Hi.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:27:35PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:45 AM Reco wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 04:00:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> > > Hi. Got a (minor) systemd problem.
> > ...
> > >└─3684 /usr/sbin/minissdpd -i enp7s0 -i
Saudações.
O instalador do programa do Imposto de Renda Pessoa Física (IRPF) 2019
não está instalando no meu Debian GNU/Linux 9 (Stretch).
O arquivo é o "IRPF2019Linux-x86_64v1.0.bin" e o hash md5 é este:
fae15aeb8d6c7807c271a0a96b13054b IRPF2019Linux-x86_64v1.0.bin
Eu executo o arquivo no
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:45 AM Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 04:00:05PM -0500, Default User wrote:
> > Hi. Got a (minor) systemd problem.
> ...
> >└─3684 /usr/sbin/minissdpd -i enp7s0 -i wlp6s0
> ...
> > So, although the minissdpd.service unit is enables, it
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:21 AM Curt wrote:
> On 2019-03-08, Default User wrote:
> >
> > doofus@doofus:~$ sudo systemctl status
> > [sudo] password for doofus:
> > doofus
> > State: degraded
> > Jobs: 0 queued
> >Failed: 1 units
>
> I believe sudo (or root) isn't required for this
Den 09.03.2019 11:22, skrev mj:
Hi,
We are using fail2ban to do this. It offers many more options, and
works by creating iptables rules. This gives you much more control
over what ports exactly are blocked.
fail2ban can run any script of your choosing as "banaction". I have a
script that
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:05:25 +
"J.Arun Mani" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Im designing an application in Python for installing some apps. I need
> help in the following:
>
> 1. Whenever I open any app which needs root permissions, it shows me a
> popup asking password. And I have seen people
Le 08/03/2019 à 04:15, David Wright a écrit :
On Thu 07 Mar 2019 at 23:12:29 (+0100), Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 07/03/2019 à 20:23, David Wright a écrit :
A filesystem
that has a label, has that label regardless of any OS.
Have you ever used UDF ?
Yes. As far as my experience goes,
'lut,
Juste un conseil: à mon avis, inutile de sauver tout ton home. Par
exemple, le cache de ton navigateur, tu t'en fiches un peu. Par
ailleurs, pour tes mails, il est préférable d'utiliser le stockage
maildir plutôt que mailbox. Ainsi, ça évitera à ta synchro de devoir
récupérer tous tes
Le 09/03/2019 à 13:01, Guillaume Clercin a écrit :
Si tu installes le système dans un volume logique, tu doit avoir un
« /boot » sur une partition à part.
Non. GRUB sait lire dans les volumes logiques LVM.
Sauf s'il y a un raid logiciel en dessous du volume logique.
Non plus. En quoi le
Bonjour,
À mon avis le "vs" n'a pas trop ça place dans le sujet puisque chacune des
deux solutions touche à mon avis à deux domaines plutôt différent. À mon
avis il faudrait faire une réel distinction entre synchronisation et
sauvegarde...
Le sam. 9 mars 2019 18:42, David BERCOT a écrit :
>
Hello.
Im designing an application in Python for installing some apps. I need help in
the following:
1. Whenever I open any app which needs root permissions, it shows me a popup
asking password. And I have seen people refer to this GKSudo. How can I setup
such one for my app?
2. Or is there
- Mail original -
> De: "David BERCOT"
> À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Samedi 9 Mars 2019 18:42:04
> Objet: Sauvegarde "classique" vs synchronisation ?
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Afin d'avoir une copie à jour (ou du moins, le plus à jour possible)
> de
> mon ordinateur (ce
Bonjour,
Afin d'avoir une copie à jour (ou du moins, le plus à jour possible) de
mon ordinateur (ce qui m'intéresse est uniquement mon /home), j'hésite
entre des sauvegardes classiques et une synchronisation type "cloud".
De mon point de vue, la sauvegarde a l'avantage d'être "consistante" et
Olá,
On 3/6/19 6:00 PM, Rafael Rocha wrote:
>
> *Resumidamente*, gostaria de saber como posso obter um certificado ou
> declaração da comunidade, de modo que eu consiga comprovar que fiz parte
> disto e que ajudei a organizar, como de fato aconteceu.
>
> Eu perguntei em particular para alguns
Bonjour,
Le samedi 09 mars 2019, Jean-Marc a écrit...
> Des conseils ? D'autres suggestions ?
J'utilise, comme on te l'a déjà conseillé, un système à base de lvm sur
raid1 depuis de nombreuses années, et sans souci.
Sinon, j'ai rajouté un 3ème disque de spare sur mon raid. Lorsque
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, mj wrote:
We are using fail2ban to do this. It offers many more options, and works by
creating iptables rules. This gives you much more control over what ports
exactly are blocked.
Plus I think (correct me if Im wrong) that using /etc/hosts.deny to block
access only
Bonjour,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:03:28 +0100
Jean-Marc wrote:
> salut la liste,
>
> J'ai deux disques dans mon PC que je compte utilisés en plus du SSD
> sur lequel j'ai mon système.
>
> Je pense les regrouper en RAID, histoire de me protéger de certaines
> pannes.
>
> Entre mdadm et LVM,
Le 09/03/2019 à 10:03, Jean-Marc a écrit :
salut la liste,
J'ai deux disques dans mon PC que je compte utilisés en plus du SSD sur lequel
j'ai mon système.
Je pense les regrouper en RAID, histoire de me protéger de certaines pannes.
Entre mdadm et LVM, j'hésite.
LVM me semble plus souple
Provavelmente vc precisa participar de um evento maior como FISL ou
Latinoware como palestrante pra poder validar.
./helio
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 21:54 Rafael Rocha wrote:
> Olá pessoas, boa noite.
>
> Estou participando da seleção de mestrado, no IFPB
>
salut la liste,
J'ai deux disques dans mon PC que je compte utilisés en plus du SSD sur lequel
j'ai mon système.
Je pense les regrouper en RAID, histoire de me protéger de certaines pannes.
Entre mdadm et LVM, j'hésite.
LVM me semble plus souple (RAID au niveau volume logique si j'ai bien lu
Am Samstag, 9. März 2019, 11:22:45 CET schrieb mj:
Hi MJ,
that is a good point, that only services are blocked, which are using
hosts.deny. For the other ports I am using tools like porstentry and
hostentry, which are running well and do a good job.
My personal style is strange: I am looking,
Hi,
We are using fail2ban to do this. It offers many more options, and works
by creating iptables rules. This gives you much more control over what
ports exactly are blocked.
Plus I think (correct me if Im wrong) that using /etc/hosts.deny to
block access only works with programs that are
Hi Paul,
fail2ban is looking promising, and I have it already installed since years. It
is more expandable than sshguard, as it is checking more services than ssh.
Both are using the same techniques - both are checking logfiles and then change
firewall rules. I think, for me fail2ban is more
On 2019-03-08, Default User wrote:
>
> doofus@doofus:~$ sudo systemctl status
> [sudo] password for doofus:
> doofus
> State: degraded
> Jobs: 0 queued
>Failed: 1 units
I believe sudo (or root) isn't required for this command (nor is it
needed for some of the other, interrogative
On 09/03/2019 08:57, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> looks like "denyhosts" is nol more in the repos. I like this tool, because it
> blocks the IP, when the wrong password is sent n-times.
>
> The blocked IP is added into /etc/hosts.deny, which IMO is a great idea.
>
> I am using a script, which,
Hi folks,
looks like "denyhosts" is nol more in the repos. I like this tool, because it
blocks the IP, when the wrong password is sent n-times.
The blocked IP is added into /etc/hosts.deny, which IMO is a great idea.
I am using a script, which, cleares the hosts.deny after a certain time, but
26 matches
Mail list logo
