gestion de version de documents

bonjour, je recherche une solution pour gérer les versions de documents sachant que j'ai déjà nextcloud de mis en service ... j'ai fait quelques recherches ezt je n'ai rien trouvé de probant que me conseillez vous ? slt bernard

Re: gestion de version de documents

Salut Bernard, Quels types de documents ? S Le 16-12-2017, à 05:17:28 +0100, Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : bonjour, je recherche une solution pour gérer les versions de documents sachant que j'ai déjà nextcloud de mis en service ... j'ai fait quelques recherches ezt je n'ai rien trouvé

[stretch] RAID + LUKS + PATCHed cryptoroot script to use USB-stick keyfile via passdev with fallback to askpass + silenced systemd

Hi List! I spent sereval hours today figuring out how to do an useful RAID with full-disk encryption for headless servers that will use an usb stick to read the keyfile from and falling back to askpass to enter the pw from console if no stick is found and also managed to silence systemd. This

Re: can't find spamhaus (very possibly OT)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Glenn English wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: > >> I take it you're on ipv6, right; and not perchance dualstack? > > Sorry. Should have mentioned that I'm one of those v4 only folks. My > ISP wants more $$

Re: badblock tres lent

Le 15/12/2017 à 08:09, Stephane Ascoet a écrit : > Bonjour, as-tu bien active les parametres qui vont bien avec hdparm? Au > pire essaye de faire un transfert de donnees depuis cette meme > distribution pour tester le debit. J'ai fait un tranfert de données, mais en lecture seulement, pas en

Re: badblock tres lent

On Friday, 15 December 2017 04:31:16 CET hamster wrote: > J'ai un disque qui me fait des erreurs d'entrées sorties de temps en > temps. J'ai donc lancé badblocks pour voir si des secteurs sont > défectueux, Que dit smartctl ? -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o-

Re: vbox installation

On 12/14/2017 12:53 PM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 14/12/17 13:57, Jack Dangler wrote: All Just letting you know that virtualbox on a linux host stops at 5.0.4 for the moment if you intend to install the extension pack. I installed 5.2 this morning on a new deb box i built and when i

Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd

On Friday 15 December 2017 07:11:04 Christian Seiler wrote: > Am 2017-12-08 21:31, schrieb Gene Heskett: > > On Friday 08 December 2017 14:26:41 Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >> No objection there, and I agree that the release notes should > >> probably have covered the policy changes. That ship has

Re: Suspected nf_conntrack_ftp module failure under Stretch

Ah, damn! I read that months ago and added a note to self in my documentation, but missed it. Thank you very much for your help! Regards. Le vendredi 15 décembre 2017 à 17:16 +0300, Reco a écrit : > Hi. > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 02:46:16PM +0100, David Guyot wrote: > > Hello, there. > >

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

Le 15/12/2017 à 13:18, Steve Keller a écrit : When calling update-grub, it scans all devices for operating systems to put into the GRUB config. It even mounts all block devices to do the scan. I'd like to avoid this and let it scan only a number of configured directories, in my case only

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 13:18:17 +0100, Steve Keller wrote: > When calling update-grub, it scans all devices for operating systems > to put into the GRUB config. It even mounts all block devices to do > the scan. I'd like to avoid this and let it scan only a number of > configured directories, in

Re: does elinks have a show hidden links option?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:16:55PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Actually, > the problem with the assumption here is, I am using a Linux shell, not a > computer running Linux. Actually, the problem is that people have to MAKE assumptions and guesses because you didn't state all the details up

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

On 12/15/2017 06:43 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 15/12/2017 à 13:18, Steve Keller a écrit : When calling update-grub, it scans all devices for operating systems to put into the GRUB config. It even mounts all block devices to do the scan. I'd like to avoid this and let it scan only a number

Suspected nf_conntrack_ftp module failure under Stretch

Hello, there. I'm running a Pure-FTPd service, with passive FTP, and I encountered what seems to be a defect in the nf_conntrack_ftp module: it seems to not recognize the passive FTP data connection as RELATED to the established control connection. IPtables rules for passive FTP connections are

Re: need help on gmplayer

On 2017-12-15, Long Wind wrote: > > many players show last frame when the clip endsbut gmplayer does not > behave this wayis it possible for gmplayer show last frame?i use > wheezy. Thanks! > Ni hao ma long-winded one. I can't find gmplayer in the official Wheezy

Re: Suspected nf_conntrack_ftp module failure under Stretch

Hi. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 02:46:16PM +0100, David Guyot wrote: > Hello, there. > > I'm running a Pure-FTPd service, with passive FTP, and I encountered > what seems to be a defect in the nf_conntrack_ftp module: it seems to > not recognize the passive FTP data connection as RELATED to

Re: badblock tres lent

On Friday, 15 December 2017 10:32:02 CET hamster wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 09:39, Dominique Dumont a écrit : > > Que dit smartctl ? > > Voir en pièce jointe. Désolé, ton disque est à l'agonie: > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! > Drive failure expected in less than 24

Re: Problem to resolv many hosts

Tiago Oliveira de Jesus wrote: > I'm stel trying find... but, if having help is better what is your setup? Do you have local DNS (looks like 127.0.0.1)? On local do you have bind? and how is it configured? I had similar issues and I moved the router dns down the dns list and put the external

update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

When calling update-grub, it scans all devices for operating systems to put into the GRUB config. It even mounts all block devices to do the scan. I'd like to avoid this and let it scan only a number of configured directories, in my case only /boot. Scanning all devices is annoying because *

Re: Re: Problem to resolv many hosts

Hi! Thanks for help! I found problem... is something on my ISP.. This is a little local ISP provider, using radios to share internet, and after changes at few days, this problem happened. They are investigating. [] s

Re: badblock tres lent

Le 15/12/2017 à 09:39, Dominique Dumont a écrit : > Que dit smartctl ? Voir en pièce jointe. smartctl 6.5 2016-01-24 r4214 [i686-linux-4.8.0-36-generic] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-16, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family:

Re: badblock très lent

On Friday 15 December 2017 11:23:17 hamster wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 10:51, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > > Conclusion : disque HS. > Merci beaucoup a tous pour votre aide. Je connais pas assez smartctl, il > va falloir que je je prenne le réflexe de plus l'utiliser a l'avenir. Si badblock très

Re: need help on gmplayer

Could you perhaps be more speciffic on what you understand under the term "last frame"? On 12/15/2017 11:39 AM, Long Wind wrote: > many players show last frame when the clip ends > but gmplayer does not behave this way > is it possible for gmplayer show last frame? > i use wheezy. Thanks!

LVM: how to avoid scanning all devices

When calling LVM commands it seems they all scan all disks for physical volumes.  This is annoying because it spins up all disks that are currently idle and causes long delays to wait for these disks to come up.  Also, I don't understand why LVM commands scan the disks so often since the

Re: badblock tres lent

Le 15/12/2017 à 10:32, hamster a écrit : Le 15/12/2017 à 09:39, Dominique Dumont a écrit : Que dit smartctl ? 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 005Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 2005 (...) 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 001 001 000Old_age Always -

Re: Problem to resolv many hosts

Hello Tiago!!! In Article , Tiago Oliveira de Jesus writes: > All ok, but now: > > *root@bkp2:~# host www.walmart.com.br* > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached (precise)soyeomul@localhost:~$ cat

Re: badblock tres lent

Le 15/12/2017 à 10:51, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : > Conclusion : disque HS. Merci beaucoup a tous pour votre aide. Je connais pas assez smartctl, il va falloir que je je prenne le réflexe de plus l'utiliser a l'avenir.

Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd

Am 2017-12-08 21:31, schrieb Gene Heskett: On Friday 08 December 2017 14:26:41 Jonathan Dowland wrote: No objection there, and I agree that the release notes should probably have covered the policy changes. That ship has now sailed unfortunately. So now, no effort will ever be made to fix the

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

Le 15/12/2017 à 14:42, Richard Owlett a écrit : I have 2 similar problems which wouldn't be solved by disabling os-prober. The common characteristic is wishing to probe all operating systems residing on on a specific physical device. I multi-boot. There may be an OS on any number of mounted

Re: Embarrassing security bug in systemd

Gene writes: > That is probably enough if the user is smart enough to know how to > check, but if I pull a new iso of the install image today, will it be > there for reading before I click install when booted to that live iso > with no network access? If your new ISO is the latest point release

Re: does elinks have a show hidden links option?

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:16:55PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: Actually, the problem is that people have to MAKE assumptions and guesses because you didn't state all the details up front. The question is in the subject line. given how I knew

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 16:31:54 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 14:42, Richard Owlett a écrit : > > > > I have 2 similar problems which wouldn't be solved by disabling os-prober. > > > > The common characteristic is wishing to probe all operating systems > > residing on on a

Re: need help on gmplayer

On 2017-12-15, Long Wind wrote: > > Thank Curt! How do you know I'm Chinese?You must have read my early > mail.but i can't sp eak any French, sorry gmplayer is in mplayer-gui > of wheezy I have tried option -fixed-vo -idleit helps a lot, thanks! > but it works with

can't find spamhaus (very possibly OT)

My SMTP sever (postfix) fails blocking spam when checking with spamhaus: Dec 14 15:07:24 srv postfix/smtpd[26981]: warning: 177.210.252.131.xbl.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=177.210.252.131.xbl.spamhaus.org type=A: Host not found, try

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

Le 15/12/2017 à 17:40, Brian a écrit : On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 16:31:54 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 15/12/2017 à 14:42, Richard Owlett a écrit : I have 2 similar problems which wouldn't be solved by disabling os-prober. The common characteristic is wishing to probe all operating systems

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

Le 15/12/2017 à 18:18, Brian a écrit : On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 17:53:57 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: . ‘GRUB_OS_PROBER_SKIP_LIST’ List of space-separated FS UUIDs of filesystems to be ignored from os-prober output. For efi

Re: Debian jigdo status

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 19:42:16 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Philip Hands on debian-cd detected two broken package files on the > fallback mirror which is mentioned at the end of the gzip-compressed > .jigdo file by: > > [Servers] >

Re: Debian jigdo status

Hi, Philip Hands on debian-cd detected two broken package files on the fallback mirror which is mentioned at the end of the gzip-compressed .jigdo file by: [Servers] Debian=http://us.cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/snapshot/Debian/ --try-last My own download now succeeded with these inputs to

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 17:53:57 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 17:40, Brian a écrit : > > On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 16:31:54 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > > > > > Le 15/12/2017 à 14:42, Richard Owlett a écrit : > > > > > > > > I have 2 similar problems which wouldn't be solved by

foss usb charger

i had an app (free utility) for charging my usb device though i did not often use it. It worked with windows/microsoft on usb 3. * i do not know if it were included/implemented in my motherboard and the soft managed it or if the soft did its job as standalone app.

Re: Debian jigdo status

Hi, Brian wrote: > Thank you for taking the trouble to respond. Thank you for asking questions which i can answer. i wrote: > It is now in "unstable" since 2 days: Correction: It is now in "testing" after only 6 days in "unstable". (Has the quarantine time been reduced ? Normally it is 10 or

Re: Debian jigdo status

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:10:12 +0100 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: Hello Thomas, >Correction: It is now in "testing" after only 6 days in "unstable". >(Has the quarantine time been reduced ? Normally it is 10 or 11 days.) It's usually five days. For some software it's extended to

Re: foss usb charger

> Original Message >Subject: foss usb charger >From: st...@airmail.nz >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > >i had an app (free utility) for charging my usb device though i did not > often use it. It worked with windows/microsoft on usb 3. > - i do not know if it were

Re: Debian jigdo status

Hi, Brian wrote: > Why doesn't giving https://...jigdo work? Or, to be more precise, why > doesn't it work for me? Obviously because you did not yet install the new package which is available since already 8 days. :)) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865864 It is now in

Re: Debian jigdo status

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 21:10:34 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Brian wrote: > > Why doesn't giving https://...jigdo work? Or, to be more precise, why > > doesn't it work for me? > > Obviously because you did not yet install the new package which is > available since already 8 days. :)) >

Re: can't find spamhaus (very possibly OT)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Glenn English wrote: > > Using domain server: > Name: ns3.spamhaus.org > Address: 2001:610:510:188:192:16:188:181#53 > Aliases: > > I asked about this yesterday on the SDLU list and got quite a few > suggestions, a couple of which said they were

Re: can't find spamhaus (very possibly OT)

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: > I take it you're on ipv6, right; and not perchance dualstack? Sorry. Should have mentioned that I'm one of those v4 only folks. My ISP wants more $$ for v6 IPs. (Doesn't make any sense to me either.) I've thought v6/4 might

Re: update-grub: how to avoid scanning all devices

On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 20:33:29 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 15/12/2017 à 18:18, Brian a écrit : > > On Fri 15 Dec 2017 at 17:53:57 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > > > > > . > > > > > > ‘GRUB_OS_PROBER_SKIP_LIST’ > > > > > >