Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
Hi all! I've the same problem... On the same pc, with windows xp internet is fast (about 80k) but with the latest debian etch, internet is very very very slow (about 25k)!! I've installed debian sarge, dist-upgrading to etch and the download speed is about 80k. But installing the deb linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 with his dependencies, the download speed decrease to 25k... What's the problem? Thank's and sorry for my english -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:48:17PM -0800, schmity wrote: Here is what I get when I do the tests. It takes a long time to ping google and yahoo. Telnet didn't work with google or yahoo and it was extremely slow also. Don't know about the ipv6 packet or where to ... Maybe check the MTU setting for the interface. It might need to be reduced. Ken -- Ken Irving, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower then dial up
On 06/11/06, Zoran Kolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows XP machine and my Debian linux machine.Internet on the Windows XP machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up (no joke! night and day difference!)What is wrong with the Debian machine?Forgive me for jumping in like this. I have no idea what the original querier's problem is, save the quotation above. Given that, I wish to state the following: I too had this problem. I got rid of dhcp, chucked the /etc/resolv.conf file's content and let pppoeconf do the rest. This may be an over-simplification; in my defence, I cite my preamble.Perhaps that will help. Cheers.-- —A watched bread-crumb never boils.—My hover-craft is full of eels.—[...]and that's the he and the she of it.
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
On 5 Nov 2006 19:48:17 -0800 schmity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=78.5 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=61.2 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=66.9 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=72.6 ms snip that's actually pretty good time... check out min :) PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=715 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=709 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=763 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=711 ms do the telnet test again, but this time use the IP instead of the name, see if it is any faster I had some issues like this, with a DSL modem, turnes out it can't handle the dns requests sent by the linux machine, you can try to set up a local dns server and see it solves the issue []s rodrigo -- = \ .-. +++ Rodrigo Paes +++ \ / /v\CCIE #14054 (RS and SP)/ \// \\ LPIC2 #19753\ / /( )\ Linux User #324449 / \^^-^^ \ / jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
Ok I added the following line in my /etc/network/interfaces file auto eth0 ... ... up ifconfig mtu 1450 after doing a ifdown -a and ifup -a I could verify the mtu by ifconfig -a. I tried 1450, 1400, 1300, 1200, .700. None of which seemed to help. how do I check on the ipv6 packet? Ken Irving wrote: On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 07:48:17PM -0800, schmity wrote: Here is what I get when I do the tests. It takes a long time to ping google and yahoo. Telnet didn't work with google or yahoo and it was extremely slow also. Don't know about the ipv6 packet or where to ... Maybe check the MTU setting for the interface. It might need to be reduced. Ken -- Ken Irving, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
Rodrigo Paes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: schmity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=78.5 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=61.2 ms that's actually pretty good time... check out min :) PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=715 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=709 ms I was shocked to see: PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=15.3 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=16.6 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=16.5 ms ... Man the internet is faster than I remember... Google, or somebody, is apparently doing something clever, because according to traceroute[*], not only is there an unsually low number of hops to the above google machine (only 11), but it's located in Japan (where I am), avoiding the big trans-pacific delay (~100ms, generally) that I get with most U.S. sites. [*] Actually mtr -t, a very nice traceroute replacement. -Miles -- `Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said. `All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 06:40:44 +0900 Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=15.3 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=16.6 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=16.5 ms ... dmn !! _that_ is fast.. Google has some Data Centers spread around the world, one of them is probably on the floor beneath you :) about the hops, like I said.. either the DC is next to your house or you get inside a nice MPLS network that masks the real number of hops. But about the connection speed, If I can surf the web pretty well with my shitty response time, .78ms should work aswell. []s rodrigo -- = \ .-. +++ Rodrigo Paes +++ \ / /v\CCIE #14054 (RS and SP)/ \// \\ LPIC2 #19753\ / /( )\ Linux User #324449 / \^^-^^ \ / jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
Rodrigo Paes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=15.3 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=16.6 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=16.7 ms 64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=16.5 ms ... dmn !! _that_ is fast.. Google has some Data Centers spread around the world, one of them is probably on the floor beneath you :) This is at my house, so I'm not sure if I should be pleased or freaked out that google has managed to sneak some servers in here... :-) Well, one must never underestimate google I suppose! -miles -- 80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower then dial up
Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet www.google.com 80 get /. I've seen your ping results. Better than my probes. To debug this issue, power down all devi- ces. Computers, router, modem. Power up modem, then router, wait to get ip address, then boot boxes. Check router configuration. Try with linux only. Change cable for debian box. Check routing table on debian. None of this helped. Newbie here. How do I check the routing table? For next mail, send details on router type, model. Dhcp, static addresses. Any rules on this router? Arp and route data. Default route. Traceroute to somewhere. Post to the list some info. Gigafast Ethernet router, Model: ee400-r. I'm not sure, but I don't think I have static addresses. Again, Newbie here. No clue on rules, Arp, rout data, default rout, traceroute. I'm gonna google for this stuff, but any help is appreciated. To my surprise, when the problem is solved, the solution is rarely posted to the list. This way would be less questions of the same type. Archives could sufice. Zoran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
If there is any question concerning the router, and if you have a spare machine with a pair of ethernet cards, download an ISO image of SmoothWall Express 2.0 (www.smoothwall.org), burn a CD, install SmoothWall on the spare machine, and see whether the situation improves. Installation of SmoothWall takes about 20 minutes, and ample help screens are provided. No configuration is required, other than entry of data such as IP address of the LAN. SmoothWall is the only firewall/router package which I have found which is simple enough for a novice to install and get running. RLH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower then dial up
On 6 Nov 2006 13:59:23 -0800 schmity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet www.google.com 80 get /. seems like we are getting somewhere now... if browsing the net with mozilla is working fast, than it definitely doesn't look like a network problem... network problems have the good symptom of being neutral, if there is a net problem, everybody feels it. about the telnet ... it's just a way for you to get a feel for the network, if the response is quick, if it is taking too long to resolve a name, if you actually have connectivity to the site, you know ..things like that ;) telneting to google on port 80, you are doing just what your browser does, and the get / is the keyword to start downloading the web page, but since you terminal is not a browser, it gets disconnected right after it. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet www.google.com 80 Trying 216.239.37.99... Connected to www.google.com. here... you are connected Escape character is '^]'. get / Connection closed by foreign host. HTH []s rodrigo -- = \ .-. +++ Rodrigo Paes +++ \ / /v\CCIE #14054 (RS and SP)/ \// \\ LPIC2 #19753\ / /( )\ Linux User #324449 / \^^-^^ \ / jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower then dial up
Ok. It seems that the internet is extremely fast when I use Mozilla and extremely slow when I use Konqueror. I am still unable to telnet www.google.com 80 get /. What machine exactly you have? If it is pentium I with 64 mb... KDE is ready to modern box, just as xp or vista. Fire up fvwm2 or evilwm. Use lynx or firefox from simple window manager. None of this helped. Newbie here. How do I check the routing table? Start with netstat. (Man netstat.) Then see at see also. Gigafast Ethernet router, Model: ee400-r. I'm not sure, but I don't think I have static addresses. Again, Newbie here. No clue on rules, Arp, rout data, default rout, traceroute. I'm gonna google for this stuff, but any help is appreciated. Yes!!! At last! You got it! Read first, ask second. Zoran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cable modem connection slower than dial up
I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up (no joke! night and day difference!) What is wrong with the Debian machine? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
On 5 Nov 2006 18:28:32 -0800 schmity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up (no joke! night and day difference!) What is wrong with the Debian machine? run some basic tests . ping www.google.com ping www.yahoo.com nslookup on both.. telnet www.google.com 80 get / Is the IPv6 module enabled on the linux box ? let us know how it turns out :) []s rodrigo -- = \ .-. +++ Rodrigo Paes +++ \ / /v\CCIE #14054 (RS and SP)/ \// \\ LPIC2 #19753\ / /( )\ Linux User #324449 / \^^-^^ \ / jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower than dial up
Here is what I get when I do the tests. It takes a long time to ping google and yahoo. Telnet didn't work with google or yahoo and it was extremely slow also. Don't know about the ipv6 packet or where to look. I'll check into it or if you have more info that you could give me it would be appreciated. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping linuxbox PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms 64 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms 64 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms 64 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.036 ms --- localhost.localdomain ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2997ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.035/0.039/0.047/0.004 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.google.com PING www.l.google.com (216.239.37.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=78.5 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=61.2 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=66.9 ms 64 bytes from 216.239.37.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=72.6 ms --- www.l.google.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 45575ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 61.215/69.836/78.565/6.460 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.yahoo.com PING www.yahoo-ht2.akadns.net (209.73.186.238) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from f1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (209.73.186.238): icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=65.2 ms 64 bytes from f1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com (209.73.186.238): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=64.3 ms 64 bytes from 209.73.186.238: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=59.2 ms --- www.yahoo-ht2.akadns.net ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 20498ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 59.263/62.949/65.271/2.651 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet www.google.com 80 Trying 216.239.37.99... Connected to www.google.com. Escape character is '^]'. get / Connection closed by foreign host. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet www.yahoo.com 80 Trying 209.73.186.238... Connected to www.yahoo.com. Escape character is '^]'. get / Connection closed by foreign host. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cable modem connection slower then dial up
I have a cable modem connected to a router that connects to a Windows XP machine and my Debian linux machine. Internet on the Windows XP machine is extremely fast and the Debian machine is slower than dial up (no joke! night and day difference!) What is wrong with the Debian machine? I've seen your ping results. Better than my probes. To debug this issue, power down all devi- ces. Computers, router, modem. Power up modem, then router, wait to get ip address, then boot boxes. Check router configuration. Try with linux only. Change cable for debian box. Check routing table on debian. For next mail, send details on router type, model. Dhcp, static addresses. Any rules on this router? Arp and route data. Default route. Traceroute to somewhere. Post to the list some info. To my surprise, when the problem is solved, the solution is rarely posted to the list. This way would be less questions of the same type. Archives could sufice. Zoran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
