the way I'd attempt it on my own
machine:
aptitude update; aptitude upgrade // to make sure etch is current
change /etc/apt/sources.list by applying s/etch/testing/
aptitude update
aptitude install aptitude
aptitude install apt-listbugs
aptitude safe-upgrade (if that's available
I thought that at one point (in the past, when I was
paying a little more attention) that a certain
ubuntu release might be better
installed as a clean reinstall (rather than trying
to upgrade from a previous release). Hearing that
(or thinking I heard that),
I simply extrapolated the
Rick Dooling wrote:
On Jan 21, 7:20 pm, charlie derr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's really eager to upgrade from etch to something newer.
You didn't say why? Is there a particular program he craves a newer
version of?
Most of them :-[ It looked to me like icedove 2.0.0.9-3 is available in
steve wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charlie derr wrote:
|
|
| I went the Ubuntu route a couple of years ago. It's fun until you do a
| routine update and everything breaks.
? Ive used it on this laptop for almost 3 years, and never had a problem
with anything breaking.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charlie derr wrote:
|
|
| I went the Ubuntu route a couple of years ago. It's fun until you do a
| routine update and everything breaks.
? Ive used it on this laptop for almost 3 years, and never had a problem
with anything breaking. you use some
charlie derr wrote:
SNIP
He actually has a second machine (laptop) with ubuntu on it (an
attempt to switch distros in the past). Since I'm not nearly as
proficient with untangling ubuntu problems as I am with understanding
debian, I don't think that it really makes sense (in the past there
upgrade // to make sure etch is current
change /etc/apt/sources.list by applying s/etch/testing/
aptitude update
aptitude install aptitude
aptitude install apt-listbugs
aptitude safe-upgrade (if that's available in the aptitude in testing right
now)
thanks much in advance for any
charlie derr wrote:
An associate is not quite as avid a linux user as I am (though he's been
at it at least as long). He's got a machine that's running etch that he
uses as a general all-purpose workstation desktop (gnome, icedove,
iceweasel, ooo, emacs, cups, and a bunch more often-used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charlie derr wrote:
| An associate is not quite as avid a linux user as I am (though he's been
| at it at least as long). He's got a machine that's running etch that he
| uses as a general all-purpose workstation desktop (gnome, icedove,
|
On Jan 21, 7:20 pm, charlie derr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's really eager to upgrade from etch to something newer.
You didn't say why? Is there a particular program he craves a newer
version of?
I went the Ubuntu route a couple of years ago. It's fun until you do a
routine update and
Boa noite amigos,
Como não tive mais respostas sobre meu antigo problema, decidi seguir minha
intuição e dar um dist-upgrade do meu Etch testing AMD64 para o Lenny. Tudo
ocorreu mais ou menos bem, pois o sistema insistiu em travar enquanto ele
instalava os pacotes, mas nada que uma
A resposta está aqui:
gzip: stdout: No space left on device
Vc está com a partição cheia, sem espaço em disco.
Em Ter, 2007-11-06 às 20:35 -0300, Hugo Guimarães escreveu:
gzip: stdout: No space left on device
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
A única partição que está perto de encher é a /boot. Então, como eu poderia
fazer para liberar espaço dela sem comprometer a inicialização do grub?
Hugo Guimarães
Em 06/11/07, edmarcos [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
A resposta está aqui:
gzip: stdout: No space left on device
Vc está com a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-11-2007 23:24, Hugo Guimarães wrote:
A única partição que está perto de encher é a /boot. Então, como eu
poderia fazer para liberar espaço dela sem comprometer a inicialização
do grub?
Ou você monta o /boot em outro local, ou você dá
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra video
On 9/12/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:32:57PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/12/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 04:21:31PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:41:34PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
one note from the logs, it is selecting an initial resolution of
1920x1200. Does your monitor really support that? it looks like a
hitachi from 1996, and I'd be
Andrew: Just a quick feedback to say thanks a bunch for poring over
that lengthy post - really appreciate the details about what you tried
that worked and your insights into the verbose-yet-cryptic X error
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Andrew: Just a quick feedback to say thanks a bunch for poring over
that lengthy post - really appreciate the details about what you tried
that worked and your insights into the verbose-yet-cryptic X error
log. Quick check
On 9/11/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:11:25PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
log. Quick check verifies that there is just the builtin 82845G
chipset video - no extra video card - and certainly no second
monitor(!!).
happy to help, though
Have answered my own questions about bug reporting and joining, and
have chimed in on open bugs 424952 and 438650. They both appear to be
still open, with no evidence of upstream changes yet.
(Perhaps addressed in unstable?? Not that I would dare run that on this box.)
On 9/11/07, Gordon
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
i810 is being replaced by intel, so fix up your xorg.conf to reflect
intel instead, but that's not
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
This is a fresh etch install, i386, 2004 hardware. See DETAILED
NOTES below for hardware notes, xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log.
Does anyone have X working on one of these builtin Intel 845 chipsets?
I have tried the following changes to
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel 845.
This is a fresh etch install, i386, 2004 hardware. See DETAILED
NOTES below for hardware notes, xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log.
Does anyone have X working on one of
On 9/9/07, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the detailed suggestions - too late tonight to experiment,
so will do so Monday and report back.
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:19:10PM -0500, Gordon Pedersen wrote:
Hi,
New etch installation on box with builtin video Intel
.
This puzzles me. I've been running etch/testing since shortly after
Sarge went stable. I made sure to edit sources.lst to make sure it
points to testing, and not etch, so I can continue to receive the
latest packages after Etch goes stable. What happens to testing when
it becomes Lenny? I expect
On 2007-02-12, Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==
Don't forget to check that your /etc/apt/sources.lst entries point to
etch and not testing, otherwise you may end up with a broken system once
etch goes stable.
This puzzles me. I've been running etch/testing since shortly after
This puzzles me. I've been running etch/testing since shortly after
Sarge went stable. I made sure to edit sources.lst to make sure it
points to testing, and not etch, so I can continue to receive the
latest packages after Etch goes stable. What happens to testing when
it becomes Lenny? I
On (12/02/07 13:31), Tyler Smith wrote:
This puzzles me. I've been running etch/testing since shortly after
Sarge went stable. I made sure to edit sources.lst to make sure it
points to testing, and not etch, so I can continue to receive the
latest packages after Etch goes stable. What happens
On (12/02/07 07:02), Hodgins Family wrote:
This puzzles me. I've been running etch/testing since shortly after
Sarge went stable. I made sure to edit sources.lst to make sure it
points to testing, and not etch, so I can continue to receive the
latest packages after Etch goes stable. What
alguien me dijo que en debian etch (testing) no habia ya soporte
para los drivers y el modulo de tarjetas nvidia... que me pasara a
sid. y lo dice...
pero hay problemas de dependencias y los paquetes no se pueden instalar...
he buscado en muchas partes (Bulma, foros de gentoo en ingles, y otros
El 6/02/07, VARGUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola... gracias por la ayuda.
Segun Joshue Rui
para solucionar tu problema con el compilador simplemente borra el
enlace al compilador que esta en /usr/bin y crea uno nuevo al
compilador que te pide (supongo el 4.1) y listo ya deberías poder
...
Luego alguien me dijo que en debian etch (testing) no habia ya soporte para
los drivers y el modulo de tarjetas nvidia... que me pasara a sid. y lo
dice...
pero hay problemas de dependencias y los paquetes no se pueden instalar...
he buscado en muchas partes (Bulma, foros de gentoo en
a pesar de hacer:
export cc=gcc-4.0 ... alias cc= gcc-4.0 no se puede recompilar
el kernel y solucionar el problema...
Luego alguien me dijo que en debian etch (testing) no habia ya soporte para
los drivers y el modulo de tarjetas nvidia... que me pasara a sid. y lo
dice...
pero hay
problema...
Instala la versión que necesite y cambia el link al gcc
Luego alguien me dijo que en debian etch (testing) no habia ya soporte para
los drivers y el modulo de tarjetas nvidia... que me pasara a sid. y lo
dice...
pero hay problemas de dependencias y los paquetes no se pueden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:20:31 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:31:01PM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:59:53 + (GMT)
s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank McCormick
Friends.
I got the debian etch testing 25 cds and converted them into 3 DVDs.
Installed debian etch testing using those DVDs.
and I wished to update all the multimedia stuff.
so added the debian-multimedia.org repository.
My /etc/apt/sources.list looks like
Shrinivasan T wrote:
Friends.
I got the debian etch testing 25 cds and converted them into 3 DVDs.
Installed debian etch testing using those DVDs.
and I wished to update all the multimedia stuff.
so added the debian-multimedia.org repository.
My /etc/apt/sources.list looks like
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:08:28 -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:41, Florian Kulzer wrote:
If your package manager lists these packages as upgradable then you
either have not run update in a while or the progeny mirror is
seriously broken or you have found a bug in the package manager.
I had the same problem in Etch a few days
On Monday 16 October 2006 02:08, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the nvidia
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:05:39PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the
On Mon October 16 2006 06:47 am, David Baron wrote:
Yes, they are closed but the drivers are apparently the same. The glx
maybe not. I get much better results with those on Nvidia's site than those
on Sid. I keep the Sid nvidia-kernel-source package around because when
this is upgrades, so is
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
packages
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror pulse to finish. You
On Monday 16 October 2006 01:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Chris Lale wrote:
I updated Etch (Testing) today and sound (alsa-base 1.0.11-2) stopped
working. I installed the version from Unstable (alsa-base 1.0.11-3)
which has the same dependencies and reloaded /etc/init.d/alsa, but no
luck.
There seems to be a conflict with Gnome software sound mixing
I updated Etch (Testing) today and sound (alsa-base 1.0.11-2) stopped
working. I installed the version from Unstable (alsa-base 1.0.11-3)
which has the same dependencies and reloaded /etc/init.d/alsa, but no
luck. Has anyone else lost sound in Testing or Unstable?
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Richard Mittendorfer schrieb:
Also sprach Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:27:28
[...]
Bzgl. testing macht es schon Sinn, da unstable-Pakete ja nicht sofort
nach testing rutschen. Und AFAIK gabs/gibts dahingehend auch
Bemuehungen.
Jupp, gibt's..
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source packages are there. when i viewed this mirror with firefox, sarge
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341055
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4590
Anyone have a work around? the --round-robin from the above link has
lessened the issue however it is still creating a load ave of over 12.0 !
I tried downgrading to sarge/stable
All DVD video disk don't mount automatically. Can't be mounted manually.
Detected as Blank DVD-RW disk (which is not true).
My system is upgraded. Running i386 Etch in AMD 64 CPU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 00:59 +0800, Bal K Paudyal wrote:
All DVD video disk don't mount automatically. Can't be mounted manually.
Detected as Blank DVD-RW disk (which is not true).
My system is upgraded. Running i386 Etch in AMD 64 CPU.
please post the exact command you used to mount it
Installed Etch testing beta 2 yesterday, very pleased so far.
Install might have been faster than sarge. Some improvements to the
installer too.
Once installed the reboot time seem must faster than sarge.
XF86 support much improved found every resolution for the monitor and
started at the max
El Viernes, 21 de Octubre de 2005 17:53, Daniel Garcia escribió:
Hola!
Quiero instalar debian en una computadora que acabo de
comprar. Tiene instalado un windows xp y lo quiero
quitar. La cuestion es q no tiene ningún programa para
grabar una imagen ISO para hacer una netinst (hay
algún
Hola!
Quiero instalar debian en una computadora que acabo de
comprar. Tiene instalado un windows xp y lo quiero
quitar. La cuestion es q no tiene ningún programa para
grabar una imagen ISO para hacer una netinst (hay
algún programa gratuito que lo haga con el Mocochof?)
por lo que he pensado
Entra en www.moco2.com
baje el nero y su crack
listo
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: Instalacion Etch (testing) con disquetes
Hola!
Quiero instalar debian en una
Daniel Garcia escribió:
Hola!
Quiero instalar debian en una computadora que acabo de
comprar. Tiene instalado un windows xp y lo quiero
quitar. La cuestion es q no tiene ningún programa para
grabar una imagen ISO para hacer una netinst (hay
algún programa gratuito que lo haga con el Mocochof?)
del primer reinicio te pedirá
configurar el apt, si apuntas a Etch ... (testing) ... se tendrá que
actualizar el sistema base. Si quieres una iso de Etch:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/etch_d-i/
Existe mucha diferencia en instalar la debian con el
CD netinst que con los disquetes
Hello,
I saw in the debian pages that each week a testing ISO
image is done, but when I look for download it I can
not find it. What I find is:
debian-31r0a-i386-binary-1.jigdo07-Jun-2005 14:19
35K
I find that at the page:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I saw in the debian pages that each week a testing ISO
image is done, but when I look for download it I can
not find it. What I find is:
debian-31r0a-i386-binary-1.jigdo07-Jun-2005 14:19
35K
Hello Ron,
The computer where I want to install the system is not
conected to internet so I can not do a network
install. That is why I need the CDs with the whole
system.
Daniel
--- Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Daniel Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:15 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Debian ISO images of etch (testing)
Hello,
I saw in the debian pages that each week a testing ISO image is done, but
when I look for download it I can not find it. What I find
Hi. Please do not cc me. I read the list. Thanks.
Art Edwards wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hm, well, I understand that you're having a problem, but I don't really
see it as a problem with testing, or that testing is broken; but rather,
it seems more like a problem with the idea that
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is its
intended pupose, wouldn't it be a good idea to try to assure that
large
scale problems are kept to a minimum?
No, because that isn't its intended purpose.
This being the case, is it possible (and relatively easy) for me to set
up my own
Joseph Haig wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
(and that's without even getting into the subject that testing does
not get direct security updates. Stable does. Unstable effectively
gets them through uploads. Testing doesn't get them until the
packages
trickle down from unstable, which could
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:08:55AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
To
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:38:14 -0500
Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta
package which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in
turn, has caused aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a
system-wide upgrade. I have
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:38:14 -0500
Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta
package which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in
turn, has caused aptitude to suggest removing KDE when
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:34:34AM -0600, Art Edwards wrote:
I have to say that during the time between Woody and Sarge (a long time)
people
were encouraged to use testing as a nearly stable platform. Without it,
Debian
may have been abandoned by a significant part of its user base. Isn't
- Original Message
From: Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Someone is breaking etch (testing)?
Date: 27/09/05 23:55
Hm, well, I understand that you're having a problem, but I don't really
see
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to skip?
--
Carl Fink
On Monday 26 September 2005 10:37, Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
I am reporting the issue.
Why are you always such a troll?
--
I use
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:08:55AM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:15 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
I
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:15:51PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
Gee, what about by just NOT upgrading the box TODAY? Oh, that's right...
people die or something if they don't update the installed packages every
twenty-four hours.
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Marc, how can people know which 24 hours to skip?
The ones for which you have no backup...
but ... update/upgrade is updating the system .. not user data
and there's gazillion ways to update/restore/recreate the system
to be able to recover
On Monday 26 September 2005 01:40 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
When did disagreeing with the clueless majority automatically make someone
a troll?
From Jargon File (4.3.1, 29 Jun 2001) [jargon]:
troll 1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a
posting on {Usenet}
Hi everyone;
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta package
which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in turn, has caused
aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a system-wide upgrade. I
have been able to hold it back by following
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:38:14PM -0500, Jason Clinton wrote:
In the past two days, etch (testing) has been updated with a kde meta package
which apparently depends on packages from unstable which, in turn, has caused
aptitude to suggest removing KDE when performing a system-wide upgrade. I
86 matches
Mail list logo
