I've always used ftp://mirror.anl.gov/pub/debian/ for my Debian mirror.
It's fast and up to date, I routinely see speeds of 1M/s on downloads.
If you are a US citizen it is partially funded with your tax dollars so why
not use it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
(Seems like I remember seeing a thread on this recently, but I don't
see it in the last week's posts.)
Last week, when the kernel update came down the pipe, most of the
packages had decent speed, but the kernel and some others were cut
down to about a fifth normal speed.
Yesterday or Saturday,
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:21:48 +0900
Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
(Seems like I remember seeing a thread on this recently, but I don't
see it in the last week's posts.)
Last week, when the kernel update came down the pipe, most of the
packages had decent speed, but the kernel and some
On Mon 23 Jun 2014 at 12:04:55 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
I don't know if any conclusions can be drawn from my anecdotes, but if
you collect enough anecdotes perhaps it can help you figure out what's
going wrong.
Lots of conclusions can be drawn from anecdotal evidence but a proven
aspect of
Joel Rees wrote:
Last week, when the kernel update came down the pipe, most of the
packages had decent speed, but the kernel and some others were cut
down to about a fifth normal speed.
What archive name are you using? I am in the US and use
ftp.us.debian.org and when I do I am actually using
20.07.2013 18:59, Joe Riel kirjoitti:
Any recommendations for a graphical tool to monitor, real-time,
the download network speed. My connection to work frequently
gets really slow, in which case I need to disconnect and reconnect.
I currently use the gnome network monitor tool, however, its
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 19:40 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
And while we are talking about community, you could help the community by
quoting properly and interleaving or bottom posting.
Lisi
Is this the appropriate way? BTW, don't you find interesting that
properly is derived from the same
On 07/20/13 at 08:59am, Joe Riel wrote:
Any recommendations for a graphical tool to monitor, real-time,
the download network speed. My connection to work frequently
gets really slow, in which case I need to disconnect and reconnect.
I currently use the gnome network monitor tool, however, its
Any recommendations for a graphical tool to monitor, real-time,
the download network speed. My connection to work frequently
gets really slow, in which case I need to disconnect and reconnect.
I currently use the gnome network monitor tool, however, its
display of Network History connection
currently
access the raw data (i.e. download speed data)?
--
Klaus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51eacea3.6080...@gmail.com
On 07/20/2013 11:59 AM, Joe Riel wrote:
Any recommendations for a graphical tool to monitor, real-time,
the download network speed. My connection to work frequently
gets really slow, in which case I need to disconnect and reconnect.
I currently use the gnome network monitor tool, however, its
On Friday 19 July 2013 17:14:33 André Nunes Batista wrote:
And I'm helping him to understand Debian as a community not as a
software company. Or hope so.
It doesn't seem to me likely that you have helped him understand that at all.
And while we are talking about community, you could help the
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:59:45AM -0700, Joe Riel wrote:
Any recommendations for a graphical tool to monitor, real-time,
the download network speed. My connection to work frequently
gets really slow, in which case I need to disconnect and reconnect.
I currently use the gnome network monitor
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 16:33 -0400, staticsafe wrote:
CLI app but works in a reliable fashion.
vnstat - http://humdi.net/vnstat/
Available in the Debian repositories.
Seems to be a great lightweight application. Thank you, I didn't know it
and test it on Arch at the moment.
$ vnstat -l 0
:)
And I'm helping him to understand Debian as a community not as a
software company. Or hope so.
--
Luther Blisset
GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80
I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but
everything is fun and worthwhile!
---BeginMessage---
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 18:43:53
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 18:43:53 André Nunes Batista wrote:
Please, note that this is debian user list, not debian customer service
list.
He's trying to be a Debian user. Seems fair enough to me.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hello, Greetings from Nepal.
I am Manoj Ghimire from Nepal. I am currently using Ubuntu 13.04. I wanted to
switch to Debian so I tried to download the ISO file from your website. What I
get is about 20KB/s download speed which is maximum some times I even get less
that 15KB/s. Ubuntu has
wanted to switch to Debian so I tried to download the ISO file from your
website. What I get is about 20KB/s download speed which is maximum some
times I even get less that 15KB/s. Ubuntu has download speed of about
100KB/s. It has cache ubuntu.ntc.net.np which happens to be hosted by
NTC
.
I am Manoj Ghimire from Nepal. I am currently using Ubuntu 13.04. I
wanted to switch to Debian so I tried to download the ISO file from your
website. What I get is about 20KB/s download speed which is maximum some
times I even get less that 15KB/s. Ubuntu has download speed of about
is about 20KB/s download speed which is maximum some
times I even get less that 15KB/s. Ubuntu has download speed of about
100KB/s. It has cache ubuntu.ntc.net.np which happens to be hosted by
NTC. It is the telecom provider of Nepal. Can you guys request NTC to
host your distribution too??? I
there is no loser but
everything is fun and worthwhile!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Ritter d...@randomstring.org
To: Tony van der Hoff t...@vanderhoff.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:04:21 -0400
Subject: Re: About download speed
On Wed, Jul 10
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 06:31 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
Can apt-get be configured to use bt? Does it already, and I just
haven't noticed?
http://wiki.debian.org/DebTorrent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 06:31 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
Can apt-get be configured to use bt? Does it already, and I just
haven't noticed?
http://wiki.debian.org/DebTorrent
And I find this tid-bit:
ISPs have
I have
watched the speed factor improve. I'm now getting a download speed of
93.51 Mb/s.
Ah, that number looks more normal.
- Ensure you are selecting a server that is close to your location
(whether in doubt, let the app to automatically select the best for
you).
The server is getting
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:29:52 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Can you please provide the results of this speed test?
http://www.speedtest.net/
I get:
Ping: 3 ms
Download: 86.09 Mbps
Upload: 9.96
On Vi, 24 aug 12, 14:47:46, Camaleón wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
[...]
- Forget wireless devices if you want to get the best numbers for your
high speed connection.
Good point, I get about 24+ Mbit/s (2.7 MB/s) over a 54 Mbit/s (Wireless
G)
now getting a download speed of 93.51 Mb/s.
- Ensure you are selecting a server that is close to your location
(whether in doubt, let the app to automatically select the best for you).
The server is getting selected by the app and it's in the city I am living
in.
- Run the test at regular
On Mi, 22 aug 12, 13:29:52, Weaver wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
Ok, still far away from the advertised 100 Mb/s, but not that bad. Did
you do the test with the recommended server or did you try also other
ones?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions
On Mi, 22 aug 12, 13:29:52, Weaver wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
Ok, still far away from the advertised 100 Mb/s, but not that bad. Did
you do the test with the recommended server or did you try also other
ones?
I tried two and the cross-comparison was fairly
I have a little off-this-thread questions.
Once I used the wget to download one file from debian repository, on
another terminal I with to use the wget to get another file at the same
time from the same repository.
I was discouraged to do that, and was also told that, two wget
downloading would
10 seconds to download.
Now let's assume that you download two of those files at the same
time. You still only have 1.0Mbit/s download speed. But now you are
downloading 2.0Mbytes of data in total. Obviously the total download
will take aproximately 20 seconds to download.
If you ran them
need a 1.0 Mbyte file. With no
other overhead it will take aproximately 10 seconds to download.
Now let's assume that you download two of those files at the same
time. You still only have 1.0Mbit/s download speed. But now you are
downloading 2.0Mbytes of data in total. Obviously the total
it will take aproximately 10 seconds to download.
Now let's assume that you download two of those files at the same
time. You still only have 1.0Mbit/s download speed. But now you are
downloading 2.0Mbytes of data in total. Obviously the total download
will take aproximately 20 seconds
attention on the time it takes
but the download speed (KiB/MiB per second). As I said, using Oracle
servers I can get up to 10 MiB/s which is the best number I have
ever got.
I understand also, that many can't get these speeds, but when you
are paying for 100MB/s and not even getting
attention on the time it takes
but the download speed (KiB/MiB per second). As I said, using Oracle
servers I can get up to 10 MiB/s which is the best number I have
ever got.
I understand also, that many can't get these speeds, but when you
are paying for 100MB/s and not even getting ADSL1
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
[…]
I understand also, that many can't get these speeds, but when you
are paying for 100MB/s and
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all... The problem here is not the network bandwidth,
it's that some parts of the update process have to download a lot of
small
with Cameleon's suggestion of
downloading a larger file from Oracle's servers, at a quiet time of
night, a 64 MB download (Mysql's community edition, X86_64) still takes
one minute and seven seconds.
Weaver, you don't have to center your attention on the time it takes but
the download speed (KiB
with Cameleon's suggestion of
downloading a larger file from Oracle's servers, at a quiet time of
night, a 64 MB download (Mysql's community edition, X86_64) still takes
one minute and seven seconds.
Weaver, you don't have to center your attention on the time it takes but
the download speed (KiB
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
Just to clarify on this situation:
I have a cable connection that is rated at 100MB/s at full capacity. I
specifically asked what the lowest speed would be, that I could expect
to experience, when I took it on from an ADSL2+ connection that
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all... The problem here is not the network bandwidth,
it's that some parts of the update process have to download a lot of
small
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
http://www.ookla.com/demo-custom.php
I
Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic
speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
Hi Weaver,
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed from
my ISP?
I want to log and then print out, so I can then forward the information with
an ultimatum.
I can't fail in a contract if they have, repeatedly, first.
It's been going on for a year and I'm
On 08/15/2012 06:52 AM, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
To achieve this, you will have to load continuously your connection in
order to get the max reached.
- If you do this (load test) on your gateway, your poor LAN users
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:19:06AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/15/2012 06:52 AM, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
To achieve this, you will have to load continuously your connection
in order to get the max
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
http://www.ookla.com/demo-custom.php
I want
Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
Greetings all,
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
I want to log and then print out, so I can then forward the information
with an ultimatum.
I can't fail in a contract if they have, repeatedly, first.
It's been going on for a year and I'm sick
I recommend you get SDSL. They are often advertised as ADSL, but that
is an incorrect name.
They have a defining characteristic that the upload speed is the same as
the download speed.
The maximum connection I can get with my ISP on SDSL is 512kbps/512kbps,
compared with 1.5Mbps/256kbps
Serena Cantor wrote:
I want to set up a server using a ADSL connection,
download speed is as important as upload, is it
possible change upload/download ratio of ADSL? Thanks!
Asynchronous DSL cannot do that. You want some other DSL technology or
cable instead.
--
Paul Johnson
Email
I want to set up a server using a ADSL connection,
download speed is as important as upload, is it
possible change upload/download ratio of ADSL? Thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Aube schrieb:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|3) I have 2 PCs, A and B. A downloads a file. After A's download is
|completed, B downloads the same file. Will this same file downloaded
|by B be retrieved from Squid (intranet speed) or from the
Joachim Förster wrote:
I would like to add: Depends on a parameter (sorry, forgot the name)
that determines the max size of a (cacheable) file. If the file is
larger, it won't be cached.
True, there is a squid.conf parameter that will limit the size of cached
files, but it defaults to no
I'm running Squid with its basic setup. When IE's proxy connection
setting is configured to use squid, the download speed will decrease
by about 10KB/s. Unchecking the 'use proxy' setting will resolve the
slower download speed issue.
1) Is there any setting in IE or Squid that I can use to fine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running Squid with its basic setup. When IE's proxy connection
setting is configured to use squid, the download speed will decrease
by about 10KB/s. Unchecking the 'use proxy' setting will resolve the
slower download speed issue.
This seems odd. Is Squid
Hello.
My home computer (running Debian sid, kernel 2.4) is connected to a LAN
and runs Apache to serve web pages and files to other computers in the
LAN.
Recently admins of the LAN told me to limit total download speed from my
computer over http. Than means, if one person
Hello.
My home computer (running Debian sid, kernel 2.4) is connected to a LAN and
runs Apache to serve web pages and files to other computers in the LAN.
Recently admins of the LAN told me to limit total download speed from my
computer over http. Than means, if one person is downloading from my
around here.
The download speed was ~1.5 Kb/s (run with minicom 115200 8N1 CTS/RTS).
The speed reported by BBS (CONNECT 115200) , my port settings are ttyS1
UART:16550A,port:0x02f8, IRQ 3,baud_base:115200 and initialization string ATF
(factory configured).
Have to dig
and dialed upp the only BBS available around
here.
The download speed was ~1.5 Kb/s (run with minicom 115200 8N1 CTS/RTS).
The speed reported by BBS (CONNECT 115200) , my port settings are ttyS1
UART:16550A,port:0x02f8, IRQ 3,baud_base:115200 and initialization string
ATF
(factory
Hi Troy
Thanks for your message.
Yes this is a pppd connection.I have played around with mtu and mru but ther is
no bigger change.
Did your second suggestion and dialed upp the only BBS available around here.
The download speed was ~1.5 Kb/s (run with minicom 115200 8N1 CTS/RTS
Hi Andreas
Thanks for your message.
The modem is an external whith cables supplied whith the modem.
The configuration of the modem port is:
/dev/ttyS1, Line 1, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x02f8, IRQ: 3
Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
closing_wait: 3000, closing_wait2:
Hi all
Have installed a BOCA 56K Internet Modem. When downloading from Win95 i normally
get a speed of 4.5-5.2 Kb/s but with Linux (hamm) only 2.5-3.0 Kb/s.
When running Win95 the RD led is glowing almost all the time.
With Linux the led is often blinking and is black for longer periods 10 sec.
63 matches
Mail list logo
