On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:59:35PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Greg Wooledge composed on 2021-10-21 09:27 (UTC-0400):
>
> > Now, knowing that this is a piece of hardware that was released in 2021,
> > I would *not* attempt to run Debian 9 on it. You *might* be able to
> > run Debian 11 on it, if
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:09:20AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> alt...@emypeople.net wrote:
> > In general I'm wondering if it is possible to upgrade an older Debian
> > system to be compatible with newer hardware, without upgrading the whole
> > system to a later Debian version?
> >
> >
> > In
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:59:09PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 19 Sep 2018 at 14:41:24 -0500, Jason wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 01:32:47AM -0300, Felipe Portales wrote:
> > > El domingo, 16 de septiembre de 2018 17:15:16 -03, Glenn English escribió:
> > > > Anybody know of a civilized,
6640 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>
> Martin
>
>
> Am 13.09.2018 um 23:16 schrieb Allen Hoover:
> > I have an SSD that has some serious issues. It conta
I have an SSD that has some serious issues. It contains files that
are fairly important to recover. The user had not done backups quite
recently.
If I view the SSD in parted, it says unrecognized disk label, and the
size is shown as 1073MB instead of 120GB as it should.
I have another SSD here
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 07:23:35PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:03:14AM -0600, Sergio Arana wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> first of all: don't just "answer" to a mail in the
> list with another new topic. This is called "thread
> hijacking" and confuses the hell out of
> > Let a car move like a Hooverboat!
> >
>
> Um, any search results for that are likely to be spelling mistakes ... I
> think the word you're after is 'hover' :-)
>
> Richard
>
Hoover looks totally fine to me!!
Regards,
Allen Hoover
-Original Message-
> From: Brian
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: 08/09/18 11:25
> Subject: Re: Brother or Canon; not both
>
> On Thu 09 Aug 2018 at 11:10:44 +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> > On Wed 08 Aug 2018 at 19:12:09 -0500, Allen Hoover w
> On Wed 08 Aug 2018 at 19:12:09 -0500, Allen Hoover wrote:
>
> > Ever since upgrading some customized Debian 64bit systems to Debian 8, I've
> > had trouble with the Canon UFRII printer drivers. I've now been
> > testing this issue on a vanilla Debian 8, and Debian 9
Ever since upgrading some customized Debian 64bit systems to Debian 8, I've
had trouble with the Canon UFRII printer drivers. I've now been
testing this issue on a vanilla Debian 8, and Debian 9 system with the
same issues on both.
I use official Brother printer drivers which are i386 only, so
10 matches
Mail list logo
