Le Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:57:48 +0300, Andres Järv a écrit :
I think I'll still stick with unstable to be up to date.
I think I'll still stick with unstable to be up to date.br
I think i ll install sid to test bugs and fix them ... be etch released in
a few monthes :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Rogério Brito:
This has been done in the past and I would expect that things would not
change so soon (see the many dummy bugs reported like this package is not
suitable for testing).
Exactly these packages *will* get into etch after sarge is stable! The
dummy bugs are there to prevent the
On Thursday 02 Jun 2005 01:34, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I _had_ planned on just staying with 'testing' in my sources.list. Is
that a bad idea?
I think Patrick might be referring to switching from sid to testing for a
while, until things settle again. Is that right, Patrick?
--
Lee.
Please
On 6/2/05, Lee Braiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 Jun 2005 01:34, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I _had_ planned on just staying with 'testing' in my sources.list. Is
that a bad idea?
I think Patrick might be referring to switching from sid to testing for a
while, until things
Incoming from Patrick Wiseman:
On 6/2/05, Lee Braiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 Jun 2005 01:34, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I _had_ planned on just staying with 'testing' in my sources.list. Is
that a bad idea?
I think Patrick might be referring to switching from sid to
On 6/2/05, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So edit sources.list to say sarge instead of testing, and watch
what others are encountering. Once you see how stable sarge is and
how others are doing with the new testing, change sarge to testing
and track the new testing.
FYI
I'm wanting
Joe Potter jpotter1034 at cfl.rr.com writes:
Hello all,
When we get a Sarge release in a few days, we will get crazy behavior
out of Sid for a while? I seem to remember that when Woody was released,
updating in testing or Sid was a problem for a long time. Will that be
the case again?
I
I think I'll still stick with unstable to be up to date.
On 6/2/05, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
No - the original poster suggested that both testing and unstable were
problematic after the last stable release. So I was concerned that
the new 'testing' would be flaky for a while. I've found the current
testing, which
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
No - the original poster suggested that both testing and unstable were
problematic after the last stable release. So I was concerned that
the new 'testing' would be flaky for a while. I've found the current
testing, which I've had in my sources.list for a couple of
Colin writes:
You'll want to change testing to sarge if you want a stable system.
If you leave it at testing, the system will go haywire a couple of
weeks from now when etch becomes the new testing.
Nothing will go haywire. Packages will just begin to flow into Testing
again after the
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:16:32PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Colin writes:
You'll want to change testing to sarge if you want a stable system.
If you leave it at testing, the system will go haywire a couple of
weeks from now when etch becomes the new testing.
Nothing will go haywire.
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On 6/2/05, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll want to change testing to sarge if you want a stable system. If
you leave it at testing, the system will go haywire a couple of weeks
from now when etch becomes the new testing.
So this answer to a FAQ is false?
---
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On 6/2/05, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll want to change testing to sarge if you want a stable system.
If
you leave it at testing, the system will go haywire a couple of weeks
from now when etch becomes the new testing.
So this answer to a FAQ is false?
---
On Thursday 02 June 2005 10:54 pm, James Ronald wrote:
snip
I'm a Debian noob and don't understand...
Won't , Sarge become Stable, Sid become Testing, whatever (etch??) become
unstable?
Also, this thread is in regard to Sid.. What happens to Sid if not become
testing?
JR
Sid is always the
I'm a Debian noob and don't understand...
Won't , Sarge become Stable, Sid become Testing, whatever (etch??)
become
unstable?
Also, this thread is in regard to Sid.. What happens to Sid if not become
testing?
JR
A more detailed explanation of what happens when a release is made is
On Jun 02 2005, Colin wrote:
So, a couple of days after all these packages are submitted, they will
eventually find their way into testing.
*IF* no bug with high severity is found/reported during the time between
the upload of the package and the period necessary to hit testing.
Hope this
On Jun 02 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
That is slightly inaccurate. There are huge changes on the way (X.org
6.8.2, GNOME 2.10, and others).
Yes, the main problems would be the partial migration of huge systems like
Gnome.
OTOH, the dependencies on basic packages may be a solution to
Hello all,
When we get a Sarge release in a few days, we will get crazy behavior
out of Sid for a while? I seem to remember that when Woody was released,
updating in testing or Sid was a problem for a long time. Will that be
the case again?
Regards, Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Joe Potter:
When we get a Sarge release in a few days, we will get crazy behavior
out of Sid for a while? I seem to remember that when Woody was released,
updating in testing or Sid was a problem for a long time. Will that be
the case again?
Nobody can say how seriously sid will break, but
On 6/1/05, Joe Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
When we get a Sarge release in a few days, we will get crazy behavior
out of Sid for a while? I seem to remember that when Woody was released,
updating in testing or Sid was a problem for a long time. Will that be
the case again?
I
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On 6/1/05, Joe Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
When we get a Sarge release in a few days, we will get crazy behavior
out of Sid for a while? I seem to remember that when Woody was released,
updating in testing or Sid was a problem for a
Steve Witt writes:
It really depends upon you and how stable you need the machine(s) to
be. If you need them to be pretty stable, then change that to 'sarge' (or
stable).
Don't change it to Stable now, though. Stable presently points to
Woody. It will be switched to point to Sarge when the
On Wednesday June 1 2005 6:22 pm, John Hasler wrote:
Steve Witt writes:
It really depends upon you and how stable you need the machine(s)
to be. If you need them to be pretty stable, then change that to
'sarge' (or stable).
Don't change it to Stable now, though. Stable presently points
On Jun 01 2005, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I _had_ planned on just staying with 'testing' in my sources.list. Is
that a bad idea?
I *will* stay with testing in my sources.list. It is a way to be always
testing the distribution and reporting problems that you see, giving
feedback to the developers.
25 matches
Mail list logo
