On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:11:30PM +0200, Lourens Steenkamp wrote:
Lourens replying to Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the documentation confusing to say the least.
I agree with that. (Once I got
Oliver Elphick schrieb:
I agree with that. (Once I got it working, I found sql-ledger to be
cumbersome and not in my opinion suitable for use as an enterprise
accounts system. )
ACK. I tried SL [sql-ledger] AFAIR 2 years ago. The plan was, to use it
for an small NGO, and for my small
Oliver Elphick schrieb:
It might suit you better. I have written an accounting system in the
past and now I have looked at sql-ledger I prefer to do the same again,
since it doesn't suit my ideas of what such a system should be like.
Ohhh, nice to hear. I have been working with more than a dozen
John Hasler schrieb:
Oliver Elphick writes:
However, I would prefer a dedicated text input program without the
web-browser overhead; so it would work like the old green-screen programs
I used to write. The objective here is maximum convenience for data
entry: type in the data, press return to go
Helmut Wollmersdorfer writes:
Please inform me about kick-off at helmut(at)wollmersdorfer.at I'm very
interesting in contributing. I see a strong need for a flexible GPLed
ledger, targeted for small to medium business, but even scalable to
larger ones.
Same here, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am
Helmut Wollmersdorfer writes:
Full time bookkeepers don't need graphics, but all the other users of a
ledger.
What for?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:10, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 02:14, John Hasler wrote:
Oliver Elphick writes:
I have the beginnings of the design of such a system; if anyone else
would like to contribute ideas, please email me.
Your requirements sound good to me, though
Lourens replying to Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:11:30PM +0200, Lourens Steenkamp wrote:
Lourens replying to Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:49:56AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Eiffel would offend those users who are especially keen on free
software, and ensure that the sotware would, at best, be in contrib.
Why? I see there is a an GNU eiffel compiler in Debian Main.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies
Johann Spies wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:49:56AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Eiffel would offend those users who are especially keen on free
software, and ensure that the sotware would, at best, be in contrib.
Why? I see there is a an GNU eiffel compiler in Debian Main.
Oh,
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 03:00, John Hasler wrote:
John Summerfield writes:
Web interfaces have their advantages though: for example, you client
machine can be anything anywhere running any web browser. One of the
things users like about sql-ledger is that you can do work at a client
site,
Lourens replying to Johann Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the documentation confusing to say the least.
I agree with that. (Once I got it working, I found sql-ledger to
be cumbersome and not in my opinion
Oliver Elphick writes:
However, I would prefer a dedicated text input program without the
web-browser overhead; so it would work like the old green-screen programs
I used to write. The objective here is maximum convenience for data
entry: type in the data, press return to go to the next
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the documentation confusing to say the least.
I agree with that. (Once I got it working, I found sql-ledger to be
cumbersome and not in my opinion suitable for use as an enterprise
accounts system. )
Thanks for your
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 11:41, Johann Spies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the documentation confusing to say the least.
I agree with that. (Once I got it working, I found sql-ledger to be
cumbersome and not in my opinion suitable for use
Johann Spies wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:44:38AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I found the documentation confusing to say the least.
I agree with that. (Once I got it working, I found sql-ledger to be
cumbersome and not in my opinion suitable for use as an enterprise
accounts
Oliver Elphick writes:
I have written an accounting system in the past and now I have looked at
sql-ledger I prefer to do the same again, since it doesn't suit my ideas
of what such a system should be like.
Any chance that you will package it? Or let someone else do so? I'm not
pleased with
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:52, John Hasler wrote:
Oliver Elphick writes:
I have written an accounting system in the past and now I have looked at
sql-ledger I prefer to do the same again, since it doesn't suit my ideas
of what such a system should be like.
Any chance that you will package
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 18:09, bob parker wrote:
Any chance that you will package it? Or let someone else do so? I'm not
pleased with sql-ledger either, but I like the alternatives even less.
Once it is written, yes. If you would like to list features you would
like to see, that could
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:10, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 13:52, John Hasler wrote:
Oliver Elphick writes:
I have written an accounting system in the past and now I have looked
at sql-ledger I prefer to do the same again, since it doesn't suit my
ideas of what such a system
Oliver Elphick wrote:
Are we talking about a web page interface here? Say Pg + Php?
If so I have the beginnings of a payroll module I could contribute.
It's built to ato rules of PAYE for dotAU but maybe there's enough in common
to suit other places.
I'm not all that keen on web interfaces;
John Summerfield writes:
Web interfaces have their advantages though: for example, you client
machine can be anything anywhere running any web browser. One of the
things users like about sql-ledger is that you can do work at a client
site, connect to your accounts (possibly using their
John Hasler wrote:
John Summerfield writes:
Web interfaces have their advantages though: for example, you client
machine can be anything anywhere running any web browser. One of the
things users like about sql-ledger is that you can do work at a client
site, connect to your accounts (possibly
John Hasler wrote:
John Summerfield writes:
Web interfaces have their advantages though: for example, you client
machine can be anything anywhere running any web browser. One of the
things users like about sql-ledger is that you can do work at a client
site, connect to your accounts (possibly
After seeing the article in Linuxjournal about sql-ledger I wanted to
try it out. The article referred to the installation as a
breeze. That was not my experience. I found the documentation
confusing to say the least.
The README.Debian says:
The easiest way to test this package is to add a
Johann Spies wrote:
After seeing the article in Linuxjournal about sql-ledger I wanted to
try it out. The article referred to the installation as a
breeze. That was not my experience. I found the documentation
confusing to say the least.
The README.Debian says:
If you don't like the deb, try
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:48, Johann Spies wrote:
After seeing the article in Linuxjournal about sql-ledger I wanted to
try it out. The article referred to the installation as a
breeze. That was not my experience. I found the documentation
confusing to say the least.
I agree with that.
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 00:01, John Summerfield wrote:
ident is not secure. Just let me near your network with my Laptop:-) I
can make _m,y_ ident say I'm whoever I want you to think I am.
The postgresql package (by default) does not enable ident authentication
except for localhost (and for
28 matches
Mail list logo
