Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:18:31PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:35 AM Russell L. Harris > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28:21PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > [...] > > >How did you create the flash device - what command did you use? > > > > After

Re: user accounts in docker group

On 1/21/23 12:42, L L wrote: > The banner at the top of https://wiki.debian.org/Docker > says: > > "The Docker daemon has setUID root, and by design allows easy access as root > to > the host filesystem. This makes it trivial for a malicious user to read and >

Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:19:16AM +, thyme after thyme wrote: > > Charles and tomas, you were both right in your guesses. Thanks a billion > for the help! Glad you found it :) Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

user accounts in docker group

The banner at the top of https://wiki.debian.org/Docker says: "The Docker daemon has setUID root, and by design allows easy access as root to the host filesystem. This makes it trivial for a malicious user to read and alter sensitive system files, or for a careless user to allow a malicious

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote: > Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash" > to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as > recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.service" > completes in two seconds! A

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 21/01/2023 01:55, Charles Curley wrote: root@white:~# ps aux | grep -i openssl root 4586 5.8 0.9 8256 2064 pts/3S+ 11:48 0:00 grep --colour=auto -i openssl root 4587 150 2.1 4720 ?R11:48 0:00 /usr/bin/openssl x509 -subject_hash_old

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote: > Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash" > to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as > recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.service" > completes in two seconds! > >

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 07:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:35 AM Russell L. Harris > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28:21PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > # cp debian-11.6.0-i386-netinst.iso /dev/sdb > > # sync > > I believe you should use dd to preserve the

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 02:35, Russell L. Harris wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28:21PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:23:06AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:18:33PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > >> > On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 2023-01-20 21:11 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2023-01-20 20:45 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> My hunch is that postfix recomputes all the hashes in >> /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs, rather than copying the files from the >> host system into the chroot which would be a lot faster. > >

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:35 AM Russell L. Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28:21PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > [...] > >How did you create the flash device - what command did you use? > > After downloading the official netinst iso image, I copied it to the > flash stick (I

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

Am Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:28:10PM +0100 schrieb Sven Joachim: > On 2023-01-20 13:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: Hello Community, > >> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop > >> there are very

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 2023-01-20 20:45 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2023-01-20 11:55 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100 >> Sven Joachim wrote: >> >>> Clearly something fishy is going on here. >> >> I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's >> a sample of

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:37 AM Charles Curley wrote: > > I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now > refuses to run. > > root@white:/var/spool# systemctl start postfix@-.service > Job for postfix@-.service failed because a timeout was exceeded. > See "systemctl status

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 2023-01-20 11:55 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100 > Sven Joachim wrote: > >> Clearly something fishy is going on here. > > I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's > a sample of what it was doing. It is a processor hog. > >

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:28:22 -0500 Greg Wooledge wrote: > More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue". In this case, laziness. The default timeout is 60 seconds. I added 30 to that. Then doubled it. Etc. That doesn't mean you are wrong. I'd like to know what that ssl command

Re: Web page management. Was: Re: Debian release criteria.

pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Unwieldly References list truncated. > > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 12:45:52 -0500 > > I use uMatrix, which I find strikes a fairly good balance between > > keeping sites working and letting me control how much crap is loaded. > > Another

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:55:35AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > My previous timeout vale was 180 seconds, which wasn't enough. So my > ancient anemic box needed between 180 and 360 seconds to start postfix. > (But see below.) More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue".

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 2023-01-20 13:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: >> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop >> there are very long delays both at boot: >> >> , >> | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1 >> | 33.340s

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote: > Clearly something fishy is going on here. I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's a sample of what it was doing. It is a processor hog. root@white:~# ps aux | grep -i openssl root 4586 5.8 0.9 8256

Web page management. Was: Re: Debian release criteria.

Unwieldly References list truncated. From: Stefan Monnier Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 12:45:52 -0500 > I use uMatrix, which I find strikes a fairly good balance between > keeping sites working and letting me control how much crap is loaded. Another helpful add-on. Thanks! A feature

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop > there are very long delays both at boot: > > , > | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1 > | 33.340s postfix@-.service > ` A delay that's a multiple of

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On 2023-01-20 09:34 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700 > Charles Curley wrote: > >> That suggests there's something wrong with >> the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later >> today. > > Not quite "later today", but: > > A bit of thinking

Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

On 1/20/23, Anssi Saari wrote: > Jude DaShiell writes: > >> I wonder if blkid might be a bit more informative. > > I don't know, I usually run mount without arguments to see what's > mounted or look in the file /proc/mounts. A super simple grep, e.g. "mount|grep sdc", works on it, too. I do it

Re: Cloning a disk: partclone?

On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 14:56 +0200, Anssi Saari wrote: > Tixy writes: > > > Surely it's also straightforward to just copy the data in the partition > > then resize the filesystem... > > > >  cp /dev/sdX1 /dev/sdY1 > >  resize2fs /dev/sdY1 > > Sure. Partclone, since the OP asked about that, can

Re: dhcp-proxy con dnsmasq

El 2023-01-20 a las 14:28 +0100, trujo escribió: > El jue, 19-01-2023 a las 20:38 +0100, Camaleón escribió: > > El 2023-01-19 a las 13:49 +0100, trujo escribió: > > > > > Estoy intentando ponerlo en marcha (con debian estable). > > > la red en la que esta recibe ipes desde un relay situado en el

Re: EOL and EOS for Debian Softwares

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:42:39PM +, Bushra Perveen wrote: > Hi Team, > > Could you please let me know the End of Life and End of Support for the below > Debian software's? > whiptail 0.5 (Linux) > P11 Glue Utilities 0.2 (Linux) > virt-what 1 (Linux) > HTTP Client 6 (Linux) > virt-what 6

Re: [HS] partage de fichiers (pour un nul)

J'utilise homebank pour gérer un budget familial. Le fichier de comptabilité est sur un serveur nextcloud (comme Zaclys) et je peux mettre à jour le fichier depuis n'importe quelle machine équipée de homebank et du client nextcloud. En revanche une seule machine à la fois peut modifier le

Re: Postfix fails after upgrade from bullseye to bookworm

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700 Charles Curley wrote: > That suggests there's something wrong with > the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later > today. Not quite "later today", but: A bit of thinking about it, and I realized that the computer in question is an ancient

EOL and EOS for Debian Softwares

Hi Team, Could you please let me know the End of Life and End of Support for the below Debian software's? whiptail 0.5 (Linux) P11 Glue Utilities 0.2 (Linux) virt-what 1 (Linux) HTTP Client 6 (Linux) virt-what 6 (Linux) DStat 0.7 (Linux) Thanks in advance, Bushra Perveen This e-mail

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:27:39AM -0600, David Wright wrote: On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 05:23:06 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:18:33PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 03:43:09 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: > > I have not figured out how to

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:28:21PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:23:06AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:18:33PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 03:43:09 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: > > I have not figured out how

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 05:23:06 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:18:33PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 03:43:09 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: > > > I have not figured out how to configure the BIOS of a Dell Latitude > > > 3510 to cause it to

Re: Icônes de montage d'une partition ext4

On Friday 20 January 2023 10:28:44 didier gaumet wrote: > Le 19/01/2023 à 19:33, ajh-valmer a écrit : > > Depuis des lustres sous KDE, > Euh... Trinity plutôt, non? Dans Debian 11, KDE c'est Plama5, alors que > tu parles du fork KDE3 maintenu par Trinity. Le but de ma remarque n'est > pas

Re: Server Static IP and At's BGW210

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:39 Tom Browder wrote: BTW, I just found this link from a guy I recently found on Youtube who seems to know his stuff: > https://christitus.com/secure-web-server/ -Tom

Re: [HS] partage de fichiers (pour un nul)

> Bonjour, bonjour, > > Le 2023-01-19 11:12, Jean Louis Giraud Desrondiers a écrit : > > finalement ça n'a pas l'air aussi simple que je le pensais a > > priori ! Merci quand même pour toutes vos réponses. > > Ça peut l'être :) > > J'utilise avec succès depuis des années Grisbi sur plusieurs

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

Am Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 02:16:57PM +0100 schrieb Mario Marietto: Hi Mario, > I still do not understand why,when I remove files on a ZFS disk using > commands like (rm and rm -r),the left space does not increase,but it > decreases. I would like to know what I can do to free some space if >

Re: dhcp-proxy con dnsmasq

El jue, 19-01-2023 a las 20:38 +0100, Camaleón escribió: > El 2023-01-19 a las 13:49 +0100, trujo escribió: > > > Estoy intentando ponerlo en marcha (con debian estable). > > la red en la que esta recibe ipes desde un relay situado en el > > conmutador. > > Si en el servidor DHCP pongo la opción

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

I still do not understand why,when I remove files on a ZFS disk using commands like (rm and rm -r),the left space does not increase,but it decreases. I would like to know what I can do to free some space if removing files does not work. And I don't understand why a ZFS disk goes fast out of space.

Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

Jude DaShiell writes: > I wonder if blkid might be a bit more informative. I don't know, I usually run mount without arguments to see what's mounted or look in the file /proc/mounts.

Re: OpenSolaris Boot Environements equivalent

Yassine Chaouche writes: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on an equivalent of OpenSolaris > BE? A quick search came up with https://docs.zfsbootmenu.org/, does that fit your needs?

Re: Cloning a disk: partclone?

Tixy writes: > Surely it's also straightforward to just copy the data in the partition > then resize the filesystem... > > cp /dev/sdX1 /dev/sdY1 > resize2fs /dev/sdY1 Sure. Partclone, since the OP asked about that, can speed this up for a partition since it's smart enough to not copy parts

Re: dell latitude 3510 - bios settings to boot debian netinst

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 05:23:06AM +, Russell L. Harris wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:18:33PM -0600, David Wright wrote: > > On Fri 20 Jan 2023 at 03:43:09 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote: > > > I have not figured out how to configure the BIOS of a Dell Latitude > > > 3510 to cause it

Re: Efficacité de spamassassin et de postgrey

Le 20 janvier 2023 Sébastien NOBILI a écrit : > Pour un usage quasi personnel (3 boîtes réelles sur mon serveur), j'ai > abandonné ces outils depuis plusieurs années au profit de bogofilter. Tout comme bogofilter spamassassin a un filtre bayésien qu'on peut entraîner. > Inconvénient (ou pas) :

Re: Server Static IP and At's BGW210

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 19:58 David Christensen wrote: … If your AT U-verse residential gateway is anything like mine (Pace > 5268AC FXN), it will have a web server/ control panel accessed … Yes, mine router is similar I own and recommend "Networking for System Administrators" by Lucas: > >

Re: Efficacité de spamassassin et de postgrey

On 1/20/23 12:03, Sébastien NOBILI wrote: Bonjour, Le 2023-01-19 10:08, Francois Mescam a écrit : J'en suis à me demander s'il est encore utile d'utiliser ces outils devant leur peu d'efficacité. Quelqu'un a-t-il des remarques à faire la-dessus ? Pour un usage quasi personnel (3 boîtes

Re: [HS] partage de fichiers (pour un nul)

Bonjour, Le 2023-01-19 11:12, Jean Louis Giraud Desrondiers a écrit : finalement ça n'a pas l'air aussi simple que je le pensais a priori ! Merci quand même pour toutes vos réponses. Ça peut l'être :) J'utilise avec succès depuis des années Grisbi sur plusieurs ordinateurs. Je synchronise

Re: Efficacité de spamassassin et de postgrey

Bonjour, Le 2023-01-19 10:08, Francois Mescam a écrit : J'en suis à me demander s'il est encore utile d'utiliser ces outils devant leur peu d'efficacité. Quelqu'un a-t-il des remarques à faire la-dessus ? Pour un usage quasi personnel (3 boîtes réelles sur mon serveur), j'ai abandonné ces

Re: Cloning a disk: partclone?

Am 19.01.2023 20:14, schrieb Charles Curley: On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:49:57 -0600 Tom Browder wrote: + Can it do a complete clone on an active disk? Or do I need a live CD or USB stick? I wouldn't try backing up a live partition due to issues with referential integrity. Suppose two

Re : Re: [HS] confusion d'outils [Was] Re: Swap en mémoire RAM. Est-ce pertinent?

Bonjour, Il me semble, que le but premier de la swap c'est d'augmenter la mémoire virtuelle et donc de stocker des pages vides. En dehors d'une situation de "pénurie", si un processus a besoin d'utiliser une page (vide) qui était "swapée", le système va trouver une page vide d'un autre

Re: Icônes de montage d'une partition ext4

On 1/20/23 10:28, didier gaumet wrote: Le 19/01/2023 à 19:33, ajh-valmer a écrit : Bonsoir, Depuis des lustres sous KDE, Euh... Trinity plutôt, non? Dans Debian 11, KDE c'est Plama5, alors que tu parles du fork KDE3 maintenu par Trinity. Le but de ma remarque n'est pas d'être désobligeant

Re: partition appears to be mounted, but not according to umount or lsblk

Charles and tomas, you were both right in your guesses. Thanks a billion for the help!

Re: Icônes de montage d'une partition ext4

Le 19/01/2023 à 19:33, ajh-valmer a écrit : Bonsoir, Depuis des lustres sous KDE, Euh... Trinity plutôt, non? Dans Debian 11, KDE c'est Plama5, alors que tu parles du fork KDE3 maintenu par Trinity. Le but de ma remarque n'est pas d'être désobligeant mais de poser le problème correctement

Re: reportbug: don't know: bug in apt [list] or in grep

another excellent example why your posts are almost always worth reading. thank you! :)