Re: Dell E6410, squeeze, touchpad anddddd keyboard problems

2010-12-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 12/23/2010 08:44 AM, Johann Spies wrote: Apologies for the long post but it is along and sad story :) I have been made sad by a Dell laptop or two. ;-) ... Maybe all the problems are related to my inabillity to disable the touchpad. On this

Re: Dell E6410, squeeze, touchpad anddddd keyboard problems

2010-12-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 12/23/2010 09:46 AM, Johann Spies wrote: Thanks Gilbert. That has disabled the touchpad. Now let us hope the other keyboard-problems will come to an end. Immediately as I type this, it feels if the keyboard reaction is faster and so far I did not miss a character. I'll keep my fingers

Re: Poppler error: floating point exception (lenny)

2010-12-19 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 12/19/2010 11:37 AM, Camaleón wrote: Hello, I am getting a floating point exception error message from Evince when opening some PDF files (a sample is linked bellow). The file gets opened but as soon as I'm reading pages (page 1, page 2, page 3...), at some point Evince closes by itself.

Re: Setting a default network cups printer

2010-12-13 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 12/13/2010 01:12 PM, Joel Roth wrote: Does anyone know how to handle this _without_ root permissions? I see there is an 'lp' group and user. Within the narrow context of this question I believe you can add any regular user to the lpadmin group to give that user permissions to configure

Re: Non native English speaker is checking whether a phrasing should be filed a minor bug report.

2010-12-01 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 11/30/2010 09:07 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:33:42 -0600 John Haslerjhas...@debian.org wrote: Cybe R. Wizard writes: Yes, it is obviously changing. These days it is preferred to use, proved, as the past participle of prove instead of, proven. The same goes for,

Re: Unison-gtk profiles removal

2010-11-20 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 11/20/2010 05:44 PM, Gary Roach wrote: I just installed Unison-gtk 2.32.52 (squeeze) sync tool on a KDE, Squeeze system. How do you delete or edit a profile. There seems to be no provisions for either. Gary R. Look in /home/user/.unison. Each profile is represented by a plain text file

X restarted, then lost ability to log on as specific user.

2010-11-02 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
System is Debian testing Xfce. Software installations strictly limited to those available from the standard repositories -- no contrib, no non-free software. While I was using the system this morning (Icedove, ssh -X session connected to another similar system, a couple of text editors, Zim

Re: X restarted, then lost ability to log on as specific user.

2010-11-02 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
I forgot to add a finding from Xorg.0.log.old: (II) NOUVEAU(0): EDID vendor SEC, prod id 12629 (II) NOUVEAU(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines: (II) NOUVEAU(0): Modeline 1920x1200x0.0 161.84 1920 2020 2052 2184 1200 1202 1208 1235 -hsync -vsync (74.1 kHz) Fatal server error:

Re: X restarted, then lost ability to log on as specific user.

2010-11-02 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 11/02/2010 01:49 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: I forgot to add a finding from Xorg.0.log.old: (II) NOUVEAU(0): EDID vendor SEC, prod id 12629 (II) NOUVEAU(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines: (II) NOUVEAU(0): Modeline 1920x1200x0.0 161.84 1920 2020 2052 2184 1200 1202 1208 1235 -hsync -vsync

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-28 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/27/2010 07:23 PM, Rob Owens wrote: I'm inclined to call it a bug in firestarter, but to be sure, test it out with Network Manager instead of wicd. See if you have the same problem. I think you will, which will indicate the problem is with firestarter (or possibly with the way you

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-26 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 12:15 PM, Rob Owens wrote: If your firewall script references an IP address (which you don't have when the network is down), I think it needs the network to be up in order to run. If the script only references the interface (eth0, for example) it might run even if the network is

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-24 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 02:38 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: ... I'm guessing I should try to run firestarter in the Pre-connection Script field first, and then fall back to using the Post-connection Script field if Pre-connection fails. Now I just have to decide which of the firestarter scripts it makes

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-24 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/24/2010 07:45 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: This is a pretty sophisticated firewall front end, allowing for connection sharing and allowing you to limit service connections to specific IP addresses or IP address ranges, but it's

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 04:57 AM, Greg Madden wrote: Runlevel 2 is the default runlevel. Look for a link: '/etc/rc2.d/Sxxfirestarter - ../init.d/firestarter' Hi, Greg. Thanks to you and Rob I'm getting a bit of an education. I found /etc/rc2.d/S19firestarter. It does not contain any apparent (to

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 08:16 AM, Rob Owens wrote: What if the network isn't up when firestarter is asked to start? Would it start anyway? Would it fail to start and log an error? Or would it fail silently? I'm not sure of the answers to the above. Maybe you could try shutting down your network

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 12:15 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Starting Network connection manager: wicd. startpar: service(s) returned failure: firestarter ... failed! Running scripts in rc2.d/ took xx seconds. Ah, you're using wicd. For each

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Post Script to Previous Message: The failure of the Scripts button to bring up anything led me to deliberately try entering the wrong password, and that got me a modal dialog: --8--- Failed to run

change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
I'm running Firestarter 1.0.3 on Debian testing (both systems involved in this message). A number of months ago I was in a situation where I wanted to establish an SSH connection from my notebook to a desktop system. Because the network on which this desktop system resides is less well

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 01:56 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the Firestarter user interface during a given

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 04:29 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:00:40PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 10/22/2010 01:56 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 08:18 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: There is an /etc/init.d/firestarter file and an /etc/firestarter/configuration file (that later one being present in its directory with a whole bunch of other files.). After a fresh

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 07:42 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 14:57:15 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started

Re: [solved] Re: Chicken-egg printer problem

2010-10-19 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/19/2010 07:59 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: Rodolfo Medinarodolfo.med...@gmail.com writes: However, I have now another problem: after cleaning the heads, the print quality remains bad. They told me it may depend on the heads dried or maybe broken. In any case, they told that the printer

Re: [solved] Re: Chicken-egg printer problem

2010-10-19 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/19/2010 11:40 AM, Klistvud wrote: The printer and cartridges business model has been a thorn in the side of conscientious consumers for years. You can say that again! Although I might characterize the position of the pain as being more toward the posterior than the side. ;-) -- To

Re: icedove and iceweasel not recognizing chromium-browser as default browser

2010-10-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/14/2010 03:24 AM, Lisi wrote: On Thursday 14 October 2010 00:15:10 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 10/13/2010 06:16 PM, Lisi wrote: On Wednesday 13 October 2010 19:51:21 Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:43:50 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: (...) Would anyone know how I can make

Re: icedove and iceweasel not recognizing chromium-browser as default browser

2010-10-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/14/2010 04:01 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:15:10 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Why on earth would the Mozilla people set the mail client to behave this way? Mozilla applications handle those things based on their own stuff/code (mime types, network protocols... are all

Re: Partitioning a drive with Windows 7 already installed

2010-10-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/14/2010 09:35 AM, Preston Boyington wrote: Mark wrote: snipped None of this matters if you use Clonezilla. So why even fiddle with it when there's a great alternative? I use Clonezilla a great deal, but most people don't think to make an image of the machine before they start Windows

icedove and iceweasel not recognizing chromium-browser as default browser

2010-10-13 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Debian testing, Xfce - with icedove, iceweasel, and chromium-browser installed. I decided to set chromium-browser as the default Web browser. In all other applications if I click on a Web link, the page loads in chromium-browser. If I click on a Web link within icedove, iceweasel is

Re: icedove and iceweasel not recognizing chromium-browser as default browser

2010-10-13 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/13/2010 06:16 PM, Lisi wrote: On Wednesday 13 October 2010 19:51:21 Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:43:50 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: (...) Would anyone know how I can make icedove and iceweasel recognize my choice of a default browser? Not exactly a serious problem

Re: [FOLLOWUP] video card reccomendation

2010-10-07 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/07/2010 02:11 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Du, 03 oct 10, 22:05:44, Sven Joachim wrote: In any case, more feedback on nouveau would be welcome. We've got a few positive answers when the package was uploaded in March, but since then all we received are a dozen of more or less serious

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-09 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/09/2010 12:29 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Mi, 08 sep 10, 19:24:11, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 09/08/2010 06:04 PM, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:25:44 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: ... youtube.com watching dumb stuff I don't need to be watching. I used

aptitude called chromium-browser obsolete

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Kind of an odd thing showed up on three Debian testing systems this morning. This all use Xfce for the DE, and they use the /etc/apt/sources.list configured like so: --8 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main deb-src

Re: aptitude called chromium-browser obsolete

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 01:31 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net writes: I don't remember seeing chromium-browser on the removal lists. Did I miss it, or is something else afoot? Chromium has been removed[1] from testing yesterday. See also the discussion[2] on

Re: aptitude called chromium-browser obsolete

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 01:42 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, this blog entry explains the problem Chromium is facing: http://www.iuculano.it/en/linux/debian/chromium-browser-removed-from-testing/ It's still available in Sid in version 6.0.472.53~r57914-3 Cheers. Yes, thanks for the link. I

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 02:17 PM, hugo vanwoerkom wrote: B. Alexander wrote: I'm just wondering, since firefox/iceweasel seems to be getting unusable. I have a 2.2GHz C2D box with an nvidia card at home, and a 3.0GHz C2D with a (lame) ATI card at work. I find that firefox (or xulrunner-stub) have memory

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 03:50 PM, Angus Hedger wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:06:05 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: I'll be looking at the the version 6 chromium-browser when it shows up in testing. (The version 5 browser was removed today.) I'm especially interested in seeing what

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 04:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-09-08 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: I'll be looking at the the version 6 chromium-browser when it shows up in testing. (The version 5 browser was removed today.) Could be a long time until this happens. Meanwhile, there is no real

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 05:07 PM, Angus Hedger wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:53:58 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: Ah! That makes more sense. I was kind of feeling dirty for a little bit there, wondering just who the GNU/Linux developers might be crawling into bed with! Chromium is

Re: Straw poll: What browser do you use?

2010-09-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/08/2010 06:04 PM, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:25:44 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: ... youtube.com watching dumb stuff I don't need to be watching. I used to just use youtube-dl, and that tended to make me more choosy about what I would bother with. +1

Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
I have a Panasonic subnotebook (CF-R3) that has been functioning superbly for months under Squeeze with Xfce/gdm. It has an integrated Intel video system and a Japanese / English keyboard with which I have used the standard kernel mapping (chosen during Expert install). This is Squeeze with no

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 11:05 AM, Alex Kuklin wrote: 1) show a)`uname -a` output b) `lspci` output there are chances that the problem resides in new xorg drivers/code. Next steps depend on you particular video card model. Thanks, Alex. ~# uname -a Linux argh 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Wed Aug 25 14:28:12

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 11:07 AM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: Not an exact solution, but perhaps you should not run testing as a desktop: http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-choosing.en.html Not meant to be snarky, just trying to say testing is for testing. I understand what you're saying, but I made the

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 11:36 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-09-04 17:23 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) My

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: You could also try wicd-curses if that's installed, or use X with the vesa driver. Here's an /etc/X11/xorg.conf for that: --8---cut here---start-8--- Section Device Identifier n Driver

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 11:07 AM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: Now, on to something more helpful: can you boot the machine into a live distro of some sort, to verify that the machine it's self does not have a failure? Hi, Damon. Just wanted to get back to you. The hardware is okay. Sven reminded me that I

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 11:05 AM, Alex Kuklin wrote: 1) show a)`uname -a` output b) `lspci` output there are chances that the problem resides in new xorg drivers/code. Next steps depend on you particular video card model. Hi, Alex. The information you had me get via the 'uname -a' and 'lspci' commands

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 01:44 PM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: Install apt-listbugs. That way before the packages installs, you will get a list of reported bugs against that package and you can decide if you want to continue or not. Thank you for the heads-up on that. I actually have apt-listchanges

Re: Squeeze System Bricked after Software Upgrades 09/04

2010-09-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 09/04/2010 02:00 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: Well, if the disadvantages of vesa do not bother you. It's slow and may not support your display's native resolution, but it works for basic 2D. I'm thinking I'll stick with vesa for now. And it does support this display's native resolution of

Re: Software to handle bits and pieces of information.

2010-08-04 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 08/04/2010 04:06 PM, Carl Johnson wrote: Gary Roachgary719_li...@verizon.net writes: Hi; I could use some suggestions. I seem to collect a lot of snippets of information scribbled on pieces of paper, old napkins, etc. Examples are notes on harware, sources for stuff, notes on possible

Re: [Slightly OT] Laptop battery draining in Lenny

2010-07-30 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 07/30/2010 08:08 PM, Christian Jaeger wrote: 2010/7/30 Markmamar...@gmail.com: Or do you shutdown when the battery reaches, say, 5%? I just ordered a few laptop battery replacements I guess you're talking about Lithium ion or Lithium polymer batteries (as all modern devices are using

Re: some hplip components non-functional after python changes?

2010-07-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 07/14/2010 11:08 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:22:08 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: Hello Gilbert, Two clean installations of daily build of Debian Squeeze are unable to run hp-setup. Today's update of hplip (testing) rectified this for me. Hi,

some hplip components non-functional after python changes?

2010-07-08 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Before I start the e-mail, let me apologize for having first accidentally posted this message from an e-mail alias. That one (jpwallen_at_comcast.net) can be ignored. That address isn't subscribed to the list and is used mostly for commercial communications for my company. Now, to the point

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-15 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Clean slate, sort of. I've removed any xorg.conf and am not blacklisting any more. System docked will not give me a display on the external screen, whether booted from old kernel or new one. System undocked works perfectly. I'm attaching a new dmesg output with the system docked with the

Re: Debian Community Poll

2010-06-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/14/2010 11:56 AM, Aioanei Rares wrote: On 06/14/2010 06:49 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: 2010/6/14 Mark Goldshteinmark.goldsht...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: A section from today's issue of the Debian Project News: Debian Community

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-14 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-12 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: I have both xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and xser-xorg-video-fbdev installed (just confirmed it in aptitude), but it doesn't appear that they are being used. I see. The latest xserver-xorg-core

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-13 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: You may as well blacklist nouveau then, since it is completely useless without KMS (the nouveau X driver requires KMS). Note, however, that without an xorg.conf the most recent xserver-xorg-core will still load the module. I decided to take baby

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-13 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/11/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: I've ran into this too, and got this solved by blacklisting the nouveau module in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf (adding a line containing just blacklist nouveau), and adding modeset=0 to my kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst (I am still on

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-12 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/12/2010 04:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: This is to be expected, because it detects and uses the display's native resolution. This is usually what you want, but you can override it with the video=800x600 boot parameter (or whatever other resolution you like). Looks like I have a bit of

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-12 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/12/2010 01:42 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-12 15:38 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 06/12/2010 04:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: Thanks. I don't see anything unusual in it, in particular nouveau detects the 1680x1050 resolution of the external display: [7.308183] [drm

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-12 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-12 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: I have both xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and xser-xorg-video-fbdev installed (just confirmed it in aptitude), but it doesn't appear that they are being used. I see. The latest xserver-xorg-core

Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-11 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally connected to a port replicator and DVI display (1680x1050). Upgraded from 2.6.32-3 to 2.6.32-6

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-11 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/11/2010 03:08 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2010-06-11 19:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally

Re: Upgrade Kernel, Lose External Display

2010-06-11 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 06/11/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:06:04 -0400 Gilbert Sullivanwhirly...@comcast.net wrote: Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch of verbiage in dmesg

<    1   2