On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:05:19 Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
rather than suggest that the DM team was under any obligation to keep
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:32:53 +, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 24 February 2011 15:05:19 Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
rather than suggest
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2011-02-23 19:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
then spread those changes elsewhere- for any update in D-M repositories.
WHY
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:25:51 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2011-02-23 19:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
then spread those
Hello Camaleón,
Am 2011-02-25 14:43:25, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Did I mention Christian at all?
Christian is toe Owner/Responsable for the Domain D-M.
If you read the full thread you'll find out what (and why) I was asking
what I asked.
In my opinion, USERS which use external
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:48:43 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Did I mention Christian at all?
Christian is toe Owner/Responsable for the Domain D-M.
Yes, I know. But I did not mention anyone in special, my question was
rather generic.
If you read the full thread you'll find out what (and
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:36:36 +0100, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On the 23/02/2011 20:50, Camaleón wrote:
I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
then spread those changes elsewhere- for
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:37:42 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
When I read it, I felt Camaléon meant ‘What do you guys think?’..
rather than suggest that the DM team was under any obligation to keep
us posted with regard to their progress.
Yes..? No..?
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:06:56 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 13:50:36 Camaleón wrote:
I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
then spread those changes
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:51:46 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
When I first read D-M notice about discontinuation of lenny, I
reviewed D- M lists to find additional information or explanation
about the change but there was no post on this matter or I couldn't
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:14:12 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:51:46 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
When I first read D-M notice about discontinuation of lenny, I reviewed
D- M lists to find additional information or explanation about the
change but there was no post on this
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:26:39 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
1/ If that was going to be a final or just a temporary decision
2/ What was the problem (broken can mean many things)
Indeed, neither point was addressed by Christian, at the time of the
announcement.
On the 24/02/2011 15:51, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:36:36 +0100, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, since debian-multimedia is a side project and not Debian proper it
makes sense that news regarding d-m are posted on d-m list and not here.
Yes, but not every Debian user
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:34:36 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:26:39 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
1/ If that was going to be a final or just a temporary decision 2/
What was the problem (broken can mean many things)
Indeed, neither point was addressed by
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:32:05 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Let's give Christian a big thanks and help him as much as we can to
spread here any important D-M change/notice.
There's also a donate (via PayPal) button on the D-M home page for
those that /really/
Hello All,
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
available, according to Christian.
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
available, according to Christian.
Good.
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:16:35 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Camaleón,
Good.
I knew somebody would appreciate it. :-)
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
widespread a bit more what is going on?
That's up to Christian, not me. I'm
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So far, about 90% is
available, according to Christian.
Good.
Shouldn't D-M
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
widespread a bit more what is going on?
Should???
It would be *nice* and it would be *helpful* to do so, but seeing that
On the 23/02/2011 20:50, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
widespread a bit more what is going on?
Should???
It would be *nice* and it
On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos or
widespread a bit more what is going on?
Should???
It would be *nice* and it would
On Wednesday 23 February 2011 13:50:36 Camaleón wrote:
I wasn't saying that they *should* provide _packages_ for oldstable
releases but *notify* here -in this same mailing list, where people can
then spread those changes elsewhere- for any update in D-M repositories.
They have their own
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:30:04 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
For those concerned about oldstable at Debian Multimedia, you'll be
pleased to hear that it's being restored. So
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:27PM EST, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any problem on the repos
or widespread a bit more what
On 02/23/2011 06:11 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:46:27PM EST, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 01:50 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:34:05 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:16 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Shouldn't D-M maintainers post here about any
26 matches
Mail list logo
