kernel 2.2.3 y emulación ide-scsi
Hola a todos, He actualizado el nucleo de la versión 2.0.36 a la 2.2.3. Antes podía usar la grabadora con el parámetro append = hdc=ide-scsi en el /etc/lilo.conf y el nucleo compilado con la opción de 'scsi generic support'. Al arrancar con el 2.2.3, me dió el mensaje correspondiente a la detección de la grabadora repetido muchas veces. He suprimido la línea del lilo.conf y ahora el mensaje de inicio queda: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 hda: FUJITSU MPA3043ATU, 4172MB w/0kB Cache, CHS=531/255/63, (U)DMA hdb: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache Uniform CDROM driver Revision: 2.52 * hdc: ATAPI 6X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 768kB Cache Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 * scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices * scsi : 1 host. * scsi : detected total. ¿Quiere decir esto que está activada la emulación scsi?. En realidad, xcdroast no reconoce el dispositivo, ni siquiera como ide. -- Gracias a todos. PS: Aprovecho para presentarme: tengo una hamm, la grabadora es una HP 7200+, y estoy bastante perdido aún con este maravilloso sistema operativo.
Re: Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic...
Subject: Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic... Date: Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400 In reply to:Brant Wells Quoting Brant Wells([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Howdy All! I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make dep; make install'... I then make a boot file for the NT Boot Manager... ^^^ Make dep ; make clean ; make bzImage ; make modules ; make modules install is the correct sequence. If you would like to save yourself some trouble get the source deb and make-kpkg wou do all of the above. When I get the NT Boot Manager to go to Linux, Everything works fine, until it comes time to mount the hard drive... I get a MSDOS FAT 12... yada yada yada... Then I get: Kernel Panic. Unable to mount the root partition on 16:05 I have DOS Fat support turned on, and the VFAT support is turned on... The MSDOS Fat is not set (It doesn't work even if it is set)I have SCSI PPA enabled for my ZipDrive Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks, Brant -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null -- Every program is a part of some other program, and rarely fits. ___ Wayne T. Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic...
Howdy All! I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make dep; make install'... I then make a boot file for the NT Boot Manager... When I get the NT Boot Manager to go to Linux, Everything works fine, until it comes time to mount the hard drive... I get a MSDOS FAT 12... yada yada yada... Then I get: Kernel Panic. Unable to mount the root partition on 16:05 I have DOS Fat support turned on, and the VFAT support is turned on... The MSDOS Fat is not set (It doesn't work even if it is set)I have SCSI PPA enabled for my ZipDrive Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks, Brant
Re: Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic...
Howdy All... My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition. I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes for me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my Hard Drive when I installed it. I just went back and looked at the setup in 'menuconfig' I see absolutely nothing about Ext2 under the FileSystems tab I do have enabled, Second extended fs... When you use zImage, what do you do after it makes the zImage?? Move the file to the /boot directory? Thanks, Brant. 2-1 INF BN S3 CLK (Lutgens, SPC) wrote: Are you running Linux on and ext2 file system or umsdos? Make sure the kernel is compiled for support for which ever one you need. If Linux is on an ext2 partition the vfat (etc.) support shouldn't matter. Double check that ext2 support is enabled ( it should default but you never know) also I am curious why the make install You mean make zImage maybe? I have only been using Linux for a year and a half but I have always done make zImage.
Re: Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic...
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote: Howdy All! I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make dep; make install'... I then make a boot file for the NT Boot Manager... When I get the NT Boot Manager to go to Linux, Everything works fine, until it comes time to mount the hard drive... I get a MSDOS FAT 12... yada yada yada... Then I get: Kernel Panic. Unable to mount the root partition on 16:05 I have DOS Fat support turned on, and the VFAT support is turned on... The MSDOS Fat is not set (It doesn't work even if it is set)I have SCSI PPA enabled for my ZipDrive Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks, Brant -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null Ummm...your Linux partition is ext2, right? Did you enable ext2 support in the kernel (NOT as a module!)? -- Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
Re: Kernel 2.2.3 Kernel Panic...
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 03:45:15PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote: Howdy All... My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition. I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes for me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my Hard Drive when I installed it. I just went back and looked at the setup in 'menuconfig' I see absolutely nothing about Ext2 under the FileSystems tab I do have enabled, Second extended fs... When you use zImage, what do you do after it makes the zImage?? Move the file to the /boot directory? Thanks, Brant. 2-1 INF BN S3 CLK (Lutgens, SPC) wrote: Are you running Linux on and ext2 file system or umsdos? Make sure the kernel is compiled for support for which ever one you need. If Linux is on an ext2 partition the vfat (etc.) support shouldn't matter. Double check that ext2 support is enabled ( it should default but you never know) also I am curious why the make install You mean make zImage maybe? I have only been using Linux for a year and a half but I have always done make zImage. -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null Use make vmlinuz or, even better, make-kpkg. Download the kernel-package package and it automates the whole kernel-installation process. -- Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Hi, depmod -a check out man depmod cheers Mark Wagnon wrote: I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3. I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile, but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's empty. I looked at the modules.dep file under my 2.0.34 directory and it looks like this file tells where all the modules are. Since mine is empty, where can I find a replacement, or how do I get it populated? I ran through the compilation sequence twice, with the same results. Any ideas/suggestions? TIA -- Debian_GNU/_ Mark Wagnon -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Re: SMP with kernel 2.2.3
Hi, Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using xosview but that seems to be broken with my current setup :( Interestingly some months back when i went SMP top showed 200% for a while :). After some upgrades this changed, xosview showed both active ( when it worked ). cheers Max Kamenetsky wrote: Has anyone here tried running an SMP system with kernel 2.2.3? If so, can you get it to use both processors? For some reason, I can get it to recognize two processors (this shows up in xproc), but top shows that at most 50% of the CPU is getting used, i.e. only one of the processors. At first I thought that top was wrong, but it does seem much slower than with kernel 2.1.121. Thanks for any help! Max Kamenetsky -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null
Re: SMP with kernel 2.2.3
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, John Leget wrote: Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using xosview but that seems to be broken with my current setup :( You are right, I think it works fine, it's just that the CPU utilization (and maybe process priorities) are different than under my old 2.1.121 kernel. Incidentally, I can't get xosview to work any more either, but /proc/cpuinfo does show 2 processors and I can get the CPU utilization to go up to 100% if I really try. Anyway, I guess I was just confused. Interestingly some months back when i went SMP top showed 200% for a while :). After some upgrades this changed, xosview showed both active ( when it worked ). Yup, I had the same 200% problem for a while, but then I think they fixed it in February. Max Max Kamenetsky wrote: Has anyone here tried running an SMP system with kernel 2.2.3? If so, can you get it to use both processors? For some reason, I can get it to recognize two processors (this shows up in xproc), but top shows that at most 50% of the CPU is getting used, i.e. only one of the processors. At first I thought that top was wrong, but it does seem much slower than with kernel 2.1.121.
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 08:39:00PM +, Mark Wagnon wrote: I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3. I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile, but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's empty. I looked at the modules.dep file under my 2.0.34 directory and it looks like this file tells where all the modules are. Since mine is empty, where can I find a replacement, or how do I get it populated? This is done by 'depmod -a'. In my system (slink) I have modutils package which installs file /etc/init.d/modutils with sequence: [...] echo -n Calculating module dependencies... depmod -a /dev/null echo done. [...] Mirek
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
John Leget wrote: Hi, depmod -a check out man depmod cheers Thanks, I'll check that out. -- __ _ Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Mirek Kwasniak wrote: This is done by 'depmod -a'. In my system (slink) I have modutils package I did that and received a bunch of strange messages for my effort. I took a look at the Changes file that comes with the kernel sources. I a have versions of some packages that are older than what the documentation suggests. I should me receiving my 2.1 disks in the mail pretty soon, so I'll just wait and try again then. I don't really have the time to get apt installed and grab all the packages required for compiling the kernel right now. I'll probably have a few questions at that time, so thanks for the response. -- __ _ Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
steven walsh wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: [snip] Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K for the 2 or 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice. On the other hand, i like having the full tgz around Just In Casetm. If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 patches, then the end product *is* 2.2.3. Just tar it up yourself and name it as 2.2.3 tgz. -- Ed C.
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Yes, there are Linux 2.2x kernels in .deb format at http://netgod.net/ Follow their 2.2.3 button in the upper left hand corner of their home page. Version 2.2.3 is the one you, now, immediately get to but the older 2.2.x versions are in the archives. At 3/10/99 08:20 PM , you wrote: When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems??? Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb?? Thanks for any input Faton Useni
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: [snip] If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 patches, then the end product *is* 2.2.3. Just tar it up yourself and name it as 2.2.3 tgz. Details, details. :) See you on the flip side - Steve Walsh (EfNet:#Babylon5:KnaraKat) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 09:20:04PM -0600, Faton Useni wrote: When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems??? Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb?? You can just get the patches instead of the whole 2.2.3. Just get the 2.2.2 _and_ the 2.2.3 and them patch them in this order (read linux/README if you have any doubts). Oh, make sure you do a 'make-kpkg clean' before you start. I always get the source package for the kernel and compile them myself by hand, aplying any patch I see fit :-) (I'm compiling 2.2.3 as I write this). -- Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.3 Date: Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:01:13AM -0600 In reply to:steven walsh Quoting steven walsh([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote: [snip] If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 patches, then the end product *is* 2.2.3. Just tar it up yourself and name it as 2.2.3 tgz. Details, details. :) See you on the flip side - Steve Walsh (EfNet:#Babylon5:KnaraKat) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The Linux Kernel HOWTO in the howto directory! -- The best book on programming for the layman is Alice in Wonderland; but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman. ___ Wayne T. Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3. I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile, but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's empty. I looked at the modules.dep file under my 2.0.34 directory and it looks like this file tells where all the modules are. Since mine is empty, where can I find a replacement, or how do I get it populated? I ran through the compilation sequence twice, with the same results. Any ideas/suggestions? TIA -- Debian_GNU/_ Mark Wagnon -o) / / (_)__ __ __ Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote: I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3. I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile, but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's empty. I looked at the modules.dep file under my 2.0.34 directory and it looks like this file tells where all the modules are. Since mine is empty, where can I find a replacement, or how do I get it populated? I also noticed this when I first started compiling kernels, and soon found out that the computer automatically made modules.dep on boot. I don't know what makes it or how. It just does.. Anyone know what package/program does this ? Roy -- Unsolicited commercial email with be billed at $350/message Roy Larsen, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To send me an email remove `.nospam' from the address.
SMP with kernel 2.2.3
Has anyone here tried running an SMP system with kernel 2.2.3? If so, can you get it to use both processors? For some reason, I can get it to recognize two processors (this shows up in xproc), but top shows that at most 50% of the CPU is getting used, i.e. only one of the processors. At first I thought that top was wrong, but it does seem much slower than with kernel 2.1.121. Thanks for any help! Max Kamenetsky
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Subject: Kernel 2.2.3 Date: Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 09:20:04PM -0600 In reply to:Faton Useni Quoting Faton Useni([EMAIL PROTECTED]): When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems??? Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb?? Thanks for any input Faton Useni Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K for the 2 or 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice. -- Basic, n.: A programming language. Related to certain social diseases in that those who have it will not admit it in polite company. ___ Wayne T. Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: [snip] Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K for the 2 or 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice. On the other hand, i like having the full tgz around Just In Casetm. See you on the flip side - Steve Walsh (EfNet:#Babylon5:KnaraKat) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kernel 2.2.3
When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems??? Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb?? Thanks for any input Faton Useni More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail
Re: Kernel 2.2.3
When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2.2.3 kernel from ftp.kernel.org and not have any problems??? i just put 2.2.2 on my thinkpad the other day without any problems. i currently have a slink/potato hybrid box but i would imagine you should be fine. Also, has anyone else packaged these kernels in a deb?? not that i know of. i believe i heard someone here say that 2.2 kernels will be available in the release after potato. you could check the archives on dejanews. adam.
