On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:54:24PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> David Christensen [2021-08-11 14:48:05] wrote:
> > That is why there is the scientific method. Please cite relevant article(s)
[...]
> And until such empirical data shows up, I'll give the benefit of the
> doubt to the scientists/
David Christensen [2021-08-11 14:48:05] wrote:
> That is why there is the scientific method. Please cite relevant article(s)
> with reproducible laboratory results and/or analysis of long-term real-world
> data regarding failure modes, effects, and hazards of non-ECC memory vs. ECC
> memory when p
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:28:57AM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
> >
>
> Are you sure your packets are forwarded via netfilter?
> Try to disable forwarding (with sysctl) or change rulte to -j DROP and
> check traffic with sniffer (no packet should be forward
>
>
>
> > > iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
>
Are you sure your packets are forwarded via netfilter?
Try to disable forwarding (with sysctl) or change rulte to -j DROP and
check traffic with sniffer (no packet should be forwarded from virt machine
to the Internet)
On 8/11/21 6:45 AM, Morgan Read wrote:
Hi List,
Since my cry for (fairly minor) help here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/08/msg00461.html
I think I've dug myself into a bit of a deep hole.
After having overcome a fairly fundamental bug with calamares as described here:
https://github
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:50:30PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Alain D D Williams wrote:
>
> > iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
> >
>
> and the OUTPUT?
OUTOUT is also ACCEPT, however this is not, I think, important as the packets
come from 10.239.239.23 (via br0) and go to the Internet - thus FORWARD
Alain D D Williams wrote:
> iptables -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
>
and the OUTPUT?
> and this is not a problem ... evidence is outgoing packets with source
> address 10.239.239.23
ah, ok, I misinterpreted it.
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On 8/11/21 7:00 AM, Celejar wrote:
I myself have no personal experience or deep understanding of the
issues, but the experts do not accept your position that [non-ECC
memory combined with operating system storage stack integrity
checking] is higher risk than [ECC memory combined with operating
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:32:51PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> I remember it was not only the POSTROUTING. May be I am wrong, but I think
> FORWARD and OUTPUT is important.
> I also wonder why you are mixing up the -s and --to-source. You should be
> using the local address for -s and --to-source the
Alain D D Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problems getting POSTROUTING to work on a Debian 10 box.
>
> Setup:
>
> INTERNET ... Broadband modem 192.168.108.1
>
> Network internal to the Debian box for virtual machines 10.239.239.0/24
>
> Debian has address 192.168.108.2 (interface enp3s0) and
Hi,
I have problems getting POSTROUTING to work on a Debian 10 box.
Setup:
INTERNET ... Broadband modem 192.168.108.1
Network internal to the Debian box for virtual machines 10.239.239.0/24
Debian has address 192.168.108.2 (interface enp3s0) and 10.239.239.254
(interface br0)
Processes on D
>> I was attempting to modify
>> # for i in `find / -user 1001`; do chown 3001 $i; done
> Dear gods. That violates at least two *major* rules of the shell.
It looks exactly like the kind of code I would write if I were trying to
"innocently" introduce a backdoor.
Stefan
> Starting that from / is horrifying. I would have started from /home,
Ah, well, yes. I was rather throwing caution to the wind. But, when you put
off doing a job for months and then you finally get round to doing it, there's
an element of recklessness that sneaks in. I guess there's a moral
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:00:38PM +, Morgan Read wrote:
> > Starting that from / is horrifying. I would have started from /home,
>
> But, all recklessness aside - what would be the correct command to achieve
> the end sought?
I'm not quite sure what that "end" is. We were never given the
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Charles Curley wrote:
The signal to noise ratio is getting pretty bad around here.
"Around here?"
Every poster brings to the list a bit of the world-at-large as
they are experiencing it. This occurs quite outside of conscious
control. It is pre-reflective behaviour. Can
Thanks Il and Zoltan,
In a nutshell - yes, yes, and yes...
However, I only realised the error when I logged into my headless
server terminal where I use an 'admin' user account rather than root
for admin as I did on my laptop - thus, on my laptop I was never
confronted with a failed terminal login
On Tue 10 Aug 2021 at 18:31:45 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-10 10:14 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > We need to replace an all-in-one printer-scanner, a HP Deskjet 3054A.
> >
> > Based on past experience, I am favoring HP, because AFAIK they mos
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 09:13:36 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-10):
> > It's the support of MOPRIA.
> > Even if it's mostly made for Android, what it does is offer a discovery
> > and printing protocol compatible with all CUPS system (will publish IP
> > en
Hi List,
Since my cry for (fairly minor) help here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/08/msg00461.html
I think I've dug myself into a bit of a deep hole.
After having overcome a fairly fundamental bug with calamares as described here:
https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1564#issu
On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine. Quit monopolizing the
conversation unless you are helping the user SOLVE his/her problem.
+1
--
Tony van der Hoff| mai
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:25:40 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Speaking as one user who would like to see this list go back to being
> a place where howto questions are answered by folks with intimate
> knowledge of how its done, an educational resource, ...
Hear, hear! Well and timely said, Gene.
T
> on 24 Jul 2021 16:27:23 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote
>
>> Why isn't this on Salsa instead of a Microsoft site?
>
> the package are dump and store at
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/hw-probe by debian package maintainer,
> maybe the upstream author (Andrey Ponomarenko) want to centralize
> test
The report is now available in Debian Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/linuxhw/TestCoverage/-/tree/main/Dist/Debian_11
> Hello all!
>
> See report here [1]. We have ~400 computers tested on Debian 11 at the
> moment. 10% of them are probed from LiveCDs, others are installed systems.
>
> The mai
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:26:43PM +, Morgan Read wrote:
> So, it seems that
> # find / -user 1002 -execdir chown 1003 '{}' \;
> Didn't perform as I expected...
Starting that from / is horrifying. I would have started from /home,
and then if you suspect you have other files outside of /home t
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 16:28:04 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 11/08/2021 à 16:01, Brian a écrit :
>
> > The point of "profiles" is to provide a simple way for enterprises to
> > configure/deploy IPP Everywhere queues (pointed at real printers, a
> > central CUPS server, etc.) when mDNS/DNS-SD isn
Le 11/08/2021 à 16:01, Brian a écrit :
The point of "profiles" is to provide a simple way for enterprises to
configure/deploy IPP Everywhere queues (pointed at real printers, a
central CUPS server, etc.) when mDNS/DNS-SD isn't feasible.
In most enterprises, it will be "you want linux ? Ok, bu
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 14:15:49 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 11/08/2021 à 12:36, Brian a écrit :
> > On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:19:37 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:54:23 +0100
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Brian,
> > >
> > > > As I've said previously, a futur
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:53:13 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 7:51 PM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:35:32 -0700
> > David Christensen wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/10/21 12:56 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >>> David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 8:04 AM, Leandro Noferini wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 06:07:21AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> On 8/11/21 5:02 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> >>wrote:
> >
> >>Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:23:53PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-11, wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
> >> has rules, often violated without realizing it.
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Speaking as one user who would like to see this list go back to being a
> place where howto questions are answered by folks with intimate
> knowledge of how its done, an educational resource, even having healthy
> arguments about methods because we are social creatures and
On 8/11/21 5:02 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine. Quit monopolizing the
conversation unless you are helping the user SOLVE his/her p
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 13:20:37 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:00:51 - (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
> Hello Curt,
>
> >Will I have to toss my trusty Brother HL-2030, brother? Fork Cups, I
> >guess, and full speed ahead.
>
> Unless I'm reading it wrong (github post Brian cited e
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 12:39:46 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:36:40 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
> >a future CUPS will not work with PPDs and driver
>
> Indeed, you mentioned that previously (I'd forgotten already). However,
> checking the github post you cite i
On 2021-08-11, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:02:14AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>>Seems like kindness or understanding on the flexibility or some rules
>>are hard to understand.
>>
>>I've got told it is okay to act this way on this list because of the
>
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 12:00:51 -, Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-11, Brian wrote:
> >>
> >> When, eventually, all HP printers run driverless _and_ no no-driverless
> >> printer exist 'in the wild', yes. Until then, I'd expect HPLIP to
> >> remain. Debian is, after all, about choice.
> >
> > The
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:16:04AM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> The package visudo not being installed on this system, [...]
visudo is not a separate package. It's a program included in the
sudo package.
unicorn:~$ type visudo
visudo is /usr/sbin/visudo
unicorn:~$ dpkg -S /usr/sbin/visudo
sudo:
On 2021-08-11, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
>> has rules, often violated without realizing it. You come roaring in here
>
> Agreed. Less roaring would be... nicer.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:00:51 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
Hello Curt,
>Will I have to toss my trusty Brother HL-2030, brother? Fork Cups, I
>guess, and full speed ahead.
Unless I'm reading it wrong (github post Brian cited elsewhere in this
thread), mechanisms are in place for existing printers that
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:36:40 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>a future CUPS will not work with PPDs and driver
Indeed, you mentioned that previously (I'd forgotten already). However,
checking the github post you cite in another message (to this list), it
would appear apple are putting in place
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Roger Price wrote:
Young Stefan had fingers so fast
No filename was safe from the blast
When emacs was "e"
It was easy to see
sud(o)ers was not meant to last
This is fabulous. With two you get egg-roll, but with
debian-user you get a...LIMERICK!
Who knew?
THANKS
Le 11/08/2021 à 12:36, Brian a écrit :
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:19:37 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:54:23 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
As I've said previously, a future CUPS will not support printer drivers.
HPLIP provides printer drivers. There will be little point in
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 08:00:51 Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-11, Brian wrote:
> >> When, eventually, all HP printers run driverless _and_ no
> >> no-driverless printer exist 'in the wild', yes. Until then, I'd
> >> expect HPLIP to remain. Debian is, after all, about choice.
> >
> > The conditi
On 2021-08-11, Brian wrote:
>>
>> When, eventually, all HP printers run driverless _and_ no no-driverless
>> printer exist 'in the wild', yes. Until then, I'd expect HPLIP to
>> remain. Debian is, after all, about choice.
>
> The condition you lay down in the first sentence is not a factor in
>
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 13:42:00 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:14:10AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:00:44 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Le 10/08/2021 à 21:48, Brian a écrit :
> > > > On Tue 10 Aug 2021 at 20:57:56 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:12:08PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-08-09 9:37 p.m., Andy Smith wrote:
> > I'm sorry you feel that way. It has felt quite frustrating having to
> > repeat myself when I thought I was being clear about what I meant.
> I think it would be
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:10:48AM +0200, solon wrote:
> I should probably have specified, but I am certain I am using a compatible
> driver, and backports is enabled.
But what did you *install* from backports? Simply enabling the repository
doesn't do anything. Backports are pinned in such a wa
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 04:21:06 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
[...]
> I doubt that driver will really be gone as printer have specific options
> like the number of drawer, the precision (DPI) and much more.
>
> Often I've read "XYZ will have no place in the future" but still is
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
> has rules, often violated without realizing it. You come roaring in here
[...]
Agreed. Less roaring would be... nicer. For all of us :-)
Cheers
-
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-11 3:49 a.m., Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> > On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
> >>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of thi
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:14:10AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:00:44 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Le 10/08/2021 à 21:48, Brian a écrit :
> > > On Tue 10 Aug 2021 at 20:57:56 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > We'll see at that time, especiall
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:19:37 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:54:23 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
> >As I've said previously, a future CUPS will not support printer drivers.
> >HPLIP provides printer drivers. There will be little point in Debian
> >packaging HPLIP,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:02:14AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Seems like kindness or understanding on the flexibility or some rules
are hard to understand.
I've got told it is okay to act this way on this list because of the
number of user who post without being subscriber.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 5:53 a.m., David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 7:51 PM, Celejar wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:35:32 -0700
>> David Christensen wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/10/21 12:56 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/10/21 8:04 AM, Leandro Noferini wrote:
>
> ht
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 4:55 a.m., Leandro Noferini wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> Ever had the idea of using quota system ?
>
> Is quota to complicated for my needs?
>
We all have different view on what's complicated and what effort we are
ready to put into a ce
On Wed 11 Aug 2021 at 08:00:44 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
[...]
> Le 10/08/2021 à 21:48, Brian a écrit :
> > On Tue 10 Aug 2021 at 20:57:56 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > >
> > > We'll see at that time, especially since what I read from
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/CUPSDriverlessPrinting makes
On 8/10/21 7:51 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:35:32 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
On 8/10/21 12:56 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
On 8/10/21 8:04 AM, Leandro Noferini wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/ZFS
...
- ECC memory is safer than non-ECC memory.
This is
Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside writes:
[...]
> Ever had the idea of using quota system ?
Is quota to complicated for my needs?
--
Ciao
leandro
Hi,
Sorry Andrew for the CC.
This one wasn't done on purpose.
Your message was saved in draft and I did a mistake for the sending.
On 2021-08-11 4:21 a.m., Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-07-24 5:33 a.m., Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 01:07:24AM -04
Hi,
On 2021-07-24 5:33 a.m., Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 01:07:24AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> Hi !
>> How would you copy the debian security update repository ?
>> I know it's not recommended.
>> But I'd like to do so.
>> --
>> Polyna-Maude R.-Summ
Hi,
On 2021-08-10 1:56 p.m., Erwan David wrote:
> Le 10/08/2021 à 16:59, Brian a écrit :
>>
>> CUPS will cease to support drivers and PPDs in the coming years. Users
>> may as well come to terms with driverless printing. HPLIP and other
>> vendor drivers will not have any place in a future CUPS.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 4:01 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Great for you, I find it rude and offensive.
>>
>> You may think it's wrong
>
> I did not THINK it is wron, I quoted to you the rules of this mailing
> that state explicitly it is wrong.
>
Rule
Thanks for the prompt response,
I should probably have specified, but I am certain I am using a
compatible driver, and backports is enabled.
~ lspci -nn | grep VGA
gives
85:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] Oland PRO [Radeon R7 240/340] [1002:6613
On 8/10/21, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 18:59 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>
>> The OP claimed they have nothing pinned, but presented no evidence to
>> support this claim. Perhaps they thought that because they didn't
>> explicitly *pin* anything themselves, there must not be an
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 3:49 a.m., Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>>> hint of
Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
> Great for you, I find it rude and offensive.
>
> You may think it's wrong
I did not THINK it is wron, I quoted to you the rules of this mailing
that state explicitly it is wrong.
> The first message I've answered you was sent in CC, that's all.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 3:41 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>> hint of replying directly to the user when it come
On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>> hint of replying directly to the user when it comes to this mailing
Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
> hint of replying directly to the user when it comes to this mailing list.
That was wrong. Do not do it.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 3:13 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-10):
>> It's the support of MOPRIA.
>> Even if it's mostly made for Android, what it does is offer a discovery
>> and printing protocol compatible with all CUPS system (will publish IP
>> endpoint that s
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:54:23 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>As I've said previously, a future CUPS will not support printer drivers.
>HPLIP provides printer drivers. There will be little point in Debian
>packaging HPLIP, wouldn't you agree? But this is a few years away.
When, eventually, all
Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-10):
> It's the support of MOPRIA.
> Even if it's mostly made for Android, what it does is offer a discovery
> and printing protocol compatible with all CUPS system (will publish IP
> endpoint that support PostScript, PCL and PDF, all depending on the
> pri
72 matches
Mail list logo