On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:02:49 +0300
andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Lu, 06 mai 19, 14:16:13, Celejar wrote:
...
> > I'm no expert, but I struck out in my search for a free,
> > standards-based email service beyond the giants. I have a number of GMX
> > accounts, and while they're not quite
On Lu, 06 mai 19, 14:16:13, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
> Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > > I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP
> > > support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers,
On Lu, 06 mai 19, 10:28:12, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019 18:37:36 +1000
> David wrote:
>
> >I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care
> >would be significantly higher than the general population though.
> >That's why I was concerned enough to respond, and why
On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:53:56 -0400
Kenneth Parker wrote:
Hello Kenneth,
>I don't notice any Advertising on ProtonMail.
The 'cost' will not necessarily be advertising. Data-mining all emails
in and out of the account is far more likely and, potentially, more
lucrative (for the miner,
On Mon, 6 May 2019 17:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote:
>
> > I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP
> > support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers, standards-based
> > email requires running some sort of
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Celejar wrote:
I once looked into ProtonMail, but IIUC, there's no POP3 / IMAP / SMTP
support in the free tier, and even in the paid tiers, standards-based
email requires running some sort of proprietary application called
"ProtonMail Bridge" on my machine. Correct me if I'm
On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:53:56 -0400
Kenneth Parker wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019, 7:20 AM Pierre Frenkiel
> wrote:
>
> > >> I have no data to support that,
> > it's
> > >> just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email
> > >> addresses
On Mon, May 6, 2019, 7:20 AM Pierre Frenkiel
wrote:
> >> I have no data to support that,
> it's
> >> just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email
> >> addresses that are in use here.
> >
> > does that mean that there is something
On Mon, 6 May 2019 13:20:31 +0200 (CEST)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Hello Pierre,
> I was not clear enough. I didn't mean "gratis" or "free as in beer",
> but
I understood that, but thanks for the clarification.
To answer your question:
> does that mean that there is something else, i.e. a
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
I have no data to support that, it's
just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email
addresses that are in use here.
does that mean that there is
On Mon, 6 May 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
I have no data to support that, it's
just my gut feeling based on the number of gmail (and similar) email
addresses that are in use here.
does that mean that there is something else, i.e. a "free" mail provider?
On Mon, 6 May 2019 18:37:36 +1000
David wrote:
Hello David,
>I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care
>would be significantly higher than the general population though.
>That's why I was concerned enough to respond, and why I wrote
>people *here* :)
Fair point.
I
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 17:22, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:26:00 +1000 David wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> >People here care about software freedom.
>
> Some do, yes. Far more simply don't care:
I think the proportion of people providing answers here who do care
would be
On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:26:00 +1000
David wrote:
Hello David,
>People here care about software freedom.
Some do, yes. Far more simply don't care: You only have to look at how
successful surveillance companies (google, facebook, twitter, et al)
have become; with people willingly, even eagerly,
> On May 5, 2019, at 4:26 PM, David wrote:
>
> For pastebin purposes within Debian, please use: https://paste.debian.net/
Thanks, David. This sound like exactly what I need.
Rick
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 20:31, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2019 03:13:46 -0700 Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> >What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone?
>
> Yes, it's available to all. pastebin.com
Hi.
No, please don't use pastebin.com
I won't read anything posted to that site, and I
On Sun, 5 May 2019 03:13:46 -0700
Rick Thomas wrote:
Hello Rick,
>What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone?
A place to share (predominantly) code snippets and the like for the
purposes of critique or garnering advice about ways to improve said code.
Yes, it's available to all.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Rick Thomas wrote:
> Thanks for the reply!
>
>> On May 5, 2019, at 2:55 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>
>> There are other places things can be put (own web site, pastebin, etc.)
>
> I used to have my own webserver, but the machine I was running it on
Thanks for the reply!
> On May 5, 2019, at 2:55 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> There are other places things can be put (own web site, pastebin, etc.)
I used to have my own webserver, but the machine I was running it on died.
What is “pastebin”? Is it available to everyone?
Enjoy!
Rick
On Sun, 5 May 2019 10:04:02 +0200
Frank Scheiner wrote:
Hello Frank,
>Strange indeed, maybe that was changed. But no longer allowing
>attachments is not that useful.
Stops ppl sending unnecessary guff to the list (emojis, html,
anim-gifs...), not that that applies necessarily to your
20 matches
Mail list logo
