On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:13:01 + (UTC), I wrote:
I'm running testing (Wheezy) and am failing to get copy/paste working cleanly
among my most common windows, namely:
several xterms
virtualbox running a virtual XP client
iceweasel
...
Is there any way to get all of these programs to
Run Level ý deðiþtirmeniz gerekmektedir.
Run Level komutu ile çalýmýþ olduðunuz level ý görebilirsiniz, init
komutu ile de bu çalýþma seviyenizi deðiþtirme þansýnýz var. Örneðin init2
gibi.
From: Eren Mustafa KESDi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-turkish@lists.debian.org
Subject: X
Selamlar;
/etc/inittab dosyanizi
# The default runlevel is defined here
id:3:initdefault:
gibi degistirebilirsiniz. Sizin bu satirda id:5 ... olan degeri 3 yapmaniz
gerekiyor.
iyi calismalar
Afsin.
eren kesdi writes:
X Windows un açılışta otomatik gelmemesi için ne
eren kesdi wrote:
X Windows un açılışta otomatik gelmemesi için ne yapabiliriz. Sadece
startX ya da X ile manuel çalıştırınca çalışsa. Nasıl açılışta
çalışmasını engelleyebiliriz ?
/etc/init.d/gdm ( ya da kullandiginiz yoneticiyinin ) scriptini
silebilir veya chmod 000 yaparak,
Onur Aslan, 15.02.2007 tarihinde şöyle yazmış:
eren kesdi wrote:
X Windows un açılışta otomatik gelmemesi için ne yapabiliriz. Sadece
startX ya da X ile manuel çalıştırınca çalışsa. Nasıl açılışta
çalışmasını engelleyebiliriz ?
/etc/init.d/gdm ( ya da kullandiginiz yoneticiyinin )
Em 06/10/06, Leonardo Larsen Rocha[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Pessoal,
Quando o XWindows entra ele sempre exibe uma tela padrăo meio cinza, e
com o ícone do mouse no formato de X, existe uma maneira de quando entrar
nessa tela ao invés de cinza deixar tudo AZUL ???
Não que eu
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 00:29:01 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael M. wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
Make sure you have the packages discover1 (for 2.6 kernels) or
discover (for 2.4 kernels) installed, as well as xresprobe,
Oh, so *that's* the difference between 'discover' and 'discover1'!
Le dimanche 25 juin 2006 à 09:28 +0800, Dr Bean a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 ? 20:03 +0800, Dr Bean a ?crit :
I don't think I have X Windows installed. How do I now install
it?
[...]
I have now a perfectly good console-based linux
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le dimanche 25 juin 2006 ? 09:28 +0800, Dr Bean a ?crit :
Also give some details about your system (video hardware).
Where would I get that. dmesg says just:
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
The sources of information for that would be:
..
-
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 16:58:14 +0800, Dr Bean wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le dimanche 25 juin 2006 ? 09:28 +0800, Dr Bean a ?crit :
Also give some details about your system (video hardware).
Where would I get that. dmesg says just:
Console: colour VGA+
Florian Kulzer wrote:
Make sure you have the packages discover1 (for 2.6 kernels) or
discover (for 2.4 kernels) installed, as well as xresprobe,
mdetect, read-edid and, if applicable, laptop-detect.
Then run (as root)
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
and you should get a proper configuration.
Michael M. wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
Make sure you have the packages discover1 (for 2.6 kernels) or
discover (for 2.4 kernels) installed, as well as xresprobe,
Oh, so *that's* the difference between 'discover' and 'discover1'! I
No, neither discover1 nor discover 2 are kernel specific.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 ? 20:03 +0800, Dr Bean a ?crit :
I don't think I have X Windows installed. How do I now install
it?
[...]
I have now a perfectly good console-based linux system, but exec
startx doesn't give me X Windows.
This is a late
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 20:03 +0800, Dr Bean a écrit :
I don't think I have X Windows installed. How do I now install
it?
[...]
I have now a perfectly good console-based linux system, but exec
startx doesn't give me X Windows.
But you do have startx? Do you get a command not found error, or a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 20:03:33 +0800, Dr Bean wrote:
I don't think I have X Windows installed. How do I now install
it?
Installing sid with installer-i386, I was given a choice about what
kind of setup I wanted, eg a personal workstation, an Internet
server, etc.
With the cursor on the
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:20:17AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:20:08 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:34:45PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
That all sounds like there are some configuration problems in your
system. Maybe you
Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:04:57PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
to
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:34:45PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 14:04:57 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at
The thread is tangled because some of my previous posting have not shown
up as yet.
Continuing to try to get the Wacom mouse to work, ran xorgcfg. The
program runs but with output to stderror Failed to initialize module
list. strace xorgcfg shows it is looking in
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:20:08 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:34:45PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
[...]
I now have all the lines in sources.list commented out except those for
testing. I ran apt-get install -f followed by apt-get update then
apt-get
Tangled thread; one of yesterday's postings just showed up.
A later posting reported editing /etc/X11/xorg.conf as per
linuxwacom.sf.net manual. I now have the following situation:
The stylus moves the cursor, the mouse does not.
The mouse buttons and scroll wheel work.
Tom George
--
To
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:04:57PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
to get gdm to start but
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 14:04:57 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
to get gdm to start but if I switch to a console I lose the window and
must restart gdm.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 03:30:43AM +, s. keeling wrote:
Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
There are reasons why Sarge is called stable. Stay with
Sarge/stable. Testing is meant for those who *know* Debian well
Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 03:30:43AM +, s. keeling wrote:
Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
There are reasons why Sarge is called stable. Stay with
Sarge/stable. Testing
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 14:04:57 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:30:37AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
to get gdm to start but
Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
There are reasons why Sarge is called stable. Stay with
Sarge/stable. Testing is meant for those who *know* Debian well
enough to not stumble, not for those who want newer software.
s. keeling wrote:
Thomas H. George [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
There are reasons why Sarge is called stable. Stay with
Sarge/stable. Testing is meant for those who *know* Debian well
enough to not stumble, not for those
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 16:41:09 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I am stumbling through the move from Sarge to testing. I have managed
to get gdm to start but if I switch to a console I lose the window and
must restart gdm. Equally frustrating, my Wacom tablet mouse is not
recognized
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 09:12:42PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:50:10PM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
I would like to write some text which includes the symbols for Spades,
Hearts, Diamonds and Clubs. I know that some years ago I had a word
processor with fonts
On 07.12.05 10:55:08, Daniel Kämtner wrote:
Hallo
ich wollte meine X-windows-manager mit
# init 3
beenden und mit
# init 5
wieder starten.
Aber da passiert nichts..
Weil das normalerweise diesselben Runlevel sind. Wir sind hier nicht bei
SuSE, in Debian sind die Runlevel 2-5 gleich. Du
Encaminhando
Original Message
Subject: Re: X Windows System (mais um coisa)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:55:54 -0400
From: Alexandre Aldrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Fabiano Pires wrote:
Os pacotes básicos que eu uso são:
x-window-system
gnome (ou kde, ou outro gerenciador de janelas)
gdm (ou kdm, ou outro gerenciador de logins)
acho que é só.
Eu costumo instalar o x-window-system-core + xterm. acho que vem muita
tranqueira com x-window-system (xprint,
Também estou tendo um problema com o X. Ele gerou a
seguinte saída (abaixo), não consegui liberar para
ele o GLcore e não entendi a última parte. Vou colocar
aqui as partes que contém erros e o contexto dele:
...
(II) LoadModule: GLcore
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module GLcore
(II)
Os pacotes básicos que eu uso são:
x-window-system
gnome (ou kde, ou outro gerenciador de janelas)
gdm (ou kdm, ou outro gerenciador de logins)
acho que é só.
Fabiano.
Em 15/11/05, Alexandre Aldrigues[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Eu tenho um sério problema com um X Windows System, eu acho que
Em Ter 15 Nov 2005 13:16, Alexandre Aldrigues escreveu:
Eu tenho um sério problema com um X Windows System, eu acho que ele
não gosta de mim. Quando instalo qualquer distribuição de Linux as
configurações do X são detectadas perfeitamente, tudo funciona, mas
daí, caso eu venha fuçar, fuçar e
quote quem=Alexandre Aldrigues
Eu tenho um sério problema com um X Windows System, eu acho que ele
não gosta de mim. Quando instalo qualquer distribuição de Linux as
configurações do X são detectadas perfeitamente, tudo funciona, mas
daí, caso eu venha fuçar, fuçar e por fim consigo o detonar,
Tudo bem, concordo... Mas eu queria aprender. Por exemplo, chegar em
qualquer m=E1quina e fazer funcionar, mesmo que fosse do zero. :/
Em 15/11/05, Fabio Guerrazzi[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
quote quem=Alexandre Aldrigues
Eu tenho um sério problema com um X Windows System, eu acho que ele
Could you post the contents of your XF86Config-4 please.On 9/22/05, Marko Sarunac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:trying to get xwin running on the v2000
Here is the latest log file from X.having problems with libGLcore.
I have tried booting with 2.6.8 and 2.6.8-amd64
Same results.
Your help is
Thanks a lot for your recomendation about qemu, i can compile it and
it works grate and also i can run the bochs virtual disk with the OS
inside.
Pablo E. Bullian
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:06:05PM -0300, Pablo Bullian wrote:
Hi!, I'm new in this and i have a problem trying to compile some programs.
I try the ./configure with bochs and it give me this error the same i
think that the compilation of aMsn give me.
First of all, there is already a bochs
Hello!!
My apt source list points to unstable currently. As much I don't want
to admit it, I guess I will reinstall Windows 98 on it (the original
OS). The current state of affairs is way too much trouble and time
consuming for me as of right now. As much as I like Linux, I am still
too much of a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:36:35PM -0400, Will Ness wrote:
Hello!
Here is the breakdown, yes I am using 2.2 idepci kernel on my laptop.
However when I do the apt-get command, it claims that the newer kernel
image is not been found.
Have you done apt-get update?
If you are using a 2.2
On 7/29/05, Paolo Pantaleo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed the x-windows-system package, and i found some
unpleasant things:
1)xdm is installed and no question is done about it during configuration
2)the keyboard doesn't work properly as said in a previous message ALT
GR + key
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
I just installed the x-windows-system package, and i found some
unpleasant things:
1)xdm is installed and no question is done about it during configuration
This is by design. x-window-system depends upon all programs that are
traditionally part of an X
Hello!
Here is the breakdown, yes I am using 2.2 idepci kernel on my laptop.
However when I do the apt-get command, it claims that the newer kernel
image is not been found. Not sure what to do next. Perhaps at this
point, should I consider a reinstall? I know that x-windows worked the
first time
You are probably using 2.2, which I have no experience with. Try upgrading to 2.4 if possible, with the following command:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386
(You will need to reboot.)
That will bring you up to 2.4, and then you may want to upgrade to
sarge, the latest stable, and get 2.6.
Hello!
I am using the standard 'safe' kernal installation on the woody cds.
No customization invovled. I believe the kernal is 2.2 or 2.4 but I
will get back to you on that. What other modules should I try?
-Will
Hello!
Cool, so now I know for sure its the mouse driver. How do I go about
adding the psmouse or event modules? Do I go in and edit the x-config
file to say psmouse/usbhid/mousedev in the device or Protocol
section? Or not that at all? I am very much a newbie when it comes to
First of all, this isn't a pain. This is what mailing lists are for.
Second, to see if it works, in a console run:
modprobe input
modprobe psmouse
modprobe usbhid
modprobe mousedev.
Then start x.
If that works, then add input, psmouse, usbhid, and mousedev to /etc/modules. That will load them on
Hello!
Thank you again for the help! Please know that I truly appreciate it!
Anyways,I tried what you suggested and all I got for each input was :
Can't locate module (input)
What happens now?
-Will
That's alright, try the other modules, and then ty starting x.
Are using the stock kernel, or are you using custom kernel? And what kernel.On 7/21/05, Will Ness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Hello!Thank you again for the help! Please know that I truly appreciate it!
Anyways,I tried what you suggested
Da alguma mensagem de erro?
Se aparece alguma mensagem de erro copia e posta ela aqui para podermos ajudar
falow
[]s
Em 23/05/05, Poch[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Alguem me ajuda com o X windows.
Ja instalei mas quando ele carregq o modo grafico aprece o console e nada
mais aprarece na tela.
Você instalou o pacote x-window-system-core ?
quote quem=Poch
Alguem me ajuda com o X windows.
Ja instalei mas quando ele carregq o modo grafico aprece o console e nada
mais aprarece na tela.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pessoal,
Tenho aqui minha maquina o debian sage (cd basico netinst).
Já instalei o básico do sistema e agora gostaria de instalar também o
wmaker, só que estou tendo problemas...
Comando: apt-get install wmaker
Obs.: Já estou com o pppoeconfig devidamente configurado
Em Ter, 2004-11-02 às 13:15 -0200, free-linux escreveu:
Olá Lista,
Estou tentando configurar o X, mas quando dou dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86 ele está gravando em outro arquivo que não é o
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4. Como saber em qual arquivo o dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86 está
Em Ter 02 Nov 2004 13:15, free-linux escreveu:
Olá Lista,
Estou tentando configurar o X, mas quando dou dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86 ele está gravando em outro arquivo que não é o
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4. Como saber em qual arquivo o dpkg-reconfigure
xserver-xfree86 está gravando.
Pois
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been trying to install debian on a Compaq Deskpro EN for last one
week. I have tried both woody (stable) and sarge (testing). In both, the
x-windows configuration does not work. In woody, installation went fine
except that none of the video
at the end nothing worked. I think the problem is again with x-windows.
What does one do?
Start by explaining in a lot more detail what nothing worked means:
what commands did you run which didn't work?
If you cannot get the X server running, or it just didn't start on its
own at boot-time,
why did it take 13 hours for you to download??? is JNU part of ernet?
if yes then, use the debian mirror at IIT Madras. here from university
of pune i downloaded the sarge in 20 mins at 625 Kb/s. the ernet is
really fast.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:39:47PM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
I have been trying to install debian on a Compaq Deskpro EN for last one
week. I have tried both woody (stable) and sarge (testing). In both, the
x-windows configuration does not work. In woody, installation went fine
except that
On (18/10/04 09:40), Paul E Condon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:39:47PM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
I have been trying to install debian on a Compaq Deskpro EN for last one
week. I have tried both woody (stable) and sarge (testing). In both, the
x-windows configuration does not work.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 09:44:03AM +, Alexis Huxley wrote:
If you cannot get the X server running, or it just didn't start on its
own at boot-time, then post the output from running 'X' from the console
- all of it, exactly as it appears.
Or the more common startx.
--
Carl Fink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sherman, Michael (GE Energy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a quick question. I know that a machine is much less secure when X
Windows is running. Does it apply in the same way when X stuff is installed,
but the desktop is not actually running?
Sherman, Michael (GE Energy) wrote:
Hi all.
I have a quick question. I know that a machine is much less secure when X
Windows is running. Does it apply in the same way when X stuff is installed,
but the desktop is not actually running?
How secure are vncserver sessions and X over ssh?
Thanks in
Sherman, Michael (GE Energy) wrote:
Hi all.
I have a quick question. I know that a machine is much less secure when X
Windows is running. Does it apply in the same way when X stuff is installed,
but the desktop is not actually running?
How secure are vncserver sessions and X over ssh?
Thanks in
Am 2004-09-19 03:11:47, schrieb Björn Schmidt:
Dirk Salva wrote:
Es ist ja auch nicht ganz so wichtig, was er theoretisch kann,
sondern vielmehr, wieviel das Board unterstuetzt. Und es gab damals
genug, die nur 64MB gecachet haben und dann mittels COAST-Modulen
aufgeruestet werden konnten.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Meine Boards sind alles HX und aufwärts...
Und für die HX-boards habe ich über all 512 MB Cache Module
Wenn Du schon mitreden musst, dann gibt wenigstens reelle
Speichergrößen an.
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Bjoern Schmidt
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
Am 2004-09-19 13:38:18, schrieb Björn Schmidt:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Meine Boards sind alles HX und aufwärts...
Und für die HX-boards habe ich über all 512 MB Cache Module
Wenn Du schon mitreden musst, dann gibt wenigstens reelle
Speichergrößen an.
Wie alle anderen... 256kByte
512er
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Meine Boards sind alles HX und aufwärts...
Und für die HX-boards habe ich über all 512 MB Cache Module
Wenn Du schon mitreden musst, dann gibt wenigstens reelle
Speichergrößen an.
Wie alle anderen... 256kByte
Also steht 512 MB Cache Module doch nicht für 512MByte?
Na gut,
Am 2004-09-19 15:57:13, schrieb Björn Schmidt:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Meine Boards sind alles HX und aufwärts...
Und für die HX-boards habe ich über all 512 MB Cache Module
Wenn Du schon mitreden musst, dann gibt wenigstens reelle
Speichergrößen an.
Wie alle anderen... 256kByte
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Doch. Ich hatte ein 512kB COAST Modul mit integriertem TAG-RAM
benutzt.
Welcher Hersteller ?
Das weiss ich nicht mehr, ich zu lange her.
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Bjoern Schmidt
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 04:57:34AM +0200, Rainer Bendig wrote:
Hi Dirk Salva, *,
[snip]
Hier laufen zur Zeit abwechselnd ion2 und blackbox.
ion2 deshalb weil das ein Windowmanager ist der sich praktisch ohne
Maus bedienen lässt, zudem recht schlank und schnell ist. Ich kann in
ion2
On Friday 17 September 2004 18:45, Dirk Salva wrote:
Nur hat es *keiner* geschafft, *seine ganz persoenlichen* Gruende
fuer einen bestimmten und gegen die anderen WM klar darzulegen.
Bisher ist auch dieser thread wieder nur eine nette Aufzaehlung, in
der zwar jeder seine Vorliebe an den Mann
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:53:01PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Tja, bei mir sitzt noch ein K6-II drauf, der hat nur den 1st level cache
eingebaut. Der 2nd level cache sitzt auf der Hauptplatine (VIA MVP3)
und ist recht klein (256kb?).
Jau, und wenn Du Dir jetzt einen K6-III goennst, wird der
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 02:10:26AM +0200, Uwe Laverenz wrote:
Das war ganz frueher der Fall, IMHO z.B. bei so Antiquitaeten wie dem
Triton-Chipsatz (HX?). Ist aber bei einem AMD K6-III egal, weil der
Sorry, aber der HX war der hochwertigste der damaligen Intel-Chipsätze,
der konnte bis zu
Dirk Salva wrote:
Es ist ja auch nicht ganz so wichtig, was er theoretisch kann,
sondern vielmehr, wieviel das Board unterstuetzt. Und es gab damals
genug, die nur 64MB gecachet haben und dann mittels COAST-Modulen
aufgeruestet werden konnten. Und davor hatten die Boards leere
IC-Sockel, die man
Hi Dirk Salva, *,
Dirk Salva wrote on Fri Sep 17, 2004 at 06:45:30PM +0200:
fvwm, windowmaker, blackbox, fluxbox, icewm, xfce4.
Nur hat es *keiner* geschafft, *seine ganz persoenlichen* Gruende
fuer einen bestimmten und gegen die anderen WM klar darzulegen.
Bisher ist auch dieser thread
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:18:19PM +0200, MarcMeyer wrote:
Dirk Salva wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Martin Werthmoeller wrote:
Wie ist das mit dem Ressourcenverbrauch bezüglich des RAM? Ist Deiner
Erfahrung nach ein K6-III-400 / 96MB ausreichend?
Aehm. Wie
Hallo Pascal,
Pascal Volk, 17.09.2004 (d.m.y):
Ich stehe voll auf XFce, weil:
* schnell und schlank
* kann alles was er können soll und wohl noch viel mehr
* der Desktop kann nicht zugemüllt werden
...und xfce kommt dem CDE kommerzieller Unix-Systeme wohl am
naechsten -
Am Thu, 16 Sep 2004 um 16:23 GMT +0200 schrieb Walter Saner:
und hat nicht ohne Grund seit Jahren fvwm als
Standard-Linux-WindowManager abgelöst.
Seit wann gibt es einen Standard-Linux-Windowmanager?
Och, schon lange.
Linux? Ein Windowmanager für den Kernel? :-)
Gruß,
martin!
Martin Werthmoeller schrieb:
Am Thu, 16 Sep 2004 um 16:23 GMT +0200 schrieb Walter Saner:
Seit wann gibt es einen Standard-Linux-Windowmanager?
Och, schon lange.
Linux? Ein Windowmanager für den Kernel? :-)
Da kannst du mal sehen, wie nützlich ein fehlertoleranter Parser
ist. Der
Hallo
Oliver Thieke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[welcher Windowmanager?]
Gibt es im grossen weiten Netz keine Seite, wo mal die Manager
verglichen werden ? Z.B. nach den Kriterien wie:
+ Ressourcenverbrauch
Ich habe hier auf einem nicht ganz so alten Rechner (K6-II-400) xfce4
Am Fri, 17 Sep 2004 um 10:52 GMT +0200 schrieb Andreas Janssen:
Hallo
Hallo Andreas,
Ich habe hier auf einem nicht ganz so alten Rechner (K6-II-400) xfce4
installiert. Der braucht mehr Ressourcen als sagen wir mal fluxbox,
aber ist so eine Art leichtgewichtige Desktop-Umgebung. Das Ding
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 04:23:02PM +0200, Walter Saner wrote:
Martin Werthmoeller schrieb:
Am Wed, 15 Sep 2004 um 23:56 GMT +0200 schrieb Martin Schmitz:
Da brauchst Du keinen Vergleich. WindowMaker dürfte in allen genannten
Kategorien am besten abschneiden
AFAIK Ansichtssache
Moin Oliver!
Oliver Thieke schrieb am Mittwoch, den 15. September 2004:
+ Ressourcenverbrauch
IceWM, Wmaker, nehmen sich nicht viel.
+ Unterstuetzung von Hotkeys
IceWM, Wmaker. Man kann auch extra-Tools nehmen (xbindkeys,
xbindkeys-config).
+ Untestuetzung anderer GUI-Libs (?) - GTK,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:31:11PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
IceWM, Wmaker, nehmen sich nicht viel.
Sche... auch. Jetzt hatte ich gehofft, dass in diesem thread wirklich
mal jemand ein *vergleichbares* Urteil faellt, und wieder nix.
Da wurde bisher empfohlen:
fvwm, windowmaker, blackbox,
Hallo
Martin Werthmoeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Am Fri, 17 Sep 2004 um 10:52 GMT +0200 schrieb Andreas Janssen:
Ich habe hier auf einem nicht ganz so alten Rechner (K6-II-400) xfce4
installiert. Der braucht mehr Ressourcen als sagen wir mal fluxbox,
aber ist so eine Art
Am 17.09.2004 18:45 schrieb Dirk Salva:
Sche... auch. Jetzt hatte ich gehofft, dass in diesem thread wirklich
mal jemand ein *vergleichbares* Urteil faellt, und wieder nix.
Da wurde bisher empfohlen:
fvwm, windowmaker, blackbox, fluxbox, icewm, xfce4.
Nur hat es *keiner* geschafft, *seine
Moin,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:41:05PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hallo
Martin Werthmoeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
Wie ist das mit dem Ressourcenverbrauch bezüglich des RAM? Ist Deiner
Erfahrung nach ein K6-III-400 / 96MB ausreichend?
Ja. Auf meinem Rechner habe ich es
* Oliver Thieke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ich hoffe Ihr hab da nen Tip ;-) !
Ich habe eine Weile lang evilwm [1] benutzt, jetzt läuft hier gerne
ratpoison [2] (in der Bedienung mit screen [3] zu vergleichen).
Letzteres wird dann beim Start von ratpoison gleich in einem aterm
gestartet. Mir langt das
Dirk Salva wrote:
Sche... auch. Jetzt hatte ich gehofft, dass in diesem thread wirklich
mal jemand ein *vergleichbares* Urteil faellt, und wieder nix.
Da wurde bisher empfohlen:
fvwm, windowmaker, blackbox, fluxbox, icewm, xfce4.
Nur hat es *keiner* geschafft, *seine ganz persoenlichen* Gruende
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Martin Werthmoeller wrote:
Wie ist das mit dem Ressourcenverbrauch bezüglich des RAM? Ist Deiner
Erfahrung nach ein K6-III-400 / 96MB ausreichend?
Aehm. Wie waers mit RAM kaufen? Mit mehr Speicher ist ein K6-III-400
noch absolut brauchbar, bei mir
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 07:46:53PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
Nur hat es *keiner* geschafft, *seine ganz persoenlichen* Gruende
Ich stehe voll auf XFce, weil:
* schnell und schlank
* kann alles was er können soll und wohl noch viel mehr
* der Desktop kann nicht zugemüllt
Dirk Salva wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Martin Werthmoeller wrote:
Wie ist das mit dem Ressourcenverbrauch bezüglich des RAM? Ist Deiner
Erfahrung nach ein K6-III-400 / 96MB ausreichend?
Aehm. Wie waers mit RAM kaufen? Mit mehr Speicher ist ein K6-III-400
noch absolut
Hallo
MarcMeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dirk Salva wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:13:34PM +0200, Martin Werthmoeller wrote:
Wie ist das mit dem Ressourcenverbrauch bezüglich des RAM? Ist Deiner
Erfahrung nach ein K6-III-400 / 96MB ausreichend?
Aehm. Wie waers mit RAM kaufen? Mit
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:34:11PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
Gibt es bei den Rechnern nicht unterhalb der maximalen Unterstützung
auch noch eine Grenze für den Bereich, der gecached werden kann? Mein
Board sagt glaube ich beim Starten was über eine DRAM cacheable
area (128 MB).
Ja, eine
Am 2004-09-15 23:56:06, schrieb Martin Schmitz:
Da brauchst Du keinen Vergleich. WindowMaker dürfte in allen genannten
Kategorien am besten abschneiden und hat nicht ohne Grund seit Jahren
fvwm als Standard-Linux-WindowManager abgelöst. Außerdem ist es der
Hä ??? - Ich habe ih noch
Am 2004-09-16 16:23:02, schrieb Walter Saner:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ su -c update-alternatives --config x-window-manager
| Password:
|
| There are 3 alternatives which provide window-manager'.
|
| SelectionAlternative
| ---
| 1
1 - 100 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
