Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-03 Thread Bob Hilliard
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've found that it is sufficient to set visible_name to the host part of my popmail address. That is, my email address at BrightNet is [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I put visible_name=win.bright.net in smail/config. This gets my mail out past their anti-spam-relay

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-03 Thread john
Bob Hilliard writes: It should be possible to make any other MUA put a proper From: field in the mail they send to smail. That isn't the problem. It is the MAIL FROM address in the smtp transaction that causes difficulty. BrightNet refuses my mail if this address is not in their domain (even

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-03 Thread Carey Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Martin at cush) writes: However, if smail is handed a from address (either by the SMTP MAIL FROM: command or by the -f or -r option to the senmail command), smail will use that address. Therefore it may be perfectly possible to convince your MUA to hand smail a from

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Martin Bialasinski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes: This may or may not be justification for refusal, I can't say for sure. My recommendation would be to avoid using potentially problematic fields, of which From (without the colon) seems to definately qualify. He doesn't add a from (without colon)

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Lee Bradshaw
Carey Evans wrote: What about the envelope sender? sendmail writes this as: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 1 16:12:31 or something similar at the top of the message. qmail puts: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as RFC821 and RFC822 (4.3.1, 4.4.3) suggest. Hi Carey and David, David

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Carey Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes: David in another message you were suggesting I not use the from line. Do you know how to turn it off? I haven't found any way to control this line -- smail seems to generate this line as Carey describes for sendmail. (This isn't quite what you're

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Lee Bradshaw
Hi, Well thanks to help from Art, Carey, Daniel, and Martin I think we have the problem narrowed down to the envelope sender (MAIL FROM: in the SMTP dialog). If I connect to the mail server with telnet as Carey suggested, everything is fine. Netscape also has no problem generating mail with the

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Christian Lynbech on satellite
I am not sure whether this can help you at all (or whether it has been brougth up before), but the following hack, posted to a debian list a long time ago, works for me in rewriting headers with smail. I am using my university account to connect to the internet, and I want all replies (regardless

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread Daniel Martin at cush
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes: Well thanks to help from Art, Carey, Daniel, and Martin I think we have the problem narrowed down to the envelope sender (MAIL FROM: in the SMTP dialog). If I connect to the mail server with telnet as Carey suggested, everything is fine. Netscape

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-02 Thread john
Daniel Martin writes: One thing I'm also doing is rewriting my smail config file each time ppp goes up so that my visible_name is set to the current value (e.g. ppp75.hcf.jhu.edu); this value is also stored in /etc/mailname. I've found that it is sufficient to set visible_name to the host part

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-01 Thread David Stern
On Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:19:37 EST, Lee Bradshaw wrote: [..] local username had to match the remote username. Check out my web page if you want to see all the effort I've put into HTML so far :^) http://www.mindspring.com/~lee.bradshaw/ And what nice dogs you have. G. If I didn't mention

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-01 Thread Carey Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes: On Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:19:37 EST, Lee Bradshaw wrote: [snip] If I didn't mention this before, I'm not cc'ing you because ipa.net rejects my from lines as spam. I don't understand why a correct header would be rejected. I'd like to see some

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-01 Thread David Stern
On 01 Mar 1998 16:23:02 +1300, Carey Evans wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stern) writes: On Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:19:37 EST, Lee Bradshaw wrote: [snip] If I didn't mention this before, I'm not cc'ing you because ipa.net rejects my from lines as spam. I don't understand why a

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-01 Thread Lee Bradshaw
David Stern wrote: I don't understand why a correct header would be rejected. I'd like to see some details for the basis to this claim, because I use the same address style as you and Daniel. Please tell. This is from /var/spool/smail/msglog/... I broke it into multiple lines Xdefer:

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-03-01 Thread David Stern
On Sun, 01 Mar 1998 14:34:05 EST, wrote: David Stern wrote: I don't understand why a correct header would be rejected. I'd like to see some details for the basis to this claim, because I use the same address style as you and Daniel. Please tell. This is from

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-02-27 Thread Lee Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lee Bradshaw said: Art, is your local user name alemas? My problem is that if I use my isp Yes. And your local user name should be same as what you want as a user name in your e-mail return address (in your case, lee.bradshaw) until we find a solution for

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-02-26 Thread Lee Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Art, I'd like to see your solution and also your headers. Could you post a copy of your headers for those of us reading the digest version of the mailing list? Or just reply to this mail? I guess your message will eventually show up in the archive, but

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-02-26 Thread Lee Bradshaw
Sorry for the previous empty message. Art, is your local user name alemas? My problem is that if I use my isp for the visible name, I get a from [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Notice there is no colon after the from. This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately my email address is lee.bradshaw and my login on

Re: Lee: Re: smail Solution for Dynamic IP's

1998-02-26 Thread alemas
Lee Bradshaw said: Sorry for the previous empty message. Art, is your local user name alemas? My problem is that if I use my isp Yes. And your local user name should be same as what you want as a user name in your e-mail return address (in your case, lee.bradshaw) until we find a