On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are
involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia
repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy system. Take it from me,
I spent ages cleaning up my system when I
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are
involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia
repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
any problems. In fact, that repo has never given me any problems. Of
course I'd prefer if I could get
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:49:22 +0100 (CET)
Pierre Frenkiel pierre.frenk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Pierre,
I was rather reluctant to use a repo relying on only one man, but
Christian is a very conscientious person. The DMO repo is very well
maintained. Of course, it's entirely up to you
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
any problems. In fact, that repo has never
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 13:05 -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
any problems. In fact, that repo has never
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 07:04:27PM +, Tixy wrote:
There seems to be a lots of packages in both repos, deb-multimedia has
its own version of loads of the AV libraries and it uses a higher epoch
in the version number to force them to be preferred over the official
libraries.
Yeah, not nice
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:46:49 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel
pierre.frenk...@gmail.com wrote:
cinelerra
You are aware of Debian's policy?
;D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 28/01/13 10:46 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
cinelerra, avidemux
the offical recommendations say:
Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
repositories from your /etc/apt/sources.list
On Monday 28 January 2013 15:46:49 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
cinelerra, avidemux
the offical recommendations say:
Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
repositories from your
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
cinelerra, avidemux
the offical recommendations say:
Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
repositories from
12 matches
Mail list logo
