Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Olá! Faz meses que o firefox-esr entrou no lugar do Iceweasel no Testing, agora está indo para as versões estáveis... O Iceweasel existia devido há divergências entre os mantenedores do Debian e a Mozilla, mas depois de 10 anos eles se entenderam e "formaram um time só". -- []'s Junior

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Faz umas semanas que eu li que Debian deixará o Iceweasel em prol do Firefox. Confere? Dessa vez nada a ver com Systemd. Em Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:44:06 +0200 "G.Paulo" escreveu: > Saudações, colegas. > > O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? > > Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11)

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Uso o Debian Jessie e tenho todas as atualizações para o mesmo e nem sinal da raposinha, aqui continua o Iceweasel. Em 16 de junho de 2016 22:44, G.Paulo escreveu: > Saudações, colegas. > > O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? > > Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Depois que adotaram o system-d as coisas ficaram meio estranhas pro Debian Obter o Outlook para Android On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:34 AM -0300, "Yuri Somacal" wrote: Pois é, uso Jessie e aqui também apareceu um pacote chamado firefox-esr. Em 16-06-2016

Re: boot times out after dist-upgrade on Stretch

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 at 03:12, Borden Rhodes wrote: > Thank you for getting back to me, Sven, > > I normally run apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade immediately after > my computer boots. According to the messages log, I turned the > computer on about 5 minutes before

Re: Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Pois é, uso Jessie e aqui também apareceu um pacote chamado firefox-esr. Em 16-06-2016 23:44, G.Paulo escreveu: Saudações, colegas. O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste laptop. Ontem, após fazer um dist-upgrade, notei que 1) no Gnome o Iceweasel foi

Iceweasel substituido por Firefox?

Saudações, colegas. O que aconteceu com o Iceweasel? Tenho Debian Wheezy (7.11) instalado neste laptop. Ontem, após fazer um dist-upgrade, notei que 1) no Gnome o Iceweasel foi substituido pelo Firefox (Firefox ESR 45.2.0), com o logo da raposinha e tudo mais. 2) No excelente Fluxbox, o item

Re: Dual boot win10+debian8

Esse i915 no se refere à parte gráfica? Especificamente a uma da Intel? Em Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:26:19 -0300 Manoel Pedro de Araújo escreveu: > No inicio aparceu error request power-well from i915 > durante a instalação ocorreu tudo nomal, mas não puder mudar a >

Re: linux-image-4.6 não compila nvidia-legacy-304xx-kernel-dkms

Valeu. Já andei encontrando uns avisos. Em Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:28:10 -0300 Gunther Furtado escreveu: > Olá, > > AViso aos navegantes: a última atualização do kernel não foi capaz de > compilar o módulo nvidia-legacy-304xx-kernel-dkms. > > Att.,

Re: How to download over https

Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 16/06/2016 18:18, Dan Purgert a écrit : > 1) >> So, the fact that HTTPS doesn't ~actually~ provide you with any security >> when a "malicious party" has root accesss to the webserver, > > >> AND that it >> adds overhead to the transmission > > Does it really add network

Re: Configurar HP Deskjet 3630

hplip is your friend... - Blackhold http://blackhold.nusepas.com @blackhold_ ~> cal lluitar contra el fort per deixar de ser febles, i contra nosaltres mateixos quan siguem forts (Esquirols) <°((( >< El dia 16 de juny de 2016, 21:01, Daniel ha escrit: > Hola: > > He de

Configurar HP Deskjet 3630

Hola: He de configurar una HP Deskjet 3630 per fer-la funcionar amb Debian 8 Jessie. Algú s'hi ha trobat? Gràcies. -- Daniel Elias Usuari de Linux nº 461584

Re: Functional Difference of dpkg --get-selections vs --get-selections "*"

On 2016-06-16 18:36 +, Bruce Gates wrote: > What is the functional difference between dpkg --get-selections and dpkg > --get-selections "*"? >From the manpage: , | --get-selections [package-name-pattern...] | Get list of package selections, and write it to stdout. |

Re: Partição não inicia em um limite de setor fisico

Não fiz nada para resolver. Olhei partiçoes e constatei que está tudo certo. Em 16 de junho de 2016 16:19, Manoel Pedro de Araújo escreveu: > Perfeitamente, no dual boot com o windows10. > > Em 16 de junho de 2016 16:09, Thiago Zoroastro < > thiago.zoroas...@bol.com.br>

Re: Apt periodic doesn't work

There is only one empty file named unattended-upgrades-shutdown.log in this directory. unattended-upgrades: Initial blacklisted packages: Initial whitelisted packages: Starting unattended upgrades script Allowed origins are: ['origin=Debian,codename=jessie,label=Debian-Security'] No packages

Re: Partição não inicia em um limite de setor fisico

Perfeitamente, no dual boot com o windows10. Em 16 de junho de 2016 16:09, Thiago Zoroastro escreveu: > Oi.. > > houveram poucos casos do tipo: > https://www.google.com.br/#q=%22Parti%C3%A7%C3%A3o+n%C3%A3o+inicia+em+um+limite+de+setor+fisico%22_rd=cr > > O que você

Partição não inicia em um limite de setor fisico

Ola, tive um problema em algumas leituras de partições. Então, Reinstalei o sistema, mas o problema(A partição ... não inicia em um limite de setor físico) continua aparecendo em algumas partições do windows e na swap. Tenho receio em usar cfdisk pois pode criar problema no inicialização do grub.

Re: Apt periodic doesn't work

Jayson Willson [2016-06-16 20:54:12+03] wrote: > Hello! I use Debian Stable. Recently I have installed > unattended-upgrades package, so as to have apt lists updated and > possible upgrades downloaded automatically (while I do not want them > to be installed automatically). However, though I

Re: open - resource temporarily unavailable

On 2016-06-16 21:46 +0600, Andrew P. Cherepenko wrote: > Hello list, > 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error: > couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable > either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when > trying to save a file). Are

Functional Difference of dpkg --get-selections vs --get-selections "*"

Hello, Noob question for y'all... What is the functional difference between dpkg --get-selections and dpkg --get-selections "*"? It seems to me that the first command would find all packages anyway, making the wildcard erroneous...perhaps I'm mistaken? Thanks guys and gals! Bruce

Re: Missing signatures for installer checksums

On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 13:04:35 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Sarah writes: > > Figuring out how to file the bug report isn't a problem. The problem > > is I don't know what component is responsible for generating either > > the existing checksum files or the .sign files for the ISOs. > > Then file

Re: boot times out after dist-upgrade on Stretch

Thank you for getting back to me, Sven, I normally run apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade immediately after my computer boots. According to the messages log, I turned the computer on about 5 minutes before running that command and the last log entry was about 3.5 hours later at 22:59. I hadn't

Re: Missing signatures for installer checksums

Sarah writes: > Figuring out how to file the bug report isn't a problem. The problem > is I don't know what component is responsible for generating either > the existing checksum files or the .sign files for the ISOs. Then file the bug against your best guess as to the culprit. The maintainer

Apt periodic doesn't work

Hello! I use Debian Stable. Recently I have installed unattended-upgrades package, so as to have apt lists updated and possible upgrades downloaded automatically (while I do not want them to be installed automatically). However, though I think I have configured everything correctly, apt

Re: error trying to launch the first firefox window on Debian Jessie

On Thursday 16 June 2016 12:48:42 Dalios wrote: > Hi list, > > my system is Debian 8 Jessie (stable) with XFCE Desktop Environment > and just a few days back my Iceweasel browser transformed to Firefox. > After that my keyboard shortcut for launching Firefox isn't working if > Firefox isn't

Re: How to download over https

Le 16/06/2016 18:18, Dan Purgert a écrit : 1) So, the fact that HTTPS doesn't ~actually~ provide you with any security when a "malicious party" has root accesss to the webserver, AND that it adds overhead to the transmission Does it really add network overhead of just CPU overhead on the

Re: Missing signatures for installer checksums

On 06/16/2016 07:44 AM, Brian wrote: > On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 08:18:18 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > >> maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box. Install >> report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly and >> report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug

error trying to launch the first firefox window on Debian Jessie

Hi list, my system is Debian 8 Jessie (stable) with XFCE Desktop Environment and just a few days back my Iceweasel browser transformed to Firefox. After that my keyboard shortcut for launching Firefox isn't working if Firefox isn't running! In other words: if a Firefox Window is open then I can

open - resource temporarily unavailable

Hello list, 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error: couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when trying to save a file). system: Debian 8.5 with kernel: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 and

Re: How to download over https

matthew wrote: > [snip] > > There are MD5 and SHA sums in that same directory. However I can only > access those checksums through unencrypted connections. Therefore they > cannot be used to check against 3rd party tampering. (Since someone > who has the ability to tamper with the .iso can also

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On Thursday 16 June 2016 16:31:21 Dan Purgert wrote: > > In the end, however, we are all at each others' mercy. :-/ > > Indeed we are.  The people who send HTML messages often create "fun" > issues (as my client expects text alone).  But, "text only" is now > seemingly the "alternate" rather than

Re: Mailing-list configuration

Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 16 June 2016 13:47:54 Dan Purgert wrote: >> In addition, I feel that both parties in the original problem >> (apparently Lisi and Nicolas -- please correct me if I'm wrong) each >> have some fault in the matter.  Mainly, this seems to stem from each of >> you

Re: testing, rhythmbox err msg "Failed to open output device: Unable to prepare device"

Sven Arvidsson wrote: ... > Most likely a problem with Gstreamer, is=C2=A0gstreamer1.0-alsa installed? pulseaudio was too noisy, took it out again, left gstreamer alone. things now work like before with alsa. thanks again, :) songbird

Re: How to download over https

On Thursday 16 June 2016 14:41:22 Matthew Davis wrote: > (Sorry about the lack of pleasantries in my previous email. I haven't used > these sorts of mailing lists before, so I just assumed it was all about > going straight to business like on Stack Exchange.) Both your emails seemed fine to me.

Re: Missing signatures for installer checksums

On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 08:18:18 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box. Install > report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly and > report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug report will be filed > correctly with

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On Thursday 16 June 2016 13:47:54 Dan Purgert wrote: > In addition, I feel that both parties in the original problem > (apparently Lisi and Nicolas -- please correct me if I'm wrong) each > have some fault in the matter.  Mainly, this seems to stem from each of > you assuming that the other's MUA

Fornecedor de Máquinas e Ferramentas!

@media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { table[class="body"] img {width: auto !important;height: auto !important;} table[class="body"] center {min-width: 0 !important;} table[class="body"] container {width: 95% !important;} table[class="body"] row {width: 100%

Re: erreur pour créer un user avec mariadb

Le Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:35:15 +0200, Daniel Caillibaud a écrit : > Le 14/06/16 à 16:25, Bernard Schoenacker > a écrit : > BS> mysql -u phpmyadmin -p > > BS> Access denied; you need (at least one of) the CREATE USER > BS> privilege(s) for this

Re: How to download over https

> Did you take a look here: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify , "Verifying authenticity of Debian CDs"? Yes I did. It's incredibly confusing. It's written with assumed knowledge that a lot of users don't have. There are lots of hex strings with mysterious 3 letter abbreviations and no commands

Re: exim 4

El Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:33:56 -0400, Marco Da Silva escribió: >> To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org From: noela...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: exim 4 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:16:50 + >> >> El Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:49:22 -0400, josealfredo escribió: (...) >> > josealfr...@ucm.hlg.sld.cu

Re: Samba 4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u3 and group specific policies

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:58:44 + (UTC), Virgo Pärna wrote: > > Those computers are part of special groups and groups have permission > for that policy. But those computers get "Access denied" when trying to > read that policy (GPT.INI). It worked before last update. >

Re: How to download over https

Did you take a look here: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify , "Verifying authenticity of Debian CDs"? The https protocol would add quite some overhead to the download of the iso-files which are already big by them self. Regards, jvp.

Re: How to download over https

Hi, > There are MD5 and SHA sums in that same directory. However I can only access > those checksums through unencrypted connections. Therefore they cannot be > used to check against 3rd party tampering. The chain of trust begins by the public keys as decribed at

Re: Mailing-list configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:20:11AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: [...] > Really? Whatever... to claim Mozilla was 'not free' based solely on the > one little issue with the trademarked logo was just plain silly. *plonk* -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Samba 4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u3 and group specific policies

Just checking if anyone else has problems with group specific Group Policies with Samba Active Directory domain controller with latest samba update (from 5th of June)? I have one policy that is only allowed for specific computers. Those computers are part of special groups and

Re: Mailing-list configuration

Nicolas George wrote: > Now, finally, how do we achieve automation? > > The ideal solution would be to have a real header telling us what to do: > "List-Reply-To: list" or "List-Reply-To: sender, list". Unfortunately, the > people in charge of that messed it up, they invented these useless headers

Re: (deb-cat) cups-browsed en catala

On 16 Jun 2016 14:33, "Xavier De Yzaguirre i Maura" wrote: > > Però eren tres abstencions crítiques o es que estaven intentant obtenir un croissant de xocolata? ...o CUPkakes O:-) > > Xavier De Yzaguirre > xdeyzaguirre(at)gmail(dot)com > > > El dia 15 de juny de 2016,

Visitantes preenchendo seus dados de subscrição para o seu formulário!

PARA SUA MEDITAÇÃO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yoli3FP5LLA O Recrutador MMN via AUTO-RESPONDER ? E COMO É ISSO? FUNCIONAMENTO Simples, cada vez que um visitante preencher seus dados de subscrição no formulário, será inscrito em uma lista exclusiva para você, neste momento a ferramenta

Re: (deb-cat) cups-browsed en catala

Però eren tres abstencions crítiques o es que estaven intentant obtenir un croissant de xocolata? *Xavier De Yzaguirre* xdeyzaguirre(at)gmail(dot)com El dia 15 de juny de 2016, 13:43, Pere Nubiola Radigales ha escrit: > Em sembla que es el resultat de la últim Consell

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/16/2016 7:45 AM, < wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:26:37AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote: >>> Mozilla isn't free >> What a ridiculous claim this has always been by debianites... > This is an unnecessary slur.

Re: Missing signatures for installer checksums

maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box. Install report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly and report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug report will be filed correctly with everything debian expects. On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Leon.37428 wrote:

Re: Mailing-list configuration

My last reply to the spammer aka 'Nicolas George'... On 6/16/2016 5:28 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > With that in mind, you realize that the reply-to-list feature is bad UI > design: No, but I did take a minute to test and discovered my MUA of choice (Thunderbird) does have a bug

Re: Mailing-list configuration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:26:37AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote: > > Not using any MUA, just a browser (Opera, which is BTW in the official > > Debian list: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers,

Re: Mailing-list configuration

On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote: > Not using any MUA, just a browser (Opera, which is BTW in the official > Debian list: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers, non-free but I don't > know why as it is a Mozilla clone; Mozilla isn't free What a ridiculous claim this has

[SOLVED (sort of)]Re: apt-get update fails with sourceforge repo

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:13:43 +0200 Michael Lange wrote: > Ok, looks like it's a bug in Jessie's apt version. Just for the record, in case anyone reads this: I filed a bug report for apt about this issue ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827365 ), however

Re: Mailing-list configuration

Le nonidi 29 prairial, an CCXXIV, Andrew McGlashan a écrit : > If you see no reply-to header, then only do reply to list as already > instructed with L for mutt, which I don't use. > > Always do reply to list, it's simple. IF someone says they are not > subscribed, please CC me, then take that