Van Snyder wrote:
> I have some DisplayLink e1649Fwu USB monitors.
>
> When I boot, there's junk (mixed graphics and text that seems to be out
> of sync) on one, and the other is dark. When I reboot, it's almost the
> same, except the monitors' roles have switched.
>
> Would the nouveau driver
to the VGA socket.
>
> When I booted, it came up with side-by-side displays. I could move
> windows from one to the other.
>
> When I closed the cover and re-opened it, instead of waking up, it re-
> started X, but this time with displays mirrored.
>
> I ran nvidia-settings to mov
Am 20.05.2024 um 12:22:48 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder:
> How do I switch to try nouveau instead?
Completely uninstall it.
Then reboot.
If you have problem with nouveau, tell about them and maybe they can be
fixed.
--
kind regards
Marco
Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1716200568mu...@cartoonies.org
On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 20:42 +0200, Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 20.05.2024 um 11:10:27 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder:
>
> > I installed the NVidia 340 driver
>
> Is there a special reason to use it instead of nouveau?
I had had trouble with nouveau on other computers using different
NVidia graphics. And I
Am 20.05.2024 um 11:10:27 Uhr schrieb Van Snyder:
> I installed the NVidia 340 driver
Is there a special reason to use it instead of nouveau?
--
Gruß
Marco
Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1716196227mu...@cartoonies.org
El día 20/05/2024, a las 15:50, Camaleón escribió:
> Parece un problema conocido relacionado con los controladores de audio
> y/o el subsistema de gestión de sonido (PulseAudio/Jackd/ALSA, etc...).
>
> Mira a ver qué driver o stack de sonido instala/usa Raspberry Pi OS¹,
> donde seguramente
El 2024-05-20 a las 11:49 +0200, Alfon escribió:
> He seguido los pasos para instalar Debian descritos en:
> https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi4#Using_EFI_Firmware_and_the_regular_Debian_Installer
>
> Y todo ha ido bien, excepto que no tengo puedo usar la GPU para ver
> vídeos con mpv y tampoco
On 20 May 2024 07:00 -0400, from d...@randomstring.org (Dan Ritter):
>> # fail2ban-server -V
>>
>> 0.11.2
>
> Bullseye became stable in August of 2021.
It's also perhaps worth noting that there seem to have been only two
interim releases.
https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/releases lists
Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> Hello
>
> Please why on Debian Bullseye, 11.9 is a pretty old version available in the
> repository?
>
> # fail2ban-server -V
>
> 0.11.2
Bullseye became stable in August of 2021.
"Stable" means that packages don't change except to fix serious
bugs, especially
On Fri May 17, 2024 at 11:56 AM BST, Max Nikulin wrote:
> You may file an issue to the emacs bug tracker.
I didn't realise this was coming straight from upstream. If it were
a Debian-local issue, I'd file something, but I will respectfully
decline to engage with Emacs upstream.
(Interesting to
On 19 May 2024 11:11 -0400, from monn...@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier):
>> If you have read permission on a directory but *not* execute permissions,
>> then the only thing you can do is read the contents of that directory --
>> the filenames and their inode numbers. You cannot stat() the
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 05:15:40PM +0200, Richard wrote:
> Then where does the combination rwx come in here? With read the app knows
> the file is there, with write it writes to the file. Question is, where the
> necessity would be to know the owner of the file or even the kind. The
> logger is
Then where does the combination rwx come in here? With read the app knows
the file is there, with write it writes to the file. Question is, where the
necessity would be to know the owner of the file or even the kind. The
logger is supposed to just append text to a file. If it were trying to
append
> If you have read permission on a directory but *not* execute permissions,
> then the only thing you can do is read the contents of that directory --
> the filenames and their inode numbers. You cannot stat() the files,
> so you can't see who owns them or even what kind of files they are.
> Just
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Richard wrote:
> Dovecot expects execution permissions on the directory it writes the logs
> to. Because "Standard POSIX permissions for a non-root process to enter a
> directory." How on earth is that even a thing?
That's how Unix permissions have always
So, I've just written to the Dovecot mailing list, the reality why Dovecot
is complaining is so much worse than anything I could have imagined. While
everything indicates Dovecot is able to write to the log files, it seems
Dovecot expects execution permissions on the directory it writes the logs
Le 19/05/2024, Timothy M Butterworth a écrit:
> sudo sync && sh -c "/usr/bin/echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
--w--- 1 root root 0 19 mai 13:11 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
The redirection won't work unless the person is already root—there was a
thread about this here just a few days ago.
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 5:53 PM Stephen P. Molnar
wrote:
> I have just installed installed Quickemu v-6.1.4.
>
> quickget windows 11 ran as it should without any errors or warnings.
> However:
> (base) comp@Abanormal:~/VM$ quickemu --vm windows-10.conf
> ~/VM ~/VM
>
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:28:44AM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> i was plundering around and found a new, to me, utility
> is any one using usbip
> is it usable or cluncky
> sounds like it might be handy
>
I've tried it for a couple of things with little success:
* Black Magic ATEM
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 11:56:06AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I have just installed installed Quickemu v-6.1.4.
>
> quickget windows 11 ran as it should without any errors or warnings.
> However:
> (base) comp@Abanormal:~/VM$ quickemu --vm windows-10.conf
> ~/VM ~/VM
>
Everyone,
First of all thanks for the input. Unfortunately, I have to apologize,
because the actual problem was somewhat silly: selinux appears to be
preventing only *root* login at the tty, which I neglected to mention.
(Also, I neglected to check until now).
Regular user logins are fine.
Hi Maurizio,
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 03:45:54PM +0200, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> Please any from you use postfix with BATV (Bounce address tag validation)
> here ?
>
> And/or it's this is part of the standard?
I don't run Postfix and while I have heard of BATV I've never looked
into it. I just
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 08:26:55PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 18:10, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On 17/05/2024 10:16, Karl Vogel wrote:
> > > > https://github.com/aaronsw/html2text/ might interest you. It
> > > > converts
> > > > (relatively) sane HTML into Markdown.
> > >
On 17/05/2024 18:10, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On 17/05/2024 10:16, Karl Vogel wrote:
https://github.com/aaronsw/html2text/ might interest you. It converts
(relatively) sane HTML into Markdown.
I put html2text.py into $HOME/lib and use this to call it:
#!/bin/sh
#
[...]
>
> Don't call me a liar, you are just too dumb to understand.
It's sad to see that you need to make it this blatantly obvious that even I
clearly understand more than you do. And you're the one trying to scold me
about sticking to the mailing list rules when you so obviously don't care
for them
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:25:49PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Actually I've been tempted to teach my mail reader to transform HTML
> >> into some lightweight markup (yeah, you need a bit of heuristics for
> >> that ;-) -- say Org, but why not its poor sister Markdown.
> > Please don't
an example of HTML to Org
converter that may generate unsafe markup?
Specifically to tables, I do not like that arbitrary code may be
executed in response to TAB or C-c C-c. However I am unsure if
formulas may appear in an Org file converted from HTML.
emacs-orgmode. Re: [BUG][Security] begin_src
if formulas
may appear in an Org file converted from HTML.
emacs-orgmode. Re: [BUG][Security] begin_src :var evaluated before the
prompt to confirm execution. Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:11:18 +0700.
https://list.orgmode.org/tjfkp7$ggm$1...@ciao.gmane.io
[ This applies to many other ELisp packages, of course
On 18/05/2024 08:15, Charles Curley wrote:
charles 2913 0.0 0.9 545852 36740 ?Sl May12 0:26
/usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/onboard
--not-show-in=GNOME,GNOME-Classic:GNOME --startup-delay=3.0
Perhaps it starts through /etc/xdg/autostart/onboard-autostart.desktop
I have no idea if
On Thu, 16 May 2024 14:09:33 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as
> updated. I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the home
> page. I believe I am not running Wayland.
>
> Has anyone else seen this? Fix/Workaround?
Got a bit
On Fri, 17 May 2024 20:42:10 +0200
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as
> > updated. I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the
> > home page. I believe I am not
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:28:35PM -0400, PMA wrote:
> I received the following today from (Jerry Henley at) Ella White
> .
>
> I suspect fraud here, so have not opened the invoice he/she attached.
>
> Can you possibly tell me whether the message is legitimate?
I did not spend much time on it.
On 5/17/24 02:02, George at Clug wrote:
Is AppArmor already installed and running? It is on my system, maybe this
would conflict with SeLinux?
# aa-status
https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/HowToUse
Disable AppArmor
AppArmor is a security mechanism and disabling it is not
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:25:49PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Actually I've been tempted to teach my mail reader to transform HTML
> >> into some lightweight markup (yeah, you need a bit of heuristics for
> >> that ;-) -- say Org, but why not its poor sister Markdown.
> > Please don't
On 2024-05-15 17:51, Max Nikulin wrote:
I have filed
https://bugs.debian.org/1071036
update-mime does not escape semicolon in .desktop Exec entries
Thanks! I should have done that, but I've postponed it because I felt I
didn't know enough about the context. (I just run Emacs on a Debian
On 17 May 2024 15:28 -0400, from armst...@eskimo.com (PMA):
> I received the following today from (Jerry Henley at) Ella White
> .
>
> I suspect fraud here, so have not opened the invoice he/she attached.
>
> Can you possibly tell me whether the message is legitimate?
The email came through a
ahem,
I got it as well.
Having never heard of the company, i simply removed it..although?
Given Google's decision to remove basic html, which gave users the ability
to flag such addresses, that someone still sent spam says allot about
google speaking personally.
Karen
On Fri, 17 May 2024,
On 5/17/24 15:28, PMA wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I received the following today from (Jerry Henley at) Ella White
> .
>
> I suspect fraud here, so have not opened the invoice he/she attached.
>
> Can you possibly tell me whether the message is legitimate?
>> Greetings! customer,
It came through
Am 17.05.2024 um 15:28:35 Uhr schrieb PMA:
> I received the following today from (Jerry Henley at) Ella White
> .
That is spam.
> I suspect fraud here, so have not opened the invoice he/she attached.
Done well.
> Can you possibly tell me whether the message is legitimate?
No. There is also
>> Actually I've been tempted to teach my mail reader to transform HTML
>> into some lightweight markup (yeah, you need a bit of heuristics for
>> that ;-) -- say Org, but why not its poor sister Markdown.
> Please don't settle for markdown. I would love a org filter!
> org-mode just handles
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:09:33PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> Onboard is not showing up in the XFCE system tray. Bookworm as updated.
> I don't see any Debian bug reports or questions on the home page.
> I believe I am not running Wayland.
>
> Has anyone else seen this?
I did
>
On Fri, 17 May 2024 15:49:52 +0200
Maurizio Caloro wrote:
>
>
> Hello
>
>
> Please i know that this arn't the Dovecot forum, but let me try, on
> the log's i have always knocking "unknown user" attempts.
>
>
> > May 15 22:39:31 Dovecot/auth-worker(2602036): Info: conn
> > unix:auth-worker
As you found out yourself, by default it's installed and running. And it's
quite likely they would interfere.
Still, the question remains. Why do you need SELinux? Do you have an actual
need for it? If not, go with what's already there. This will be much easier
to set up and handle.
Richard
Am
On 30/04/24 at 14:07, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
Hi,
Basically I've the same issue described here:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1180389/speaker-test-returns-all-6-channels-to-front-speakers
The speaker-test program is provided by the alsa-utils package. I'm using
Debian 12 Bookworm, I've no
Am 17.05.2024 um 15:49:52 Uhr schrieb Maurizio Caloro:
> Please i know that this arn't the Dovecot forum, but let me try, on
> the log's i have always knocking "unknown user" attempts.
Best place should be the f2b list:
https://sourceforge.net/p/fail2ban/mailman/fail2ban-users/
> > May 15
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:20:17AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote:
> No the point is, you are not setting a file path, you are configure dovecot
> to directly write to these files.
> And dovecot is not just one process, there are multiple running as
> different users all trying t write into one
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Richard wrote:
> So now that you don't know any further, you just start lying? Now that's
> rich.
>
> > I told you where to look, which is more than you deserve after how you
> behave.
>
> You didn't though.
Don't call me a liar, you are just too dumb
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 12:43:49PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 10:16, Karl Vogel wrote:
> >https://github.com/aaronsw/html2text/ might interest you. It converts
> >(relatively) sane HTML into Markdown.
> >
> >I put html2text.py into $HOME/lib and use this to call it:
>
On 16/05/2024 14:48, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Wed May 15, 2024 at 4:51 PM BST, Max Nikulin wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/1071036
update-mime does not escape semicolon in .desktop Exec entries
Re-reading your bug report I'm struck by how hard to reason about
(and test) the emacs .desktop
Hans writes:
> Dear list,
>
> does anyone know, where kmail is storing its tags for mails? The tags I mean
> are those like "already read".
I've never done that but maybe this helps, from
https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kmail/kmail2/faq.html#transfer-mail-and-settings:
6.10. How do I transfer
Is there a specific reason why you want to use SELinux? AppArmor is already
there and much easier to configure. SELinux usually causes more issues than
AppArmor too as it's not as granular, especially on distros not made
specifically for it, at least in my experience. And on Debian, some apps
Le Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:41:21AM +0200, Fabien R a écrit :
> On 15/05/2024 11:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Plus précisément, ni le clavier ni la
> > souris ne se réveillent,
> J'ai de temps en temps un problème similaire mais seulement avec le touchpad.
> Je reload le module associé et ça
On 5/7/24 14:17, David Martin wrote:
Bonjour,
Savez vous quelle est la meilleure solution aujourd'hui pour un
serveur dédié sous Debian Linux ?
Un serveur dédié pour quoi faire? C'est différent s'il gère une
association locale de libristes ou de joueurs de bridge (dans ce cas,
une
So now that you don't know any further, you just start lying? Now that's
rich.
> I told you where to look, which is more than you deserve after how you
behave.
You didn't though.
> Configure the literal industry standard syslog or journald to use a facility
to your liking and the problem should
Is AppArmor already installed and running? It is on my system,
maybe this would conflict with SeLinux?
# aa-status
https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor/HowToUse
DISABLE APPARMOR
AppArmor is a security mechanism and disabling it is not recommended.
If you really need to disable AppArmor on your
On 15/05/2024 11:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
Plus précisément, ni le clavier ni la
souris ne se réveillent,
J'ai de temps en temps un problème similaire mais seulement avec le touchpad.
Je reload le module associé et ça repart.
-
Fabien
by private mail manjunathreddy boreddy wrote:
I am unable to access under /dev/gpio*.
Please post to the debian user mailing list rather than to me :-)
I do not myself use GPIO devices so I am not able to offer a truely
sensible advice but I would begin with what the gpiodetect command
On 17/05/2024 10:16, Karl Vogel wrote:
https://github.com/aaronsw/html2text/ might interest you. It converts
(relatively) sane HTML into Markdown.
I put html2text.py into $HOME/lib and use this to call it:
#!/bin/sh
#
I am puzzled by this wrapper. I expect that "$@" is
Le 17/05/2024 à 06:16, manjunathreddy boreddy a écrit :
Hello
I am using debian 12 bookworm i am unable to export gpio
pins by using echo 0 > /sys/class/gpio/export i am getting bash: echo :
write error earlier it was working fine when i re installed debian
package i am una
manjunathreddy boreddy composed on 2024-05-17 09:46 (UTC+0530):
> I am using intel i686 7600u processor.
Exactly what does that mean? The only 7600u processor I see on intel.com is this
x86_64 much like two of mine, both using amd64 Bookworm, not i686:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:48:23AM -0400, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Actually I've been tempted to teach my mail reader to transform HTML
> into some lightweight markup (yeah, you need a bit of heuristics for
> that ;-) -- say Org, but why not its poor sister Markdown.
Hello,
Charles Plessy wrote on 15/05/2024 at 11:12:52+0200:
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> désolé pour la rafale de messages mais c'est un peu la cata…
>
> Aujourd'hui j'ai redémarré mon portable et depuis il ne sort plus de
> veille après qu'il y soit entré. Plus précisément, ni le clavier ni la
>
On 17 May 2024 00:12 +0700, from maniku...@gmail.com (Max Nikulin):
> Be realistic, to get the bug fixed, there should be affected persons
> motivated enough to try vanilla kernel or even to build custom kernels with
> provided patches. Developers time is limited and expensive resource. It may
>
On 16/05/2024 22:53, piorunz wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ will they be interested in Debian specific
error? I don't use vanilla kernel so maybe it's Debian only problem.
If you *find* a similar report there then it is likely an upstream
issue. (Developers of specific driver may use
Hi,
Aditya Garg wrote:
> This one is gonna be interesting.
> Wish me luck.
Fingers are crossed ...
(But everything in the procedure is supposed to be deterministic. So there
is few room for luck, good or bad. We rather have to navigate the chaos.)
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On 16/05/2024 20:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Actually I've been tempted to teach my mail reader to transform HTML
into some lightweight markup (yeah, you need a bit of heuristics for
that ;-) -- say Org, but why not its poor sister Markdown.
I am not familiar with pandoc features enough to
Well I'm used to unsquashfs, chroot, squashfs and repack the iso. This one is
gonna be interesting.
Wish me luck.
> On 16 May 2024, at 9:42 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> Not the OP, but thanks, Thomas.
>
> Well, ISO 9660 is known to be my hobby. So i can
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Not the OP, but thanks, Thomas.
Well, ISO 9660 is known to be my hobby. So i can hardly resist trying
to acquire new users for xorriso.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On 16/05/2024 12:35, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote:
As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my
system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with
vanilla kernel.
You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:20:40PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aditya Garg wrote:
> > I would prefer making the ISO as similar to the official Debian ISO and just
> > replace the Debian kernel with the customised kernel.
>
> In that case, i'd go along
[...]
Not the OP, but thanks,
Hi,
Aditya Garg wrote:
> I would prefer making the ISO as similar to the official Debian ISO and just
> replace the Debian kernel with the customised kernel.
In that case, i'd go along
https://wiki.debian.org/RepackBootableISO
Either by using the xorrisofs options in /.disk/mkisofs of the ISO
Well it's indeed not as easy as I thought as far as Debian ISOs are concerned.
I'll try to be more precise. I am a maintainer for Ubuntu on Linux on T2 Macs
project: https://t2linux.org/.
We work to modify ISOs of commonly used distros by adding a custom kernel with
drivers for T2 Macs and
On 2024-05-16, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> When this sort of subject comes up (as it does, every so often), I wonder
>> why `text/markdown` isn't offered as a mime type for sending emails.
>
> FWIW, last time I tried to send `text/(x-)markdown` messages,
Attribute quotes accurately.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:47:48PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:28:05AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > So, yes, I encourage you to send more of those, and if your recipients
> > don't like the result, try and get them to complain to their
> > MUA's
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:28:05AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
> So, yes, I encourage you to send more of those, and if your recipients
> don't like the result, try and get them to complain to their
> MUA's authors (most of those MUAs are of course proprietary and are not
> very ...
> When this sort of subject comes up (as it does, every so often), I wonder
> why `text/markdown` isn't offered as a mime type for sending emails.
FWIW, last time I tried to send `text/(x-)markdown` messages,
I discovered that many "popular" MUAs do not display those at all (they
treat them as
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:00:19PM +0200, Richard wrote:
> But why is postfix even holding a lock on it? And how do I prevent that? I
> never asked it to.
> At least, I don't think there should be a different process holding a lock
> on it.
>
I told you where to look, which is more than you
On 16/05/2024 17:35, piorunz wrote:
As much as I would like to try vanilla kernel, I don't want to break my
system. I use Debian Stable, don't know if things would just work with
vanilla kernel.
You may try bookworm-backports kernel 6.6.13+bpo-amd64
You may check https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
But why is postfix even holding a lock on it? And how do I prevent that? I
never asked it to.
At least, I don't think there should be a different process holding a lock
on it.
Am Mi., 15. Mai 2024 um 18:45 Uhr schrieb Henning Follmann <
hfollm...@itcfollmann.com>:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at
On 15/05/2024 20:55, Michael Kjörling wrote:
You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I can certainly
understand that you would like to see it fixed, that's not an
inordinate amount of time to wait.
What probably _would_ be helpful is to see whether you can recreate
the same
Estoy usando el típico Sveon que se muestra en la lista.
Yo también lo uso como método de autenticación al sistema mediante
pam_pkcs11.
El Fri, 3 May 2024 19:56:51 +0200
Camaleón va escriure el següent:
> El 2024-05-03 a las 09:57 -0600, Alejandro G. Sanchez Martinez
> escribió:
>
> > En
kslashes added before ";" and it is a bug.
>
> I have filed
> https://bugs.debian.org/1071036
> update-mime does not escape semicolon in .desktop Exec entries
Thanks for persevering with this!
Re-reading your bug report I'm struck by how hard to reason about
(and test) the ema
ср, 15 мая 2024 г. в 16:55, Hans :
> Dear developers,
Users.
> in April 2024 the security hole CVE-2023-6546 was discovered in linux-image,
> and I believe, it is fixed in kernel 6.1.0 (from debian/stable) as soon after
> this a new kernel was released.
On 15 May 2024 20:40 +0100, from pior...@gmx.com (piorunz):
> I have reported a regression in latest Linux kernel in Debian Stable:
>
> segfault at amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071080
You made this bug report less than 48 hours ago. While I
On Wed, 2024-05-15 at 15:57 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On 15/05/2024 03:17, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> > On 15/05/2024 02:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > >
> > > > Messages in
On 5/15/24 10:50, Nicolas George wrote:
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15):
PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely
accepted netiquette set of standards.
You can add the “Re: ” to that list.
It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing
else
On 5/15/24 6:46 AM, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
. . .
No its not, its your refusal to use the down arrow in your reply editor
to put your reply after the question. It really is that simple. If your
choice of email agents cannot do that, its time to switch to an agent
that can. There are dozens of
Since my request started this offtopic subthread I hope I can put it to
rest.
Yes I requested to not toppost. I asked politely, and I added pertinent
response on topic. I do not claim to be right or wrong about this. I prefer
interleaved style for reason. Everyone on this list heard all arguments
On 07/05/2024 23:24, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 2024-05-06 17:04, Max Nikulin wrote:
So doubled backslashes (as in .desktop files) are correct.
What is wrong is lack of backslashes added before ";" and it is a bug.
I have filed
https://bugs.debian.org/1071036
update-mime does not escape semicolon
On 15/05/2024 03:17, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 15/05/2024 02:32, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Messages in Markdown in the Windows world? I have never seen it.
[...]
The only sensible interpretation I can
come up with for why these asterisks
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15):
> PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely
> accepted netiquette set of standards.
You can add the “Re: ” to that list.
It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing
else.
The MUAs who write “RE: ” are
On 5/15/24 10:06, Nicolas George wrote:
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15):
Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the
magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to
both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense
to me.
Git
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the
> magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to
> both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense
> to me.
>
> PS
-Original Message-
From: Greg Wooledge
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting
Date: 05/14/24 13:41:17
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> how many times has this top post crap been dug up
> don't y'all have any thing
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15):
> Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the
> magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to
> both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense
> to me.
Git is an order of magnitude younger than
-Original Message-
From: gene heskett
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting
Date: 05/14/24 10:54:50
On 5/14/24 10:09, Richard wrote:
Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean
it's
not standard behavior. And how it relates to this mailing
> Le 15/05/2024 à 11:03, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> >
> > j'ai des tonnes de ceci dans mes logs système:
> >
> > mai 15 17:51:18 bubu tracker-extract[1711]: Could not connect to
> > filesystem miner endpoint: Le délai d’attente est dépassé
> >
Le Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:12:12AM +0200,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:23:35PM +0200, Richard wrote:
>
[...]
> But that's still not that helpful for the main issue. Why on earth is
> postfix throwing issues about the log files, even when they are
> world-readable and -writable? It's not that dovecot doesn't log to them,
> but it's also
On 2024-05-15 at 03:05, Hans wrote:
> Dear developers,
As usual, most of us here are not Debian developers, even if some of us
may be software developers.
> in April 2024 the security hole CVE-2023-6546 was discovered in linux-image,
> and I believe, it
> is fixed in kernel 6.1.0 (from
On 15/5/24 18:52, Richard wrote:
mailbox_transport isn't defined anywhere.
Am Mi., 15. Mai 2024 um 12:37 Uhr schrieb jeremy ardley
:
On 15/5/24 18:23, Richard wrote:
> Interesting. That's not even configured in our main.cfg. We have
these
> concerning dovecot:
>
1 - 100 of 1289091 matches
Mail list logo
