make-kpkg revision rules not following documentaton, confusing error messages

I was attempting to compile my own kernel as a debian package, following these directions: https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/ch08s06.html.en When I got to the point where it has you run make-kpkg itself, where it suggests the following command: # fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd

Re: override kernel version with make-kpkg

On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:36:02 -0500 (EST), Michael Gulick wrote: I think my only option if I want automatic upgrades is to keep the abiname constant. I'm assuming (and I'm not sure whether this assumption is correct) that all the third party modules (primarily nvidia drivers and vmware)

Re: override kernel version with make-kpkg

On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:13:32 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote: If you want to do this, you won't be able to use make-kpkg. You will need to do something like make a modified version of the Debian source package, linux, and build it with dpkg-buildpackage. But you want to use upstream sources

override kernel version with make-kpkg

Hi, I'm looking for a way to override the default kernel package versions generated by make-kpkg. With 3.0+ kernels, the kernel sublevel (as in VERSION.PATCHLEVEL.SUBLEVEL), which is incremented when there are stable updates for a kernel release, is used to generate the package name

Re: override kernel version with make-kpkg

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Michael Gulick mgul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking for a way to override the default kernel package versions generated by make-kpkg. With 3.0+ kernels, the kernel sublevel (as in VERSION.PATCHLEVEL.SUBLEVEL), which is incremented when there are stable updates

Re: override kernel version with make-kpkg

On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:39:29 -0500 (EST), Michael Gulick wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a way to override the default kernel package versions generated by make-kpkg. With 3.0+ kernels, the kernel sublevel (as in VERSION.PATCHLEVEL.SUBLEVEL), which is incremented when there are stable updates

Je...compilando el kernel 3.8.11...con make-kpkg... :þ

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Psé... 2 horitas y 20 minutos...de nada... Uno lo está haciendo gracias a los paquetes de Debian Sid... No. Nononono. Lo hago con el paquete de kernel.org...pero con make-kpkg. :þþþ Ahora va bien. :þ - -- Saludos de Santiago José López

Re: Je...compilando el kernel 3.8.11...con make-kpkg... :þ

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 07/05/13 16:25, Santiago José López Borrazás escribió: :-þþþ 'Yastoy' con él... :þþþ - -- Saludos de Santiago José López Borrazás. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIVAwUBUYlYSLuF9/q6J55WAQoIsxAArPV2NbBtw0olX1zOTsUVNGuTrnIXiRAo

make-kpkg doesn't work properly when compiling i386 kernel on amd64 host

Makefile mentions an environment variable named HOSTCC. I tried to set the variable, but it still failed because of linker issue. Can make-kpkg do this job correctly? What extra parameter I should add?

Re: make-kpkg doesn't work properly when compiling i386 kernel on amd64 host

build the kernel itself correctly, but the problem is script tools such as genksyms are build as amd64 format. I notice that Linux Makefile mentions an environment variable named HOSTCC. I tried to set the variable, but it still failed because of linker issue. Can make-kpkg do this job correctly

Re: make-kpkg doesn't work properly when compiling i386 kernel on amd64 host

correctly, but the problem is script tools such as genksyms are build as amd64 format. I notice that Linux Makefile mentions an environment variable named HOSTCC. I tried to set the variable, but it still failed because of linker issue. Can make-kpkg do this job correctly? What extra parameter I should add

Re: Question about make-kpkg and versions

On 3/28/12, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: (I.e. is this a bug or a feature?) Haha, indeed! It seems M$ is haunting us, haha... Regards, Panayiotis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Question about make-kpkg and versions

Hi, I am trying to understand how make-kpkg chooses the versions for the packages it creates. Each package has a name(a), which contains a version part(a1), as well as a version(b), which is further split in upstream version(b1) and Debian revision(b2), right? Assuming this, I'll ask my question

Re: Question about make-kpkg and versions

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:49:58 -0400 (EDT), Panayiotis Karabassis wrote: I am trying to understand how make-kpkg chooses the versions for the packages it creates. Each package has a name(a), which contains a version part(a1), as well as a version(b), which is further split in upstream version

Re: Question about make-kpkg and versions

), the version in the name of the package and the debian package version are often different! Regards, Panayiotis On 03/27/2012 02:05 PM, Stephen Powell wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:49:58 -0400 (EDT), Panayiotis Karabassis wrote: I am trying to understand how make-kpkg chooses the versions

Re: Question about make-kpkg and versions

always did too. There were different suffices, but the basic version (x.y.z, for example, 2.6.32), was always consistent. This is no longer the case. As further clarification, make-kpkg uses the internal version in it's package name, and the value specified for --append-to-version will be appended

make-kpkg not including postinst-scripts

Hello, I try to compile a custom kernel in my home-directory with make-kpkg to create a .deb-package. Unfortunately, when installing this debian-package, apt-get complains about a wrong symlink: Hmm. There is a symbolic link /lib/modules/3.0.9.mptcp+/build However, I can not read

OFF-TOPIC: make-kpkg vs. make deb-pkg

Buenas. Tan solo para comentaros que estoy corriendo, bajo debian 6, el kernel 2.6.38-rc8. Para crearlo primero usé la utilidad make-kpkg (que había usado años atrás en multitud de ocasiones). No había forma que cargase el sistema. No digo que se me olvidase algo (a final de cuentas, dejé el

Re: OFF-TOPIC: make-kpkg vs. make deb-pkg

El día 10 de marzo de 2011 11:45, Manuel Trujillo (TooManySecrets) toom...@toomany.net escribió: Buenas. Tan solo para comentaros que estoy corriendo, bajo debian 6, el kernel 2.6.38-rc8. Para crearlo primero usé la utilidad make-kpkg (que había usado años atrás en multitud de ocasiones

RE: make-kpkg (from kernel-package) does not build xen patched kernel

Going to try a make-file patch when I get some time. The patch was offered from a user on the Xen-user mailing list. [1] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-09/msg00396.html -M Subject: make-kpkg (from kernel-package) does not build xen

make-kpkg (from kernel-package) does not build xen patched kernel

Hello list, I cannot get make-kpkg to build a Xenlinux type kernel into a Debian kernel binary on my Debian Squeeze x86_64 system. I am using GNU/Linux kernel sources tree (2.6.34.4) with Xen patches for this custom kernel. I am trying to use the make-kpkg command to build a working linux

Re: make-kpkg fails writing to weird directories on dual or multi core processors

Hi Rob, WARNING: Couldn't open directory /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0: No such file or directory FATAL: Could not open /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0/modules.dep.temp for writing: No such file or

make-kpkg fails writing to weird directories on dual or multi core processors

Hi I have using make-kpkg successfully on my amd64 dual core system until about a month ago. I did the following: installed debian testing amd64 apt-get install kernel-package make g++ gcc build-essentail libncurses5-dev linux-source-2.6.32 and any other files I needed to build a kernel I

Re: make-kpkg fails writing to weird directories on dual or multi core processors

Hi Here it fails again. this is version 12.033 instead of 12.032 I downloaded kernel--package-12.033.tar.gz invoke like this CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=3 make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version dickhead1.0 kernel_image kernel_headers All done in /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32. I am running kernel

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

On Wed, Apr 07 2010, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files in debian/... On a slow link, this is very annoying (if I forget to run screen) I have RTFM but I

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

On 08.04.2010 01:59, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files in debian/... On a slow link, this is very annoying (if I forget to run screen) I have RTFM but I

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

Mart Frauenlob mart.frauen...@chello.at writes: On 08.04.2010 01:59, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files in debian/... On a slow link, this is very annoying

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

On 08.04.2010 12:12, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Mart Frauenlob mart.frauen...@chello.at writes: On 08.04.2010 01:59, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

On Thu, Apr 08 2010, Mart Frauenlob wrote: Does v.12.033 always run a 'clean' first? Yes. Mine with lenny v.11.015 does not. That is one major version ago. Things changed a lot witht he new major version. manoj -- mophobia, n.: Fear of being verbally abused by a

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

Manoj Srivastava sriva...@ieee.org writes: On Wed, Apr 07 2010, Cameron Hutchison wrote: Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files in debian/... Please file a wishlist bug. I have

Re: Making make-kpkg quieter

Mart Frauenlob mart.frauen...@chello.at writes: You want to see the output of the build, but the clean process is too much? The build output will be multiple times greater anyways. This is not a problem over the slow link? Ok. It looks like you haven't run the latest make-kpkg. I just did

Making make-kpkg quieter

Is there any way to make make-kpkg (kernel-package 12.033) quieter? When I run a make-kpkg clean it spits out lots of lines about unlinking files in debian/... On a slow link, this is very annoying (if I forget to run screen) I have RTFM but I cannot see anything about making make-kpkg less

Re: Building kernel image packages with make-kpkg, custom dependency

/contol and debian/Control Both of these files are rewritten when I do a `fakeroot debian/rules binary` to build the kernel. ,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) line 145 ] | --overlay-dir /path/to/directory |The specified directory should contain files that will be placed |in the ./debian

Re: Building kernel image packages with make-kpkg, custom dependency

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:36:37PM -0500, Cliff Flood wrote: Hi, I'm having some problems with building kernel image packages using `make-kpkg` I'm trying to build a package with a custom dependency and have tried

Re: Building kernel image packages with make-kpkg, custom dependency

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:17:20PM -0500, Cliff Flood wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:36:37PM -0500, Cliff Flood wrote: Hi, I'm having some problems with building kernel image packages using `make-kpkg

Re: Building kernel image packages with make-kpkg, custom dependency

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:36:37PM -0500, Cliff Flood wrote: Hi, I'm having some problems with building kernel image packages using `make-kpkg` I'm trying to build a package with a custom dependency and have tried editing the control files generated by make-kpkg but find

Building kernel image packages with make-kpkg, custom dependency

Hi, I'm having some problems with building kernel image packages using `make-kpkg` I'm trying to build a package with a custom dependency and have tried editing the control files generated by make-kpkg but find that these changes don't make it into the produced package. So let me back up

Lancer make-kpkg pour que la compilatio n se fasse sur tous les coeurs en parallè le, est ce possible ?

Bonjour, j'ai un laptop avec 4 coeurs. La compilation de noyau prends 2 heures. j'ai l'impression qu'elle ne tourne que sur 1 processeur. Est il possible avec make-kpkg de compiler le noyau en parallèle ? merci d'avance Guillaume -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http

Re: Lancer make-kpkg pour que la compilation se fasse sur tous les coeurs en parallèle, est ce possible ?

Le samedi 09 janvier 2010 14:31:35, giggz a écrit : Bonjour, j'ai un laptop avec 4 coeurs. La compilation de noyau prends 2 heures. j'ai l'impression qu'elle ne tourne que sur 1 processeur. Est il possible avec make-kpkg de compiler le noyau en parallèle ? merci d'avance Guillaume

Re: Lancer make-kpkg pour que la co mpilation se fasse sur tous les coeurs en parallèle, est ce possible ?

Jean-Damien Durand a écrit : Le samedi 09 janvier 2010 14:31:35, giggz a écrit : Bonjour, j'ai un laptop avec 4 coeurs. La compilation de noyau prends 2 heures. j'ai l'impression qu'elle ne tourne que sur 1 processeur. Est il possible avec make-kpkg de compiler le noyau en parallèle

make-kpkg no crea imagen initrd

Hola chicos Desde anoche que estoy intentando compilar un kernel con la herramienta kernel-package y ejecute la siguiente orden: make-kpkg kernel_image kernel_headers --initrd Luego instalo el paquete recien creado con dpkg -i bla bla bla, pero no me crea la imagen initrd. A alguien mas le pasa

Re: make-kpkg no crea imagen initrd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 09/05/2009 21:23, Maximiliano Marin Bustos escribió: A alguien mas le pasa lo mismo? Puede ser un bug? A mí, hace unos días tuve ese mismo problema, y la solución, es copiar los ficheros de kernel-package, los que están en /usr/share/. Los de

Re: make-kpkg no crea imagen initrd

2009/5/9 Santiago José López Borrazás sjlop...@yahoo.es: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 09/05/2009 21:23, Maximiliano Marin Bustos escribió: A alguien mas le pasa lo mismo? Puede ser un bug? A mí, hace unos días tuve ese mismo problema, y la solución, es copiar los

Re: make-kpkg no crea imagen initrd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 09/05/2009 21:41, Maximiliano Marin Bustos escribió: (...) Asi estaba leyendo. Felipe Portales me dijo que esto ya habia sido solucionado en la lista y le estaba echando una mirada al directorio. Porque dices que hay que modificar el fichero

Re: make-kpkg no crea imagen initrd

2009/5/9 Santiago José López Borrazás sjlop...@yahoo.es: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 09/05/2009 21:41, Maximiliano Marin Bustos escribió: (...) Asi estaba leyendo. Felipe Portales me dijo que esto ya habia sido solucionado en la lista y le estaba echando una mirada al

Re: make-kpkg y pqueños problemas...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 02/05/2009 00:58, Santiago José López Borrazás escribió: Haciéndolo ya... Hecho. Y solucionado. Ahora me faltan 2 cosas, como tengo grub, hay que editar el fichero script de enlaces de símbolos de las imágenes, y hay que comentar el 'lilo',

etch Something is missing when Building Kernel with make-kpkg

The command is make-kpkg buildpackage. So far, it has never worked under etch. The build starts out but fails after about a minute: CHK include/linux/compile.h /home/martin/linux-2.6.29/scripts/gen_initramfs_list.sh: Cannot open 'y' make[3]: *** [usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz] Error 1 make[2

make-kpkg y pqueños problemas...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hola: Al compilar el kernel 2.6.29.2, detecto que ya da un problema bastante grande. Cuando ejecuto: make-kpkg --revision=1-686 --initrd binary-arch Todo correctamente, que hace la compilación. Peeero, cuando llega la hora de la verdad, ya

Re: make-kpkg y pqueños problemas...

El vie, 01-05-2009 a las 23:38 +0200, Santiago José López Borrazás escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hola: Al compilar el kernel 2.6.29.2, detecto que ya da un problema bastante grande. Cuando ejecuto: make-kpkg --revision=1-686 --initrd binary-arch Todo

Re: make-kpkg y pqueños problemas...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 02/05/2009 00:03, mariodebian escribió: A partir de las versiones nuevas los kernel de kernel-package no generan initramfs si no lo indicas... Ah, coñees lo que no contaban. Y mira que hay que leerselo todo del fichero... :-P Es que, hace

Re: make-kpkg y pqueño s problemas...

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:38:59PM +0200, Santiago José López Borrazás wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hola: Al compilar el kernel 2.6.29.2, detecto que ya da un problema bastante grande. Cuando ejecuto: make-kpkg --revision=1-686 --initrd binary-arch Todo

Re: make-kpkg y pqueños problemas...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 02/05/09 00:10, Blu escribió: Lee /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/NEWS.Debian.gz Haciéndolo ya... - -- Slds. de Santiago José López Borrazás. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIVAwUBSft+pYFZAuZYtJmMAQoPsRAAgGDWujI1LOv8KLnMqbhgKUDUOxX06ZOx

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Tue, Dec 09 2008, Stefan Goebel wrote: Manoj, should I file a bug report for this or is there something else I can try first? Thankd for the bug-report and patch; it is always appropriate to file a bug on kernel-package when you are experiencing

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

On Tue, Dec 09 2008, Stefan Goebel wrote: Manoj, should I file a bug report for this or is there something else I can try first? Thankd for the bug-report and patch; it is always appropriate to file a bug on kernel-package when you are experiencing difficulties. At worst, you'll be

Xen kernel and make-kpkg

-patches/all/2.6.26/apply/debian -a i386 -f xen works, running make-kpkg --revision='1.0' --append-to-version='-foo' kernel_image does not work, apparently make-kpkg tries to run make bzImage on the kernel sources and there is Nothing to be done for 'bzImage'. A make deb-pkg on the sources works

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

Le Mar 9 décembre 2008 13:53, Stefan Goebel a écrit : Applying the Xen patches with ../kernel-patches/all/2.6.26/apply/debian -a i386 -f xen works, running make-kpkg --revision='1.0' --append-to-version='-foo' kernel_image does not work, apparently make-kpkg tries to run make bzImage

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

François Cerbelle wrote: Le Mar 9 décembre 2008 13:53, Stefan Goebel a écrit : Applying the Xen patches with ../kernel-patches/all/2.6.26/apply/debian -a i386 -f xen works, running make-kpkg --revision='1.0' --append-to-version='-foo' kernel_image does not work [...] You should try to use

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

Lenny. Applying the Xen patches with ../kernel-patches/all/2.6.26/apply/debian -a i386 -f xen works, running make-kpkg --revision='1.0' --append-to-version='-foo' kernel_image does not work, apparently make-kpkg tries to run make bzImage on the kernel sources and there is Nothing to be done

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

), on an i386 system running Lenny. Applying the Xen patches with ../kernel-patches/all/2.6.26/apply/debian -a i386 -f xen works, running make-kpkg --revision='1.0' --append-to-version='-foo' kernel_image does not work, apparently make-kpkg tries to run make bzImage on the kernel sources

Re: Xen kernel and make-kpkg

On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 01:53:58PM +0100, Stefan Goebel wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build a custom Xen (DomU for now) kernel using the Debian sources (i.e. linux-source-2.6.26 (2.6.26-11) with Debian's Xen patches from linux-patch-debian-2.6.26 (2.6.26-11)) and kernel-package (11.015), on an

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

# fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image kernel source# dpkg -i /home/user/src/linux-image-2.6.27_custom.1.0_amd64.deb kernel source# mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.27 2.6.27 That last should not be required if you had added --initrd to the make-kpkg line. Here

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

-kpkg. The compile process gets all the way to the end and fails with debian/stamp/Install: Is a directory The exact command line I'm using at the top level linux-2.6.27 direcory is: fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --arch amd64 kernel_image have tried to compile this in etch and lenny with no luck

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

2008/10/12 thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've used Lenny default for the kernel I'm currently running (11.001-something I think), and then tried 11.007 from Sid with good results. The .config is from my previously home-rolled 2.6.26-6, gcc is Lenny 4.3.2, config is nothing fancy,

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

2008/10/12 thveillon.debian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Adrian Levi a écrit : I have since tried compiling the kernel in a clean lenny debootstrap chroot sucessfully. Strangely is was called, linux-xenu-2.6.27_2.6.27-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb Maybe you enabled xen support in the config : CONFIG_XEN

Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

I'm having troubles compiling a vanilla 2.6.27 kernel using kernel-package. Looks like there is a new iwl4965 driver and I'd like to try it out. The kernel compiles correctly using the usual toolchain provided with the sources but fails on the packaging part using make-kpkg. The compile process

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

Adrian Levi a écrit : I have since tried compiling the kernel in a clean lenny debootstrap chroot sucessfully. Strangely is was called, linux-xenu-2.6.27_2.6.27-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb Maybe you enabled xen support in the config : CONFIG_XEN But it boots and works, must be a version

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

for testing (aka fun !) purpose, the compilation went smoothly, including creation of kernel-headers, but I didn't actually try the resulting kernel yet. I'm on Lenny amd64. Basically command is : make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version -vanilla64 --revision 2 kernel-image kernel-headers

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

-kpkg. The compile process gets all the way to the end and fails with debian/stamp/Install: Is a directory The exact command line I'm using at the top level linux-2.6.27 direcory is: fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --arch amd64 kernel_image have tried to compile this in etch and lenny with no luck, can

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

on the packaging part using make-kpkg. Have you tried kernel-package 11.007 from sid? The compile process gets all the way to the end and fails with debian/stamp/Install: Is a directory The exact command line I'm using at the top level linux-2.6.27 direcory is: fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --arch amd64

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

Adrian Levi a écrit : But you ended up with a .deb package at the end, Mine is failing before creating the package. My installed kernel-package version is 11.007 what was yours? What did you use for a .config file? Mine is from linux-image-2.6.26 in lenny, answered the few new questions and

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

on the packaging part using make-kpkg. The compile process gets all the way to the end and fails with debian/stamp/Install: Is a directory The exact command line I'm using at the top level linux-2.6.27 direcory is: fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --arch amd64 kernel_image Have you tried without

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

On Sun, Oct 12 2008, Adrian Levi wrote: I have since tried compiling the kernel in a clean lenny debootstrap chroot sucessfully. Strangely is was called, linux-xenu-2.6.27_2.6.27-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb But it boots and works, must be a version incompatibility somewhere, I still have etch

Re: Compile vanilla 2.6.27 using make-kpkg

provided with the sources but fails on the packaging part using make-kpkg. The compile process gets all the way to the end and fails with debian/stamp/Install: Is a directory The exact command line I'm using at the top level linux-2.6.27 direcory is: fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --arch amd64

Re: Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

setarch i386 make-kpkg --initrd --arch=i386 --revision $revision binary Thanks for that info, Steve. However I still cannot get it to work. Try this: DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386 make-kpkg --arch i386 --cross_compile - \ --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd --append-to-version mytest kernel_image What you

Re: Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

use this: setarch i386 make-kpkg --initrd --arch=i386 --revision $revision binary Thanks for that info, Steve. However I still cannot get it to work. When I run make-kpkg with the --arch parameter, it seems to always try to use a cross-compiler - i486-linux-gnu-gcc (or something like

Re: Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

On Sat Jul 12, 2008 at 04:12:56 -, Cameron Hutchison wrote: I just needed to add that --cross-compile - argument and it worked. I spoke too soon. It does not quite work. It builds an amd64 arch package, so I cannot install it on an i386 arch. I use this: setarch i386 make-kpkg

Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

I am trying to build a kernel for my i386 box on my amd64 host. I want to do this because the amd64 box build at least 10 times faster than the target box. I am using make-kpkg to build the kernel package. I am having the following problem: $ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --arch i386 kernel_image

Re: Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

Cameron Hutchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to build a kernel for my i386 box on my amd64 host. I want to do this because the amd64 box build at least 10 times faster than the target box. I am using make-kpkg to build the kernel package. I am having the following problem: $ make-kpkg

Re: Building an i386 kernel on amd64 host with make-kpkg

Cameron Hutchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cameron Hutchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am trying to build a kernel for my i386 box on my amd64 host. I want to do this because the amd64 box build at least 10 times faster than the target box. I am using make-kpkg to build the kernel package. I

make-kpkg crosscompile pas

Bonjour, Je veux fabriquer un paquet noyau i386 depuis amd64 debian je lance: make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --arch i386 --append_to_version $version --revision=$revision --initrd kernel_image kernel_headers kernel_doc modules_image depuis un poste 64 bits ca plante avec un: /usr/bin/make

Re: make-kpkg crosscompile pas

/home/georges/src/crusoe/linux-2.6.24.5/scripts/gcc-version.sh: line 22: i486-linux-gnu-gcc: command not found apparement un probleme avec gcc? gcc --version donne gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 (Debian 4.2.4-1) est ce un bug, ou il me manque un paquet? Si je lance make-kpkg sans arch i386 ca

Re: make-kpkg crosscompile pas

[précision] installe gcc-3.4 avant bien sûr.. -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/DebFrFrenchLists Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: make-kpkg crosscompile pas

Le samedi 24 mai 2008 à 10:00 +0200, François Boisson a écrit : [précision] installe gcc-3.4 avant bien sûr.. Ben non, ca marche pas non plus, ca me fait un probleme avec asm maintenant arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set

Re: make-kpkg crosscompile pas

Le Sat, 24 May 2008 10:22:53 +0200 georges [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Le samedi 24 mai 2008 à 10:00 +0200, François Boisson a écrit : [précision] installe gcc-3.4 avant bien sûr.. Ben non, ca marche pas non plus, ca me fait un probleme avec asm maintenant

Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

On Thu, 2008-08-05 at 06:44 +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote: The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h does not match current version: 2.6.25 Please correct this. Any pointers here would be helpful. It

Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:55:22AM -0700, Bill wrote: Should there be a include/linux/version.h file in the 2.6.25 directory? if you follow the documentation of kernel-package then make-kpkg will create it. If no commands were executed in the 2.6.25 directory tree after creating

make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

Hi folks, I'm trying to compile 2.6.25 using fakeroot make-kpkg clean fakeroot make-kpkg modules-clean The second command terminates with an error as follows: echo The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h; echo \\ ; echo does not match current version:; echo \2.6.25\ ; echo

Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote: The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h does not match current version: 2.6.25 Please correct this. Any pointers here would be helpful. It might be a faq about kernel-package, and its documentation in

custom kernel and make kpkg modules_image

I made a custom kernel: make kpkg --revision=.custom.10 --append-to-version=.cybo.1 --initrd kernel_image this issued in: linux-image-2.6.25.cybo.1_custom.1.0_amd64.deb I installed this and wanted to make nvidia modules for it: make-kpkg modules_image This issued an error: (para phrased

make-kpkg aplica automaticamente os patchs ?

Olá, Ao correr o comando make-kpkg --revision hostname.versão kernel-image São aplicados automaticamente os patchs da debian ao kernel ?

Re: make-kpkg aplica automaticamente os patchs ?

Em Ter, 2008-02-12 às 19:54 +, debiminho debiminho escreveu: Olá, Ao correr o comando make-kpkg --revision hostname.versão kernel-image São aplicados automaticamente os patchs da debian ao kernel ? Olá. Se você pegou o kernel do site kernel.org não, simplemente o

Fwd: make-kpkg aplica automaticamente os patchs ?

Olá, Ao correr o comando make-kpkg --revision hostname.versão kernel-image São aplicados automaticamente os patchs da debian ao kernel ? Estou a perguntar isto por causa da falha detectada a pouco tempo, pelos vistos o source já foi actualizado assim como um pacote com as patchs

make-kpkg fails when kernel distclean clobbers ./debian

I have recently switched to debian, and I am trying to learn to compile kernels the debian way. I need a patch and an external module, so I am trying the following script: M=make-kpkg \ --us --uc --initrd \ --append-to-version q4 \ --stem linux \ --added-modules madwifi

Re: make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

Am 2007-03-17 20:11:57, schrieb dranger003: Indeed it was the debug causing the issue. After disabling all DEBUG lines in the .config the kernel is now of the correct size. :-) Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian

make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

Indeed it was the debug causing the issue. After disabling all DEBUG lines in the .config the kernel is now of the correct size. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

I have exactly the same problem. Also running Feisty. I used the following to compile the kernel: sudo make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-1-Custom kernel_image kernel_headers My /lib/modules/$(uname -r) folder is huge as well. All the modules have bigger than normal sizes - every

Re: make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

Am 2007-03-06 22:04:59, schrieb Matt Price: snip this? the vmlinuz produced by the package is of normal size, but the initrd is huge -- 43 megs! -- and /lib/modules/kernel-version-number/ is on the order of 530 megs!!! Sorry, but with the infos you have provided I can not help you. Please,

Re: make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

hi obviously a half-gig-sized kernel package is not optimal, i'd very much like to figure out what's going on here... also i should say that the after the build process, the source directory becomes enormous -- 2.7 gigs with ubuntu's 2.6.20 as opposed to a more restrained 700megs back in the

make-kpkg makes HUGE kernel packages??

i, i'm having a problem using make-kpkg to build kernel packages on my laptop, which runs ubuntu feisty and currently has make-kpkg version 10.065ubuntu4. this happens with upstream, debian, and ubuntu sources, as far as I can tell, but most of my experimentation has been with ubuntu's linux

Re: make-kpkg

Jacques L'helgoualc'h a écrit : Bayrouni a écrit, vendredi 2 mars 2007, à 10:37 : [...] la région du MBR, d'ailleurs beaucoup plus petite qu'1M, et elle doit faire, si je ne me trompe pas 512 Ko. Perdu, c'est 512 ... octets :) Une petite question de vocabulaire au passage : Au

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >