Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On 21/7/21 03:36, andre...@gmail.com wrote: Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. Boa tarde, estou desinstalado crhomium do Debian 10 e o procedimento instala automaticamente o firefox e o mesmo acontede ao desistalar o firefox. Como resolver isso? Obrigado. Good Morning Andre Could you please explain the process you used. Are you using pure Debian or an alternate, like MX or lmde -- All the best Keith Bainbridge keith.bainbridge.3...@gmail.com 0447 667 468
Re: Strange email behaviour................
On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 02:19:43 PM Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 20 iul 21, 11:37:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 08:07:22 AM Charlie wrote: > > > Nothing happened when I ran the "filter all messages in folder" or when > > > I ran filter "filter selected messages". So then selected, highlighted, > > > the message and used the "move" command in Claws Mail, and selected the > > > folder the message was to go to. > > > > > > It just vanished. Attempted to find the message in every directory > > > including Trash, but it is nowhere to be found, assume forever gone. > > > > > > Can a macro or some such thing; be placed/hidden, in an email message > > > to delete it the minute an attempt is made to move it? > > In theory, yes, it's probably possible, but I think it is *highly* > unlikely. > > > From the peanut gallery, my first suspicion would be that you've somehow > > specified the directory to move it to incorrectly. > > > > It would be helpful to post the macro here, or if it is long, at least > > the parts relevant to moving that email to the directory you specified. > > > > To answer your question, yes, a macro could be written (at least in some > > languages -- I don't use Claws mail so not sure about that) that could > > delete the email, although I would suspect it would end up in a trash > > folder in which you could find it. Oops, disregard my answer / comments above, they are misleading / not on point -- I didn't read the original post carefully enough. > The only realistic method that *might* work on many different clients > would be to embed something in the HTML part. See EFAIL[1] for a past > example. Even then, you might notice that not all clients were (fully) > affected[2]. > > Also, what would be the point in deleting the message just because it's > moved to a different folder? > > The only thing that might come close would be Outlook's "recall message" > feature, though it rarely works properly on Outlook and I seriously > doubt Claws Mail even supports it. > > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFAIL > [2] > https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/05/decade-old-efail-at > tack-can-decrypt-previously-obtained-encrypted-e-mails/ > > Kind regards, > Andrei
Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On 20.07.21 23:00 Greg Wooledge wrote: unicorn:~$ apt-cache show gnome-core | grep firefox Depends: [...] firefox-esr (>= 78) | firefox (>= 78) | chromium | chromium-browser | epiphany-browser, [...] In other words, it only accepts the browsers specifically stated in that list, and will not permit you to substitute any other. Exactly. They should simply add "gnome-www-browser | www-browser" and everybody could be happy. One of the reasons why I prefer Google Chrome, is that I am already on bullseye and Chromium was (is?) always very outdated on testing. I know that testing has no security support, but I need secuity patches in time for a package that is so close to the front like an internet browser. (And personally, I like the full Google integration of Chrome.) I'm not even sure whether you can hack around it using equivs. I know You can, I remember doing it. that works for virtual packages like www-browser or mail-transport-agent but I don't know whether it can be made to lie about having one of those five specific packages installed. Using the "provides" field. Of course, the most obvious answer is "just install firefox-esr, even if Doing it that way currently. It actually turned out that having a second browser installed can be handy from time to time (knowing that firefox-esr in testing is also outdated sometimes). you don't use it". (Well, second most obvious, after "purge gnome-core".)
Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:38:12PM -0700, Weaver wrote: > On 21-07-2021 06:17, Christian Britz wrote: > > On 20.07.21 19:58 Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> You probably have a desktop environment installed which Depends: on > >> a web browser. So, when you uninstall one, it falls back to a different > >> one, in order to satisfy this dependency. > >> > >> If firefox-esr is currently installed, then you can ask aptitude what's > >> keeping it here: > >> > >> aptitude why firefox-esr > > In my case it is meta package gnome-core. It is a pity that it doesn't > > have an alternative dependency on www-browser, this would be satisfied > > by google-chrome-stable, which I prefer over chromium. Yeah, that is... odd. Even more odd, there's a 9-year-old bug open for it (sort of): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662150 > There are plenty of others, quite stable. > Falkon is as quick as any of them, if you're happy to work around [...] The issue isn't that a given web browser is well- or ill-suited, but rather that the Debian package named "gnome-core" has the following hard-coded dependency: unicorn:~$ apt-cache show gnome-core | grep firefox Depends: [...] firefox-esr (>= 78) | firefox (>= 78) | chromium | chromium-browser | epiphany-browser, [...] In other words, it only accepts the browsers specifically stated in that list, and will not permit you to substitute any other. I'm not even sure whether you can hack around it using equivs. I know that works for virtual packages like www-browser or mail-transport-agent but I don't know whether it can be made to lie about having one of those five specific packages installed. Of course, the most obvious answer is "just install firefox-esr, even if you don't use it". (Well, second most obvious, after "purge gnome-core".)
Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On 21-07-2021 06:17, Christian Britz wrote: > On 20.07.21 19:58 Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:15:32PM -0400, andre...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the >>> procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when >>> uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. >> You probably have a desktop environment installed which Depends: on >> a web browser. So, when you uninstall one, it falls back to a different >> one, in order to satisfy this dependency. >> >> If firefox-esr is currently installed, then you can ask aptitude what's >> keeping it here: >> >> aptitude why firefox-esr > In my case it is meta package gnome-core. It is a pity that it doesn't > have an alternative dependency on www-browser, this would be satisfied > by google-chrome-stable, which I prefer over chromium. There are plenty of others, quite stable. Falkon is as quick as any of them, if you're happy to work around one or two minor discrepancies from a stripped down process that keeps it that way. I have three installed, because I do a little web design work, and I need them for checking, but to each his own. For example, I wouldn't touch Chrome. Cheers! Harry. -- `When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty' -- Thomas Jefferson
Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On 20.07.21 19:58 Greg Wooledge wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:15:32PM -0400, andre...@gmail.com wrote: Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. You probably have a desktop environment installed which Depends: on a web browser. So, when you uninstall one, it falls back to a different one, in order to satisfy this dependency. If firefox-esr is currently installed, then you can ask aptitude what's keeping it here: aptitude why firefox-esr In my case it is meta package gnome-core. It is a pity that it doesn't have an alternative dependency on www-browser, this would be satisfied by google-chrome-stable, which I prefer over chromium.
Re: Strange email behaviour................
On Ma, 20 iul 21, 11:37:02, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 08:07:22 AM Charlie wrote: > > Nothing happened when I ran the "filter all messages in folder" or when > > I ran filter "filter selected messages". So then selected, highlighted, > > the message and used the "move" command in Claws Mail, and selected the > > folder the message was to go to. > > > > It just vanished. Attempted to find the message in every directory > > including Trash, but it is nowhere to be found, assume forever gone. > > > > Can a macro or some such thing; be placed/hidden, in an email message > > to delete it the minute an attempt is made to move it? In theory, yes, it's probably possible, but I think it is *highly* unlikely. > From the peanut gallery, my first suspicion would be that you've somehow > specified the directory to move it to incorrectly. > > It would be helpful to post the macro here, or if it is long, at least the > parts relevant to moving that email to the directory you specified. > > To answer your question, yes, a macro could be written (at least in some > languages -- I don't use Claws mail so not sure about that) that could delete > the email, although I would suspect it would end up in a trash folder in > which > you could find it. The only realistic method that *might* work on many different clients would be to embed something in the HTML part. See EFAIL[1] for a past example. Even then, you might notice that not all clients were (fully) affected[2]. Also, what would be the point in deleting the message just because it's moved to a different folder? The only thing that might come close would be Outlook's "recall message" feature, though it rarely works properly on Outlook and I seriously doubt Claws Mail even supports it. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFAIL [2] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/05/decade-old-efail-attack-can-decrypt-previously-obtained-encrypted-e-mails/ Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Uninstalling Chromium
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:15:32PM -0400, andre...@gmail.com wrote: > Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the > procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when > uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. You probably have a desktop environment installed which Depends: on a web browser. So, when you uninstall one, it falls back to a different one, in order to satisfy this dependency. If firefox-esr is currently installed, then you can ask aptitude what's keeping it here: aptitude why firefox-esr
Uninstalling Chromium
Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. Boa tarde, estou desinstalado crhomium do Debian 10 e o procedimento instala automaticamente o firefox e o mesmo acontede ao desistalar o firefox. Como resolver isso? Obrigado.
Uninstalling Chromium
Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. Boa tarde, estou desinstalado crhomium do Debian 10 e o procedimento instala automaticamente o firefox e o mesmo acontede ao desistalar o firefox. Como resolver isso? Obrigado.
Uninstalling Chromium
Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. Boa tarde, estou desinstalado crhomium do Debian 10 e o procedimento instala automaticamente o firefox e o mesmo acontede ao desistalar o firefox. Como resolver isso? Obrigado.
Uninstalling Chromium
Good afternoon, I am uninstalling chromium from Debian 10 and the procedure automatically installs firefox and the same happens when uninstalling firefox. How to solve this? Thanks. Boa tarde, estou desinstalado crhomium do Debian 10 e o procedimento instala automaticamente o firefox e o mesmo acontede ao desistalar o firefox. Como resolver isso? Obrigado.
Re: Wireguard and my Buster kernel
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Reco wrote: It has nothing to do with the kernel module status. I'd blame your ISP first, and the code quality of kernel module second. I don't have any intuitive "feel" for kernel processes i.e. I am unable to discern or even form a small hunch that a given effect I am witnessing has its source in events in the kernel. I suppose there are some who do! If not - you'll just waste your time upgrading to next version of wireguard. I did the upgrade; my VPN vendor prefers us to use the latest. But I see no change in behaviour. Oh well, I guess that's just life in the Big Leagues; they don't call it hard ball for nothing. 9-) Thank you all. -- ...a society must incorporate the rationalizing power symbolized by scientific knowledge, for otherwise it will be a fatally split society- split between a powerful elite and the disenfranchised mass. To this we add now: an irrational elite is the most dangerous of all. Holton, Gerald. 1985. On the Integrity of Science: The Issues Since Bronowski. Leonardo 18 (4), Special Issue: Jacob Bronowski: A Retrospective (1985): 229-232.
Re: Wiki Debian "Release page" should have template (Was Re: Buster no release file)
On 7/20/21 11:34 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: I send out this email first. So I can have a link to attach on my report bug later. Will replying this thread later with report bugs number, I hope this will be useful to prevent issue like this. Thanks to Greg and Paul for great contribution on Debian Wiki. p/s: Wiki Debian "Release page" == https://wiki.debian.org/Debian Here the bug report https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991322 -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu
Re: Strange email behaviour................
On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 08:07:22 AM Charlie wrote: > Nothing happened when I ran the "filter all messages in folder" or when > I ran filter "filter selected messages". So then selected, highlighted, > the message and used the "move" command in Claws Mail, and selected the > folder the message was to go to. > > It just vanished. Attempted to find the message in every directory > including Trash, but it is nowhere to be found, assume forever gone. > > Can a macro or some such thing; be placed/hidden, in an email message > to delete it the minute an attempt is made to move it? From the peanut gallery, my first suspicion would be that you've somehow specified the directory to move it to incorrectly. It would be helpful to post the macro here, or if it is long, at least the parts relevant to moving that email to the directory you specified. To answer your question, yes, a macro could be written (at least in some languages -- I don't use Claws mail so not sure about that) that could delete the email, although I would suspect it would end up in a trash folder in which you could find it.
Wiki Debian "Release page" should have template (Was Re: Buster no release file)
On 7/11/21 6:44 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: I was going to link you to the DebianBuster wiki page where I had put the standard sources.list for buster, but it appears someone doesn't want you to have that information. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster?action=diff&rev2=23&rev1=22 You can thank the person who goes by the name PaulWise for making your Debian wiki a less informative and less useful place. I *REALLY* and truly hate assholes like that. I don't agree calling someone asshole but I agree with Greg in-term of sometimes someone make Debian Wiki less informative and less useful. This is great example, this is what I see what happening on the time line.. Timeline 1: Greg put useful information https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster?action=diff&rev1=21&rev2=22 Timeline 2: PaulWise revert the changes as he comment is as unnecessary changes https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster?action=diff&rev1=21&rev2=23 On timeline 1 and 2, The class issue are Greg added useful information and PaulWise remove it / revert it (to me it likely want to tidy up and make it uniform like others "Debian Release" pages) Both have own perspective and good attention. Wiki are great in term of collective information but quite really-ugly on deciding which "information" should be put here and which should not.. worst, there is no template to follow as far I check. Plus, I can't found how to create template on Debian Wiki. So.. Greg and Paul have clash on something important here. (Too be honest, I wish Debian move to Wiki with pull-request approval type rather just who-ever have Wiki approved account can do change) The best solution and improvement are to send report to bug list as wishlist's to have a standard template for this "Debian Release" pages and this template should have standard sources.list or a link to https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList (this wiki page also need improvement, IMHO) I send out this email first. So I can have a link to attach on my report bug later. Will replying this thread later with report bugs number, I hope this will be useful to prevent issue like this. Thanks to Greg and Paul for great contribution on Debian Wiki. p/s: Wiki Debian "Release page" == https://wiki.debian.org/Debian -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu
Re: MDs & Dentists
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:46:59 +0300 Reco wrote: ... > You cannot catch a ransomware cryptolocker using Linux on a desktop, Of course you can, although it's certainly much less likely than when using Windows. > it's definitely Windows-only kind of software. In fact, any FOSS OS has > this advantage, unless you're using Wine (software). It's definitely not Windows-only, although it is (at this point) still mostly Windows: https://hacked.com/linux-ransomware-notorious-cases-and-ways-to-protect/ https://phoenixnap.com/blog/linux-ransomware https://linuxsecurity.com/features/anatomy-of-a-linux-ransomware-attack https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-version-of-ransomexx-ransomware-discovered/ Celejar
Re: VirtualBox Problem
On 7/18/21 3:00 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: First off, let me say that I am not trying to start a war or nasty exchange4of insults. That is really bad introduction like expecting Debian-user is place of war or nasty insult. We have CoC. I am forced by circumstance to run a Linux program on my Windows 10 Laptop. In order to accomplish his I have installed Buster in a VirtualBox v-6.1. Although the AMD Rizen 5 CPU has eight threads, of which the VirtualBox only allows four of the threads to be used. Hmm.. so your are using windows and want to have linux program running? I smell XYZ problem here. Read https://xyproblem.info , Can you be specific of what program you mean here? Unfortunately , perhaps not too surprisingly, neither the Windows 10 or VirtualBox sources seem to have a solution that I can find. Google is defiantly not my friend. Again, there is no clear problem. and not sure what solution your are looking for. Can anyone in Linux land be of help? Thanks in advance, -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu
Re: Fwd: Re: ASTM Lab equipment protocol
Hi there On 12/07/2021 15:40, Markos wrote: OK. Now I understand a little bit more the situation. You are referring to this pattern: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1381.htm I didn't know this standard. What I have seen in my experience with laboratory automation with some instruments/equipment is that each manufacturer has its own ASCII communication protocol. Therefore, it is more viable to use some standard to specify a communication interface but without specifying the specific protocol of each equipment/instrument. The only ASTM standard for laboratory automation with this approach (define interface) was the LECIS standard, which is now discontinued: https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/WITHDRAWN/E1989.htm I discovered, a few days ago, the SiLA project to standardize automation in the laboratory: https://sila-standard.com/ But I still don't know the details. I have already had to implement programs for serial communication with instruments and equipment in the laboratory. But I don't remember seeing any Debian packages related to this ASTM standard. The thing to do is probably to use github search and then download, install and test each relevant program. I found two which are programmed in C, so I can modify them myself if need be. The vet however is perfectly happy with using the native skyla protocol, so I used this instead. They are already using my software and perfectly happy with it. The software simply dumps the data in a text file which they then can access. Nothing fancy here. There is an other blood analyses machine heading this way, with yet an other protocol for which I will also write software. In the long run ASTM is probably the way to go. With lots of googling you can actually find bits and pieces of the standard without having to pay for it. I've found some programs for acquisition and graphic display of data received through the serial port. But as they didn't have all the resources I decided to develop my own programs using the Tcl/Tk language, always using Debian. I tried to document some of these projects on my website, which might be useful. The material is in Portuguese but it is possible to translate it with the help of Google Translator: https://tinyurl.com/46vnrp68 Email-me if you have any question. Regards, Rob
Re: Strange email behaviour................
Am Dienstag, 20. Juli 2021, 14:07:22 CEST schrieb Charlie: Are you running some spamfilter, like spamassassin, spamd or whatever? Take a look at the rules, maybe there is a rule "delete recognized spammails". I am not using clawsmail, but kmail, and my rules say: If this is a spammail, then move it to the folder "Spam", and mark it as "read". So you can see false positives and false negatives and let the spamfilter learn by correcting things manually. Again, looks like a spam rule for me. Best Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Strange email behaviour................
From my keyboard: Hello Everyone, Using Claws Mail 3.17.8 Debian Bullseye Received an email from a government department. Saved the attachment. Then attempted to run a filter that would place all future emails from this department using this address, into a designated folder. Nothing happened when I ran the "filter all messages in folder" or when I ran filter "filter selected messages". So then selected, highlighted, the message and used the "move" command in Claws Mail, and selected the folder the message was to go to. It just vanished. Attempted to find the message in every directory including Trash, but it is nowhere to be found, assume forever gone. Can a macro or some such thing; be placed/hidden, in an email message to delete it the minute an attempt is made to move it? Just wondering, because any emails from this department will need to be treated differently in the future, if this is the case. Thanks for any information. Charlie East Gippsland Wildlife Rehabilitators Inc.. http://www.egwildlife.com.au/ -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *** A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything, and the value of nothing. --Oscar Wilde *** Debian GNU/Linux - Magic indeed. -
Re: 回复：Re: where can i find a list of wireless adapter that debian support
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:47:21 +0800 wrote: > Windows is better supported because many vendors claim they support > Windows from winxp to win10they don't mention linux > This is because all PC hardware is *designed* to work with current, recent and near-future versions of Windows, because the manufacturer would have no market for his products otherwise. It is more profitable to ignore a few percent of the potential customers than to double the development and testing effort. -- Joe
USB audio device no longer showing up
I've been using a Schiit Modi 3 D/A converter for my main desktop audio for a year or two. In the last week, it's been sporadically vanishing from PulseAudio. It's normally plugged into a USB port on my monitor, which has several such ports, all of which work with other devices. When I plug it in, dmesg shows me: [2126764.183346] usb 3-3.4: new full-speed USB device number 75 using xhci_hcd[2126765.035388] usb 3-3-port4: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?[2126765.887389] usb 3-3-port4: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?[2126765.887461] usb 3-3-port4: attempt power cycle[2126768.319399] usb 3-3-port4: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?[2126769.171424] usb 3-3-port4: Cannot enable. Maybe the USB cable is bad?[2126769.171483] usb 3-3-port4: unable to enumerate USB device I get similar messages from other ports; other devices show up fine. This port is successfully providing power to the Schiit. Though "Maybe the USB cable is bad?" is a dubious-sounding message, I did swap out the existing random cable with a brand-new good-quality one, with no difference. I also tried to plug the Schiit into a Debian laptop, with the same results as above. Confoundingly, after this test, I re-plugged it into my monitor and it magically started to work -- it showed up in dmesg, it started to play audio. However, hoping it magically works isn't a good long-term solution. Is there any way to figure out what's causing this? Could it be a hardware problem with the Schiit? If so, how do I report it to them?
Re: Wireguard and my Buster kernel
Bob Bernstein wrote: > /var/log/kern.log contains these lines: > > Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.444725] wireguard: module verification > failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel > Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.449554] wireguard: WireGuard > 1.0.20200712 loaded. See www.wireguard.com for information. > Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.449555] wireguard: Copyright (C) > 2015-2019 Jason A. Donenfeld . All Rights Reserved. > > This is an old HP amd64 running as noted: > > $ uname -a > Linux debian.localdomain 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 > (2021-01-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Principal symptom: pervasive slowdown of all connections to remote hosts, > notice first with my smtp smart host. > > I am resigned to reinstalling my VPN, which will bring the latest Wireguard > with it iirc, but are those kern.log lines consistent with my > complaint/report of slowness? Probably not. We have Wireguard installed on a hundred or so machines, including roving laptops, and there are no issues like that. Note that Wireguard will be part of the default kernel when Bullseye becomes stable in a month or so, or if you get a backports kernel now. -dsr-
回复：Re: where can i find a list of wireless adapter that debian support
Christian Britz wrote: On Windows, everything regarding the driver is non-free, not only the firmware. Personally I can live with non-free firmware and have always enabled this. Windows is better supported because many vendors claim they support Windows from winxp to win10they don't mention linux Ubuntu is more friendly than debian in this case, it just install them(including non-free firmware), hiding ugly details from user
Re: where can i find a list of wireless adapter that debian support
At 20.07.21 11:01 loushanguan2...@sina.com wrote: Thank Andrew, Stefan and nick! i prefer old wifi adapter if new one often requires non-free firmware it seems that Windows is better supported than linux in this aspect On Windows, everything regarding the driver is non-free, not only the firmware. Personally I can live with non-free firmware and have always enabled this. finding my ideal adapter with right interface isn't easy (usb is preferred, some pci card can't be install in my PC) finding them at reasonable price on Chinese market isn't easy i may have to give up, i have to put up with non-free firmware
Re: where can i find a list of wireless adapter that debian support
Thank Andrew, Stefan and nick! i prefer old wifi adapter if new one often requires non-free firmware it seems that Windows is better supported than linux in this aspect finding my ideal adapter with right interface isn't easy (usb is preferred, some pci card can't be install in my PC) finding them at reasonable price on Chinese market isn't easy i may have to give up, i have to put up with non-free firmware
Re: Wireguard and my Buster kernel
Hi. On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:46:48AM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote: > /var/log/kern.log contains these lines: > > Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.444725] wireguard: module verification > failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel It's an out-of-tree module, so this is expected. Moreover, it tells you that it's a self-built unsigned module, which is expected if you happen to use dkms. > Principal symptom: pervasive slowdown of all connections to remote > hosts, notice first with my smtp smart host. It has nothing to do with the kernel module status. I'd blame your ISP first, and the code quality of kernel module second. I.e. if you're seeing large amounts of CPU eaten by the kernel - the kernel module is likely the problem (although it needs to be verified by perf top). If not - you'll just waste your time upgrading to next version of wireguard. Reco
Wireguard and my Buster kernel
/var/log/kern.log contains these lines: Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.444725] wireguard: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.449554] wireguard: WireGuard 1.0.20200712 loaded. See www.wireguard.com for information. Jul 19 09:15:38 debian kernel: [69157.449555] wireguard: Copyright (C) 2015-2019 Jason A. Donenfeld . All Rights Reserved. This is an old HP amd64 running as noted: $ uname -a Linux debian.localdomain 4.19.0-14-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.171-2 (2021-01-30) x86_64 GNU/Linux Principal symptom: pervasive slowdown of all connections to remote hosts, notice first with my smtp smart host. I am resigned to reinstalling my VPN, which will bring the latest Wireguard with it iirc, but are those kern.log lines consistent with my complaint/report of slowness? Thank you, -- ...a society must incorporate the rationalizing power symbolized by scientific knowledge, for otherwise it will be a fatally split society- split between a powerful elite and the disenfranchised mass. To this we add now: an irrational elite is the most dangerous of all. Holton, Gerald. 1985. On the Integrity of Science: The Issues Since Bronowski. Leonardo 18 (4), Special Issue: Jacob Bronowski: A Retrospective (1985): 229-232.
Servicio de la flota
Buenos días: Le escribo para hablarle sobre una de las mejores herramientas GPS en el mercado. La herramienta, que me gustaría presentarle brevemente, dispone de muchas funciones útiles para su trabajo, que optimizan los procesos de transporte y le ayudan a realizar tareas de campo de manera más eficiente. ¿Quiere conocer los detalles? Atentamente, Alarico Veloz
