Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-11 Thread Jiri Baum
Hello,

Gary Singleton:
 I have to ask what the advantage of gs-aladdin is (if any)?

gs-aladdin is the newest version

gs lags behind some fixed number of years (maybe three but I don't
remember)


I use gs-aladdin because it has/had some driver that I needed.


Jiri [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-11 Thread Bob Nielsen
The README.gz file in /usr/doc/gs has a 1996 copyright, so that sounds
about right.

To get around dselect not handling versioned provides with
magicfilter/gs-aladdin, I downgraded from gs-aladdin to gs.  The hpdj
driver in gs gives errors (however dj500 seems to work fine).  I don't
know if this is really a gs 5.10 problem or just a fluke with that driver.

Bob

On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Jiri Baum wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Gary Singleton:
  I have to ask what the advantage of gs-aladdin is (if any)?
 
 gs-aladdin is the newest version
 
 gs lags behind some fixed number of years (maybe three but I don't
 remember)
 
 
 I use gs-aladdin because it has/had some driver that I needed.


Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DM42nh  http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-10 Thread Pedro Guerreiro
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 11:22:50PM +0200, Jan Vroonhof wrote:
 Brian Servis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  For me it is the addition by the gs-aladdin maintainer of the HP Deskjet
  driver.
 
 But that driver is LGPL so it could also go into the free gs.

At least in gs-5.10-1 it is.

-- 
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.


What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-07 Thread Gary Singleton
With all the discussion about these two over the last
couple of days I have to ask what the advantage of
gs-aladdin is (if any)?  I read the FAQ on Wisconsin's
home for Ghostscript and in section 1.3 it states that
the only difference is in licensing.  The only
difference there is apparently that the Aladdin
license prohibits _any_ commercial distribution.  If
this is correct, why would someone choose to run
gs-aladdin over gs?  I _must_ be missing something.

BTW, you guys on this list are really an asset.  Back
when I used another distro that shall remain nameless;
I never got this much _quality_ assistance.

Best regards,
Gary Singleton
--
Dilbert's mom uses Linux!  Dilbert's mom rules!
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-07 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 11:56:45 -0700, Gary Singleton wrote:
 With all the discussion about these two over the last couple of days I
 have to ask what the advantage of gs-aladdin is (if any)? 

Unless I'm mistaken, gs-aladdin is the actively maintained version, i.e.
new/improved drivers and new features (like PDF support some time ago)
appear in gs-aladdin first, and get into the free version by old gs-aladdin
versions being rereleased as free ones.

Ray
-- 
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-07 Thread Brian Servis
*- On  7 Apr, Gary Singleton wrote about What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?
 With all the discussion about these two over the last
 couple of days I have to ask what the advantage of
 gs-aladdin is (if any)?  I read the FAQ on Wisconsin's
 home for Ghostscript and in section 1.3 it states that
 the only difference is in licensing.  The only
 difference there is apparently that the Aladdin
 license prohibits _any_ commercial distribution.  If
 this is correct, why would someone choose to run
 gs-aladdin over gs?  I _must_ be missing something.
 

For me it is the addition by the gs-aladdin maintainer of the HP Deskjet
driver.

From gs-aladdin package description,
 .
 This package also contains the hpdj driver contributed by
 Martin Lottermoser.

and from the gs-hpdj man page,

DESCRIPTION
   Scope
   The ghostscript device driver hpdj is a ghostscript  backĀ­
   end  for  printers understanding Hewlett-Packard's Printer
   Command Language, Level 3 (PCL-3).  It is intended to supĀ­
   port in particular the following printer models:

   HP DeskJet 500
   HP DeskJet 500C
   HP DeskJet 510
   HP DeskJet 520
   HP DeskJet 540
   HP DeskJet 550C
   HP DeskJet 560C
   HP DeskJet 850C
   HP DeskJet 855C

I use it with the 660c but it works great, much better than the dj550
driver that is in the free gs.

-- 
Brian 
-
Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,  
 because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes. 
   - unknown  

Mechanical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University   http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-07 Thread Jan Vroonhof
Brian Servis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 For me it is the addition by the gs-aladdin maintainer of the HP Deskjet
 driver.

But that driver is LGPL so it could also go into the free gs.

 I use it with the 660c but it works great, much better than the dj550
 driver that is in the free gs.

Indeed, at least it needs a lot less tuning. I just wish Uli would
allow his dj8xx driver in as well. That has much better color support.

Jan


Re: What advantage; gs-aladdin vs. gs?

1999-04-07 Thread Wojciech Zabolotny
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Gary Singleton wrote:

 With all the discussion about these two over the last
 couple of days I have to ask what the advantage of
 gs-aladdin is (if any)?  I read the FAQ on Wisconsin's
 home for Ghostscript and in section 1.3 it states that
 the only difference is in licensing.  The only
 difference there is apparently that the Aladdin
 license prohibits _any_ commercial distribution.  If
 this is correct, why would someone choose to run
 gs-aladdin over gs?  I _must_ be missing something.
 
The conversion ps-pdf works fine in gs-aladdin (5.50),
and sometimes gives very ugly results in gs (5.10) (particularly
in eps graphics).
Wojtek Zabolotny
[EMAIL PROTECTED]