On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:30:05 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Fri, August 24, 2012 7:47 am, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
Regards and thanks,
Holly cow! That numbers are not good at all.
It has been a few days since their last contact. In the interim
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:29:52 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Can you please provide the results of this speed test?
http://www.speedtest.net/
I get:
Ping: 3 ms
Download: 86.09 Mbps
Upload: 9.96
On Vi, 24 aug 12, 14:47:46, Camaleón wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
[...]
- Forget wireless devices if you want to get the best numbers for your
high speed connection.
Good point, I get about 24+ Mbit/s (2.7 MB/s) over a 54 Mbit/s (Wireless
G)
On Fri, August 24, 2012 7:47 am, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:29:52 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Can you please provide the results of this speed test?
http://www.speedtest.net/
I
On Mi, 22 aug 12, 13:29:52, Weaver wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
Ok, still far away from the advertised 100 Mb/s, but not that bad. Did
you do the test with the recommended server or did you try also other
ones?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions
On Mi, 22 aug 12, 13:29:52, Weaver wrote:
Ping: 69 ms
Download: 27.71 Mb/s
Upload: 2.28 Mb/s
Ok, still far away from the advertised 100 Mb/s, but not that bad. Did
you do the test with the recommended server or did you try also other
ones?
I tried two and the cross-comparison was fairly
I have a little off-this-thread questions.
Once I used the wget to download one file from debian repository, on
another terminal I with to use the wget to get another file at the same
time from the same repository.
I was discouraged to do that, and was also told that, two wget
downloading would
lina wrote:
Once I used the wget to download one file from debian repository, on
another terminal I with to use the wget to get another file at the same
time from the same repository.
And if you needed both files then that seems fine to me.
I was discouraged to do that, and was also told
On Thursday 23,August,2012 03:34 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
lina wrote:
Once I used the wget to download one file from debian repository, on
another terminal I with to use the wget to get another file at the same
time from the same repository.
And if you needed both files then that seems fine to
Hi,
Here my question is that, is it true that open two wget will affect
the downloading speed? better one by one, just suspect it.
Let's assume you have a 1.0 Mbit/s download connection. Because it
makes the math easier. And assume you need a 1.0 Mbyte file. With no
other overhead it
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all...
Rick, careful when
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all...
Rick, careful when
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 schrieb Weaver:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
[…]
I understand also, that many can't get these speeds, but when you
are paying for 100MB/s and
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all... The problem here is not the network bandwidth,
it's that some parts of the update process have to download a lot of
small
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all...
Rick, careful when quoting...
Yes, I understand this, Rick, but even
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all...
Rick, careful when quoting...
Yes, I understand this, Rick, but even
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
Just to clarify on this situation:
I have a cable connection that is rated at 100MB/s at full capacity. I
specifically asked what the lowest speed would be, that I could expect
to experience, when I took it on from an ADSL2+ connection that
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote:
I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
And so do we all... The problem here is not the network bandwidth,
it's that some parts of the update process have to download a lot of
small
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
http://www.ookla.com/demo-custom.php
I
Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic
speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
Hi Weaver,
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed from
my ISP?
I want to log and then print out, so I can then forward the information with
an ultimatum.
I can't fail in a contract if they have, repeatedly, first.
It's been going on for a year and I'm
On 08/15/2012 06:52 AM, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
To achieve this, you will have to load continuously your connection in
order to get the max reached.
- If you do this (load test) on your gateway, your poor LAN users
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:19:06AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On 08/15/2012 06:52 AM, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
To achieve this, you will have to load continuously your connection
in order to get the max
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
http://www.ookla.com/demo-custom.php
I want
Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:52:59 -0700, Weaver wrote:
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
Well, there are online tests that you can run to measure your (up/down)
link speed:
http://www.speedtest.net/
Greetings all,
What's the best programme to employ with regard to logging traffic speed
from my ISP?
I want to log and then print out, so I can then forward the information
with an ultimatum.
I can't fail in a contract if they have, repeatedly, first.
It's been going on for a year and I'm sick
26 matches
Mail list logo
