[TheFox]

Si te piden contraseñas malo. Lo mejor que se puede hacer con este tipo de
mensajes es borrarlos directamente. Y si se tiene dudas (en algún caso uno
puede pensar «a lo mejor es cierto lo que me están diciendo») lo que se
tiene que hacer es llamar a la empresa que nos ofrece el servicio, en este
caso Web-Mail, y preguntarles.

Santiago.

El 28 feb. 2017 23:09, "Ignacio Martirén"  escribió:

Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó a
todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...

Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net
para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org

El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista



El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema


--
  Ignacio

Re: Security hole in LXDE?

[Lisi Reisz]

On Tuesday 28 February 2017 17:45:57 David Wright wrote:
> Both aptitude and synaptic can run by an ordinary user, and it's a
> very safe way to run them when you don't yet fully understand their
> abilities.

To extend for the sake of pedantic ultra-clarity, and not to contradict:  
aptitude can be run as an ordinary user, but you cannot change anything as an 
ordinary user - only look at what is there.  To change anything, e.g. install 
or uninstall  something, you must have root privileges.

Lisi

Re: A minimal relational database in Debian

[Richard Owlett]

On 02/28/2017 05:06 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:

On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:

I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.


Would temporarily changing your dpi settings work, the help is
perfectly legible here, but I have increased dpi (96 > 132) rather than
font size as it is an across the board improvement for my monitor size.



Not sure it would be worth the annoyance.
If this problem is representative of their workmanship ...

Re: cx-freeze pour les très nuls et juste pour voir

[G2PC]

Le 22/01/2017 à 23:31, Samy Mezani a écrit :
> Bonsoir,
>
> Le 22/01/2017 à 22:41, G2PC a écrit :
>> Ma question : cx-freeze pour les très nuls et juste pour voir => Comment
>> installer cx-freeze
>> NB : J'ai 2 Os sur lesquels jaimerais tester.
>>
>> -Debian Jessie 8.5 (Machine virtuelle)
>>
>> -Linux Mint Sarah ( Ou Serena ) (Machine virtuelle)
>
> Pour Debian, une solution a apparemment été trouvée (# pip install
> cx_freeze)
>
> Pour Linux Mint, avant toute chose, quels sont les dépôts que tu
> utilises ? (sudo rgrep deb /etc/apt/sources.list* | grep -v save)
>
> Samy
>

Bonsoir/Bonjour
Merci de ta réponse Samy
Pour Debian, cela n'a pas fonctionné, j'ai du louper une étape.
Je tenterais de repprendre cela par la suite, pas certain que cela
fonctionne si bien que ça, et surtout, je n'en ai pas encore l'utilité.
Je reste curieux de voir une procédure fonctionnelle si quelqu'un crée
un tutoriel pour installer cx-freeze.

Re: [OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[javier frf]

El 28 de febrero de 2017, 19:08, Ignacio Martirén
 escribió:
>
> Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó a
> todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...
>
> Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net
> para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
>
> El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista
>

El muchacho al parecer nos está alertando de la presencia de phishing
en la lista de correo. phishing es la técnica que se usa para robar
tus datos personales y usurpar tu identidad en diferentes plataformas
virtuales. con el fin de obtener beneficios.
Saludos!

>
>
> El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
> Estimado usuario
>
> Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
> actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
> un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
> continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:
>
> (1) E - mail:
> (2) nombre:
> (3) contraseña:
> (4) Confirmar contraseña:
>
> Gracias
> Administrador del sistema
>
>
> --
>   Ignacio
>

Re: A minimal relational database in Debian

[Dominic Knight]

On Monday 27 February 2017 13:17:56 Richard Owlett wrote:
> I looked at at LibreOffice Base. It was unusable as its "help" system
> provided no intrinsic way to increase fonts to a legible size.

Would temporarily changing your dpi settings work, the help is
perfectly legible here, but I have increased dpi (96 > 132) rather than
font size as it is an across the board improvement for my monitor size.

Regards
Dom.

Re: wifi mystere Resolu

[G2PC]

Le 28/02/2017 à 19:53, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :
> On 2017-02-28 10:18:10 +0100, VieuxGeek DuSystem wrote:
>> Lol dsl
>>
>> aptitude why network-manager
>>
>>(1)
>> i   gnome-shell-extensions Dépend gnome-shell (< 3.15)
>> i A gnome-shellRecommande gnome-control-center
>> i A gnome-control-center   Recommande network-manager-gnome (>= 0.9.8)
>> i A network-manager-gnome  Dépend network-manager (>= 0.9.10)
> Je me demande pourquoi un DE recommande un outil de connexion
> particulier.
>

Je vous lis sur ce sujet qui pourrait m'aider à avancer sur des soucis
de connection wifi, sur certains wifi ainsi que le partage de connexion
avec android.

Installer wicd nécessite une configuration particulière ?

J'ai lu qu'une des réponses précédente proposait de supprimer
complètement network-manager. Comment, via un autoremove network-manager ?

Nettoyage du spam : février 2017

[jean-pierre giraud]

Bonjour,
Comme nous sommes en mars, il est désormais possible de
traiter les archives du mois de février 2017 des listes francophones.

N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs
pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes.

Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur :

https://wiki.debian.org/I18n/FrenchSpamClean

Re: [solved] Re: No sound

[deloptes]

GiaThnYgeia wrote:

> How does one trace the inputs of the audio system?  Basic hardware
> configuration only shows usual mic input, but using FMT for example
> after mic gets unplugged some sound input is getting recorded.  Banging
> on the box records well.  None of the hardware specs I've found list any
> other device.  Could the mini-speaker-beeper on the board act as a mic?
> Why would audio software be allowed to use a speaker as a mic?

don't hijack please. open new thread

show us your hardware and other useful info. may be you have built in mic?

Britix24 Targeted Requirements

[dora . delgado]

Hi,

Would you be interested in Targeted *Britix24* leads? We are happy to
provide the database across globe, specifically *North America, EMEA, APAC*
 and *Latin America*.

We also have other users like *Alfresco, OnBase, IBM, Liferay Digital,
EMC2, Citrix, Bitrix24, Huddle, Exo Platform, Yammer, Bloomfire *many more.

Please review and let me know your thoughts, I will get back to you counts,
pricing and more information in my next email (or) let’s Schedule a quick
call so I can share the idea with you.

Really look forward to hearing from you.

Best Regards,

*Dora Delgado* | Mktg Manager.

Re: No sound

[deloptes]

Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:

> Sid Unstable

give me a break!!!

Re: [solved] Re: No sound

[GiaThnYgeia]

Rodolfo Medina:
> Rodolfo Medina  writes:
> I installed alsaplayer-alsa and pulseaudio and now I have sound, I don't know
> thanks to which of the two.
> 
> $ cat /etc/debian_version; uname -a
> 9.0
> Linux lenovo 4.9.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.10-1 (2017-02-17) x86_64 
> GNU/Linux
9.0
Linux DellUziOn 4.9.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.6-3 (2017-01-20) x86_64
GNU/Linux

How does one trace the inputs of the audio system?  Basic hardware
configuration only shows usual mic input, but using FMT for example
after mic gets unplugged some sound input is getting recorded.  Banging
on the box records well.  None of the hardware specs I've found list any
other device.  Could the mini-speaker-beeper on the board act as a mic?
Why would audio software be allowed to use a speaker as a mic?

> Cheers,
> Rodolfo

Peace and quiet

-- 
 "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG

[OT] Alerta!!!!! fishing en esta lista!!!!

[Ignacio Martirén]

Hola amigos. No soy experto. Me ha llegado este mensaje. Les llegó a
todos? qué significa?  están pidiendo una contraseña...

Lo envía: juansnti...@reseup.net
para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org

El asunto:Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista



El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:
Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema


-- 
  Ignacio

Re: No sound

[Cindy-Sue Causey]

On 2/28/17, Rodolfo Medina  wrote:
> Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:
>
>  alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui
> gstreamer1.0-alsa
>  libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev
> libasound2-plugins
>  libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio
>
> , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:


Hi, Rodolpho and All :)

I've repeatedly lost sound myself the last year so'ish. For me, it
started when there was a change in Pulseaudio's relationship in Xfce4
somehow.

Sound would occasionally work on new installs (debootstrap) but would
then fail soon after. I THINK those fails came immediately after mass
day-to-day upgrades in Sid Unstable. I've done all kinds of playing
with anything I could find sound related via "apt-cache search" and
repeatedly had fail after fail after... heartbreaking... fail.

About a month ago, I HAD to get it working to process some important
video sound bytes so I really dug in about trying to find something. I
simultaneously came across aumix via "apt-cache search" while aumix
was receiving a couple mentions on this list in sound related threads.

I installed "aumix", and it worked once. And only once.

The first time the interface came up, it had one column that was
turned off. I bumped it up and miraculously had sound. On the next
reboot, no sound over and over.

Because aumix worked that one time when nothing had for pushing close
to a year, I went back in with aumix as a search keyword. I found
aumix-gtk and so tried installing that, *too*.. That still brings up
an extremely small interface, but it has more columns.

ONE OF THOSE COLUMNS... is something called Pcm2. That one is ALWAYS
at zero after reboots. I bump that over to 100 and have sound
every time now.

EVERY. SINGLE. TIME!

Yayhoo!

Maybe addressing that "Pcm2" setting in the other various favored
sound [controllers] will slow down sound problems?

If anyone uses aumix and additionally also installs that aumix-gtk,
the terminal command is still just the "aumix".

Its developers are my #Heros! #TrueStory! It's CRUCIAL that my sound
work right now, and that was the avenue that worked to date... on this
particular... for now anyway.

Hope that helps someone.. *grin*

Cindy :)

-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA

* runs with crochet hook *

Re: unattended-upgrades: apache won't restart

[Yasir Assam]

Can anyone help with this?

Just to be clear, after apache is upgraded via unattended-upgrades,
apache is in the stopped state. I have to manually start it again.

On 27/02/2017 12:45 PM, Yasir Assam wrote:
> Running Jessie. Every time apache is upgraded through
> unattended-upgrades, it isn't restarted.
>
> Here's an excerpt from syslog:
>
>   Feb 27 06:41:32 musomates systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Apache2 web server...
>   Feb 27 06:41:32 musomates apache2[24650]: Starting web server: apache2.
>   Feb 27 06:41:33 musomates apache2[24659]: Stopping web server: apache2.
>   Feb 27 06:41:33 musomates systemd[1]: Started LSB: Apache2 web server.
>
> Here's what it looks like when I run aptitude upgrade manually on a
> different machine, not via unattended-upgrades:
>
>   Feb 27 12:06:50 buildoneforme systemd[1]: Stopping LSB: Apache2 web
> server...
>   Feb 27 12:06:52 buildoneforme apache2[11958]: Stopping web server:
> apache2.
>   Feb 27 12:06:52 buildoneforme systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Apache2 web
> server...
>   Feb 27 12:06:52 buildoneforme apache2[11983]: Starting web server:
> apache... 
>   Feb 27 12:06:53 buildoneforme systemd[1]: Started LSB: Apache2 web server.
>
> On the machine with unattended-upgrades running, it looks like it's
> trying to start apache before stopping it. Obviously it should be the
> other way round.
>
> Anyone have a clue what's going on here?
>
> Yasir
>

Re: [solved] Re: No sound

[deloptes]

Rodolfo Medina wrote:

> I installed alsaplayer-alsa and pulseaudio and now I have sound, I don't
> know thanks to which of the two.

the dependencies (libasound2 libasound2-data) I guess. But most likely it
triggered a proper configuration of your driver

regards

Re: ssh naar Linux computer achter "router"

[Geert Stappers]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:39PM +0100, Richard Lucassen wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 17:00:12 +0100
> Geert Stappers  wrote:
> } Het idee is om Alice een SSH verbinding naar Mike te laten maken.
> } Bob gaat zelf ook naar Mike om vervolgens via de SSH verbinding
> } van Alice naar haar computer te gaan.
> >
> >   B --- M === A
> >
> > Wat bestaat er aan Debian packages voor zulke situaties?
>
> Zet bij jou een OpenVPN server neer en laat de client er naartoe
> connecten. Dan heb je een volledige verbinding, alsof die remote comp
> in jouw netwerk staat. En als je een dynamisch ip hebt kun je de server
> op "float" zetten, dan volgt-ie de client zonder problemen.

Aan een VPN had ik nog niet aangedacht.
Ik denk echter dat het een oplossing is voor een ander probleem.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian stretch: problem solved.

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:47:15PM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> My thanks for all the help and suggestions, and my apologies for all
> the floundering. Cepstral support spotted the problem pretty quickly.
> 
> Evidently somehow I managed to install a 32 bit Debian on this 64 bit
> PC, but I was attempting to install a 64 bit package on it. Downloading
> and installing the 32 bit Cepstral package did the trick.
> 
> It's not been my day.

Ah. I see. That explains things :-)

Disregard my other posts, then.

Regards, and glad you found it.
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli15IUACgkQBcgs9XrR2ka03gCeOwvQSzx54JzUl/bI3dN6fbFW
thoAnjd+nqbFqRWhW5WutFJfbEiRgKpj
=dS/Y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:28:22PM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> Okay, I think we're closing in on it. 
> 
> The Cepstral swift package runs fine on archlinux, where using ldd -r
> on the executable lists eleven libraries, all but one of which is
> present on Debian where the Cepstral package fails. On Debian, ldd -r
> on the executable says simply "not a dynamically linked executable."
> 
> The item found on Arch but missing on Debian is:
> 
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7fd2b1fd1000)
> 
> Any idea where to go from here? 

Aha. So ignore my previous post. This file above is part of the libc6
package. It *should* be somewhere on your system (your Debian is a
64 bit system, isn't it? What does "uname -a" say?)

Try "ldd" on some working binary on your debian box, so you can see
what ld.so it is using, like so:

  ldd /bin/ls

For good measure do also

  file /bin/ls

to make sure that it actually is a 64 bit executable. My hunch is
that your Debian has its 64 bit libraries still in /lib and not,
as it does these days in /lib64.

A possible solution (untested, at least by me!) would be to symlink
/lib to /lib64 (*if* /lib contains 64 bit libraries!) and then run
ldconfig.

What do others think?

God luck
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli14+QACgkQBcgs9XrR2kabtACeOv2qxyRxcnUgKd2tZukBM9JJ
wRwAnRNgNetAa2/1Ne3j6Nfw0b6tA7v3
=rolZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Recap: Cepstral Swift and Debian Stretch

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:30:13AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> Here is a summary of what we now know:
> 
> The only package in play now is
> Cepstral_William_x86-64-linux_6.2.3.873.tar.gz
> 
> 
> It was downloaded with wget from a link given to me from support at
> cepstral.com. 
> 
> The package was downloaded to Debian Stretch on a dual boot system
> where Arch Linux is the secondary OS. It was installed on Debian, and
> after problems were discovered, was moved to Arch and installed there,
> where it ran without error.
> 
> The output of file for the swift.bin executable was identical on b oth
> systems, and was:
> 
>  ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
> linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.9,
> not stripped, with debug_info

Since the binary is the same, the difference must be in the environment.
The first stop would be to check what's behind

  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

(background: that's the dynamic linker. Every executable has an
"interpreter" which takes care of running it, e.g. for a shell
executable it might be /bin/sh. For ELF executables, it's ld-linux*.so,
with some variations depending on architecture). There is actually a
man page for it (man 8 ld.so)).

A second approach would be calling the program under strace and see
whether there's some usable info, like so:

  strace -o  -f 

(the f means "follow" across forks: thus you might call the shell wrapper
to let it do its setup).

The output is very verbose, but since the program dies quickly, you can
look at the end of the trace file for hints.

Strace records the system calls and their results.

Just ask away when stuck.

> Sorry about  earlier top-posts, I'm new to the list and have bad
> habits.

No worries. I just re-ordered things as posting styles got too mixed
up :-)

Regards
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli138QACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYNJQCeKp4Ny0SP/xBp9LOUhG/7v2L8
ygIAn04KBtt/60arZ2Uex9xqP0pt46p3
=4bcY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[solved] Re: No sound

[Rodolfo Medina]

Rodolfo Medina  writes:

> Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:
>
>  alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui gstreamer1.0-alsa
>  libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev libasound2-plugins
>  libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio
>
> , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:


I installed alsaplayer-alsa and pulseaudio and now I have sound, I don't know
thanks to which of the two.

$ cat /etc/debian_version; uname -a
9.0
Linux lenovo 4.9.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.10-1 (2017-02-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Cheers,

Rodolfo

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents (RESOLT)

[Robert Marsellés]

Hola,

Els meus comentaris.

On 28/02/17 19:27, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Hi ha un munt de navegadors per GNU/Linux com per haver-ne de provar cap
> a Windows.
> Jo de vegades utilitzo Midori per canviar de motor de renderització.
> 

Jo (fa segles) havia usat un "plugin" (crec que se'n diu) que permetia
canviar el nom del navegador que veia la pàgina web però en alguna de
les re-instal·lacions de Debian ho vaig oblidar.

A més a més, l'eina s'havia quedat obsoleta ja que l'últim Internet
Explorer al que podia suplantar era la versió 8 (crec, de memòria) i les
pàgines web no volien usar quelcom tan vell i insegur.

>> 
>>> En canvi, el mateix document PDF de LaTeX (PDF v1.5, amb fonts Latin
>>> Modern incrustades) usant Internet Explorer des de una màquina virtual
>>> amb Win7 oli en un llum. Trist però cert. Què hi farem!
>>
>> - Això què vol dir? que Firefox/Iceweasel no va bé? (i potser
>> Chrome/Chromium, Opera o potser Dillo sobre GNU/Linux van bé? Que només
>> va bé Internet Exploter? O que cal usar Windows, encara que sigui sigui
>> amb FF?
>>

No puc donar una conclusió general. Jo tenia un problema, he buscat
diverses formes de solucionar-lo, he dissenyat i realitzat experiments
per validar algunes d'aquestes hipòtesis, he solucionat el problema i he
publicat la informació generada. He complert amb totes les etapes del
mètode científic tal com ho explico a la canalla.

Evidentment, com tot el que fem els humans, no és perfecte. Amb la
mateixa informació es poden elaborar diferents conclusions en funció de
criteris i enfocaments personals.

La meva conclusió és que ser alternatiu costa molts més recursos
(inclosa la paciència) del que la majoria de la gent es pensa. És
precisament per punyetes com aquestes que trobo que eines com VirtualBox
són útils a nivell d'usuari. Potser si em dediqués professionalment al
"software" ho podria resoldre d'una altra forma.

Salut i peles,

robert

Re: wifi mystere Resolu

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2017-02-28 10:18:10 +0100, VieuxGeek DuSystem wrote:
> Lol dsl
> 
> aptitude why network-manager
> 
>(1)
> i   gnome-shell-extensions Dépend gnome-shell (< 3.15)
> i A gnome-shellRecommande gnome-control-center
> i A gnome-control-center   Recommande network-manager-gnome (>= 0.9.8)
> i A network-manager-gnome  Dépend network-manager (>= 0.9.10)

Je me demande pourquoi un DE recommande un outil de connexion
particulier.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Cepstral swift and Debian stretch: problem solved.

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

My thanks for all the help and suggestions, and my apologies for all
the floundering. Cepstral support spotted the problem pretty quickly.

Evidently somehow I managed to install a 32 bit Debian on this 64 bit
PC, but I was attempting to install a 64 bit package on it. Downloading
and installing the 32 bit Cepstral package did the trick.

It's not been my day.

Chuck



-- 
A bicycle can't stand alone; it's just two tired.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 59°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (6% of Full)

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Sven Hartge]

Brad Rogers  wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:28:22 -0500 Chuck Hallenbeck 
>  wrote:

>> Any idea where to go from here? 

> File you need is in package sid's libc6 package.  NB: A quick search
> seems to indicate that it's currently *only* available in sid.

No, the file (as symlink) is available in Jessie and Wheezy as well:

Wheezy:
# ls -al /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 May 29  2016 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so

Jessie:
# ls -al /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Nov 28 05:26 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so

Stretch/Sid:
# ls -al /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jan 16 18:43 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.24.so

If the symlink is not at that location, then the system has no AMD64
installation.

Grüße,
Sven.



-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Alerta!!! fhishing en esta lista!!!!

[juansantiago]

El 2017-02-28 18:29, Web-Mail escribió:

Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que
actualmente se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir
un mensaje dentro de 24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a
continuación para verificar y actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema

Re: No sound

[deloptes]

Rodolfo Medina wrote:

> [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open
> ['/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p' failed (-2): No such file or directory

As no one answered with a meaningful suggestion. The problem is as you see
above that alsa can not locate your hardware (audio card)

you need to debug this first

regards

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents (RESOLT)

[Narcis Garcia]

Hi ha un munt de navegadors per GNU/Linux com per haver-ne de provar cap
a Windows.
Jo de vegades utilitzo Midori per canviar de motor de renderització.



__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
administrator should fix this.
El 28/02/17 a les 18:11, Eduard Selma ha escrit:
> El 28/02/17 a les 17:48, Robert Marsellés ha escrit:
> 
>> En canvi, el mateix document PDF de LaTeX (PDF v1.5, amb fonts Latin
>> Modern incrustades) usant Internet Explorer des de una màquina virtual
>> amb Win7 oli en un llum. Trist però cert. Què hi farem!
> 
> - Això què vol dir? que Firefox/Iceweasel no va bé? (i potser
> Chrome/Chromium, Opera o potser Dillo sobre GNU/Linux van bé? Que només
> va bé Internet Exploter? O que cal usar Windows, encara que sigui sigui
> amb FF?
> 
> Aniria bé saber-ho, per si ens hi hem de trobar en un futur.
> 
> Salut i bits (lliures, si pot ser).
> 
> Eduard Selma.
> 
> 

Estimado usuario

[Web-Mail]

Estimado usuario

Su correo electrónico ha superado 2 GB creado por el webmaster, que actualmente 
se están ejecutando a 2,30 GB, no puede enviar o recibir un mensaje dentro de 
24 horas, por favor ingrese sus datos a continuación para verificar y 
actualizar tu cuenta:

(1) E - mail:
(2) nombre:
(3) contraseña:
(4) Confirmar contraseña:

Gracias
Administrador del sistema

Re: No sound

[darkestkhan]

99% of my sound issues are resolved by:

sudo aptitude purge pulseaudio

(the remaining 1% tends to be some do-once-and-forget-forever-tweak in
alsa config files)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Jude DaShiell  wrote:
> Pulseaudio is needed for sound to the same level as a fish needs a
> bicycle.On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Hans wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:32:30
>> From: Hans 
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: No sound
>> Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:32:56 + (UTC)
>> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017, 15:27:46 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>> Hi Rodolfo,
>>
>> I am not sure, but it looks like you need pulseaudio for sound. Did you
>> install the pulseaudio package?
>>
>> Pulseaudio is the next generation audiodriver and uses alsa as well.
>>
>> Hope it helps. Good luck!
>>
>> Hans
>>>
>>> Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:
>>>
>>>  alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui
>>> gstreamer1.0-alsa libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data
>>> libasound2-dev
>>> libasound2-plugins libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio
>>>
>>> , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:
>>>
>>> $ mplayer *
>>> MPlayer 1.3.0 (Debian), built with gcc-6.2.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team
>>> do_connect: could not connect to socket
>>> connect: No such file or directory
>>> Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote
>>> control.
>>>
>>> Playing 21-apr-2011.flv.
>>> libavformat version 57.56.101 (external)
>>> Mismatching header version 57.56.100
>>> libavformat file format detected.
>>> [mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f4b77ce5d00]Protocol name not provided,
>>> cannot
>>> determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access
>>> patterns cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol
>>> [lavf]
>>> stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
>>> [lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und
>>> VIDEO:  [H264]  400x300  24bpp  30.000 fps  512.0 kbps (62.5 kbyte/s)
>>>
>>> ==
>>> Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
>>> libavcodec version 57.64.101 (external)
>>> Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
>>>
>>> ==
>>> Clip info:
>>>  major_brand: FACE
>>>  minor_version: 1337
>>>  compatible_brands: isomavc1FACE
>>>  creation_time: 2011-04-21T22:58:18.00Z
>>> Load subtitles in ./
>>>
>>> ==
>>> Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
>>> AUDIO: 22050 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 36.8 kbit/5.21% (ratio: 4596->88200)
>>> Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4
>>> Audio))
>>>
>>> ==
>>> AO: [pulse] Init failed: Connection refused
>>> Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse'
>>> [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open
>>> '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p'
>>> failed (-2): No such file or directory [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib:
>>> pcm_dmix.c:1052:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave [AO_ALSA]
>>> Playback
>>> open error: No such file or directory
>>> Failed to initialize audio driver 'alsa'
>>> [AO SDL] Samplerate: 22050Hz Channels: Mono Format floatle
>>> [AO SDL] using aalib audio driver.
>>> [AO SDL] Unsupported audio format: 0x1d.
>>> [AO SDL] Unable to open audio: No available audio device
>>> Failed to initialize audio driver 'sdl:aalib'
>>> Could not open/initialize audio device -> no sound.
>>> Audio: no sound
>>> Starting playback...
>>> Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
>>> VO: [vdpau] 400x300 => 400x300 Planar YV12
>>> V:   2.7   0/  0  9%  3%  0.0% 0 0
>>>
>>> Exiting... (Quit)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help,
>>>
>>> Rodolfo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>



-- 

darkestkhan
--
Feel free to CC me.
jid: darkestk...@gmail.com
May The Source be with You.

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Brad Rogers]

On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:53:24 +
Brad Rogers  wrote:

Hello,

>seems to indicate that it's currently *only* available in sid.

Well, it's installed here, in testing, so I most likely misread data
received regarding availability.

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
If Adolf Hitler flew in today, they'd send a limousine anyway
(White Man) In Hammersmith Palais - The Clash


pgpa2_RaLrZq2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:53:24PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:28:22 -0500
> Chuck Hallenbeck  wrote:
> 
> Hello Chuck,
> 
> >Any idea where to go from here? 
> 
> File you need is in package sid's libc6 package.  NB: A quick search
> seems to indicate that it's currently *only* available in sid.
> 
Hi Brad,
Many thanks for that. I'm not sure I want to move to sid for now, but
it's a relief to have the issue pinned down.  

Chuck

> -- 
>  Regards  _
>  / )   "The blindingly obvious is
> / _)radnever immediately apparent"
> They take away our freedom in the name of liberty
> Suspect Device - Stiff Little Fingers



-- 
A bicycle can't stand alone; it's just two tired.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 57°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (6% of Full)

Re: cuotas con el squid...

[Ricardo Eimil Pineda]

Hola colega si recibe este menaje por favor responder en que version de 
debian aplico el squish


--
Empresa de Construcción y Montaje 
Ciego de Ávila

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Brad Rogers]

On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:28:22 -0500
Chuck Hallenbeck  wrote:

Hello Chuck,

>Any idea where to go from here? 

File you need is in package sid's libc6 package.  NB: A quick search
seems to indicate that it's currently *only* available in sid.

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
They take away our freedom in the name of liberty
Suspect Device - Stiff Little Fingers


pgpDA5Cz3JPp5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: No sound

[Jude DaShiell]

Pulseaudio is needed for sound to the same level as a fish needs a 
bicycle.On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Hans wrote:



Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:32:30
From: Hans 
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: No sound
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:32:56 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org

Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017, 15:27:46 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
Hi Rodolfo,

I am not sure, but it looks like you need pulseaudio for sound. Did you
install the pulseaudio package?

Pulseaudio is the next generation audiodriver and uses alsa as well.

Hope it helps. Good luck!

Hans

Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:

 alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui
gstreamer1.0-alsa libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev
libasound2-plugins libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio

, then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:

$ mplayer *
MPlayer 1.3.0 (Debian), built with gcc-6.2.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team
do_connect: could not connect to socket
connect: No such file or directory
Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote
control.

Playing 21-apr-2011.flv.
libavformat version 57.56.101 (external)
Mismatching header version 57.56.100
libavformat file format detected.
[mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f4b77ce5d00]Protocol name not provided, cannot
determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access
patterns cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol [lavf]
stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
[lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und
VIDEO:  [H264]  400x300  24bpp  30.000 fps  512.0 kbps (62.5 kbyte/s)
==
Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
libavcodec version 57.64.101 (external)
Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
==
Clip info:
 major_brand: FACE
 minor_version: 1337
 compatible_brands: isomavc1FACE
 creation_time: 2011-04-21T22:58:18.00Z
Load subtitles in ./
==
Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
AUDIO: 22050 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 36.8 kbit/5.21% (ratio: 4596->88200)
Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
==
AO: [pulse] Init failed: Connection refused
Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse'
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p'
failed (-2): No such file or directory [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib:
pcm_dmix.c:1052:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave [AO_ALSA] Playback
open error: No such file or directory
Failed to initialize audio driver 'alsa'
[AO SDL] Samplerate: 22050Hz Channels: Mono Format floatle
[AO SDL] using aalib audio driver.
[AO SDL] Unsupported audio format: 0x1d.
[AO SDL] Unable to open audio: No available audio device
Failed to initialize audio driver 'sdl:aalib'
Could not open/initialize audio device -> no sound.
Audio: no sound
Starting playback...
Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
VO: [vdpau] 400x300 => 400x300 Planar YV12
V:   2.7   0/  0  9%  3%  0.0% 0 0

Exiting... (Quit)


Thanks for any help,

Rodolfo






--

Re: Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Sven Hartge]

Chuck Hallenbeck  wrote:

> Okay, I think we're closing in on it. 

> The Cepstral swift package runs fine on archlinux, where using ldd -r
> on the executable lists eleven libraries, all but one of which is
> present on Debian where the Cepstral package fails. On Debian, ldd -r
> on the executable says simply "not a dynamically linked executable."

> The item found on Arch but missing on Debian is:

> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7fd2b1fd1000)

> Any idea where to go from here? 

Hmm. That file is contained in the package libc6:amd64. It should be
installed on your system if you system really is of the amd64 variant.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: No sound

[Jude DaShiell]

Have you got pulseaudio installed?  If so, see if you can find 
pulsemixer and run pulsemixer and repeat your work then everything 
should be sounding.  If that's not the case, you may need to do aplay -l 
and check devices one at a time with speaker-test.   Hope this helps.


On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Rodolfo Medina wrote:


Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:27:46
From: Rodolfo Medina 
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: No sound
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:28:14 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org

Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:

alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui gstreamer1.0-alsa
libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev libasound2-plugins
libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio

, then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:

$ mplayer *
MPlayer 1.3.0 (Debian), built with gcc-6.2.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team
do_connect: could not connect to socket
connect: No such file or directory
Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control.

Playing 21-apr-2011.flv.
libavformat version 57.56.101 (external)
Mismatching header version 57.56.100
libavformat file format detected.
[mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f4b77ce5d00]Protocol name not provided, cannot 
determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access patterns 
cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol
[lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
[lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und
VIDEO:  [H264]  400x300  24bpp  30.000 fps  512.0 kbps (62.5 kbyte/s)
==
Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
libavcodec version 57.64.101 (external)
Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
==
Clip info:
major_brand: FACE
minor_version: 1337
compatible_brands: isomavc1FACE
creation_time: 2011-04-21T22:58:18.00Z
Load subtitles in ./
==
Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
AUDIO: 22050 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 36.8 kbit/5.21% (ratio: 4596->88200)
Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
==
AO: [pulse] Init failed: Connection refused
Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse'
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p' 
failed (-2): No such file or directory
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_dmix.c:1052:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
[AO_ALSA] Playback open error: No such file or directory
Failed to initialize audio driver 'alsa'
[AO SDL] Samplerate: 22050Hz Channels: Mono Format floatle
[AO SDL] using aalib audio driver.
[AO SDL] Unsupported audio format: 0x1d.
[AO SDL] Unable to open audio: No available audio device
Failed to initialize audio driver 'sdl:aalib'
Could not open/initialize audio device -> no sound.
Audio: no sound
Starting playback...
Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
VO: [vdpau] 400x300 => 400x300 Planar YV12
V:   2.7   0/  0  9%  3%  0.0% 0 0

Exiting... (Quit)


Thanks for any help,

Rodolfo




--

Re: No sound

[David Christensen]

On 02/28/2017 07:27 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:

Please help with no sound issue.


What release of Debian?  What kernel?

2017-02-28 08:03:16 dpchrist@jesse ~
$ cat /etc/debian_version; uname -a
8.7
Linux jesse 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22) 
x86_64 GNU/Linux



David

Re: Security hole in LXDE?

[David Wright]

On Tue 28 Feb 2017 at 12:31:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> As a user and as I understand it you should not be able to make
> system-wide changes and many packages affect other parts of the system.
> A user can install and run any package that does not affect the system,
> as a stand alone.  The system is a whole must be maintained by the
> sysadmin for all users.  That is my simplistic understanding.
> Unless it is specifically configured otherwise I don't see why these
> assumptions would be wrong.  Imagine if I like MATE and the other user
> likes X11 and I delete x11 and install MATE, or I install a package that
> has dependency conflicts and replaces what is essential for the other
> users' packages.
> 
> Live systems allow you to install whatever you like as they assume you
> are the root or sysadmin.
> 
> At least that is how I understand security policy for this system.

Apart from not understanding what you mean by "installing packages as
a stand alone", that all looks fine. My post merely demonstrated that
synaptic is not unusual in being runnable by ordinary users. So your
inability, and the need for a password, lies outside synaptic and in
the realm of the DE, which set up the icon or menu that you use to
the exclusion of other methods. In a sense my post was just a gloss
on Jonathan Dowland's post.

So why did I comment on _your_ post? Only days ago, I mentioned
someone's old d-u assertions that you couldn't run aptitude as an
ordinary user, which is not true. I didn't want your statement to
give people the same false impression anout synaptic, especially
as that someone uses synaptic.

Both aptitude and synaptic can run by an ordinary user, and it's a
very safe way to run them when you don't yet fully understand their
abilities.

> David Wright:
> > On Mon 27 Feb 2017 at 11:13:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> >> testingAmd64LXDE
> >>
> >> I have never, not once, been able to run synaptic in any similar system
> >> without a root or a sudo password.  Not to execute a command, just to
> >> get the gui up you need a password.
> > 
> > Why would that be? You should be able to do so. There's a popup
> > window that says this:
> > 
> >   Starting "Synaptic Package Manager" without administrative privileges
> > 
> >   You will not be able to apply any changes, but you can still export
> >   the marked changes or create a download script for them.
> > 
> > I can select packages, look at their properties, dependencies,
> > installed files, get changelogs etc. I can edit some of the
> > preferences. I can see the immediate effects of that in files
> > like ~/.synaptic/synaptic.conf when I click OK. I can select
> > packages for installation and it will write a little script
> > for me:
> > 
> >  #!/bin/sh
> >  wget -c
> >  
> > http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/i/ibm-3270/3270-common_3.3.14ga11-1_i386.deb
> > 
> > So it suggests that the OP has set something in their system
> > to cause the behaviour they observe, both the popup and the
> > fact that a user's password is sufficient for installing software.
> > 
> > I can run (the similar program) aptitude likewise. The main differences
> > with synaptic are that aptitude is in the user's normal PATH (whereas
> > synaptic is in /usr/sbin); when you try to install, it asks you to
> > consider becoming root from the Actions menu; and if you persist, it
> > gives you the option to become root in a dialog box, and you can then
> > type the root password.
> > 
> >> I don't know whether creating a user with 100% admin privileges will
> >> still require a pass or not, I suspect it would still.  As if you add a
> >> user in the sudo group it is the user's pass that is asked.  So
> >> something is wrong on your specific installation.

Cheers,
David.

Re: Security hole in LXDE?

[David Wright]

On Tue 28 Feb 2017 at 11:02:14 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> I am not sure, if I some day allowed the normal user to start synaptic as a 
> normal user. Sometimes this option is offered at the first start.

I wouldn't know how to _prevent_ and ordinary user from running
synaptic by typing /usr/sbin/synaptic, unless you had them running in
some sort of restricted shall. Synaptic is obviously designed to be
run by unprivileged users which is why it has that dialog box warning.

> If I have done this (which I was at that moment wiling to do), where do I 
> have 
> to look, to make this thing back to normal?
> 
> Please note, that I am not using sudoers, but I am sure, I am using either 
> kdesu or gksudo. As I am a mostly using KDE, I bet, kdesu is the one, where I 
> might have to look for as IMO this one is the thing, that might be 
> responsible 
> for the rights.  But where do I have to look then? 

Yes, I agree that the clue is in your DE. I'm a WM person (fvwm)
and use sudoers for allowing me to do a few things like kicking
exim and changing timezones. Joe and Pontus may be more help
in at least having the configuration files to look at.

My assumption would be to look at the DE's configuration in
/etc as you wouldn't expect a user to be able to confer this privilege
on themselves. Are you user 1000? Did you gain privileges merely
through being the first user at installation time? Could that be
normal? Not for Pontus it seems.

Just as, by default, you can gain privileges by being the person
seated at the computer, so it might make some sort of sense for the
first user to have certain privileges granted to them for
administrating the DE. After all, you wouldn't want to run X as
root, let alone a whole DE. My own working practice is a root
shell inside an xterm (and my tools aren't gui), but that doesn't
fit with how a DE runs things. I assume your problem lies in a
helper, which picks up privileges, somewhere between the icon
(or menu choice) and the synaptic binary itself. How it might have
got changed, I don't know.

Cheers,
David.

Re: upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

[Sven Hartge]

Marc Auslander  wrote:
> Dominique Dumont  writes:
>> On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:01:18 CET Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>> short question about /lib/systemd/system: AFAICS the config
>>> files here are supposed to be overridden by local config files
>>> in /etc/systemd/system, using the same path, as described in
>>> systemd.unit(5)
>>> 
>>> How can I make sure that there is a conflict dialog at upgrade
>>> time, if I have to modify the unit file shipped with my package?

>> I don't understand why a change in /lib/systemd/system should trigger a 
>> conflict warning.
>>
>> Either you have changed a value not modified by end user and there's no 
>> conflict

> IIRC in the "old" world, if you had a modified version of a config
> file and an update modified the original released version, you got a
> warning and a dialog which let you decide how to proceed.

> The question is whether or not you will get such a warning using the
> described method of modifying a config file by publishing a new
> version in the override directory.

If you copied the *whole* unit from /lib/systemd/system/foobar.service
to /etc/systemd/system/foobar.service, then you have been using the
override system the wrong way.

The correct (and documented) way is to

1) create /etc/systemd/system/foobar.service.d/
2) put your overrides and *only* your overrides into
   /etc/systemd/system/foobar.service.d/somename.conf

Or, starting with Stretch, you can just do "systemctl edit
foobar.service" and it will do the right thing for you.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: No sound

[Hans]

Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017, 15:27:46 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
Hi Rodolfo, 

I am not sure, but it looks like you need pulseaudio for sound. Did you 
install the pulseaudio package?

Pulseaudio is the next generation audiodriver and uses alsa as well.

Hope it helps. Good luck!

Hans
> Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:
> 
>  alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui
> gstreamer1.0-alsa libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev
> libasound2-plugins libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio
> 
> , then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:
> 
> $ mplayer *
> MPlayer 1.3.0 (Debian), built with gcc-6.2.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team
> do_connect: could not connect to socket
> connect: No such file or directory
> Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote
> control.
> 
> Playing 21-apr-2011.flv.
> libavformat version 57.56.101 (external)
> Mismatching header version 57.56.100
> libavformat file format detected.
> [mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f4b77ce5d00]Protocol name not provided, cannot
> determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access
> patterns cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol [lavf]
> stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
> [lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und
> VIDEO:  [H264]  400x300  24bpp  30.000 fps  512.0 kbps (62.5 kbyte/s)
> ==
> Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
> libavcodec version 57.64.101 (external)
> Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
> ==
> Clip info:
>  major_brand: FACE
>  minor_version: 1337
>  compatible_brands: isomavc1FACE
>  creation_time: 2011-04-21T22:58:18.00Z
> Load subtitles in ./
> ==
> Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
> AUDIO: 22050 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 36.8 kbit/5.21% (ratio: 4596->88200)
> Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
> ==
> AO: [pulse] Init failed: Connection refused
> Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse'
> [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p'
> failed (-2): No such file or directory [AO_ALSA] alsa-lib:
> pcm_dmix.c:1052:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave [AO_ALSA] Playback
> open error: No such file or directory
> Failed to initialize audio driver 'alsa'
> [AO SDL] Samplerate: 22050Hz Channels: Mono Format floatle
> [AO SDL] using aalib audio driver.
> [AO SDL] Unsupported audio format: 0x1d.
> [AO SDL] Unable to open audio: No available audio device
> Failed to initialize audio driver 'sdl:aalib'
> Could not open/initialize audio device -> no sound.
> Audio: no sound
> Starting playback...
> Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
> VO: [vdpau] 400x300 => 400x300 Planar YV12
> V:   2.7   0/  0  9%  3%  0.0% 0 0
> 
> Exiting... (Quit)
> 
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Rodolfo

Cepstral swift on Debian and on Arch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

Okay, I think we're closing in on it. 

The Cepstral swift package runs fine on archlinux, where using ldd -r
on the executable lists eleven libraries, all but one of which is
present on Debian where the Cepstral package fails. On Debian, ldd -r
on the executable says simply "not a dynamically linked executable."

The item found on Arch but missing on Debian is:

/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7fd2b1fd1000)

Any idea where to go from here? 

Chuck



-- 
A bicycle can't stand alone; it's just two tired.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 57°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (5% of Full)

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents (RESOLT)

[Eduard Selma]

El 28/02/17 a les 17:48, Robert Marsellés ha escrit:


En canvi, el mateix document PDF de LaTeX (PDF v1.5, amb fonts Latin
Modern incrustades) usant Internet Explorer des de una màquina virtual
amb Win7 oli en un llum. Trist però cert. Què hi farem!


- Això què vol dir? que Firefox/Iceweasel no va bé? (i potser 
Chrome/Chromium, Opera o potser Dillo sobre GNU/Linux van bé? Que només 
va bé Internet Exploter? O que cal usar Windows, encara que sigui sigui 
amb FF?


Aniria bé saber-ho, per si ens hi hem de trobar en un futur.

Salut i bits (lliures, si pot ser).

Eduard Selma.

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents (RESOLT)

[Josep Lladonosa]

2017-02-28 17:48 GMT+01:00 Robert Marsellés :

> Hola,
>
> On 28/02/17 14:36, Ernest Adrogué wrote:
> > 2017-02-27, 20:19 (+0100); Robert Marsellés escriu:
> >> Podria ser culpa del navegador? O de la pàgina web (depèn de com és
> >> miri). És a dir, que quan la pàgina web ha de treballar amb un navegador
> >> que no és pel que han fet el disseny de la pàgina doni problemes?
> >
> > No crec.  He fet tràmits a la web de Correus amb el navegador
> > Iceweasel/Firefox sense problemes.
>
> Actualitzo la informació perquè en quedi constància si mai algú està
> interessat en el tema. Confirmo que el problema estava al navegador.
>
> Com l'Ernest, faig servir Iceweasel/Firefox i ja us he explicat els
> problemes. N'he tingut a altres llocs abans. Això és el que em va fer
> pensar-hi.
>

M'he trobat amb situacions similars amb el mateix navegador i totes eren
pel xifratge. Potser era això.





>
> En canvi, el mateix document PDF de LaTeX (PDF v1.5, amb fonts Latin
> Modern incrustades) usant Internet Explorer des de una màquina virtual
> amb Win7 oli en un llum. Trist però cert. Què hi farem!
>
> Gràcies a tots novament per la pluja d'idees. Salut.
>
> robert
>
>


-- 
--
Salutacions...Josep
--

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:06:13PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Am 28.02.2017 um 13:00 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> >> Am 28.02.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> >>> Hi everyone, 
> >>>
> >>> I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> >>> Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> >>>
> >>> /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> >>> error
> >>>
> >>> My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
> >>> Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
> >>> the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
> >>>
> >>> Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
> >>> on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie. 
> >>>
> >>> Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
> >>>
> >>> Chuck
> >>
> >> Can you run & post the output of
> >>   ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> >>   uname -a
> >> for both Arch and Debian?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> /peter
> >>
> > 
> > Here it is:
> > 
> > not a dynamic executable
> > 
> > So, I did an ls -l and it said,
> > 
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 94946 Feb 28 06:41 /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > 
> > So it's not a permission issue.
> > 
> > Chuck
> 
> Maybe not an permission issue. But I assume that somewhere down the line
> there's a missing library on Debian, that's present on Arch. Which is
> why I'd like to see the output for both.

Peter, The lengthy output of ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin I sent earlier 
suddenly reduced to only 11 lines with no errors or warnings when I placed 
/opt/swift/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf and ran ldconfig. Sorry I didn't think of 
that sooner. The Debian installation already had that set, and still says not a 
dynamically linked executable.

> 
> But it's strange that file says it's an dynamically linked executable,
> but ldd disputes that.
> 
> Regards
> /peter
> 




-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 57°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (5% of Full)

Re: upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

[Marc Auslander]

Dominique Dumont  writes:

> On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:01:18 CET Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> short question about /lib/systemd/system: AFAICS the config
>> files here are supposed to be overridden by local config files
>> in /etc/systemd/system, using the same path, as described in
>> systemd.unit(5)
>> 
>> How can I make sure that there is a conflict dialog at upgrade
>> time, if I have to modify the unit file shipped with my package?
>
> I don't understand why a change in /lib/systemd/system should trigger a 
> conflict warning.
>
> Either you have changed a value not modified by end user and there's no 
> conflict
>
> Or you change a value overridden by user, then your change is not taken into 
> account by systemd: conflict is solved by giving priority to user value.
>
> Did I miss something ?
>
> All the best
> -- 
>  https://github.com/dod38fr/   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
> http://ddumont.wordpress.com/  -o-   irc: dod at irc.debian.org

IIRC in the "old" world, if you had a modified version of a config
file and an update modified the original released version, you got
a warning and a dialog which let you decide how to proceed.

The question is whether or not you will get such a warning using the
described method of modifying a config file by publishing a new
version in the override directory.

No sound

[Rodolfo Medina]

Please help with no sound issue.  I installed the following packages:

 alsa-oss alsa-tools alsa-tools-gui alsa-utils alsamixergui gstreamer1.0-alsa
 libalsaplayer0 libasound2 libasound2-data libasound2-dev libasound2-plugins
 libsox-fmt-alsa python-alsaaudio

, then ran alsamixer and unmuted all volumes, but still:

$ mplayer *
MPlayer 1.3.0 (Debian), built with gcc-6.2.1 (C) 2000-2016 MPlayer Team
do_connect: could not connect to socket
connect: No such file or directory
Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control.

Playing 21-apr-2011.flv.
libavformat version 57.56.101 (external)
Mismatching header version 57.56.100
libavformat file format detected.
[mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f4b77ce5d00]Protocol name not provided, cannot 
determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access patterns 
cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol
[lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
[lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und
VIDEO:  [H264]  400x300  24bpp  30.000 fps  512.0 kbps (62.5 kbyte/s)
==
Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
libavcodec version 57.64.101 (external)
Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
==
Clip info:
 major_brand: FACE
 minor_version: 1337
 compatible_brands: isomavc1FACE
 creation_time: 2011-04-21T22:58:18.00Z
Load subtitles in ./
==
Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders
AUDIO: 22050 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 36.8 kbit/5.21% (ratio: 4596->88200)
Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
==
AO: [pulse] Init failed: Connection refused
Failed to initialize audio driver 'pulse'
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_hw.c:1602:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p' 
failed (-2): No such file or directory
[AO_ALSA] alsa-lib: pcm_dmix.c:1052:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
[AO_ALSA] Playback open error: No such file or directory
Failed to initialize audio driver 'alsa'
[AO SDL] Samplerate: 22050Hz Channels: Mono Format floatle
[AO SDL] using aalib audio driver.
[AO SDL] Unsupported audio format: 0x1d.
[AO SDL] Unable to open audio: No available audio device
Failed to initialize audio driver 'sdl:aalib'
Could not open/initialize audio device -> no sound.
Audio: no sound
Starting playback...
Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
VO: [vdpau] 400x300 => 400x300 Planar YV12 
V:   2.7   0/  0  9%  3%  0.0% 0 0 

Exiting... (Quit)


Thanks for any help,

Rodolfo

Re: `No candidate version found for alsa-base'

[Elimar Riesebieter]

* Rodolfo Medina  [2017-02-28 13:24 +]:

> Hi.
> 
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
> 
>  No candidate version found for alsa-base

alsa-base has been removed from distribution [0]. It's only purpose was
to clean old conffiles.

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852455

Elimar
-- 
.~.
/V\   L   I   N   U   X
   /( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
   ^^-^^

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 03:06:13PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Am 28.02.2017 um 13:00 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> >> Am 28.02.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> >>> Hi everyone, 
> >>>
> >>> I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> >>> Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> >>>
> >>> /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> >>> error
> >>>
> >>> My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
> >>> Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
> >>> the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
> >>>
> >>> Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
> >>> on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie. 
> >>>
> >>> Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
> >>>
> >>> Chuck
> >>
> >> Can you run & post the output of
> >>   ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> >>   uname -a
> >> for both Arch and Debian?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> /peter
> >>
> > 
> > Here it is:
> > 
> > not a dynamic executable
> > 
> > So, I did an ls -l and it said,
> > 
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 94946 Feb 28 06:41 /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > 
> > So it's not a permission issue.
> > 
> > Chuck
> 
> Maybe not an permission issue. But I assume that somewhere down the line
> there's a missing library on Debian, that's present on Arch. Which is
> why I'd like to see the output for both.

Okay, the one that works gives 101 lines of output, as follows:

linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffda4952000)
libswift.so.6 => not found
libm.so.6 => /usr/lib/libm.so.6 (0x7f4dd78bc000)
libpthread.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f4dd769f000)
libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x7f4dd749b000)
libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x7f4dd7283000)
librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x7f4dd707b000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f4dd6cf3000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so.6 (0x7f4dd6955000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f4dd7bc)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x7f4dd673e000)
undefined symbol: swift_param_descriptors   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: get_param_string  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_write_utterance_files  
(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_set_voice_by_name  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_speak_adl_nag  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_platformName  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_event_get_times (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: LM_set_batch_mode (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_strcaseeq (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_engine_close(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_string_append (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_set_diag_types(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_event_get_error (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_license_check_port_key  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_close  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_safe_realloc  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_speak_text (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_show_diag_ffl (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_streq (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_strerror(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: string_val(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: val_car   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: feat_string   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_find_first_voice   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_voice_load_lexicon  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_safe_alloc(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_set_voice_from_dir (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_params_new  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_params_set_val  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_event_type_get_name (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: LM_license_check_batchRewrite (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: LM_license_get_canRegPorts(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_port_load_sfx   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_license_check_voice_key (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_val_string  (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: LM_license_check_voice(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: val_string(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_string_crop   (/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: swift_params_set_param(/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin)
undefined symbol: cst_sleep 

CheckPoint/Fortinet/Avaya Users

[amber . benson]

Hi,



Would you be interested in *CheckPoint/Fortinet/Avaya Users* List for your
sales and marketing campaigns?



We also have other technology users like:

Mitel

Brocade

Fortinet

IBM

Symantec

Netgear

Sophos

Polycom

Trend Micro

Oracle

McAfee

Juniper Security

FireEye

Imperva

WatchGuard

Mercury Interactive

BigFix

CheckPoint



*Information Fields*: Name, Title, Email, Phone Number, Company name, Web
Address, Physical Address, SIC Code and Industry.

Please drop us a quick email with your thoughts when you get the chance and
I can send you samples on the same for you to test our quality.



Thanks,
*Amber Benson*
Data Specialist Consultant



Disclaimer: If you have received this electronic mail by error or if you're
not the right person to speak with in this regard, I'd appreciate if you
would be so kind as to forward this email to the right person or the person
in charge.



To opt out kindly reply back with ‘leave out’

Re: upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

[Dominique Dumont]

On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:01:18 CET Harald Dunkel wrote:
> short question about /lib/systemd/system: AFAICS the config
> files here are supposed to be overridden by local config files
> in /etc/systemd/system, using the same path, as described in
> systemd.unit(5)
> 
> How can I make sure that there is a conflict dialog at upgrade
> time, if I have to modify the unit file shipped with my package?

I don't understand why a change in /lib/systemd/system should trigger a 
conflict warning.

Either you have changed a value not modified by end user and there's no conflict

Or you change a value overridden by user, then your change is not taken into 
account by systemd: conflict is solved by giving priority to user value.

Did I miss something ?

All the best
-- 
 https://github.com/dod38fr/   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/  -o-   irc: dod at irc.debian.org

Re: Problemas con el Package exim4

[Miguel Matos]

2017-02-28 0:53 GMT-04:00 Yair De la cruz :
> Buenas Noches Comunidad
> Desde hace ya unas semanas me esta saliendo este error cada vez que hago
> apt-get upgrade
>
> root@debian:/home/elisur/Downloads# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
>   iceweasel
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Setting up exim4-daemon-light (4.84.2-2+deb8u3) ...
> Job for exim4.service failed. See 'systemctl status exim4.service' and
> 'journalctl -xn' for details.
> invoke-rc.d: initscript exim4, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing package exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4:
>  exim4 depends on exim4-daemon-light | exim4-daemon-heavy |
> exim4-daemon-custom; however:
>   Package exim4-daemon-light is not configured yet.
>   Package exim4-daemon-heavy is not installed.
>   Package exim4-daemon-custom is not installed.
>
> dpkg: error processing package exim4 (--configure):
>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  exim4-daemon-light
>  exim4
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> root@debian:/home/elisur/Downloads# apt-get -f install
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Setting up exim4-daemon-light (4.84.2-2+deb8u3) ...
> Job for exim4.service failed. See 'systemctl status exim4.service' and
> 'journalctl -xn' for details.
> invoke-rc.d: initscript exim4, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing package exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4:
>  exim4 depends on exim4-daemon-light | exim4-daemon-heavy |
> exim4-daemon-custom; however:
>   Package exim4-daemon-light is not configured yet.
>   Package exim4-daemon-heavy is not installed.
>   Package exim4-daemon-custom is not installed.
>
> dpkg: error processing package exim4 (--configure):
>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  exim4-daemon-light
>  exim4
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> Que estara pasando alli??? Alguien tendra laguna idea al respecto???
>

No nos aportas más datos, así que haré la idea de que tienes Debian
Stable. El problema se da a causa de una instalación errada, en este
caso, del paquete exim4. Debido a que sus dependencias no se
instalaron, el paquete está incompleto, y por ello salen estos
errores. Sugiero usar este comando como root:
apt-get remove --purge exim4 exim4-daemon-light, y después (sólo si
hubo éxito al eliminarlo): apt-get autoclean.
Nota al margen: el metapaquete exim4 es para poder configurar un
servidor de correo. Puedes ingresar en synaptic por Archivo->Histórico
para que revises en las últimas instalaciones y saber cuándo
instalaste dicho paquete, capaz fue cuando configurastes algo que
necesitaba dicho paquete y no te enterastes. Y a menos que montes un
servidor de correo, no hace falta.

-- 

Ayuda para hacer preguntas inteligentes: http://is.gd/NJIwRz

Re: Problemas con el Package exim4

[Gonzalo Rivero]

El mar, 28-02-2017 a las 00:53 -0400, Yair De la cruz escribió:
> Buenas Noches Comunidad
> Desde hace ya unas semanas me esta saliendo este error cada vez que
> hago apt-get upgrade 
> 
> root@debian:/home/elisur/Downloads# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree       
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
>   iceweasel
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Setting up exim4-daemon-light (4.84.2-2+deb8u3) ...
> Job for exim4.service failed. See 'systemctl status exim4.service'
> and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
> invoke-rc.d: initscript exim4, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing package exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
> status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4:
>  exim4 depends on exim4-daemon-light | exim4-daemon-heavy | exim4-
> daemon-custom; however:
>   Package exim4-daemon-light is not configured yet.
>   Package exim4-daemon-heavy is not installed.
>   Package exim4-daemon-custom is not installed.
> 
> dpkg: error processing package exim4 (--configure):
>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  exim4-daemon-light
>  exim4
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> root@debian:/home/elisur/Downloads# apt-get -f install
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree       
> Reading state information... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Setting up exim4-daemon-light (4.84.2-2+deb8u3) ...
> Job for exim4.service failed. See 'systemctl status exim4.service'
> and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
> invoke-rc.d: initscript exim4, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing package exim4-daemon-light (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
> status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of exim4:
>  exim4 depends on exim4-daemon-light | exim4-daemon-heavy | exim4-
> daemon-custom; however:
>   Package exim4-daemon-light is not configured yet.
>   Package exim4-daemon-heavy is not installed.
>   Package exim4-daemon-custom is not installed.
> 
> dpkg: error processing package exim4 (--configure):
>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  exim4-daemon-light
>  exim4
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> Que estara pasando alli??? Alguien tendra laguna idea al respecto??? 
> 

probablemente ejecutar
 systemctl status exim4.service
y
 journalctl -xn
te den alguna pista de lo que está fallando

Re: `No candidate version found for alsa-base'

[Rodolfo Medina]

Rodolfo Medina  writes:

> Shin Ice  writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>>> Hi.
>>> 
>>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>>> 
>>>  No candidate version found for alsa-base

Also:

 No candidate version found for gstreamer0.10-alsa

I saw that gstreamer0.10-alsa is a debport package, so I added

deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports unstable main
deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports unreleased main
deb http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports experimental main

to sources.list but still that error message...

Thanks,

Rodolfo

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Peter Ludikovsky]

Am 28.02.2017 um 13:00 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
>> Am 28.02.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
>>> Hi everyone, 
>>>
>>> I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
>>> Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
>>>
>>> /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
>>> error
>>>
>>> My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
>>> Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
>>> the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
>>>
>>> Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
>>> on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie. 
>>>
>>> Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>
>> Can you run & post the output of
>>   ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
>>   uname -a
>> for both Arch and Debian?
>>
>> Regards
>> /peter
>>
> 
> Here it is:
> 
> not a dynamic executable
> 
> So, I did an ls -l and it said,
> 
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 94946 Feb 28 06:41 /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> 
> So it's not a permission issue.
> 
> Chuck

Maybe not an permission issue. But I assume that somewhere down the line
there's a missing library on Debian, that's present on Arch. Which is
why I'd like to see the output for both.

But it's strange that file says it's an dynamically linked executable,
but ldd disputes that.

Regards
/peter



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents

[Ernest Adrogué]

2017-02-27, 20:19 (+0100); Robert Marsellés escriu:
> Podria ser culpa del navegador? O de la pàgina web (depèn de com és
> miri). És a dir, que quan la pàgina web ha de treballar amb un navegador
> que no és pel que han fet el disseny de la pàgina doni problemes?

No crec.  He fet tràmits a la web de Correus amb el navegador
Iceweasel/Firefox sense problemes.  Un vegada el pagament va fallar i
vaig haver de pagar un altre cop perquè em deixés imprimir un
certificat.  Al final em van cobrar 2 cops i vaig haver de reclamar.  A
part d'aquest cas, normalment m'ha funcionat.

Si com diu el Javier el fitxer ha de ser un PDF/A, pots utilitzar
aquesta web per veure concretament on és el problema:

http://demo.verapdf.org/

Re: `No candidate version found for alsa-base'

[Rodolfo Medina]

Shin Ice  writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>> Hi.
>> 
>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>> 
>>  No candidate version found for alsa-base
>> 
>
> interesting, alsa-base is availlable on sid on version 1.0.27+1.
> how are you trying to install it?

 # aptitude install alsa-base
 

> did you made an update before?

Yes, I did `# aptitude update' just a few seconds before...

Rodolfo

Re: Correos.es i fonts incrustades en documents

[Ernest Adrogué]

2017-02-27, 21:33 (+0100); Narcis Garcia escriu:
> Jo havia intentat fer PDFs a partir de LaTeX i sempre m'he topat amb
> problemes de format i compatibilitat dels fitxers finals, per exemple
> amb impressores especialitzades.

Deus tenir algun problema amb els drivers de les impressores.  LaTeX és
un software molt utilitzat a la indústria editorial, particularment en
publicacions científiques, i mai a la vida he sentit ningú que digui que
genera PDFs incompatibles.

Re: `No candidate version found for alsa-base'

[Shin Ice]

Hi,

Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
> Hi.
> 
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
> 
>  No candidate version found for alsa-base
> 

interesting, alsa-base is availlable on sid on version 1.0.27+1.
how are you trying to install it? did you made an update before?


-- 
I'm just a placeholder for a really awesome signature...
...that is still missing *sob*

Recap: Cepstral Swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

Here is a summary of what we now know:

The only package in play now is
Cepstral_William_x86-64-linux_6.2.3.873.tar.gz


It was downloaded with wget from a link given to me from support at
cepstral.com. 

The package was downloaded to Debian Stretch on a dual boot system
where Arch Linux is the secondary OS. It was installed on Debian, and
after problems were discovered, was moved to Arch and installed there,
where it ran without error.

The output of file for the swift.bin executable was identical on b oth
systems, and was:

 ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.9,
not stripped, with debug_info

I obtained a checksum on each swift.bin, and those too were identical,
each one was this:

bf67fecfbae44e68f2c6d669fbb65512e197db87  /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin

By "identical" I mean I saved each output to a file and used diff to
compare them, no output was produced.

The hardware is a Dell Optiplex 780 with plenty of ram and CPU power,
Debian is using kernel 4.9.0, and Arch is using 4.9.11.  Swift executes
without error on Arch, but on Debian where I want to use it, it reports
a bad format for swift.bin, which ldd also describes an not an
executable ffile.

Sorry about  earlier top-posts, I'm new to the list and have bad
habits.

Chuck





-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 43°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (5% of Full)

`No candidate version found for alsa-base'

[Rodolfo Medina]

Hi.

I want to install alsa-base but get:

 No candidate version found for alsa-base

, although the pacakage seems to exist.  My sources.list:

# stable
#deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main
#deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main

# unstable
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main

# non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free

# debports:
deb http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian unstable main

Thanks for any help,

Rodolfo

upgraded config files in /lib/systemd/system

[Harald Dunkel]

Hi folks,

short question about /lib/systemd/system: AFAICS the config
files here are supposed to be overridden by local config files
in /etc/systemd/system, using the same path, as described in
systemd.unit(5)

How can I make sure that there is a conflict dialog at upgrade
time, if I have to modify the unit file shipped with my package?


Regards
Harri

Re: problème débogage systemd à l'extinction système

[Alexandre Hoïde]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:37:10AM +0100, maderios wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 09:35 PM, Alexandre Hoïde wrote:
> >   Malheureusement, sur ma Sid, le délai à l'extinction résiste depuis de
> > longs mois, avec ses nombreuses versions du noyau, de systemd et de tout
> > ce qui va avec… y compris le noyau 4.9.0-1 (actuellement sur Stretch et
> > 4.9.0-2 sur Sid).
> 
> Tu pourrais peut-être envoyer un rapport de bug.

  Mais, j'envisage très sérieusement cette option ! J'aimerais tout de
même creuser un peu avant d'envoyer… ne serait-ce que pour savoir à quel
paquet il faudrait attribuer le rapport. Et puis, la primo-installation
de ma Sid remontant à plusieurs années, il est fort probable que j'aie
négligé moult messages de changelogs… encore une fois, sur une Stretch
fraîchement installée (avec beaucoup moins de logiciels installés), le
problème ne se pose pas.
  C'est une occasion de me familiariser un peu plus avec systemd -- en
dépit de mon aversion. ^^

-- 
 ___  _
| $ post_tenebras ↲ | waouh!  ?! | $ per_systemd ↲ |
| GNU\ /|\   /   | TENEBRAS :  |
|  -- * --  | o   | #)&&*+^'.|;>%9- |
| $ who ↲/ \|_-- ~_||| =!¨!$£{]]_:`¢_´ |
| Alexandre Hoïde   |  _/| |   / \   | … … … ...---... |
 ---  -

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:32:39PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:52:56AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > My comment below:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:30:25PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:04:24AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:59:01AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > > > On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > > > > Hi everyone, 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my 
> > > > > > Debian
> > > > > > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec 
> > > > > > format
> > > > > > error
> > > > > Show us the output of
> > > > > file /usr/local/bin/swift
> > > > > file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > > > > 
> > > > > (Especially the latter.)
> > > 
> > > [took the liberty to fix top-post]
> > > 
> > > > Here is what file says:
> > > > 
> > > > /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> > > > (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> > > > for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
> > > 
> > > How did this swift.bin arrive to your disk? (I mean: download, unpack,
> > > etc.)
> > > 
> > > Suspecting some corruption along the way (e.g. line-end transformation
> > > by text mode in ftp, some (un)packer or similar).
> > 
> > The Cepstral was obtained from a direct link to www.cepstral.com which
> > support gave me, via wget. There was an earlier package that was in
> > fact first downloaded to a Windows machine and then moved to Debian,
> > but while Windows unzipped it without changing its name, it eventually
> > produced the error I am now getting with the directly downloaded
> > package. BTW, I failed to show the output of file for the symlink,
> > which looks like this:
> > 
> > /usr/local/bin/swift: symbolic link to /opt/swift/bin/swift
> > 
> > I notice that it does not point to swift.bin, but to a directory
> > containing it. 
> 
> Is /opt/swift/bin/swift really a directory? I'd expect it to be
> just a shell script invoking swift.bin (after possibly setting
> up some environment).

Tomas,
You are right. Sorry I jumped to that conclusion. The script is only 12
lines, it sets up some defaults and finally attempts to exec swift.bin


> 
> > Either way, it runs under Arch on this box, but not under Debian.
> 
> Hmmm. "it" meaning the very same file, i.e. Arch and Debian share a
> file system? Or a copy of the file?
> 
> If the last is the case, could you compare their checksums, i.e.
> 
>   sha1sum /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
Ok, will do, but it might be a few hours. RL is intruding here.

Thanks much.


> 
> Are they equal?
> 
> (No need to do it if the first is the case, of course).
> 
> Just a shot in the dark: quoting a previous mail from you
> 
> > Here is what file says:
> >
> > /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> > (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> > for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
> 
> Does /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 exist on your Debian box? (would be
> strange if not, but hey...)
> 
> regards
> -- tomás
> 

-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 43°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full)

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:52:56AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> My comment below:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:30:25PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:04:24AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:59:01AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > > On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > > > Hi everyone, 
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> > > > > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> > > > >
> > > > > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> > > > > error
> > > > Show us the output of
> > > > file /usr/local/bin/swift
> > > > file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > > > 
> > > > (Especially the latter.)
> > 
> > [took the liberty to fix top-post]
> > 
> > > Here is what file says:
> > > 
> > > /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> > > (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> > > for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
> > 
> > How did this swift.bin arrive to your disk? (I mean: download, unpack,
> > etc.)
> > 
> > Suspecting some corruption along the way (e.g. line-end transformation
> > by text mode in ftp, some (un)packer or similar).
> 
> The Cepstral was obtained from a direct link to www.cepstral.com which
> support gave me, via wget. There was an earlier package that was in
> fact first downloaded to a Windows machine and then moved to Debian,
> but while Windows unzipped it without changing its name, it eventually
> produced the error I am now getting with the directly downloaded
> package. BTW, I failed to show the output of file for the symlink,
> which looks like this:
> 
> /usr/local/bin/swift: symbolic link to /opt/swift/bin/swift
> 
> I notice that it does not point to swift.bin, but to a directory
> containing it. 

Is /opt/swift/bin/swift really a directory? I'd expect it to be
just a shell script invoking swift.bin (after possibly setting
up some environment).

> Either way, it runs under Arch on this box, but not under Debian.

Hmmm. "it" meaning the very same file, i.e. Arch and Debian share a
file system? Or a copy of the file?

If the last is the case, could you compare their checksums, i.e.

  sha1sum /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin

Are they equal?

(No need to do it if the first is the case, of course).

Just a shot in the dark: quoting a previous mail from you

> Here is what file says:
>
> /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped

Does /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 exist on your Debian box? (would be
strange if not, but hey...)

regards
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli1becACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYpQwCfb6O4tt1f3V0O1KSI2Bo17n4o
t4AAn05+c0rKtW5TA1E5Gv87tvLgn2ax
=41hy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Security hole in LXDE?

[GiaThnYgeia]

As a user and as I understand it you should not be able to make
system-wide changes and many packages affect other parts of the system.
A user can install and run any package that does not affect the system,
as a stand alone.  The system is a whole must be maintained by the
sysadmin for all users.  That is my simplistic understanding.
Unless it is specifically configured otherwise I don't see why these
assumptions would be wrong.  Imagine if I like MATE and the other user
likes X11 and I delete x11 and install MATE, or I install a package that
has dependency conflicts and replaces what is essential for the other
users' packages.

Live systems allow you to install whatever you like as they assume you
are the root or sysadmin.

At least that is how I understand security policy for this system.

David Wright:
> On Mon 27 Feb 2017 at 11:13:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>> testingAmd64LXDE
>>
>> I have never, not once, been able to run synaptic in any similar system
>> without a root or a sudo password.  Not to execute a command, just to
>> get the gui up you need a password.
> 
> Why would that be? You should be able to do so. There's a popup
> window that says this:
> 
>   Starting "Synaptic Package Manager" without administrative privileges
> 
>   You will not be able to apply any changes, but you can still export
>   the marked changes or create a download script for them.
> 
> I can select packages, look at their properties, dependencies,
> installed files, get changelogs etc. I can edit some of the
> preferences. I can see the immediate effects of that in files
> like ~/.synaptic/synaptic.conf when I click OK. I can select
> packages for installation and it will write a little script
> for me:
> 
>  #!/bin/sh
>  wget -c
>  
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/i/ibm-3270/3270-common_3.3.14ga11-1_i386.deb
> 
> So it suggests that the OP has set something in their system
> to cause the behaviour they observe, both the popup and the
> fact that a user's password is sufficient for installing software.
> 
> I can run (the similar program) aptitude likewise. The main differences
> with synaptic are that aptitude is in the user's normal PATH (whereas
> synaptic is in /usr/sbin); when you try to install, it asks you to
> consider becoming root from the Actions menu; and if you persist, it
> gives you the option to become root in a dialog box, and you can then
> type the root password.
> 
>> I don't know whether creating a user with 100% admin privileges will
>> still require a pass or not, I suspect it would still.  As if you add a
>> user in the sudo group it is the user's pass that is asked.  So
>> something is wrong on your specific installation.
>>
>> Hans:
>>> Am Montag, 27. Februar 2017, 21:00:15 CET schrieb Davor Balder:
 Hi Hans,

 Question 1 which one: stable, testing or unstable?
>>>
>>> testing/amd64

 Generally (to aid in your investigation):

>>> I did, but found nothing unusual. 
>>>
>>> If no one can confirm this, it is a problem on my system!
> 
> Cheers,
> David.
> 

-- 
 "The most violent element in society is ignorance" rEG

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Am 28.02.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> > Hi everyone, 
> > 
> > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> > 
> > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> > error
> > 
> > My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
> > Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
> > the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
> > 
> > Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
> > on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie. 
> > 
> > Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
> > 
> > Chuck
> 
> Can you run & post the output of
>   ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
>   uname -a
> for both Arch and Debian?
> 
> Regards
> /peter
> 

Here it is:

not a dynamic executable

So, I did an ls -l and it said,

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 94946 Feb 28 06:41 /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin

So it's not a permission issue.

Chuck





-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 43°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full)

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

My comment below:


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:30:25PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:04:24AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:59:01AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone, 
> > > >
> > > > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> > > > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> > > >
> > > > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> > > > error
> > > Show us the output of
> > > file /usr/local/bin/swift
> > > file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > > 
> > > (Especially the latter.)
> 
> [took the liberty to fix top-post]
> 
> > Here is what file says:
> > 
> > /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> > (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> > for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
> 
> How did this swift.bin arrive to your disk? (I mean: download, unpack,
> etc.)
> 
> Suspecting some corruption along the way (e.g. line-end transformation
> by text mode in ftp, some (un)packer or similar).

The Cepstral was obtained from a direct link to www.cepstral.com which
support gave me, via wget. There was an earlier package that was in
fact first downloaded to a Windows machine and then moved to Debian,
but while Windows unzipped it without changing its name, it eventually
produced the error I am now getting with the directly downloaded
package. BTW, I failed to show the output of file for the symlink,
which looks like this:

/usr/local/bin/swift: symbolic link to /opt/swift/bin/swift

I notice that it does not point to swift.bin, but to a directory
containing it. 

Either way, it runs under Arch on this box, but not under Debian.


> 
> Regards
> -- tomás
> 

-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 43°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full)

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Peter Ludikovsky]

Am 28.02.2017 um 01:03 schrieb Chuck Hallenbeck:
> Hi everyone, 
> 
> I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> 
> /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> error
> 
> My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
> Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
> the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
> 
> Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
> on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie. 
> 
> Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
> 
> Chuck

Can you run & post the output of
  ldd -r /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
  uname -a
for both Arch and Debian?

Regards
/peter



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[tomas]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 06:04:24AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:59:01AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > > Hi everyone, 
> > >
> > > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> > > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> > >
> > > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> > > error
> > Show us the output of
> > file /usr/local/bin/swift
> > file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> > 
> > (Especially the latter.)

[took the liberty to fix top-post]

> Here is what file says:
> 
> /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
> (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
> for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped

How did this swift.bin arrive to your disk? (I mean: download, unpack,
etc.)

Suspecting some corruption along the way (e.g. line-end transformation
by text mode in ftp, some (un)packer or similar).

Regards
- -- tomás
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAli1X1EACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYwNgCdFOAmT5QCRvXMPenxGgiaU12q
KnYAnA9TNz8nMdriZ2eezW0dD6lWZS/a
=Tw6u
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

Here is what file says:

/opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2,
for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped

Thanks.


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:59:01AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > Hi everyone, 
> >
> > I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> > Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> > error
> Show us the output of
> file /usr/local/bin/swift
> file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin
> 
> (Especially the latter.)
> 
> 
> -- 
> A watched clock never boils.
> 
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
> edua...@kalinowski.com.br

-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 43°F
   Conditions Mostly Cloudy
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full)

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Eduardo M KALINOWSKI]

On 27-02-2017 21:03, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> Hi everyone, 
>
> I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
> Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
>
> /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
> error
Show us the output of
file /usr/local/bin/swift
file /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin

(Especially the latter.)


-- 
A watched clock never boils.

Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br

Re: Security hole in LXDE?

[Hans]

I am not sure, if I some day allowed the normal user to start synaptic as a 
normal user. Sometimes this option is offered at the first start.

If I have done this (which I was at that moment wiling to do), where do I have 
to look, to make this thing back to normal?

Please note, that I am not using sudoers, but I am sure, I am using either 
kdesu or gksudo. As I am a mostly using KDE, I bet, kdesu is the one, where I 
might have to look for as IMO this one is the thing, that might be responsible 
for the rights.  But where do I have to look then? 

Thanks for any hints.

Best

Hans

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian Stretch

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

No, it's a 64 bit package on a 64 bit machine, and it runs fine under
Arch Linux on the same machine. It only fails under Debian.


On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:28:28AM -0500, Jessica Litwin wrote:
> Is this by chance a 32 bit cepstral package for a 64 bit system that doesn't
> have 32 bit libs installed? 
> On Feb 27, 2017 19:03, "Chuck Hallenbeck"  wrote:
> 
>   Hi everyone,
> 
>   I'm attempting to install a tommercial TTS from Cepstral on my Debian
>   Stretch system, and get the following when running swift:
> 
>   /usr/local/bin/swift: 12: exec: /opt/swift/bin/swift.bin: Exec format
>   error
> 
>   My system dual-boots Debian Stretch and Arch Linux, and the same
>   Cepstral executable, swift, runs without error on Arch, but fails with
>   the above error on Debian, same hardware for both of course.
> 
>   Cepstral support was unable to help, except to say other users run it
>   on Debian, Ubuntu, and even (gasp) Raspberry Pie.
> 
>   Anybody seen this? or have a suggestion? or use it successfully?
> 
>   Chuck
> 
>   --
>   When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
>   Willoughby Ohio
>      Temperature 46°F
>      Conditions Mostly Cloudy
>   The Moon is Waxing Crescent (2% of Full)
> /home/chuck/.elinks//elinks.conf:146: unknown option
> /home/chuck/.elinks//elinks.conf:151: unknown option
> /home/chuck/.elinks//elinks.conf:155: unknown option
> /home/chuck/.elinks//elinks.conf:184: unknown option
> /home/chuck/.elinks//elinks.conf:286: unknown option
> 
-- 
When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall.
Willoughby Ohio
   Temperature 41°F
   Conditions Clear
The Moon is Waxing Crescent (4% of Full)

Re: wifi mystere Resolu

[VieuxGeek DuSystem]

Lol dsl

aptitude why network-manager

   (1)
i   gnome-shell-extensions Dépend gnome-shell (< 3.15)
i A gnome-shellRecommande gnome-control-center
i A gnome-control-center   Recommande network-manager-gnome (>= 0.9.8)
i A network-manager-gnome  Dépend network-manager (>= 0.9.10)

Le 27 février 2017 à 20:54, maderios  a écrit :
> On 02/27/2017 06:41 PM, VieuxGeek DuSystem wrote:
>>
>> Demande à ton system :-)
>>
>> aptitude why network-manager
>
>
> Je n'utilise pas cet horrible NM qui devrait être banni chez Debian.
> C'est le wifi itinérant qui m'a obligé à utiliser wicd, excellent logiciel.
> Auparavant, network.conf édité à la main suffisait pour le fonctionnement
> réseau.
> --
> Maderios
>

Re: problème débogage systemd à l'extinction système

[maderios]

On 02/27/2017 09:35 PM, Alexandre Hoïde wrote:

  Malheureusement, sur ma Sid, le délai à l'extinction résiste depuis de
longs mois, avec ses nombreuses versions du noyau, de systemd et de tout
ce qui va avec… y compris le noyau 4.9.0-1 (actuellement sur Stretch et
4.9.0-2 sur Sid).


Tu pourrais peut-être envoyer un rapport de bug.

--
Maderios