On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:07:42 +0100
mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-04-28 16:05, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
&g
e
DDG, certainly for its attitude and track record of taking privacy
seriously, as well as for doing remarkably well as a competitor to
Google with what I assume is a tiny fraction of its resources.
Celejar
tween Bing and Google. Technically they could probably just as
> well rely on Google (or on both).
FWIW, Bing doesn't find the Thetis homepage either, so that supports
your point.
Celejar
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key
> > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn'
uot; to false in "about:config" - no
extensions required.
Celejar
data archives:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deb_%28file_format%29
If both control archive files are using a package name of
"master-pdf-editor", you can try Stefan's suggestion of renaming one
and seeing if they'll then coinstall.
Celejar
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:07:02 +0100
Morgan Read wrote:
> On 23/04/2021 5:40 pm, Celejar wrote:
> > I'll defer to those with a better understanding of the debian packaging
> > system internals, and it may depend on the details of the package, but
> > I'm pretty sure
irtualization. LXC (or some sort of chroot solution) in particular
might be a good fit here - you get a separate filesystem, without the
overhead of a full VM, which shouldn't be necessary in this case.
Celejar
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:42:14 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Interesting. I thought my usecase was a pretty straightforward one - I
> > have various typical home user services that I have no intention of
> > making available on the public internet, so I
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:26:36 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:45:13AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > I have various web (HTTP, not HTTPS) apps (e.g., pi-hole, Home
> > Assistant) running on localhost (either actually on localhost, or on
> > an
ookie store ("Manage Cookies and Site Data")
doesn't show any cookies stored from any site other than localhost.)
This doesn't seem to be an issue for normal web sites, where
whitelisting the website is (generally?) sufficient to get the sites to
work. What am I missing?
Celejar
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:31:11 -0300
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
> On 15/04/2021 09:12, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:16:59 +0100
> > piorunz wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/04/2021 03:15, Celejar wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://www.daat.ac
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:16:59 +0100
piorunz wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 03:15, Celejar wrote:
>
> >> It certainly works fine for me. I use https only mode for many months
> >> now. Can you bring an example of a page which returns good page on http,
> >> but
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:01:13 -0300
riveravaldez wrote:
> On 4/14/21, Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently switched to Firefox's native HTTPS-Only mode from the
> > HTTPS Everywhere extension, and I've just made the nasty discovery that
> > a
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:57:01 +0100
piorunz wrote:
> On 14/04/2021 17:19, Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently switched to Firefox's native HTTPS-Only mode from the
> > HTTPS Everywhere extension, and I've just made the nasty discovery that
> > a
://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25121604
Celejar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:51:20 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:16:55PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:51:13 -0300
> > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > What happens when you try to access https://letsencrypt.org/, whic
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:51:13 -0300
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 11/04/2021 11:25, Celejar wrote:
> > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out.
> >
> > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The
> > browsers object that
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:32:10 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:25:24AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out.
> >
> > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The
> > browsers object that
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:55:41 -0700
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11 2021 at 10:25:24 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out.
> >
> > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The
> > browsers objec
gestions for fixing this in my case. I have
a pretty standard Debian installation, with standard certificates
installed, and no customization to my local certificate infrastructure.
I'm connecting via Verizon FioS, with no proxy in use (on my end, at
least).
Celejar
On Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:30:45 +0200
Linux-Fan wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:48:01 +0300
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > On Vi, 09 apr 21, 08:02:46, Celejar wrote:
> > > > What about cases where the software simply isn&#x
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:48:01 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 09 apr 21, 08:02:46, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > What about cases where the software simply isn't in Debian at all?
> > Recently, I've used IntelliJ IDEA and Android Studio, and I'd like to
> &
uot;the easiest way to install Nextcloud on a web space"
* Appliance, i.e., a pre-built VM, "designed to be an easy way for less
technical users to get Nextcloud up and running or to test it out" (so
perhaps only one level of containerization, not Docker on top of a VM,
as per another part of this thread)
Celejar
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:39:23 +0200
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:28:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Sorry, I meant NextCloud
>
> I see. I kept myself confusing those two for a while.
>
> AFAIK it's packaged in Debian? Too
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:51:29 +0200
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:02:46AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:21:49 +0200
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Can you pose one concrete use case where it is unavoidable?
> >
> > What a
e of these.
A third solution to consider: firejail (I use Zoom firejailed)
Celejar
may rely upon system
libraries and other dependencies, which is good, insofar as everything
works, but it will also have more of a chance to mess with the system
(even if only accidentally).
Celejar
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:18:29 +0200
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:07:20AM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> > Hellow,
> >
> > Celejar writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
&
tu is it uses way too much snaps and I do not think it is a
> > matter of laziness.
>
> I had occasion to install Zoom a few weeks ago;'snap install zoom-client'.
> Everything went smoothly and I quite like having this proprietary package
> strictly confined.
'apt install zoom_amd64.deb' goes smoothly as well. Confinement is
certainly a good thing - I'll have to look into whether the snap route
is preferable to the firejail solution that I currently use.
Celejar
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:31:29 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
> On 06.04.2021 01:14, Celejar wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> >> Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving your
>
ction. I just haven't been able to figure out how
much of a "standard" it actually is. Some RFCs (e.g.,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233) acknowledge it as existing ("On
email systems that allow for 'subaddressing' or 'detailed
addressing' (e.g., "ken+si...@example.org") ..."), but it doesn't seem
to be a formal standard.
Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:39:43 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address
> > > > a logical part of a
On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:50:30 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Celejar [2021-04-05 14:49:15] wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> Celejar wrote:
> >> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:57:50 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:10:05 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > >
>
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > What's the recommended modern bes
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Celejar wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > >
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email
> > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud
> > bots?
>
> Assum
inst current
bots?
http://www.wbwip.com/wbw/emailencoder.html
Celejar
ain name server.
A notable class of exceptions is that of OpenWrt powered devices:
OpenWrt comes with dnsmasq configured out of the box, and thus provides
caching.
Celejar
x27;s packaging tools or
> similar... :-)
'apt-file search pdflatex'
'apt-file' is in the 'apt-file' package - it keeps a local database,
which one updates periodically / occasionally via 'apt-file update'.
Celejar
d some trouble getting xsane to find my networked Brother
HL-2280DW. I eventually got it to work by adding "brother4" to
/etc/sane.d/dll.conf, following the directions from the ArchWiki:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SANE/Scanner-specific_problems#Network_Scanning
Celejar
where a simple 'cat' won't work - I use its 'concat demuxer'
regularly to contatenate MP4 files (Android starts a new video file when
a 4GB limit is hit):
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate
Celejar
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:53:13 -0300
riveravaldez wrote:
> On 3/18/21, Celejar wrote:
...
> > (...) The bottom line: no, I don't "know" that WhatsApp is secure, but
> > neither do I "know" that anything I run is. (...)
>
> To put it simply, I can&
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:49:27 -0300
riveravaldez wrote:
> I'm getting pretty confuse with these statements.
>
> On 3/18/21, Celejar wrote:
> > (...)
> > I definitely share your concerns about Facebook (although perhaps not
> > quite your vehemence), but making **
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:25:48 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I definitely share your concerns about Facebook (although perhaps not
> > quite your vehemence),
>
> :-)
>
> >
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:28:06 +0100
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:54:24PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:45:28 +0100
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 09:24:50AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
it's closed source, so we can't know for sure what's really
in there, and I certainly won't use it, but as far as anyone knows, it
is the real deal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whatsapp#End-to-end_encryption
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/whatsapp-is-now-most-widely-used-end-to-end-crypto-tool-on-the-planet/
Celejar
script. This can be done quickly without pushing code to Github.
This is pretty much what I use - I have the following snippet
in .config/mc/mc.ext :
# Markdown
shell/i/.md
View=pandoc %f | lynx -stdin
Not quite a GUI, but close ;)
Celejar
es.debian.org/buster/pandoc) can do that for you with a
> > > simple "pandoc -o README.html README.md" or "pandoc -o README.pdf
> > > README.md" etc.
> >
> > Or, at the other end of the spectrum, you might like to try out Typora.
> > Cheers!
>
> Looks nice, thank you. I did not quite understand however, is it a
> commercial software, non-free?
Yes:
https://support.typora.io/License-Agreement/
https://snapcraft.io/typora
Celejar
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key
> > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn'
with
Google. And I do usually access Google without being logged in, with
most cookies blocked, NoScript, etc., so in general it has much less
(not zero, of course) "context" with regard to me than it does in
general.
Celejar
ately due to its
openness and non-x86ness:
https://www.osnews.com/story/133093/review-blackbird-secure-desktop-a-fully-open-source-modern-power9-workstation-without-any-proprietary-code/
Of course, Raptor seems to be a tiny player, and it's hard to see how
they'll get any traction since the pricing isn't very competitive,
apparently at least in part due to the chicken-and-egg market share
problem, but it's an exciting development to watch.
Celejar
e:
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/frobtads
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=frobtads&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
Celejar
; filled.
> >
> > I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and
> > work your way down.
>
> My personal favorite:
>
> du -hx --max-depth=1 | sort -h
As someone else mentioned in this thread, 'ncdu' is very convenient
for disk usage exploration, due to its interactive, navigable
interface.
Celejar
nitely not on the whitelist, so the machine
refused to boot, and I couldn't disable Secure Boot without graphics
output. (Even blindly resetting CMOS may not work, since HP flashes a
code on the screen which you have to enter via the keyboard to confirm
changes, at least under certain circumstances.) I eventually wound up
spending $13 for a Nvidia NVS 315 that was on the whitelist, and then
another $8 for a DMS-59 adapter to make the thing work with a normal
monitor ...
But again, the advantages of the hardware quality once you get this
sort of nonsense ironed out are substantial ...
Celejar
to be doing it.
2) That being said, here's a solution someone built for Arch - I don't
know how easy it'll be to port it over to Debian:
https://github.com/grazzolini/mkinitcpio-tor
Celejar
2758/how-to-use-27c6538d-goodix-fingerprint-dell-inspiron-5490-dell-vostro-5590
[Hint: when trying to get hardware working, try searching the web for
the USB ids along with "linux".]
Celejar
on the NIC hardware itself. Winmodems therefore often lack Linux
support, since software has to be written for the host, while loadable
firmware doesn't pose any particular technical problem for Linux (aside
from the ideological problem of it being non-free).
Celejar
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:05:38 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:16:25AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
...
> > I know I can't avoid the risk
> > entirely, but this is one of the reasons I try hard to limit my use of
> > software to stuff in the repos.
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:14:08 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:21:46AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:59 +0100
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 4
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:05:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:10:45 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > Joe wrote:
...
> > > Indeed. The new heartbeat/data return function in OpenSSL, itself
> > > the core of much
ed a backdoor?
> Assunto: Re: Trusting trust [was: PARTIAL DIAGNOSIS of Installation problems]
> De: to...@tuxteam.de
> Enviado em: 4 de março de 2021 10:18
> Para: cele...@gmail.com
> Cópia: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:17:59 +0100
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:10:45AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:41:13 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Undoubtedly. But there is also no doubt that gcc and every other
&
ngs being what they are, is it really plausible that no one
involved has ever let the cat out of the bag? Are the TLAs really that
good at what they do? I mean, we have Snowden ...
Celejar
) in the past, and believe there are other choices:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/buster/approx
There are, notably apt-cacher and apt-cacher-ng. I use the latter, and
I'm very happy with it - one generally doesn't notice it's there.
Celejar
; to the appropriate section. pdf2htmlEX *IGNORES* them!
>
> A suggested tool?
You can try pdftohtml, in poppler-utils. I don't know whether it will
suffer from the same problem you have with pdf2htmlEX
Celejar
[Fixed top-posting.]
On Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:23:51 +
David Goodenough wrote:
> On Monday, 1 March 2021 09:29:57 GMT Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Du, 28 feb 21, 12:03:31, Celejar wrote:
> > > Snark aside, what's wrong with something like this:
> > >
> &g
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:11:51 +
Brian wrote:
> On Sun 28 Feb 2021 at 12:03:31 -0500, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:49:58 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri 26 Feb 2021 at 16:28:56 -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > >
t ask ask why the inferior installer is prominent :).)
Snark aside, what's wrong with something like this:
"Many wireless network cards (and even some wired ones) require
non-free firmware to function properly. This firmware is not included
in the standard installation images, due to Debian's free software
ideals. If the network hardware your installation will rely upon
requires such firmware, you may consider using the alternate non-free
installation images available here."
Celejar
ommon this is with modern NICs.
Celejar
ason is very common: I need "Python 3.9", but stable Debian
> doesn't have it.
> So, I have to use Docker.
>
> There is even a Linux distro that doesn't have anything except bare core
> OS: "Core OS"
And Ubuntu is apparently going in that direction, although I don't know
how far they plan to go:
https://www.howtogeek.com/670084/what-you-need-to-know-about-snaps-on-ubuntu-20.04/
Celejar
(upstream doesn't maintain a
sufficiently stable version, etc.) are not packaged for Debian, and
going the Docker / Flatpak / Snap route is quite tempting.
Celejar
> library package forcibly installed to a different location is suddenly
> unavailable for packages that might need it. And this is just the
> beginning of potential problems if you go this route.
Aren't Windows DLLs roughly analogous to Linux library packages?
Celejar
. Your changes to the /etc/resolv.conf file will be overwritten,
> > probably within an hour.
> >
> > At this point, please read <https://wiki.debian.org/resolv.conf> to
> > see what your options are, for making permanent changes to
> > resolv.conf. It's really stupidly complicated, and there's no point
> > in my repeating it all here.
Celejar
s was before HP specialised on building inkjets of [CENSORED]
> quality.
Hey, I have a Z440 (purchased cheaply on eBay). It's a very nice, high
quality machine, and it runs linux beautifully ;)
Celejar
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:42:40 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > > If you are OK buying used equipment, Intel-based gigabit NICs, 4 ports
> > > to a PCIe slot, cost about $35 (or $70 new). If you've got a 5 year old
> >
> > My understanding - pl
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:03:35 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > > I can be glad that OpenWRT has improved their security practices
> > > and simultaneously not be interested in using it.
> >
> > I think we are really in basic agreement. The reason
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:57:13 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:36:34 -0500
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > OpenWRT's security process doesn't look as terrible as it used
> > > to be, but it doesn't real
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:36:34 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 06:41:23 -0500
> > Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > > Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > > > If you want a Linux router/AP, I recommend OpenWRT over Debian. It runs
>
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 04:44:26 +0200
John Berden wrote:
> Hello.
> Can you recommend any trusted repositories for installing the latest
> developer packages, including Python?
> Thanks in advance!
Please be more specific - what exactly are you trying to accomplish? An
example?
Celejar
/security/2021/dsa-4844
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2021/msg00026.html
https://openwrt.org/advisory/2021-01-19-1
Celejar
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 07:25:45 -0800
cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote:
> How do you remove a WiFi AP in Buster?
You're going to have to be more specific about what software framework
you're using to manage your WiFi access, and what you mean by "remove."
Celejar
cripts that use standard tools should
explicitly disable configuration file reading, e.g.:
wget --no-config ...
Celejar
the firmware packages installed, but X
wouldn't start. I didn't experiment too much further to see how much
functionality the card provided without its firmware.
Celejar
bian.org/NVIDIA%20Optimus
FWIW, I've gotten the Quadro K620M on my Lenovo W550s to work with a fair
amount of fiddling using various methods (Optimus, nvidia-xrun), but
the performance was always disappointing and (for me) just not worth
it, so I don't bother.
Celejar
d it did work simply and nicely.
Huh - that looks neat! I have Syncthing set up to do my file
transferring between phone, laptop, and servers, but this certainly
looks like a useful solution for situations where one just needs a
quick and simple way to do a file transfer.
Thanks,
Celejar
or just asking your own question on the forums).
FWIW, I've been using a TP-Link AC2600 with OpenWrt for years, and I've
been pretty satisfied with it.
Celejar
t require any firmware at all.
> Ath9k is limited to 802.1n though. See [2] for an example list.
>
> Reco
>
> [1] https://hackaday.com/2016/02/26/fcc-locks-down-router-firmware
> [2] https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath9k/products/external
Celejar
't need to backup when
upgrading, either. (Of course, you should always be backing up
everything you care about, whatever you're doing.)
Celejar
they
currently still require a phone number.
Celejar
ive is just sitting there, but I can't decide
whether to go with a new install, and spend the time getting rid of
stuff I really don't need (which will take more time than the actual
install, as you say) and migrate configuration, or to just do what Felix
suggests in another method in this thread and just clone partitions.
Celejar
o much more elegant solutions (just an example):
>
> https://shop.protonmail.com/products/webcam-cover
Yes. And what does "audio is off" mean - is the microphone physically
sound-shielded, or just disabled in software (on some level of the
system)? If the latter, why shouldn't that suffice for the camera as
well?
Celejar
On Fri, 1 Jan 2021 12:41:38 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 09:50:00AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:13:54 -0500
> >Michael Stone wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:59:36AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >> >I
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 11:13:54 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:59:36AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> >I don't know how to evaluate this. But still, if the camera is
> >reporting 720p, shouldn't the applications default to that?
>
> The optical qu
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:48:33 +0100
Eugen Dedu wrote:
> Hi Celejar,
>
> To find out the capabilities of your camera, you can install v4l-utils
> and execute:
> v4l2-ctl --list-devices
> v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --list-formats
> v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --list-formats-ext
&
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:53:37 -0800 (PST)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 décembre 2020 à 16:40:06 UTC+1, Celejar a écrit :
> [...]
> > 1) Why does VLC default to the lower resolution? Incidentally, I see
> > that Cheese also opens the camera by default at a lower resol
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:02:31 -0800 (PST)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 décembre 2020 à 16:40:06 UTC+1, Celejar a écrit :
> [...]
> > 1) Why does VLC default to the lower resolution? Incidentally, I see
> > that Cheese also opens the camera by default at a lower resol
mehow figure out that he has to first discover the
offered resolutions via something like lsusb or Cheese [0], and then enter
them manually via the 'width' and 'height' parameters?!
Who designed this thing's UIs? At least Cheese offers a relatively
straightforward way of setting the resolution.
[0]
https://askubuntu.com/questions/214977/how-can-i-find-out-the-supported-webcam-resolutions
Celejar
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 22:24:58 +0100
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > Some recent update to unstable seems to have broken Xfce4 for me:
>
> The Xfce team is uploading Xfce 4.16 at the moment. Because not all
> components can be uploaded in one go, this may
201 - 300 of 3117 matches
Mail list logo
