Monitor Blanking When Starting X; atombios stuck

2016-04-27 Thread Stephen R Guglielmo
Hello,

I have a system running Debian Testing. It was freshly installed from
the stable net-installer image then immediately upgraded to testing. I
then installed xfce4 and configured it to start from console as per
these[1] instructions. However, when I run `startx`, I get some output
from it (the usual xserver messages), but then the monitor goes blank.

Here's my kern.log from booting to the blank screen, then forcing a
reboot again after that.
http://dpaste.com/16R30GF.txt

The relevant portion is here in the event the paste disappears:

kernel: [   22.631932] [drm:atom_op_jump [radeon]] *ERROR* atombios
stuck in loop for more than 5secs aborting
kernel: [   22.631947] [drm:atom_execute_table_locked [radeon]]
*ERROR* atombios stuck executing CB32 (len 62, WS 0, PS 0) @ 0xCB4E
kernel: [   27.636246] [drm:atom_op_jump [radeon]] *ERROR* atombios
stuck in loop for more than 5secs aborting
kernel: [   27.636277] [drm:atom_execute_table_locked [radeon]]
*ERROR* atombios stuck executing CB32 (len 62, WS 0, PS 0) @ 0xCB4E
kernel: [   27.636307] [drm:atom_execute_table_locked [radeon]]
*ERROR* atombios stuck executing C1DC (len 1136, WS 0, PS 0) @ 0xC576
kernel: [  378.768505] sysrq: SysRq : SAK
kernel: [  378.768579] tty tty1: SAK: killed process 557 (bash): by session
kernel: [  378.768586] tty tty1: SAK: killed process 483 (login): by session
kernel: [  378.768651] tty tty1: SAK: killed process 483 (login): by
controlling tty
kernel: [  378.768659] tty tty1: SAK: killed process 557 (bash): by
controlling tty

I have the following relevant packages installed:
xserver-xorg-video-radeon
firmware-linux
firmware-linux-nonfree
firmware-amd-graphics
intel-microcode

lspci shows my video card to be:

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] Turks LE [Radeon HD 5570/6510/7510/8510] (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
Subsystem: VISIONTEK Turks LE [Radeon HD 5570/6510/7510/8510]
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 34
Memory at e000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at f7de (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
I/O ports at dc00 [size=256]
Expansion ROM at f7e0 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [58] Express Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [a0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [100] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=010 
Capabilities: [150] Advanced Error Reporting
Kernel driver in use: radeon
Kernel modules: radeon

I would appreciate any help in tracking this issue down.
Thank you,
Steve

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Xfce#From_the_console



/etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Tech Geek
I have uncommented the following line in the /etc/inittab file on
Debian Squeeze:

T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyS0 9600 vt100

Basically, I am trying to output a login console on Serial Port 1
also. This works if my system starts up normally i.e. via
xdm-fluxbox. However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox
(instead of user typing in username and password in xdm) and I still
want the basic login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm
package (apt-get purge xdm) and added the following line to my
/etc/rc.local:

su - user -c startx

Now my system does the autologin into fluxbox but I no longer get my
login console on Serial Port 1. It seems that the /etc/inittab file is
not honored with this method (auto login). Any ideas how can I get my
login console on Serial Port 1 and at the same time auto log into
fluxbox?

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calxxvm5rdvkwlr1jb4kppvgl_rmbcigd92xxq1fdz3qkfr3...@mail.gmail.com



Re: /etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Bob Proulx
Tech Geek wrote:
 I have uncommented the following line in the /etc/inittab file on
 Debian Squeeze:
 
 T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L ttyS0 9600 vt100

Seems reasonable.  I do that on server systems too.

 This works if my system starts up normally i.e. via xdm-fluxbox.

Sure.

 However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox (instead of user
 typing in username and password in xdm) and I still want the basic
 login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm package (apt-get
 purge xdm) and added the following line to my /etc/rc.local:
 
 su - user -c startx
 
 Now my system does the autologin into fluxbox but I no longer get my
 login console on Serial Port 1. It seems that the /etc/inittab file is
 not honored with this method (auto login).

That seems very strange to me.  I have not tested that exact
combination but I would certainly not have expected it.  And I am
suspicious that something else is going on because it seems that there
should not be a relationship between those two systems.  I am so
suspicious that I am compelled to ask if you are really sure that is
the correlation?  Please double check.

Are there any messaged logged to /var/log/syslog concerning failure of
getty to start on /dev/ttyS0?

If you run 'ps' do you see the getting running?

  $ ps -ef |grep getty

 Any ideas how can I get my login console on Serial Port 1 and at the
 same time auto log into fluxbox?

I have a system similarly configured using gdm (gdm 2.20.11, not gdm3)
and have it configured with the following:

File /etc/gdm/gdm.conf has this:
[daemon]
AutomaticLoginEnable=true
AutomaticLogin=guest

Both of these, the getting on the serial port and the gdm automated
login, work fine together for me.  Since this is using gdm
configuration to automatically log in a user it is different from your
using su and startx from the rc.local though.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: /etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Tech Geek
 suspicious that I am compelled to ask if you are really sure that is
 the correlation?  Please double check.
Yes, I double checked that. As soon as I revert back to installing
xdm, the login console appears on Serial Port 1.

 Are there any messaged logged to /var/log/syslog concerning failure of
 getty to start on /dev/ttyS0?
No there are none.

 If you run 'ps' do you see the getting running?

  $ ps -ef |grep getty
The above command returns nothing i.e it looks like getty is not started at all.

 Both of these, the getting on the serial port and the gdm automated
 login, work fine together for me.  Since this is using gdm
 configuration to automatically log in a user it is different from your
 using su and startx from the rc.local though.
May be that's the reason. But just like you even I am very surprised
to see that /etc/inittab is not executed/sourced when using su and
startx method via rc.local.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calxxvm7lxrbh-0anjq1r9gbxnhzrbmoehl7vj4oikrxcm0-...@mail.gmail.com



Re: /etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Ivan Shmakov
 Tech Geek techgeek12...@gmail.com writes:

[…]

  However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox (instead of user
  typing in username and password in xdm) and I still want the basic
  login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm package (apt-get
  purge xdm) and added the following line to my /etc/rc.local:

  su - user -c startx

  Now my system does the autologin into fluxbox but I no longer get my
  login console on Serial Port 1.

I guess that the inittab(5) entry in question is only started
after rc.local finishes.  Therefore, starting startx(1) in the
background may help.

[…]

-- 
FSF associate member #7257


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86r54m4ivc@gray.siamics.net



Re: /etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Bob Proulx
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
  Tech Geek writes:
   However, I want to do a auto login into my fluxbox (instead of user
   typing in username and password in xdm) and I still want the basic
   login console on Serial Port 1. So I removed xdm package (apt-get
   purge xdm) and added the following line to my /etc/rc.local:
 
   su - user -c startx
 
   Now my system does the autologin into fluxbox but I no longer get my
   login console on Serial Port 1.
 
   I guess that the inittab(5) entry in question is only started
   after rc.local finishes.  Therefore, starting startx(1) in the
   background may help.

Good catch.  Almost certainly that is the problem.  The rc.local is
still running.  Here is an additional clue:

   $ ps -ef |grep getty
 The above command returns nothing I.e it looks like getty is not
 started at all.

Not even other console logins?  Normally there would be all of the
virtual consoles there.

  $ ps -efH | less

I expect that to show that rc.local is still running.  And so it was
never able to move on and complete the boot up sequence.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: /etc/inittab not executed upon starting X with startx command

2011-08-15 Thread Tech Geek
Ivan,
        I guess that the inittab(5) entry in question is only started
        after rc.local finishes.  Therefore, starting startx(1) in the
        background may help.
That was it. Adding  at the end of the command in rc.local did the
trick! Thanks!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALXXvm7tFvV4K04Gpv4DVdKpu=haoj7fgwfsp8y8vg15+dk...@mail.gmail.com



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-09 Thread John W Foster
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 00:58 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Here's what happening.
 
 After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
 
 After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
 
 A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
 still gets me back to X)
 
 This problem appeared soon after converting to 
 dependency-based boot process using insserv.
 
 I've been using a self-compiled amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
 No such problems before insserv.
 
 Thanks for any possible leads. I have no idea where to
 even start.
 
 thanks,
 
 Joel
 
 
 -- 
 Joel Roth
--
Passing along a tip from Wayne Topa that helped me. maybe it will help
you. I did a dist-update a while back using a stock kernel  had this
same issue ,I think??

 Do
 dpkg -l console-setup
 if you don't have it installed, install it.
 
 HTH
 Wayne



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1284046625.4792.5.ca...@beast.johnwfoster.info



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-06 Thread Rares Aioanei
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:58:21 -1000
Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:

[...]
What video card/driver are you using?
-- 
Rares Aioanei debian.dev.list


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100906101456.3089ea1d.debian.dev.l...@localhost.localdomain



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-06 Thread Joel Roth
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:14:56AM +0300, Rares Aioanei wrote:
 On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 00:58:21 -1000
 Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
 
 [...]
 What video card/driver are you using?
 -- 
 Rares Aioanei debian.dev.list

The card is:

 lspci | grep -i radeon
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS780MC [Radeon HD 3100 
Graphics]

The driver, I don't know. You can maybe find it in the
/var/log/Xorg.0.log file pasted into a previous mail.

The problem seemed to be solved by going to a stock kernel.

Thanks for your questions.

Joel


-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100906224711.ga19...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Vi, 03 sep 10, 16:54:25, Joel Roth wrote:

 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
 drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
 drmOpenDevice: open result is 11, (OK)
 drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 11
 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:05.0
 (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version 
 mismatch.
 [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
 [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy 
 modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
 [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
 [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
 [dri] with support for KMS.
 [dri] Disabling DRI.

This, combined with the fact that you are running a self-compiled kernel 
would indicate that you might miss some module. Can you try a stock 
kernel?

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Joel Roth
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:35:28PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Vi, 03 sep 10, 16:54:25, Joel Roth wrote:
 
  drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
  drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
  drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
  drmOpenDevice: open result is 11, (OK)
  drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 11
  drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:05.0
  (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version 
  mismatch.
  [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
  [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy 
  modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
  [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
  [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
  [dri] with support for KMS.
  [dri] Disabling DRI.
 
 This, combined with the fact that you are running a self-compiled kernel 
 would indicate that you might miss some module. Can you try a stock 
 kernel?

Thanks for checking this out! 

Console *does* VT switching correctly under a stock 2.6.31-1-amd64 kernel. 
(But for some reason suspend doesn't work... will try a later kernel.)

Why didn't I think of this? Probably because the kernel was working before.

Mahalo

Joel

 
 Regards,
 Andrei
 -- 
 Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic



-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904112051.gb2...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:35:28 -0400 (EDT), Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Vi, 03 sep 10, 16:54:25, Joel Roth wrote:

 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
 drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
 drmOpenDevice: open result is 11, (OK)
 drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 11
 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:05.0
 (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version 
 mismatch.
 [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
 [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy 
 modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
 [dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
 [dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
 [dri] with support for KMS.
 [dri] Disabling DRI.
 
 This, combined with the fact that you are running a self-compiled kernel 
 would indicate that you might miss some module. Can you try a stock 
 kernel?

Nice work, Andrei!

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1948183613.604400.1283605583354.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sb, 04 sep 10, 09:06:23, Stephen Powell wrote:
 
 Nice work, Andrei!

Not fair, you did the heavy lifting :)

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Joel Roth
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:04:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Sb, 04 sep 10, 09:06:23, Stephen Powell wrote:
  
  Nice work, Andrei!
 
 Not fair, you did the heavy lifting :)

Both deserving of a beer, if not a pizza as well,
to be collectible at some future FTF.

-j

 Regards,
 Andrei



-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904190356.gb5...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Angus Hedger
Hey,

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:20:51 -1000
Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
 Thanks for checking this out! 
 
 Console *does* VT switching correctly under a stock 2.6.31-1-amd64
 kernel. (But for some reason suspend doesn't work... will try a later
 kernel.)
 
 Why didn't I think of this? Probably because the kernel was working
 before.

I think the cause of the problem is that there was just an xorg and
kernel update, this may have also updated the ATI driver, and as far i
understand it, due to KMS, you have to upgrade the kernel modules in
lockstep with the userspace bytes or unhappy things happen, like this.
(I have very little experience with ATI and mainline graphics drivers,
so I may be wrong! caveat emporium!)
 Mahalo
 
 Joel
 
  
  Regards,
  Andrei
  -- 
  Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
  http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
 
 

If you still want to build your own kernel, build it off the updated
debian src, or build the kernel modules into there own package. Or if
you want to use a newer mainline, think about building the ati driver
as well ;)
--
Regards,

Angus Hedger

Debian GNU/Linux User   PGP Public Key 0xEE6A4B97


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-04 Thread Joel Roth
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:37:55PM +0100, Angus Hedger wrote:
 Hey,
 
 On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:20:51 -1000
 Joel Roth jo...@pobox.com wrote:
  Thanks for checking this out! 
  
  Console *does* VT switching correctly under a stock 2.6.31-1-amd64
  kernel. (But for some reason suspend doesn't work... will try a later
  kernel.)
  
  Why didn't I think of this? Probably because the kernel was working
  before.
 
 I think the cause of the problem is that there was just an xorg and
 kernel update, this may have also updated the ATI driver, and as far i
 understand it, due to KMS, you have to upgrade the kernel modules in
 lockstep with the userspace bytes or unhappy things happen, like this.
 (I have very little experience with ATI and mainline graphics drivers,
 so I may be wrong! caveat emporium!)
  Mahalo

There do seem to be some kernel options that needed to be 
enabled, hence my success using a stock kernel.

Thanks!

Joel
 
  Joel
  
   
   Regards,
   Andrei
   -- 
   Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
   http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
  
  
 
 If you still want to build your own kernel, build it off the updated
 debian src, or build the kernel modules into there own package. Or if
 you want to use a newer mainline, think about building the ati driver
 as well ;)
 --
 Regards,
 
 Angus Hedger
 
 Debian GNU/Linux User PGP Public Key 0xEE6A4B97



-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904210255.ga2...@sprite



sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Roth
Hello all,

Here's what happening.

After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)

After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)

A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
still gets me back to X)

This problem appeared soon after converting to 
dependency-based boot process using insserv.

I've been using a self-compiled amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
No such problems before insserv.

Thanks for any possible leads. I have no idea where to
even start.

thanks,

Joel


-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903105821.ga3...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Roth
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Here's what happening.
 
 After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
 
 After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
 
 A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
 still gets me back to X)
 
 This problem appeared soon after converting to 
 dependency-based boot process using insserv.
 
 I've been using a self-compiled amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
 No such problems before insserv.
 
 Thanks for any possible leads. I have no idea where to
 even start.

Okay, here is one start. A boot message:

udevd-work[905] kernel provided name 'uinput' and
NAME='input/uinput' disagree. Please use SYMLINK+=
or change kernel to provide proper name.

This looks like a warning, not a failure.

Another piece of the puzzle... I just did a dist-upgrade.

(And another brokenness, suspend works once, second time is
black screen (no backlight.) I should have known better not
to dist-upgrade a well functioning system.)

Regards,

 thanks,
 
 Joel
 
 
 -- 
 Joel Roth
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903105821.ga3...@sprite
 

-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903183300.gc3...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 Here's what happening.
 
 After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
 
 After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
 
 A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
 still gets me back to X)
 
 This problem appeared soon after converting to 
 dependency-based boot process using insserv.
 
 I've been using a self-compiled amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
 No such problems before insserv.
 
 Thanks for any possible leads. I have no idea where to
 even start.

Yeah, that happened to me too, a while ago.  It's the X driver.
Specifically, it's the KMS settings that are messing you up.
I hate KMS.  It does solve certain problems for developers,
but causes other problems for users.  Maybe in a few years all
these KMS-related bugs will get sorted out.  But for now, they
are a pain.

How to fix it depends on your chipset.  In one case, I had
an nvidia card, and the upgrade switched me from the nv
driver to the nouveau driver.  I could get around it by
blacklisting the nouveau driver and creating an explicit
/etc/X11/xorg.conf file that specifies

   driver = nv

in the appropriate place.  For other chipsets, such as Intel,
you may be able to set a module parameter like kms=0,
or some such thing.  Search the internet for your card
manufacturer, Linux, and KMS, and maybe you'll find something.
These techniques are only a temporary stopgap measure.
Eventually, there will be no option.  You will either have
to use KMS or not use an X server at all.  Oh joy.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1744286447.595363.1283545337251.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Roth
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:22:17PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 12:58:21AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
  Hello all,
  
  Here's what happening.
  
  After boot: normal console font (about 80 characters wide)
  
  After startx: small console font (maybe 132 characters?)
  
  A little later: no display in console at all (Alt-F7
  still gets me back to X)
  
  This problem appeared soon after converting to 
  dependency-based boot process using insserv.
  
  I've been using a self-compiled amd64 kernel with 32-bit userland.
  No such problems before insserv.
  
  Thanks for any possible leads. I have no idea where to
  even start.
 
 Yeah, that happened to me too, a while ago.  It's the X driver.
 Specifically, it's the KMS settings that are messing you up.
 I hate KMS.  It does solve certain problems for developers,
 but causes other problems for users.  Maybe in a few years all
 these KMS-related bugs will get sorted out.  But for now, they
 are a pain.

Good lead! 

For example, we have LKML posts such as:

Re: Resume problem with radeon+KMS (2.6.34-rc2 and before)

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1003.2/02225.html

Which hits one of my problems as well.

FWIW, here is my dmesg output regarding my ATI Radeon 3100 chip (RS780MC).
I wonder about the 'loading firmware' bit, which seems to fail.

[ 1478.833236] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[ 1478.934354] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
[ 1478.934483] radeon :01:05.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 1478.939239] [drm] radeon: Initializing kernel modesetting.
[ 1478.939410] [drm] register mmio base: 0x9630
[ 1478.939415] [drm] register mmio size: 65536
[ 1478.945526] ATOM BIOS: Tos_SCT10AP_MC
[ 1478.945576] [drm] Clocks initialized !
[ 1478.945969] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=256M, BAR=256M
[ 1478.945978] [drm] RAM width 32bits DDR
[ 1478.946151] [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics memory: 899812 kiB.
[ 1478.946186] [drm] radeon: 256M of VRAM memory ready
[ 1478.946191] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
[ 1478.946257] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
[ 1478.946263] [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072
[ 1478.948761] [drm] Loading RS780 Microcode
[ 1478.949103] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/RS780_pfp.bin
[ 1479.022552] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/RS780_me.bin
[ 1479.047423] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/R600_rlc.bin
[ 1479.057460] r600_cp: Failed to load firmware radeon/R600_rlc.bin
[ 1479.057476] [drm:r600_startup] *ERROR* Failed to load firmware!
[ 1479.057483] radeon :01:05.0: disabling GPU acceleration
[ 1479.057510] radeon :01:05.0: 88006df24000 unpin not necessary
[ 1479.057517] radeon :01:05.0: 88006df24000 unpin not necessary
[ 1479.057530] [drm] Enabling audio support
[ 1479.057850] [drm] Radeon Display Connectors
[ 1479.057855] [drm] Connector 0:


 How to fix it depends on your chipset.  In one case, I had
 an nvidia card, and the upgrade switched me from the nv
 driver to the nouveau driver.  I could get around it by
 blacklisting the nouveau driver and creating an explicit
 /etc/X11/xorg.conf file that specifies
 
driver = nv
 
 in the appropriate place.  For other chipsets, such as Intel,
 you may be able to set a module parameter like kms=0,
 or some such thing.  Search the internet for your card
 manufacturer, Linux, and KMS, and maybe you'll find something.
 These techniques are only a temporary stopgap measure.
 Eventually, there will be no option.  You will either have
 to use KMS or not use an X server at all.  Oh joy.

I expect it will be debugged in time.

Regards,

Joel
 
 
 -- 
   .''`. Stephen Powell
  : :'  :
  `. `'`
`-
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/1744286447.595363.1283545337251.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
 

-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903205759.ga4...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:59 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
 
 FWIW, here is my dmesg output regarding my ATI Radeon 3100 chip (RS780MC).
 I wonder about the 'loading firmware' bit, which seems to fail.
 
 [ 1478.833236] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
 [ 1478.934354] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
 [ 1478.934483] radeon :01:05.0: setting latency timer to 64
 [ 1478.939239] [drm] radeon: Initializing kernel modesetting.
 [ 1478.939410] [drm] register mmio base: 0x9630
 [ 1478.939415] [drm] register mmio size: 65536
 [ 1478.945526] ATOM BIOS: Tos_SCT10AP_MC
 [ 1478.945576] [drm] Clocks initialized !
 [ 1478.945969] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=256M, BAR=256M
 [ 1478.945978] [drm] RAM width 32bits DDR
 [ 1478.946151] [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics memory: 899812 kiB.
 [ 1478.946186] [drm] radeon: 256M of VRAM memory ready
 [ 1478.946191] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready.
 [ 1478.946257] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
 [ 1478.946263] [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072
 [ 1478.948761] [drm] Loading RS780 Microcode
 [ 1478.949103] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/RS780_pfp.bin
 [ 1479.022552] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/RS780_me.bin
 [ 1479.047423] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/R600_rlc.bin
 [ 1479.057460] r600_cp: Failed to load firmware radeon/R600_rlc.bin
 [ 1479.057476] [drm:r600_startup] *ERROR* Failed to load firmware!
 [ 1479.057483] radeon :01:05.0: disabling GPU acceleration
 [ 1479.057510] radeon :01:05.0: 88006df24000 unpin not necessary
 [ 1479.057517] radeon :01:05.0: 88006df24000 unpin not necessary
 [ 1479.057530] [drm] Enabling audio support
 [ 1479.057850] [drm] Radeon Display Connectors
 [ 1479.057855] [drm] Connector 0:
 

Aha!  failed to load firmware!  That may be your problem.  You should
always follow up on such messages.  Do you have package firmware-linux-nonfree
installed?  If so, you need to install it.  It is in the non-free section
of the Debian archive; so make sure that the non-free and contrib
sections of the archive are present in your /etc/apt/sources.list file.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/123733784.596256.1283548289546.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Roth
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
 On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:57:59 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
  
  FWIW, here is my dmesg output regarding my ATI Radeon 3100 chip (RS780MC).
  I wonder about the 'loading firmware' bit, which seems to fail.
  
  [ 1478.948761] [drm] Loading RS780 Microcode
  [ 1478.949103] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting 
  radeon/RS780_pfp.bin
  [ 1479.022552] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting 
  radeon/RS780_me.bin
  [ 1479.047423] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting 
  radeon/R600_rlc.bin
  [ 1479.057460] r600_cp: Failed to load firmware radeon/R600_rlc.bin
  [ 1479.057476] [drm:r600_startup] *ERROR* Failed to load firmware!
  [ 1479.057483] radeon :01:05.0: disabling GPU acceleration
  
 
 Aha!  failed to load firmware!  That may be your problem.  You should
 always follow up on such messages.  Do you have package firmware-linux-nonfree
 installed?  If so, you need to install it.  It is in the non-free section
 of the Debian archive; so make sure that the non-free and contrib
 sections of the archive are present in your /etc/apt/sources.list file.

I installed firmware-linux-nonfree, and the *ERROR*
message is gone. Also, the 'disabling GPU acceleration'
message is gone. Which sounds like it can only be good. :-)

However I have the same issue as before: 

First switch from X to virtual console: small font.
Next switch: black screen.

Thanks for your help with this.

Joel

 
 -- 
   .''`. Stephen Powell
  : :'  :
  `. `'`
`-
 
 
-- 
Joel Roth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100903213211.ga2...@sprite



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:32:12 -0400 (EDT), Joel Roth wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
 Aha!  failed to load firmware!  That may be your problem.  You should
 always follow up on such messages.  Do you have package 
 firmware-linux-nonfree
 installed?  If so, you need to install it.  It is in the non-free section
 of the Debian archive; so make sure that the non-free and contrib
 sections of the archive are present in your /etc/apt/sources.list file.
 
 I installed firmware-linux-nonfree, and the *ERROR*
 message is gone. Also, the 'disabling GPU acceleration'
 message is gone. Which sounds like it can only be good. :-)
 
 However I have the same issue as before: 
 
   First switch from X to virtual console: small font.
   Next switch: black screen.
 
 Thanks for your help with this.

Well, that needed to be done anyway.  Unfortunately, it was not
sufficient to solve the problem.  But it's a step in the right
direction.  Please post the output of your
/var/log/Xorg.0.log file.  Maybe it will give me some ideas.

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1313416886.599388.1283560530317.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com



Re: sid: Console problems after starting X

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Roth
: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 0.0.2
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 6.0
(EE) open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory
(II) RADEON(0): TOTO SAYS 9630
(II) RADEON(0): MMIO registers at 0x9630: size 64KB
(II) RADEON(0): PCI bus 1 card 5 func 0
(II) RADEON(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section
Default Screen Section for depth/fbbpp 24/32
(==) RADEON(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(II) RADEON(0): Pixel depth = 24 bits stored in 4 bytes (32 bpp pixmaps)
(==) RADEON(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(II) Loading sub module vgahw
(II) LoadModule: vgahw
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libvgahw.so
(II) Module vgahw: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 0.1.0
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 6.0
(II) RADEON(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp-IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp-PIOOffset is 0x
(==) RADEON(0): RGB weight 888
(II) RADEON(0): Using 8 bits per RGB (8 bit DAC)
(--) RADEON(0): Chipset: ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics (ChipID = 0x9613)
(--) RADEON(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x8000
(II) RADEON(0): PCI card detected
(II) Loading sub module int10
(II) LoadModule: int10
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libint10.so
(II) Module int10: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 6.0
(II) RADEON(0): initializing int10
(II) RADEON(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000
(II) RADEON(0): ATOM BIOS detected
(II) RADEON(0): ATOM BIOS Rom: 
SubsystemVendorID: 0x1179 SubsystemID: 0xff6a
IOBaseAddress: 0x6000
Filename: BR29079C.bin
BIOS Bootup Message: 
Tos_SCT10AP_MC RS780MC DDR2 200e/500m   

(II) RADEON(0): Framebuffer space used by Firmware (kb): 20
(II) RADEON(0): Start of VRAM area used by Firmware: 0xfffb000
(II) RADEON(0): AtomBIOS requests 20kB of VRAM scratch space
(II) RADEON(0): AtomBIOS VRAM scratch base: 0xfffb000
(II) RADEON(0): Cannot get VRAM scratch space. Allocating in main memory instead
(II) RADEON(0): Default Engine Clock: 35
(II) RADEON(0): Default Memory Clock: 333000
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Output: 120
(II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Output: 0
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 13500
(II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 1000
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel Clock: 40
(II) RADEON(0): Reference Clock: 14320
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:05.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 11, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 11
drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:05.0
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version mismatch.
[dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
[dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.0.0.[dri] If using legacy 
modesetting, upgrade your kernel.
[dri] If using kernel modesetting, make sure your module is
[dri] loaded prior to starting X, and that this driver was built
[dri] with support for KMS.
[dri] Disabling DRI.
(II) RADEON(0): using shadow framebuffer
(II) Loading sub module shadow
(II) LoadModule: shadow
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libshadow.so
(II) Module shadow: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 1.7.7, module version = 1.1.0
ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
(II) RADEON(0): Detected total video RAM=262144K, accessible=262144K (PCI 
BAR=262144K)
(--) RADEON(0): Mapped VideoRAM: 262144 kByte (128 bit DDR SDRAM)
(II) RADEON(0): Color tiling disabled
(II) Loading sub module ddc
(II) LoadModule: ddc
(II) Module ddc already built-in
(II) Loading sub module i2c
(II) LoadModule: i2c
(II) Module i2c already built-in
(II) RADEON(0): PLL parameters: rf=1432 rd=12 min=9 max=12; xclk=4
(WW) RADEON(0): LVDS Info:
XRes: 1280, YRes: 800, DotClock: 69300
HBlank: 136, HOverPlus: 48, HSyncWidth: 24
VBlank: 16, VOverPlus: 3, VSyncWidth: 6
(II) RADEON(0): Output LVDS has no monitor section
(II) RADEON(0): I2C bus LVDS initialized.
(II) RADEON(0): Output VGA-0 has no monitor section
(II) RADEON(0): I2C bus VGA-0 initialized.
(II) RADEON(0): Port0:
  XRANDR name: LVDS
  Connector: LVDS
  LCD1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_LVTMA
  DDC reg: 0x7e50
(II) RADEON(0): Port1:
  XRANDR name: VGA-0
  Connector: VGA
  CRT1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_DAC1
  DDC reg: 0x7e40
(II) RADEON(0): I2C device LVDS:ddc2 registered at address 0xA0.
(II) RADEON(0): EDID for output LVDS
(II) RADEON(0): Manufacturer: LPL  Model: 120  Serial#: 0
(II) RADEON(0): Year: 2008  Week: 0
(II) RADEON(0): EDID Version: 1.3
(II) RADEON(0): Digital Display Input
(II) RADEON(0): Max Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 33  vert.: 21
(II) RADEON(0): Gamma: 2.20
(II) RADEON(0): No DPMS capabilities specified
(II) RADEON(0): Supported color encodings: RGB 4:4:4 YCrCb 4:4:4 
(II) RADEON(0): First

black screen when starting X on radeon HD4850 with xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.13

2010-04-16 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi everybody,

Please, CC: me, as I am not subscribed to the list.

I am running Debian sid on an Apple iMac 27, with a Mobility Radeon HD
4850 video card (ATI Technologies Inc M98L). The kernel I use is
2.6.33-2 from experimental, and I have disable KMS.

Depending on the version of the radeon driver I use, I see or not
something on the screen:

- with 1:6.12.192-2, everything startx correctly when I launch startx
  from the command line.
- with 1:6.13.0-1, the screen becomes black, and it is impossible to go
  back to a console using Alt+Ctl+F?. However, I can ssh to the system,
  and see using ps that the KDE session has indeed started.

Here are in attachment the two logs: failed is with 6.13, and success is
with 6.12.192.

Has someone an idea of what is going on? Is there an option I could add
to my (at the moment empty) xorg.conf to remedy this problem?

Best regards,

Cédric


Xorg.0.log.failed2.gz
Description: Binary data


Xorg.0.log.success2.gz
Description: Binary data


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


lcd brightness goes up when starting X

2009-12-19 Thread Arun G Nair
Hi,

   I  installed Lenny on my ThinkPad R51. It has an Intel 82852/855GM
graphics card. After executing startx the LCD goes 100% bright. Same
thing happens if I wake up the LCD from sleep (xset +dpms). My Fn +
Home/End keys work fine and i can adjust the brightness. But its
annoying to do it everytime I boot up and start X. Any solutions ?

-Arun

PS: Am not subscribed to the list, so please CC me while replying. Thanks.


-- 
...Keep Smiling...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread Norman Bird
I recall seeing something along that line in the , known issues after
installing Lenny , in the install notes. about the display not using all the
screen, they had a fix for it also.

thanks

Norm

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:13 AM, S D sund...@yahoo.com wrote:




 --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:

  Probably need to add some modes or modelines to your
  xorg.conf.  Might try
  dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (or sth like that) to get the
  resolution you
  want.

 I checked xorg.conf, it already has 1600x1200 line entries. Besides, the
 KDE configuration utility (Control Center | Peripherals | Display) shows
 that the monitor *is* running in the 1600x1200 mode. However, the picture
 doesn't use the whole available screen space.

 Thanks





 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread Pavlos Parissis
2009/2/17 S D sund...@yahoo.com


 --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:

  For the ati module, you need the package:
   p   xserver-xorg-video-ati  - X.Org X server --
  ATI display driver

 Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue
 somewhat. I was able to start X and KDE, KDE is running and and appears to
 be functional (v 3.5.10) but the picture looks very strange indeed.

 The picture now, for some reason, doesn't use the whole available screen
 space but leave unused areas about 3-5 cm from the left, right, top and
 bottom monitor edges. It looks something like this:

  +1--+
  |   |
  |   |
  |+---2-+|
  || ||
  || ||
  || ||
  |+-+|
  |   |
  |   |
  +---+

 Where 1 is the monitor and 2 is the picture.

 I usually run my monitor in 1600x1200 mode and KDE shows it as the current
 resolution.

 Any ideas? Thanks


I had a similar problem after the upgrade to Lenny.
My problem was that at GDM login the screen was a bit to left but inside
GNOME was fine. GNOME was forcing vertical refresh rate at 75 but X was
using 60, thus I had tha difference.

Try the following
1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run  xvidtune and tune the settings
as you wish. Then click on show button, this will print on the terminal the
setting to be used in xorg.conf.
2) Use the above info to add a Modeline in the Monitor section on your
xorg.conf
Furthermore, make sure the same Modeline name is in the Screen Section
Here is a snap of my xorg.conf, take a look at 1280x1...@75

Section Monitor
Identifier  SDM-HS75P
HorizSync   28-80
VertRefresh 48-75
Option  DPMS
Modeline 1280x1...@75   135.00   1280 1296 1440 1688   1024 1025
1028   1066 +hsync +vsync
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Default Screen
Device  Nvidia FX5500
Monitor SDM-HS75P
DefaultDepth24
SubSection Display
Depth   1
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   4
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   8
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   15
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   16
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   24
Modes   1280x1...@75 1024x768 800x600
640x480
EndSubSection
EndSection

3) restart X

Hope it helps,
Pavlos


Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread S D



--- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:

 Try the following
 1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run  
 xvidtune and tune the settings
 as you wish. Then click on show button, this will 
 print on the terminal the setting to be used in 
 xorg.conf. 

Weird, when I try to run (as root) xvidtune from a terminal window I get:

# xvidtune
Error: Can't open display:

And it's true, I don't have a Modeline entry in the Monitor section of the 
/etc/X11/xorg.conf

Any ideas? Thanks



  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:08:26 -0800 (PST)
S D sund...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
 
 
 --- On Tue, 2/17/09, pavlos.paris wrote:
 
  Try the following
  1) inside GNOME/KDE open a terminal and run  
  xvidtune and tune the settings
  as you wish. Then click on show button, this will 
  print on the terminal the setting to be used in 
  xorg.conf. 
 
 Weird, when I try to run (as root) xvidtune from a terminal window I get:
 
 # xvidtune
 Error: Can't open display:
 
 And it's true, I don't have a Modeline entry in the Monitor section of
 the /etc/X11/xorg.conf
 
 Any ideas? Thanks

You don't need root access in order to run that command.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread S D
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis p_pav...@freemail.gr wrote:

 You don't need root access in order to run that
 command.

True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:

$ which xvidtune
/usr/bin/xvidtune
$ `which xvidtune`
Please install the program before using
$ /usr/bin/xvidtune
Please install the program before using

It appears some people also had this issue but no solution was provided:

xvidtune always appeared accessible and judging from the below 'c' code the 
message is internally generated.
http://www.x.org/pub/unsupported/pro...une/xvidtune.c
if (!AppRes.ad_installed) {fprintf(stderr, Please install the program before 
using\n); return 3;}
Maybe an understanding of how the boolean ad_installed is set would clarify 
matters.

Thanks




  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:06:48 -0800 (PST)
S D sund...@yahoo.com wrote:

 --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis p_pav...@freemail.gr wrote:
 
  You don't need root access in order to run that
  command.
 
 True, but if I run it as a regular user, it gets even funnier:
 
 $ which xvidtune
 /usr/bin/xvidtune
 $ `which xvidtune`
 Please install the program before using
 $ /usr/bin/xvidtune
 Please install the program before using
 
 It appears some people also had this issue but no solution was provided:
 
 xvidtune always appeared accessible and judging from the below 'c' code the
 message is internally generated.
 http://www.x.org/pub/unsupported/pro...une/xvidtune.c if 
 (!AppRes.ad_installed)
 {fprintf(stderr, Please install the program before using\n); return 3;} 
 Maybe an
 understanding of how the boolean ad_installed is set would clarify matters.
 
 Thanks
 
 
[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
id -a
uid=1000(pparissis) gid=1000(pparissis) 
groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),34(backup),40(src),44(video),46(plugdev),1000(pparissis)
[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
which xvidtune
/usr/bin/xvidtune
[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
dpkg -S /usr/bin/xvidtune
x11-xserver-utils: /usr/bin/xvidtune
[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
aptitude show x11-xserver-utils|grep Version
Version: 7.3+5
[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
xvidtune 
Vendor: (null), Model: (null)
Num hsync: 1, Num vsync: 1
hsync range 0:  28.00 -  80.00
vsync range 0:  48.00 -  75.00
1280x1024   135.00   1280 1296 1440 1688   1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync

[pparis...@spartacos][~]$
cat /etc/debian_version 
5.0


BTW, have you seen this ?
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#vga-output-bug


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-17 Thread S D
--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Pavlos Parissis p_pav...@freemail.gr wrote:

 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$
 id -a
 uid=1000(pparissis) gid=1000(pparissis)
 groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),34(backup),40(src),44(video),46(plugdev),1000(pparissis)
 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ which xvidtune
 /usr/bin/xvidtune
 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/xvidtune
 x11-xserver-utils: /usr/bin/xvidtune
 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ aptitude show x11-xserver-utils|grep Version
 Version: 7.3+5
 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$ xvidtune 
 Vendor: (null), Model: (null)
 Num hsync: 1, Num vsync: 1
 hsync range 0:  28.00 -  80.00
 vsync range 0:  48.00 -  75.00
 1280x1024   135.00   1280 1296 1440 1688   1024
 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync
 
 [pparis...@spartacos][~]$
 cat /etc/debian_version 
 5.0

I see no discrepancies when it comes to x11-xserver-utils or debian version. 
But my xvidtune doesn't run.


 BTW, have you seen this ?
 http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#vga-output-bug

Yes, I'm not using Intel Mobile GM965 though. I filed a bug, it has more info 
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-binbugreport.cgi?bug=515840 ).


Thanks



  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-16 Thread S D

After dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, I'm trying to run lenny using 2.6.18 
kernel that I have left over from etch, as I'm having issues assembling mdadm 
RAID drives under the new 2.6.28 lenny kernel (For more info see 
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.user/browse_thread/thread/b97fd9b0a450370f#
 )

The problem now is that when I try to start X, it fails complaining that:
(EE) Failed to load module type1 (module doesn't exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module ait (module doesn't exist, 0)
(E) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found, giving up


Any ideas? Thanks






  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-16 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 16 February 2009 16:13:29 S D wrote:
 (EE) Failed to load module ait (module doesn't exist, 0)

For the ati module, you need the package:
 p   xserver-xorg-video-ati  - X.Org X server -- ATI display driver
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-16 Thread S D

--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:

 For the ati module, you need the package:
  p   xserver-xorg-video-ati  - X.Org X server --
 ATI display driver

Installed the xserver-xorg-video-ati package and it did resolve the issue 
somewhat. I was able to start X and KDE, KDE is running and and appears to be 
functional (v 3.5.10) but the picture looks very strange indeed.

The picture now, for some reason, doesn't use the whole available screen space 
but leave unused areas about 3-5 cm from the left, right, top and bottom 
monitor edges. It looks something like this:

  +1--+
  |   |
  |   |
  |+---2-+|
  || ||
  || ||
  || || 
  |+-+|
  |   |
  |   |
  +---+

Where 1 is the monitor and 2 is the picture.

I usually run my monitor in 1600x1200 mode and KDE shows it as the current 
resolution.

Any ideas? Thanks



  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-16 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:58:13 S D wrote:
 The picture now, for some reason, doesn't use the whole available screen
 space but leave unused areas about 3-5 cm from the left, right, top and
 bottom monitor edges. It looks something like this:

 I usually run my monitor in 1600x1200 mode and KDE shows it as the current
 resolution.

Probably need to add some modes or modelines to your xorg.conf.  Might try 
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (or sth like that) to get the resolution you 
want.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Lenny upgrade: Failed to load modules ati and typ1 when starting X. No drivers available

2009-02-16 Thread S D



--- On Tue, 2/17/09, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:

 Probably need to add some modes or modelines to your
 xorg.conf.  Might try 
 dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (or sth like that) to get the
 resolution you 
 want.

I checked xorg.conf, it already has 1600x1200 line entries. Besides, the KDE 
configuration utility (Control Center | Peripherals | Display) shows that the 
monitor *is* running in the 1600x1200 mode. However, the picture doesn't use 
the whole available screen space.

Thanks


  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Small package on console after starting X

2007-10-09 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:41:41PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
 On 10/8/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
   I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
  
   After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
   what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
   quarter of my screen.  After I Alt-7 back to X, and then Ctl-Alt-Fx
   back to a console, it's gone.  Any ideas what it might be, and how to
   rid myself of it?  I've used rkhunter and chkrootkit, neither of which
   reports anything amiss, but that may be meaningless.
 
  What does this package look like?  Is it a single non-alphanumeric char?
 
 No, I don't think so, as it's bigger (maybe 4x) than the other
 characters on the console.  And it's bright, where everything else,
 after I launch X, is dim.  Weird, I know.  I'll see if I can take a
 picture of it.

Do you use a frame-buffer for your text console?  If so, it could be
video memory corruption (garbage left around during the switch).

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Small package on console after starting X

2007-10-08 Thread Patrick Wiseman
Hello:

I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.

After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
quarter of my screen.  After I Alt-7 back to X, and then Ctl-Alt-Fx
back to a console, it's gone.  Any ideas what it might be, and how to
rid myself of it?  I've used rkhunter and chkrootkit, neither of which
reports anything amiss, but that may be meaningless.

Patrick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Small package on console after starting X

2007-10-08 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
 I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
 
 After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
 what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
 quarter of my screen.  After I Alt-7 back to X, and then Ctl-Alt-Fx
 back to a console, it's gone.  Any ideas what it might be, and how to
 rid myself of it?  I've used rkhunter and chkrootkit, neither of which
 reports anything amiss, but that may be meaningless.

What does this package look like?  Is it a single non-alphanumeric char?

Doug.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Small package on console after starting X

2007-10-08 Thread Patrick Wiseman
On 10/8/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:15:55PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
  I have this odd phenomenon, which I suspect indicates some sort of attack.
 
  After I start X, when I return to a console (with Ctl-Alt-Fx) there's
  what looks like a little package sitting in the bottom, right-hand
  quarter of my screen.  After I Alt-7 back to X, and then Ctl-Alt-Fx
  back to a console, it's gone.  Any ideas what it might be, and how to
  rid myself of it?  I've used rkhunter and chkrootkit, neither of which
  reports anything amiss, but that may be meaningless.

 What does this package look like?  Is it a single non-alphanumeric char?

No, I don't think so, as it's bigger (maybe 4x) than the other
characters on the console.  And it's bright, where everything else,
after I launch X, is dim.  Weird, I know.  I'll see if I can take a
picture of it.

Patrick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-10-04 Thread José Alburquerque

libre fan wrote:



libre fan wrote:
  
Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I 
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range



I reconfigured several times trying to correct errors, and I compared the
original Xfree config file with the present xorg.config. I really don't know
how to put the matter straight.

Something else you may want to try:
1) Shutdown your system for maintenance if possible (otherwise stop X 
from running)
2) Save a copy of your /etc/X/xorg.conf file somewhere (other than in 
/etc/X)

3) Remove the 'xorg.conf' file in /etc/X
4) run dexconf ('man dexconf' to see what this command does)

HTH

--
Sincerely
Jose Alburquerque


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-10-03 Thread libre fan




libre fan wrote:
Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I 
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range

I reconfigured several times trying to correct errors, and I compared the
original Xfree config file with the present xorg.config. I really don't know
how to put the matter straight. I set the default depths at 16 then later at
24. I set the default and only resolution at 1024x768 because this has
always worked. Here are snippets from the latest Xorg.log
(/var/log/Xorg.0.log):

(--) MGA(0): Chipset: mgag200
(**) MGA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) MGA(0): RGB weight 888
(==) MGA(0): Using AGP 1x mode
(--) MGA(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xF500

(--) MGA(0): VideoRAM: 8192 kByte

(II) MGA(0): Supported VESA Video Modes:
...
(II) MGA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (interlaced)
(II) MGA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(II) MGA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(II) MGA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(II) MGA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
(==) MGA(0): Min pixel clock is 17 MHz
(--) MGA(0): Max pixel clock is 250 MHz
(II) MGA(0): Sony CDP-110GS/EST: Using hsync range of 30.00-70.00 kHz
(II) MGA(0): Sony CDP-110GS/EST: Using vrefresh range of 48.00-120.00 Hz
(II) MGA(0): Clock range:  17.75 to 250.00 MHz

(WW) (1024x768,Sony CDP-110GS/EST) mode clock 94.5MHz exceeds DDC maximum
0MHz
(WW) (1024x768,Sony CDP-110GS/EST) mode clock 133.475MHz exceeds DDC maximum
0MHz
(II) MGA(0): Not using default mode 1024x768 (hsync out of range)

(--) MGA(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)
(**) MGA(0): *Default mode 1024x768: 94.5 MHz, 68.7 kHz, 85.0 Hz
(II) MGA(0): Modeline 1024x768   94.50  1024 1072 1168 1376  768 769 772
808 +hsync +vsync
...

BTW I also get font errors, like this:
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc).
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/.Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/).
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/).
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi).
...
I no longer get errors in the log file still the message out of scan range
is displayed after I type startx.

Your help would be much appreciated!

cheers,
libre fan

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6633861
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-09-25 Thread libre fan

Hello,

I have a Debian Etch+Sid and Xubuntu Dapper dual-boot. 

Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I 
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range

Though  X is started (I typed startx on a terminal)  Wdm (my display
manager) doesn't load.

Is the message to do with the monitor config? Everyting worked fine before
hand -- I have had Debian-based distros for about three years now without
any hardware problems.

What can I do? Can you help me? perhaps I could downgrade: comment the sid
lines oin my sources.list, pat-get get update, uninstall x.org, reinstall it
from the Etch repositories?

There must be a simpler way. Run xorg config?

Many thanks in advance!



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6482623
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-09-25 Thread José Alburquerque

libre fan wrote:


Hello,

I have a Debian Etch+Sid and Xubuntu Dapper dual-boot. 

Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I 
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range


Though  X is started (I typed startx on a terminal)  Wdm (my display
manager) doesn't load.

Is the message to do with the monitor config? Everyting worked fine before
hand -- I have had Debian-based distros for about three years now without
any hardware problems.

What can I do? Can you help me? perhaps I could downgrade: comment the sid
lines oin my sources.list, pat-get get update, uninstall x.org, reinstall it
from the Etch repositories?

There must be a simpler way. Run xorg config?

Many thanks in advance!



 

Sounds to me like the error your getting is because your monitor 
settings are not correct in your /etc/X/xorg.conf file.  You probably 
replaced your config when you updated.  Reconfiguring the xserver-xorg 
package ('sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg') might fix your problem.


--
Sincerely
Jose Alburquerque


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: starting X fails: out of scan range

2006-09-25 Thread libre fan



Jos? Alburquerque-3 wrote:
 
 libre fan wrote:
Last Friday I updated Debian (lot of xorg stuff was updated) and when I 
rebooted I got this message on the screen: out of scan range
 
 Sounds to me like the error your getting is because your monitor 
 settings are not correct in your /etc/X/xorg.conf file.  You probably 
 replaced your config when you updated.  Reconfiguring the xserver-xorg 
 package ('sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg') might fix your problem.
 

I did reconfigure as you suggest. I get two error messages: no  usable 
screen and no frame buffer found. I see there's an option in the
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg process to do without the frame buffer. i'll
check again if I disabled this option.
I compared the xorg.conf files in Debian and in Xubuntu, and corrected the
reference of the screen.
Cheers

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/starting-X-fails%3A-out-of-scan-range-tf2330274.html#a6499854
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen
Could have found what's causing the issue. I have no idea what he's  
talking about though...

Looking in to it now, but any help is appreciated.

Jeroen

--- start quote ---

Framebuffer/X notes

New - I managed to replace the atyfb code of 2.4.27 with the one of  
2.4.16. This means there are dozens of new drivers available for for  
users which need the framebuffer-patch. Due to its completely  
different design, 2.6.8.x kernels still bring along difficulties in  
respect of forward porting. Anyway, the resulting 2.4.27 kernel is  
available as a deb-package.


Using kernel 2.4.16 with or without full-width console patch works  
fine with X. Mind that the following modeline is required:


ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync - 
vsync


The atyfb of 2.4.18 and later seems to have changed a lot. The full- 
width console patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore - not even this  
one. If framebuffer support is compiled in, Xfree86 4.3 whites the  
screen slowly which doesn't look healthy. Not even the modeline entry  
helps. Xserver-mach64 works insufficiently (corrupts the screen and  
mouse-input is translated horribly).


I'm trying to insert the 2.4.16 atyfb code into higher kernels  
(probably 2.6.8). Results will be published here upon success.


--- end quote ---

from http://gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html


On 06 Sep 2005, at 00:54, jeroen wrote:

Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked  
your mail rules (it did trick mine)

Jeroen

On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:



I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I  
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.






#gdm
returns a command not found


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:




jeroen wrote:




I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still  
have to

after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).




Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get your
network up.





It's getting late now, and my primary concern is getting something  
of a GUI, ifup isn't that hard to type ;). But many thanks for  
pointing me to the solution. Greatly appreciated!






Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)




These images look like your video settings are not suitable for your
hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?





When i comment out the modeline (and un-comment out the HorizSync  
and VertRefresh) i get the same white screen.






What other minor changes did you make?





My complete config can now be found @
http://www.yuru.be/debian/XF86Config-4

other changes i made are:

/OptionXkbLayoutukto
-OptionXkbLayoutgb
Probably nothing serious or X killing, just changed it to the  
working config i found on the cam.ac.uk site


/IdentifierConfigured Mouse
/OptionEmulate3Buttontrue
/OptionZAxisMapping4 5 to
-IdentifierConfigured Mouse
-OptionButtons5
-OptionZAxisMapping5 4
Same here, just copied it, hoping it would work like a charm.

Other changes are:
Adding the modeline and commenting out the HorizSync and VertRefresh.
The last thing i changed where all resolutions in the Display  
Subsections of the Screen Section (was  320x240 640x480)






Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.





Hey cool, thanks! I was trying to do that with Ctrl-Alt-Delete...





With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
window manager




I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.

You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
(aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure you've got xterm  
installed

(aptitude install xterm) and then put icewm or xterm in the file
~/.xinitrc (you'll probably have to create the file), and then run
startx. If you put icewm in ~/.initrc, Icewm should start  
up; if
you put xterm, you should get an xterm (with no window controls;  
you

can type exit to shut down X in such a case).





Tried this, with both suggested wms (and both .xinitrc and .initrc  
- was this a typo or are they indeed different?), they produce the  
same white screen.

You where right that i had to create both files.
I renamed them so there never was both a .xinitrc and and .initrc  
in my ~/.





Remember that USB disk you mentioned? I bet it works with USB fobs  
as well.






Doh! Thanks for that. It's the only floppy drive i have so i have  
to plug it in and out, it works, that's most important.
I do have a problem with copying my XFree86.0.log, It gives a -36  
error when i try to copy it over to my mac. I'll look into that  

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen

This is starting to look like a blog ;)

I installed the kernel found on the previously mentioned page (http:// 
gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html).
It doesn't look really nice. Full screen console is built in but is  
shifted (not placed correctly, with white band down the screen).  
Startx (with fvwm) works fine. That means i get to see the graphical  
login screen now... the screen itself doesn't really look nice, with  
stripes all over the place.


As mentioned in the above page the problems with the white screen  
allegedly happen with Xfree86 4.3. I'm now looking into removing the  
version i have running now and replace it with a previous version. If  
i get this to work with the standard default kernel i will be a happy  
man.


kernel compiling is a bit over the top for me right now i think.  
Maybe next week ;D


Cheers,
Jeroen

On 06 Sep 2005, at 20:35, jeroen wrote:

Could have found what's causing the issue. I have no idea what he's  
talking about though...

Looking in to it now, but any help is appreciated.

Jeroen

--- start quote ---

Framebuffer/X notes

New - I managed to replace the atyfb code of 2.4.27 with the one of  
2.4.16. This means there are dozens of new drivers available for  
for users which need the framebuffer-patch. Due to its completely  
different design, 2.6.8.x kernels still bring along difficulties in  
respect of forward porting. Anyway, the resulting 2.4.27 kernel is  
available as a deb-package.


Using kernel 2.4.16 with or without full-width console patch works  
fine with X. Mind that the following modeline is required:


ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 - 
hsync -vsync


The atyfb of 2.4.18 and later seems to have changed a lot. The full- 
width console patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore - not even this  
one. If framebuffer support is compiled in, Xfree86 4.3 whites the  
screen slowly which doesn't look healthy. Not even the modeline  
entry helps. Xserver-mach64 works insufficiently (corrupts the  
screen and mouse-input is translated horribly).


I'm trying to insert the 2.4.16 atyfb code into higher kernels  
(probably 2.6.8). Results will be published here upon success.


--- end quote ---

from http://gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html


On 06 Sep 2005, at 00:54, jeroen wrote:


Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked  
your mail rules (it did trick mine)

Jeroen

On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:




I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I  
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.







#gdm
returns a command not found


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:





jeroen wrote:





I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still  
have to

after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).





Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking  
restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get  
your

network up.






It's getting late now, and my primary concern is getting something  
of a GUI, ifup isn't that hard to type ;). But many thanks for  
pointing me to the solution. Greatly appreciated!







Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)





These images look like your video settings are not suitable for your
hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?






When i comment out the modeline (and un-comment out the HorizSync  
and VertRefresh) i get the same white screen.







What other minor changes did you make?






My complete config can now be found @
http://www.yuru.be/debian/XF86Config-4

other changes i made are:

/OptionXkbLayoutukto
-OptionXkbLayoutgb
Probably nothing serious or X killing, just changed it to the  
working config i found on the cam.ac.uk site


/IdentifierConfigured Mouse
/OptionEmulate3Buttontrue
/OptionZAxisMapping4 5 to
-IdentifierConfigured Mouse
-OptionButtons5
-OptionZAxisMapping5 4
Same here, just copied it, hoping it would work like a charm.

Other changes are:
Adding the modeline and commenting out the HorizSync and VertRefresh.
The last thing i changed where all resolutions in the Display  
Subsections of the Screen Section (was  320x240 640x480)







Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.






Hey cool, thanks! I was trying to do that with Ctrl-Alt-Delete...






With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
window manager





I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.

You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
(aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure you've got xterm  
installed
(aptitude install xterm) and then 

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-06 Thread jeroen

continuing blog

i installed the x-server from woody, x starts up fine now, jeej!
i guess this issue is closed, unless this was a bad idea.

Thx for reading my ramblings,
Jeroen

On 06 Sep 2005, at 21:06, jeroen wrote:


This is starting to look like a blog ;)

I installed the kernel found on the previously mentioned page  
(http://gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html).
It doesn't look really nice. Full screen console is built in but is  
shifted (not placed correctly, with white band down the screen).  
Startx (with fvwm) works fine. That means i get to see the  
graphical login screen now... the screen itself doesn't really look  
nice, with stripes all over the place.


As mentioned in the above page the problems with the white screen  
allegedly happen with Xfree86 4.3. I'm now looking into removing  
the version i have running now and replace it with a previous  
version. If i get this to work with the standard default kernel i  
will be a happy man.


kernel compiling is a bit over the top for me right now i think.  
Maybe next week ;D


Cheers,
Jeroen

On 06 Sep 2005, at 20:35, jeroen wrote:


Could have found what's causing the issue. I have no idea what  
he's talking about though...

Looking in to it now, but any help is appreciated.

Jeroen

--- start quote ---

Framebuffer/X notes

New - I managed to replace the atyfb code of 2.4.27 with the one  
of 2.4.16. This means there are dozens of new drivers available  
for for users which need the framebuffer-patch. Due to its  
completely different design, 2.6.8.x kernels still bring along  
difficulties in respect of forward porting. Anyway, the resulting  
2.4.27 kernel is available as a deb-package.


Using kernel 2.4.16 with or without full-width console patch works  
fine with X. Mind that the following modeline is required:


ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 - 
hsync -vsync


The atyfb of 2.4.18 and later seems to have changed a lot. The  
full-width console patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore - not even  
this one. If framebuffer support is compiled in, Xfree86 4.3  
whites the screen slowly which doesn't look healthy. Not even the  
modeline entry helps. Xserver-mach64 works insufficiently  
(corrupts the screen and mouse-input is translated horribly).


I'm trying to insert the 2.4.16 atyfb code into higher kernels  
(probably 2.6.8). Results will be published here upon success.


--- end quote ---

from http://gefechtsdienst.de/uman/c1ve-general.html


On 06 Sep 2005, at 00:54, jeroen wrote:



Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked  
your mail rules (it did trick mine)

Jeroen

On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:





I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager,  
I think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.








#gdm
returns a command not found


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:






jeroen wrote:






I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still  
have to

after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).






Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking  
restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get  
your

network up.







It's getting late now, and my primary concern is getting  
something of a GUI, ifup isn't that hard to type ;). But many  
thanks for pointing me to the solution. Greatly appreciated!








Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)





These images look like your video settings are not suitable for  
your

hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?







When i comment out the modeline (and un-comment out the HorizSync  
and VertRefresh) i get the same white screen.








What other minor changes did you make?







My complete config can now be found @
http://www.yuru.be/debian/XF86Config-4

other changes i made are:

/OptionXkbLayoutukto
-OptionXkbLayoutgb
Probably nothing serious or X killing, just changed it to the  
working config i found on the cam.ac.uk site


/IdentifierConfigured Mouse
/OptionEmulate3Buttontrue
/OptionZAxisMapping4 5 to
-IdentifierConfigured Mouse
-OptionButtons5
-OptionZAxisMapping5 4
Same here, just copied it, hoping it would work like a charm.

Other changes are:
Adding the modeline and commenting out the HorizSync and  
VertRefresh.
The last thing i changed where all resolutions in the Display  
Subsections of the Screen Section (was  320x240 640x480)








Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.







Hey cool, thanks! I was trying to do that with Ctrl-Alt-Delete...







With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
window 

starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread jeroen

Hello all,

--intro

I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i succeeded  
in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous versions didn't  
support USB disks (at least not on a noob level) so thx debian!


I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i  
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to  
after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).


Once i got the machine to boot from its own HD i though it would be  
nice to have GUI to learn my way around debian (and linux in general).


--/intro

fresh install
i did:
#apt-get install x-window-system
#apt-get install gnome

immediately after this i used vi to change my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
The most important change i did was adding this modeline:
ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync - 
vsync
together with some other minor changes i found on http://www- 
jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~mma29/c1/


#startx
works fine (this means it starts up ;-/ ), the only thing i get to  
see is a black screen which bleeds to a very white blue (starting at  
the edges). Some vertical and horizontal lines can be seen as well,  
all at the edge of some very white colours.

Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)

The only way to get me out of this white hell is by tapping Ctrl-Alt- 
F1, followed by Ctrl-C to stop the X server.


With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a  
window manager (didn't i read somewhere that this is not included in  
gnome??) so i did

#apt-get install fvwm

nothing changed.

So here i am writing this mail, hoping somebody here can put me on  
the right track.


Thx for taking the time to read this,
Jeroen

I would include my XFree86.0.log but i have no idea how to get it of  
the laptop (skipped mail config in debian installer...)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Oliver Lupton

jeroen wrote:


Hello all,

--intro

I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i succeeded  
in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous versions didn't  
support USB disks (at least not on a noob level) so thx debian!


I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i  
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to  
after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).


Once i got the machine to boot from its own HD i though it would be  
nice to have GUI to learn my way around debian (and linux in general).


--/intro

fresh install
i did:
#apt-get install x-window-system
#apt-get install gnome

immediately after this i used vi to change my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
The most important change i did was adding this modeline:
ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync - 
vsync
together with some other minor changes i found on http://www- 
jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~mma29/c1/


#startx
works fine (this means it starts up ;-/ ), the only thing i get to  
see is a black screen which bleeds to a very white blue (starting at  
the edges). Some vertical and horizontal lines can be seen as well,  
all at the edge of some very white colours.

Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)

The only way to get me out of this white hell is by tapping Ctrl-Alt- 
F1, followed by Ctrl-C to stop the X server.


With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a  
window manager (didn't i read somewhere that this is not included in  
gnome??) so i did

#apt-get install fvwm

nothing changed.

So here i am writing this mail, hoping somebody here can put me on  
the right track.


Thx for taking the time to read this,
Jeroen

I would include my XFree86.0.log but i have no idea how to get it of  
the laptop (skipped mail config in debian installer...)



I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I think) 
instead of 'startx' and see how that works.
I think that apt-get install gnome should have installed metacity, 
GNOME's window manager.


Good luck.

Oliver


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Kent West
jeroen wrote:

 I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i 
 did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to 
 after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).

Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get your
network up.

 Once i got the machine to boot from its own HD i though it would be 
 nice to have GUI to learn my way around debian (and linux in general).

 --/intro

 fresh install
 i did:
 #apt-get install x-window-system
 #apt-get install gnome

 immediately after this i used vi to change my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
 The most important change i did was adding this modeline:
 ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 -hsync -
 vsync
 together with some other minor changes i found on http://www-
 jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~mma29/c1/

 #startx
 works fine (this means it starts up ;-/ ), the only thing i get to 
 see is a black screen which bleeds to a very white blue (starting at 
 the edges). Some vertical and horizontal lines can be seen as well, 
 all at the edge of some very white colours.
 Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
 http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)

These images look like your video settings are not suitable for your
hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?

What other minor changes did you make?

 The only way to get me out of this white hell is by tapping Ctrl-Alt-
 F1, followed by Ctrl-C to stop the X server.

Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.

 With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a 
 window manager

I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.

 (didn't i read somewhere that this is not included in  gnome??) so i did
 #apt-get install fvwm

 nothing changed.

 So here i am writing this mail, hoping somebody here can put me on 
 the right track.

 Thx for taking the time to read this,
 Jeroen

 I would include my XFree86.0.log but i have no idea how to get it of 
 the laptop (skipped mail config in debian installer...)

Remember that USB disk you mentioned? I bet it works with USB fobs as well.



-- 
Kent West
Technology Support
/A/bilene /C/hristian /U/niversity


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread Kent West
Kent West wrote:

jeroen wrote:
  

With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a 
window manager



I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.
  


You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
(aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure you've got xterm installed
(aptitude install xterm) and then put icewm or xterm in the file
~/.xinitrc (you'll probably have to create the file), and then run
startx. If you put icewm in ~/.initrc, Icewm should start up; if
you put xterm, you should get an xterm (with no window controls; you
can type exit to shut down X in such a case).

-- 
Kent West
Technology Support
/A/bilene /C/hristian /U/niversity


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread jeroen


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:

I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I  
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.




#gdm
returns a command not found


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:


jeroen wrote:


I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to
after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).


Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get your
network up.



It's getting late now, and my primary concern is getting something of  
a GUI, ifup isn't that hard to type ;). But many thanks for pointing  
me to the solution. Greatly appreciated!




Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)


These images look like your video settings are not suitable for your
hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?



When i comment out the modeline (and un-comment out the HorizSync and  
VertRefresh) i get the same white screen.




What other minor changes did you make?



My complete config can now be found @
http://www.yuru.be/debian/XF86Config-4

other changes i made are:

/OptionXkbLayoutukto
-OptionXkbLayoutgb
Probably nothing serious or X killing, just changed it to the working  
config i found on the cam.ac.uk site


/IdentifierConfigured Mouse
/OptionEmulate3Buttontrue
/OptionZAxisMapping4 5 to
-IdentifierConfigured Mouse
-OptionButtons5
-OptionZAxisMapping5 4
Same here, just copied it, hoping it would work like a charm.

Other changes are:
Adding the modeline and commenting out the HorizSync and VertRefresh.
The last thing i changed where all resolutions in the Display  
Subsections of the Screen Section (was  320x240 640x480)




Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.



Hey cool, thanks! I was trying to do that with Ctrl-Alt-Delete...



With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
window manager


I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.

You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
(aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure you've got xterm  
installed

(aptitude install xterm) and then put icewm or xterm in the file
~/.xinitrc (you'll probably have to create the file), and then run
startx. If you put icewm in ~/.initrc, Icewm should start up; if
you put xterm, you should get an xterm (with no window controls; you
can type exit to shut down X in such a case).



Tried this, with both suggested wms (and both .xinitrc and .initrc -  
was this a typo or are they indeed different?), they produce the same  
white screen.

You where right that i had to create both files.
I renamed them so there never was both a .xinitrc and and .initrc in  
my ~/.



Remember that USB disk you mentioned? I bet it works with USB fobs  
as well.




Doh! Thanks for that. It's the only floppy drive i have so i have to  
plug it in and out, it works, that's most important.
I do have a problem with copying my XFree86.0.log, It gives a -36  
error when i try to copy it over to my mac. I'll look into that  
tomorrow (when i follow your tips on the interfaces).


Now it's time for me to go to bed, i'm on CET and have to work tomorrow.

Thank you for your time,
Jeroen



jeroen wrote:




Hello all,

--intro

I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i  
succeeded  in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous  
versions didn't  support USB disks (at least not on a noob level)  
so thx debian!


I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation  
(i  did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still  
have to  after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).


Once i got the machine to boot from its own HD i though it would  
be  nice to have GUI to learn my way around debian (and linux in  
general).


--/intro

fresh install
i did:
#apt-get install x-window-system
#apt-get install gnome

immediately after this i used vi to change my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
The most important change i did was adding this modeline:
ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 - 
hsync - vsync
together with some other minor changes i found on http://www-  
jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~mma29/c1/


#startx
works fine (this means it starts up ;-/ ), the only thing i get  
to  see is a black screen which bleeds to a very white blue  
(starting at  the edges). Some vertical and horizontal lines can  
be seen as well,  all at the edge of some very white colours.

Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg 

Re: starting X makes the screen go white (newb - new install)

2005-09-05 Thread jeroen
Sorry if this came in double, the resend i did might have tricked  
your mail rules (it did trick mine)

Jeroen

On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:19, Oliver Lupton wrote:


I'm a newbie too, but try running 'gdm' (GNOME Display Manager, I  
think) instead of 'startx' and see how that works.





#gdm
returns a command not found


On 05 Sep 2005, at 22:25, Kent West wrote:



jeroen wrote:



I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation (i
did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still have to
after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).



Take a look at /etc/network/interfaces (also man interfaces for
examples). Once configured, a simple /etc/init.d/networking restart
(or reboot, which will run this script during bootup) should get your
network up.




It's getting late now, and my primary concern is getting something of  
a GUI, ifup isn't that hard to type ;). But many thanks for pointing  
me to the solution. Greatly appreciated!





Some pictures i took during this  happening can be found here:
http://www.yuru.be/debian/startx_1.jpg  (going from 1 to 6)



These images look like your video settings are not suitable for your
hardware; what happens if you remove that ModeLine you added?




When i comment out the modeline (and un-comment out the HorizSync and  
VertRefresh) i get the same white screen.





What other minor changes did you make?




My complete config can now be found @
http://www.yuru.be/debian/XF86Config-4

other changes i made are:

/OptionXkbLayoutukto
-OptionXkbLayoutgb
Probably nothing serious or X killing, just changed it to the working  
config i found on the cam.ac.uk site


/IdentifierConfigured Mouse
/OptionEmulate3Buttontrue
/OptionZAxisMapping4 5 to
-IdentifierConfigured Mouse
-OptionButtons5
-OptionZAxisMapping5 4
Same here, just copied it, hoping it would work like a charm.

Other changes are:
Adding the modeline and commenting out the HorizSync and VertRefresh.
The last thing i changed where all resolutions in the Display  
Subsections of the Screen Section (was  320x240 640x480)





Ctrl-Alt-Backspace should kill it from within X.




Hey cool, thanks! I was trying to do that with Ctrl-Alt-Delete...




With my limited knowledge i though i could have forgotten to add a
window manager



I don't think so; this looks like a video sync -type issue.

You can double-check this possibility by installing another wm
(aptitude install icewm, etc), or make sure you've got xterm  
installed

(aptitude install xterm) and then put icewm or xterm in the file
~/.xinitrc (you'll probably have to create the file), and then run
startx. If you put icewm in ~/.initrc, Icewm should start up; if
you put xterm, you should get an xterm (with no window controls; you
can type exit to shut down X in such a case).




Tried this, with both suggested wms (and both .xinitrc and .initrc -  
was this a typo or are they indeed different?), they produce the same  
white screen.

You where right that i had to create both files.
I renamed them so there never was both a .xinitrc and and .initrc in  
my ~/.




Remember that USB disk you mentioned? I bet it works with USB fobs  
as well.





Doh! Thanks for that. It's the only floppy drive i have so i have to  
plug it in and out, it works, that's most important.
I do have a problem with copying my XFree86.0.log, It gives a -36  
error when i try to copy it over to my mac. I'll look into that  
tomorrow (when i follow your tips on the interfaces).


Now it's time for me to go to bed, i'm on CET and have to work tomorrow.

Thank you for your time,
Jeroen




jeroen wrote:





Hello all,

--intro

I'm trying (finally) to get debian to work on my Vaio PCG-C1VE.
Using the latest version of the installer (floppy images) i  
succeeded  in installing 3.1 on the little b*st*rd. Previous  
versions didn't  support USB disks (at least not on a noob level)  
so thx debian!


I used apt to get me the files i needed during the installation  
(i  did have to do an 'ifup -a' to get the network up - and still  
have to  after every reboot - but that's slightly OT here).


Once i got the machine to boot from its own HD i though it would  
be  nice to have GUI to learn my way around debian (and linux in  
general).


--/intro

fresh install
i did:
#apt-get install x-window-system
#apt-get install gnome

immediately after this i used vi to change my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.
The most important change i did was adding this modeline:
ModeLine 1024x480 65.00 1024 1032 1176 1344 480 488 494 563 - 
hsync - vsync
together with some other minor changes i found on http://www-  
jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~mma29/c1/


#startx
works fine (this means it starts up ;-/ ), the only thing i get  
to  see is a black screen which bleeds to a very white blue  
(starting at  the edges). Some vertical and horizontal lines can  
be seen as well,  all at the edge 

Re: Trouble starting X [Was:Re: more info]

2005-08-01 Thread Hans-Peter Sulzer
On 27 July 2005, Kent West wrote:

 snip

  [EE] xf860 penserial: cannot open device /dev/input/miceno such
  device
  [EE] configured mouse: cannot open input device
  [EE] PreInit failed for input device Configured Mouse
 
  I have a 5$ optical mouse that is made by MicroInnovations (or maybe
  there's a space in there).  It connects to my ps/2 connector.

 Try running dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 and selecting ps2 as your
 mouse type when you get to that question.

This only works, if he hasn't changed XF86Config-4 manually!!!

If you have changed this config file (this is absolutly allowed
in Debian!), you will find a comment at the beginning of
this file, how you can reset this, so you can again use
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86. (BTW: It then asks you
the same questions, as it did, when you have had installed
Debian)

Peter
-- 
peter_sulzer doesn't like spam and this is my domain:
t-online.de



Trouble starting X [Was:Re: more info]

2005-06-27 Thread Kent West
Dylan Evans wrote:

 when I typed startx at the command prompt, it made the same error
 messages it did initially,

snip

 [EE] xf860 penserial: cannot open device /dev/input/miceno such
 device
 [EE] configured mouse: cannot open input device
 [EE] PreInit failed for input device Configured Mouse

 I have a 5$ optical mouse that is made by MicroInnovations (or maybe
 there's a space in there).  It connects to my ps/2 connector.

Try running dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 and selecting ps2 as your
mouse type when you get to that question.

 lspci -vv says the following about my network card:

 :00:10.0 Ethernet Controller: Realtek semiconductor Co., Ltd.  RTL
 -8139/8139C/8139C+ (Rev 10)

Are you including this info because your network is not working? You'd
probably do best to make a separate thread out of this question.

 additionally, when booting, the loader program has my kernel listed as
 2.41something.  I thought debian 3.1 was the latest version, and I'd
 have 2.6something.  I also saw some error messages in the boot up that
 said things like: failed to load.  kernel 2.6 required.  did I get
 gypped with the dvds I bought?

I always just use the official Debian CD files/netinst CDs, so I can't
really speak to your DVD quality. However, I doubt that you've been
gypped. I believe 2.4 is the default kernel in Sarge, but you can easily
upgrade to 2.6 if you like. Try:

#aptitude search kernel-image-2.6 | grep k7

for the available 2.6 kernels for the Athlon. If nothing appears, your
DVDs don't have them, and you may want to configure your box to pull the
kernel from the net. Otherwise, if some do appear, pick the one you want
and install it with a command similar to:

#aptitude install kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7

If you see a message about initrd, make sure that your /etc/lilo.conf
file has a line like
initrd=/initrd.img
in the stanza for the new 2.6 kernel. (This assumes that Sarge installed
lilo rather than grub.)

   And is there a good tutorial/reference to learn how to access all
 your drives, like finding out what's on your floppy, or cd, or
 whatever.  And how to transfer files to a windows partition.
 thanks for your help

Probably, but I can't suggest one. You might do well to Google for this
info. Or, as Martin as mentioned, he has a new book out for Debian
adminstrators that might have all you want (or, then again, it might be
too indepth since it's not for general use issues). See
http://debiansystem.info/.

-- 
Kent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem starting x server

2004-12-27 Thread Adrian S. Glover



Hello!

I'm new to Debian and this GNU/linux. I've 
installed from CD but the machine returns an error saying "I cannot start x 
server, it is likely that it is not set up correctly etc etc". 

Then next screen says "warning process set to nice 
value 0 instead of -10 as requested etc". 
Next screen "would you like to run the x config 
program etc" 
then "I will now try to restart x server again" 

then "I cannot start the x server".

It either goes round in circles or I have to 
decline and get to the command prompt. 
The machine is not yet on either its network or the 
internet, the only way in is via CD (no-floppy).

Can anyone tell me how (in simple terms please!) 
how to get through this and bring up the GUI? I copied the CD from a 
mirror.
I've tried the faq's and other lists.

Also I get loads of error messages, all the same, 
thus: ide2: unexpected interrupt, status=0xd0, count= (ascending number), I 
think it's because I've got a large SATA drive is this true? How canI lose 
the messages echoing to screen?


Thanks


Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem starting x server

2004-12-27 Thread Kent West
Adrian S. Glover wrote:
Hello!
 
I'm new to Debian and this GNU/linux. I've installed from CD but the 
machine returns an error saying I cannot start x server,  it is 
likely that it is not set up correctly etc etc.
Setting up X is one of the most common difficulties newbies have, 
especially if they're using the current Stable branch of Debian, Woody. 
Woody is ancient, and if this is what you have, you'd probably find life 
much easier if you could upgrade to Sarge (Testing) or Sid (Unstable), 
both of which are suitable for workstation use (whereas you'd probably 
do better to stick with Woody for a server, in which case, do you really 
need X?).

Then next screen says warning process set to nice value 0 instead of 
-10 as requested etc.
You can ignore this error; it's not the one causing you problems.
Next screen would you like to run the x config program etc
then I will now try to restart x server again
then I cannot start the x server.
 
It either goes round in circles or I have to decline and get to the 
command prompt.
The machine is not yet on either its network or the internet
Then upgrading to Sarge or Sid is more difficult.
, the only way in is via CD (no-floppy).
 
Can anyone tell me how (in simple terms please!) how to get through 
this and bring up the GUI? I copied the CD from a mirror.
I've tried the faq's and other lists.

Run lspci and see what video chipset you have; the output will look 
something like this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/westk/DOCS/KCARC/NEWSLETTERS/2005 lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo 
KT266/A/333]
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo 
KT266/A/333 AGP]
:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys NC100 Network Everywhere 
Fast Ethernet 10/100 (rev 11)
:00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c325 [ViRGE] (rev 06)
:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:11.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 
1.1 Controller (rev 1b)
:00:11.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 
1.1 Controller (rev 1b)
:00:11.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 
1.1 Controller (rev 1b)
:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 30)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 
RL/VR AGP
There are two lines referring to VGA controllers, indicating that this 
box has two video cards (yours probably (almost certainly) only  has 
one); one is an S3 86c325; the other is an ATI Rage 128.

Now that you know what video chipset you have, run dpkg-reconfigure 
xserver-xfree86, and select the corresponding driver for your chipset 
when prompted. After this program is finished, try starting X manually 
with the startx command.

If it still fails, look on the screen (Shift-PgUP to scroll up) for any 
relevant error messages. Also you might look in /var/log/XFree86.0.log.

As your other question is on a different topic, it really deserves its 
own thread. I'd still attempt answering it, however, if I were so qualified.

--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem starting x server

2004-12-27 Thread John Smith
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 17:08 +, Adrian S. Glover wrote:
 Hello!
 Adrian
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Adrian,

in case of a misconfigured xserver you can do a couple of things
that all come to basically the same thing: modifying
your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 This is your central xserver config file. You
can run the configure tool
again with a 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86' or do it manually with
a 'lspci' as root, find your graphics card and note it down. Edit the
file with a 'nano /etc/X11/XF86Config-4', find a 'Section Device' and
modify the 'Driver' statement to have the driver matching your card,
don't forget to save. Start xfree86 again with a' /etc/init.d/gdm
start'.

Sincerely ,

Jan.
  
-- 
John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello

cfk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install
 x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a
 startx and get twm. I can also right-click and get a tclsh8.4.
 
 Thats the good news. Unfortunately, being unfamiliar with apt-get yet,
 I dont know how to get say kde or gnome up. I am currently trying:
 
 apt-get install kde kdevelop kdelibs kdebase
 
 after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I
 wonder what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more
 importantly, where I can go to figure out a few steps after that,
 other then googling.

kde should be started by default and be preferred over twm if you run
startx. Anyway I suggest you install the KDE login manager kdm, which
lets you select which WM/DE you want to log into. There are also other
ways, like creating your own ~/.xsession and adding startkde (make sure 
that allow-user-xsession is in your /etc/X11/Xsession.options), or
telling startx which command to run.

best regards
 Andreas Janssen

-- 
Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps-sarge.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Sebastian Kapfer
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:00:12 +0100, cfk wrote:

 after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I wonder 
 what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more importantly, where I 
 can go to figure out a few steps after that, other then googling.

tasksel helps a lot with this.  You're probably still missing a display
manager from your Red Hat experience.  Since you're into KDE, I suggest
kdm.  Though, being a GNOME geek, I also have to point out that GDM is
much better ;-)

-- 
Best Regards,  | This signature is currently under construction.
 Sebastian | Please check back later!
   |
   | mailbox in From silently drops any mail  20k


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:59:01PM -0800, cfk wrote:
 On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote:
 Dear Sam:
   Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install 
 x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a startx 
 and get twm. I can also right-click and get a tclsh8.4.
 
   Thats the good news. Unfortunately, being unfamiliar with apt-get yet, 
 I dont 
 know how to get say kde or gnome up. I am currently trying:
 
 apt-get install kde kdevelop kdelibs kdebase
 
 after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I wonder 
 what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more importantly, where I 
 can go to figure out a few steps after that, other then googling.
 
 Charles
 

the following sequence yields:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /usr/bin | grep kde
.
kdebugdialog
kde-config
.
startkde
wkdemenu.pl

It seems to be startkde, so

startx `which startkde`

should get you there


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Sam Watkins
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 12:18:14PM +0100, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
 Since you're into KDE, I suggest kdm.  Though, being a GNOME geek, I
 also have to point out that GDM is much better ;-)

maybe we need an uber-display manager that lets the user choose what
display manager they want to use before entering the login ;)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



beyond starting x

2004-12-19 Thread cfk
 tasksel helps a lot with this.  You're probably still missing a display
 manager from your Red Hat experience.  Since you're into KDE, I suggest
 kdm.  Though, being a GNOME geek, I also have to point out that GDM is
 much better ;-)

 --
 Best Regards,  | This signature is currently under construction.
  Sebastian | Please check back later!

Thank you all that helped me last night. I did an 'apt-get install kde 
kdevelop kdelibs kdebase' and now the computer boots into an X logon screen 
for kde. At this point I can run kpackage or apt-get and add other 'stuff' 
and thats a good thing.

I admit that my experience is with RedHat, so I dont know yet how to change 
back and forth between a text logon, a kde logon or a gnome logon in Debian. 
So, I cannot get back to the startx prompt at this time to experiment. I 
would enjoy experimenting with gnome versus kde versus text a bit as I am 
doing all this on my experimental computer, so I have the time to poke 
around. Unfortunately, my poking around for the last four years has all been 
RedHat and not Debian, so my incantations and cheat sheet doesnt help a great 
deal, only a little bit.

Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: beyond starting x

2004-12-19 Thread Kent West
cfk wrote:
I admit that my experience is with RedHat, so I dont know yet how to change 
back and forth between a text logon, a kde logon or a gnome logon in Debian. 
So, I cannot get back to the startx prompt at this time to experiment.

You can search the Debian archives; this has been covered many times.
The short version:
Ctrl-Alt-F[usually 1 - 6] will switch you to a virtual terminal (VT), 
aka a text console. Alt-F7 will (usually) switch you back to X.

Unless you have a glitchy video system, you can switch to a VT (say, 
Ctrl-Alt-F2 for VT2), and login as a second person, and then start a 
second X session with something like startx -- :1 (the first X session 
is on display number 0). Then you can switch to VT3 with Ctrl-Alt-F3, 
login as a third person, and then start a third X session with startx 
-- :2. You can switch back and forth between the X sessions with 
Ctrl-Alt-F7, Ctrl-Alt-F8, and Ctrl-Alt-F9. Add more if you wish. This is 
great for a family computer; Mom can run Gnome; Dad can run Icewm, Baby 
Boy can run KDE, and Baby Girl can run Gnome too, just like Mommie, but 
without trashing Mommie's files and background wallpaper.

If you want a different window manager/environment on those other X 
sessions, just create a one-liner .xinitrc file in each user's home 
directory with the name of the wm/e you wish to use. Or feed the wm/e 
name to the startx command as a parameter (I forget the syntax, though, 
so I just use ~/.xinitrc).

If you want to disable KDM temporarily, there are half a dozen ways of 
doing it; I just put exit 0 as the first executable line in 
/etc/init.d/kdm.

If you want to switch to a different login manager, dpkg-reconfigure 
xdm (pick a dm that's not currently the default - that is, if you're 
running KDM, don't reconfigure KDM, but rather xdm or wdm or gdm). Be 
aware you'll need to have these other dm's installed, like apt-get 
install xdm kdm wdm gdm.

To remove a login manager, just apt-get --purge remove kdm (say, to 
remove KDM).

This ought to help you get your feet wet.
Freebie X Tip, just for joining this list: If your mouse gets knocked 
off the table and cracks and fails to work anymore, you can simulate a 
mouse with your numeric keypad. Just press Shift-Numlock to turn the 
simulation on (or off). Then the 5 key is the Click button, / sets 5 to 
be  left-click; * sets 5 to be a middle-click, - sets 5 to be a 
right-click; the other number keys move the pointer in the corresponding 
direction; 0 is a click-and-hold; DEL is a release click.

--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



starting x

2004-12-18 Thread cfk
Gentlemen:
Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for 
a few 
years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed 
Sarge to start X.

I try the incantation startx from either a user or root command 
prompt and 
get command not found.

Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 18 December 2004 5:44 pm, cfk wrote:
 Gentlemen:
  Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat 
for a few 
 years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly 
installed 
 Sarge to start X.

Searching through the archives would have told you you need to install X 
before you can run it a lot faster than asking the same thing again.

-- 
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/


pgpxzewU9tnR6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Robert Vangel
cfk wrote:
Gentlemen:
	Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a few 
years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly installed 
Sarge to start X.

	I try the incantation startx from either a user or root command prompt and 
get command not found.

Charles

Perhaps `apt-get install xserver-xfree86' is needed


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread cfk
On Saturday 18 December 2004 17:42, Robert Vangel wrote:
 cfk wrote:
  Gentlemen:
  Its my turn to be a newbie to Debian, although I have used Red Hat for a
  few years. Please bear with me and suggest how I may get my newly
  installed Sarge to start X.
 
  I try the incantation startx from either a user or root command prompt
  and get command not found.
 
  Charles

 Perhaps `apt-get install xserver-xfree86' is needed

Dear Robert:

Thank you for your kind reply. I was in the midst of reading apt-get's 
commands and options as I come up to speed on Debian.

I did try 'apt-get install xserver-xfree86' and apt-get finishes very 
quickly 
saying:

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree ... Done
xserver-xfree86 is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded

Then I invoke startx from the root prompt and get

-bash: startx: command not found

So, I did 'echo $PATH' and found /usr/bin/X11 was in the path, went there and 
saw there was no 'startx', but there was an 'X', which when run, gives me a 
modest blank X screen. Unfortunately, no menu or any right click mouse option 
such as 'open terminal'.

I can go 'Alt-Ctrl-F1', F2 or F3 where F1 shows some error messages, F2 
gets 
me back to the big blank X window and F3 gives me a new logon prompt with an 
inoperable keyboard.

At this point I am pressing the reset switch and starting over and hoping for 
a bit more advice.

Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Sam Watkins
startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.

You should:

  apt-get install x-window-system-core

or probably:

  apt-get install x-window-system


you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on with:

  apt-cache show x-window-system-core

you can see reverse dependencies with

  apt-cache rdepends xterm

you can find out what package contains a certain file with apt-file:

  apt-get install apt-file
  apt-file search startx
  apt-cache rdepends x-base-clients

etc.


good luck!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread Robert Vangel
Sam Watkins wrote:
startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.
You should:
  apt-get install x-window-system-core
or probably:
  apt-get install x-window-system
you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on with:
  apt-cache show x-window-system-core
you can see reverse dependencies with
  apt-cache rdepends xterm
you can find out what package contains a certain file with apt-file:
  apt-get install apt-file
  apt-file search startx
  apt-cache rdepends x-base-clients
etc.
good luck!

x-window-system is the one I was thinking of, sorry!
startx is actually part of xbase-clients, which installing 
x-window-system would end up installing.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: starting x

2004-12-18 Thread cfk
On Saturday 18 December 2004 18:14, Sam Watkins wrote:
 startx is not part of the X server, it is in the package x-base-clients.

 You should:

   apt-get install x-window-system-core

 or probably:

   apt-get install x-window-system


 you can look at what each of these meta packages depends on with:

   apt-cache show x-window-system-core

 you can see reverse dependencies with

   apt-cache rdepends xterm

 you can find out what package contains a certain file with apt-file:

   apt-get install apt-file
   apt-file search startx
   apt-cache rdepends x-base-clients

 etc.


 good luck!

Dear Sam:
Thank you very much for the tip. I did do a 'apt-get install 
x-window-system', and a number of good things happened. I can now do a startx 
and get twm. I can also right-click and get a tclsh8.4.

Thats the good news. Unfortunately, being unfamiliar with apt-get yet, 
I dont 
know how to get say kde or gnome up. I am currently trying:

apt-get install kde kdevelop kdelibs kdebase

after a search of archives and it seems to be working. After that, I wonder 
what the incantation is to start kde and perhaps more importantly, where I 
can go to figure out a few steps after that, other then googling.

Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Extra commands when starting X

2004-09-12 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Some sites tell me to do things like

  Please add the following line to the ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc.
export [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exec uim-xim

But in Debian, neither ~/.xsession nor ~/.xinitrc exist by default. And
if you create them, you cannot use them for *adding* things to the X
start-up process. If you do, X refuses to start. They can only be used
to specify the *whole* X start-up process. For instance, calling the
window manager should be the last line.

This may be a frosty FAQ, but I could not find the answer in spite of
much Googling. What is the Debian way to execute some extra commands
(preferably on a per-user basis) each time X is started?

Regards, Jan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-15 Thread Micha Feigin
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:08:39AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
 On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
 
  Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
  switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
  running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW:
  
 you know, I think we're barking up the wrong tree, in fact I dont even
 think we are in the woods at all ;-)
 It might well be a bug. but a bug in what?
 
 Try without any x sessions running run 'X' as root and see how long does
 it take to start, that way you can see if it is xfree or (I assume your
 using it) gnome.
 

Running just X also hangs in the same way, so its X that's giving the
problems.

I am not running gnome btw, I'm running FVWM (gnome is too slow,heavy
and not configurable enough). Also running wdm gives the same problem
and its not starting .xsession or gnome-session so thats not the
problem.

 Assuming it starts quickly, next you want to type:
 $ export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0
 
 $ gnome-session (or enter the name of your wm's main app)
 
 If what I think the problem is is right this should be slow to launch, so
 exit it (not X just the wm) and this time on another console run 'netstat
 -c' This will show all network connections and refresh them every few
 seconds. then relaunch your wm and see does any new datagrams or streams
 open up in netstat, esp ones that sit in a state of 'SYN_SENT' You are
 going to get a few going no further than /tmp/.orbit-root, I'm fairly sure
 they will be streams, they are what gives gnome its network transparency,
 even local only connections open up sockets.
 Thats what I think the problem is, gnome is trying to open up a network
 socket to somewhere.
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
  +++
  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-13 Thread Micha Feigin
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:49:29AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
 On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
 
  
  BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
  on this:
  
  [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
  interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
  
  The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem to be
  ignoring the /etc/hosts file also.
  
 
 what package are you getting host from, I dont have it on my system. whats

/usr/bin/host

 in your /etc/resolv.conf, mine has
 search personal.ie
 nameserver 192.168.1.1
 

domain luna.local
nameserver 192.168.0.1

 I think you should have nameserver 127.0.0.1 in there before any remote
 binds, I dont, but then, I dont have a problem ;-) I think If you have
 127.0.0.1 in there as the first nameserver it will check the local one
 first (/etc/hosts) 

Doesn't work.

 apart from that what happens if you run startx without gdm running?
 

Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW:

20:25:55.791908 IP litshi.luna.local.32784  rice.luna.local.domain:  6405+ A? 
-.luna.local. (30)
20:25:55.792612 IP litshi.luna.local.32785  rice.luna.local.domain:  7688+ PTR? 
1.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (42)
20:25:55.793239 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32784:  6405 NXDomain* 
0/1/0 (80)
20:25:55.793411 IP litshi.luna.local.32786  rice.luna.local.domain:  6406+ A? -. (19)
20:25:55.793894 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32785:  7688* 1/1/0 
PTR[|domain]
20:25:55.794140 IP litshi.luna.local.32787  rice.luna.local.domain:  7689+ PTR? 
3.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (42)
20:25:55.794252 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32786:  6406 NXDomain 
0/1/0 (94)
20:25:55.794411 IP litshi.luna.local.32788  rice.luna.local.domain:  6407+ A? 
-.luna.local. (30)
20:25:55.795182 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32787:  7689* 1/1/0 
PTR[|domain]
20:25:55.795591 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32788:  6407 NXDomain* 
0/1/0 (80)
20:25:55.795645 IP litshi.luna.local.32788  rice.luna.local.domain:  6408+ A? -. (19)
20:25:55.796280 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32788:  6408 NXDomain 
0/1/0 (94)
20:25:55.796419 IP litshi.luna.local.32788  rice.luna.local.domain:  6409+ A? 
local:root.luna.local. (39)
20:25:55.797114 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32788:  6409 NXDomain* 
0/1/0 (89)
20:25:55.797158 IP litshi.luna.local.32788  rice.luna.local.domain:  6410+ A? 
local:root. (28)
20:25:55.797800 IP rice.luna.local.domain  litshi.luna.local.32788:  6410 NXDomain 
0/1/0 (103)
20:26:00.790557 arp who-has litshi.luna.local tell rice.luna.local
20:26:00.790591 arp reply litshi.luna.local is-at 08:00:46:5b:70:62


 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
  +++
  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-13 Thread Steven Satelle
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:

 Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
 switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
 running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW:
 
you know, I think we're barking up the wrong tree, in fact I dont even
think we are in the woods at all ;-)
It might well be a bug. but a bug in what?

Try without any x sessions running run 'X' as root and see how long does
it take to start, that way you can see if it is xfree or (I assume your
using it) gnome.

Assuming it starts quickly, next you want to type:
$ export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0

$ gnome-session (or enter the name of your wm's main app)

If what I think the problem is is right this should be slow to launch, so
exit it (not X just the wm) and this time on another console run 'netstat
-c' This will show all network connections and refresh them every few
seconds. then relaunch your wm and see does any new datagrams or streams
open up in netstat, esp ones that sit in a state of 'SYN_SENT' You are
going to get a few going no further than /tmp/.orbit-root, I'm fairly sure
they will be streams, they are what gives gnome its network transparency,
even local only connections open up sockets.
Thats what I think the problem is, gnome is trying to open up a network
socket to somewhere.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread Micha Feigin
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
  Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
  nameserver is not reachable then ping hostname works but
  host hostname returns
  192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
  Nameserver not reachable
  litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again
  my /etc/hosts has the following lines:
  127.0.0.1   localhost
  127.0.0.1   litshi.luna.local   litshi
  (I know pointing hostname to 127.0.0.1 is not advised, but its a
  laptop and has several possible IPs).
  
  Any ideas?
  
 
 right you are getting me puzzled now :-)
 I suppose a bit of fishing is in order
 what's in /etc/host.conf, it should say 
 'order hosts,bind'

order hosts,bind
multi on

 that file tells the sys how to resolve hosts in the network, you want it
 to check the local hosts file before going to bind
 also whats in /etc/hostname? It should, at least on my sys, have the

litshi

 hostname of the sys, not the fqdn, just the hostid.If It doesnt use 
 'hostname litshi' to set it, ignore the fqdn for now, just try with that.
 If that doesnt work, have you looked at m$ windows recently ;-)
 If even that doesnt work you could try (dont tell anyone I said this) a
 reboot, after setting the hostname and entering it into /etc/hosts, the
 files may just need to be re-read

hostname returns
litshi

now I tried pulling the cable and testing again:

ping litshi
PING litshi.luna.local (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.112 ms
64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms
64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms

host litshi
Nameserver not responding
litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again

(after reconnecting cable)
host litshi
litshi.luna.local   A   192.168.0.3

/etc/hosts file:
cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1   localhost
127.0.0.1   litshi.luna.local   litshi

Tried everything as root and checked read permissions for all the files

ll /etc/ | grep -v .r..r..r
total 1620
-rw---1 root root  144 2002-01-18 10:13 at.deny
-rw---1 root root  549 2004-04-27 04:07 group-
-rw-r-1 root shadow467 2004-05-08 16:54 gshadow
-rw---1 root root  457 2004-04-27 04:07 gshadow-
-rw---1 root root  998 2004-05-08 16:55 passwd-
-rw-r-1 root shadow745 2004-05-08 16:55 shadow
-rw---1 root root  685 2004-04-01 15:52 shadow-
-r--r-1 root root  302 2004-04-01 06:14 sudoers

Anything else that could cause the problem?

BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
on this:

[...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.

The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem to be
ignoring the /etc/hosts file also.

 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
  +++
  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread Steven Satelle
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:

 
 BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
 on this:
 
 [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
 interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
 
 The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem to be
 ignoring the /etc/hosts file also.
 

what package are you getting host from, I dont have it on my system. whats
in your /etc/resolv.conf, mine has
search personal.ie
nameserver 192.168.1.1

I think you should have nameserver 127.0.0.1 in there before any remote
binds, I dont, but then, I dont have a problem ;-) I think If you have
127.0.0.1 in there as the first nameserver it will check the local one
first (/etc/hosts) 
apart from that what happens if you run startx without gdm running?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-12 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Steven Satelle:
 On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
  
  [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
  interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
  
  The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem to be
  ignoring the /etc/hosts file also.
 
 what package are you getting host from, I dont have it on my system. whats
 in your /etc/resolv.conf, mine has
 search personal.ie
 nameserver 192.168.1.1

If you want to augment that, it may be dependent on the
package/transport you use to set up your network.  I use pppd and I
see there's a /etc/ppp/resolv/provider that lists nameserver
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx records to be used to create resolv.conf


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)   http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling 
- -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Micha Feigin
I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
if anyone else experiences it too.

When starting X with a configured network and no cable, it hangs for
about 30 seconds until it starts (which is consistent with network
timeouts). If I disable the network or not configure the ethernet card
it starts immediately.

This started now with the latest X upgrade (it seems like more and more
things are bypassing the /etc/hosts file, don't know if its this
though).

And this is after finally fixing exim4 not to hang with no network
cable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Thomas Adam
--- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

 I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
 if anyone else experiences it too.

Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
there, then maybe consider filing one.

-- Thomas Adam

=
The Linux Weekend Mechanic -- http://linuxgazette.net
TAG Editor -- http://linuxgazette.net

shrug We'll just save up your sins, Thomas, and punish 
you for all of them at once when you get better. The 
experience will probably kill you. :)

 -- Benjamin A. Okopnik (Linux Gazette Technical Editor)





___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - 
so many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:

 --- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 
 I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
 if anyone else experiences it too.
 
 Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
 there, then maybe consider filing one.

no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0 AFAIR.
If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've set a
hostname, so it is trying to resolvethat. add the hostname to /etc/hosts
and you shouldnt have any further problems. at least AFAIR


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-11 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:33:15PM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
 
  --- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  
  I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
  if anyone else experiences it too.
  
  Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
  there, then maybe consider filing one.
 
 no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0 AFAIR.
 If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've set a
 hostname, so it is trying to resolvethat. add the hostname to /etc/hosts
 and you shouldnt have any further problems. at least AFAIR


Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
nameserver is not reachable then ping hostname works but
host hostname returns
192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
Nameserver not reachable
litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again
my /etc/hosts has the following lines:
127.0.0.1   localhost
127.0.0.1   litshi.luna.local   litshi
(I know pointing hostname to 127.0.0.1 is not advised, but its a
laptop and has several possible IPs).

Any ideas?

 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
  +++
  This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
  at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:09 +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:

 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
 
 no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0
 AFAIR. If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've
 set a hostname, so it is trying to resolvethat. add the hostname to
 /etc/hosts and you shouldnt have any further problems. at least AFAIR
 
 What do you enter into /etc/hosts if you get the ip via DHCP?
 
 O. Wyss

I dont know, try typing 'uname -n' that prints off the hostname your
using.
if by any chance your using a static dhcp address (thats what I tend to
use, but I configure my own dhcp server) you will always be assigned the
same address and therefore always get the same name and you could enter
that into /etc/hosts. another easy option would be to set a hostname on
the pc. just enter a name into /etc/hostname. That will set a perminent
hostname on the pc, then enter that into /etc/hosts


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: starting X hangs on network timeout (hosts file ignored)

2004-07-11 Thread Steven Satelle
 Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
 nameserver is not reachable then ping hostname works but
 host hostname returns
 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
 Nameserver not reachable
 litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again
 my /etc/hosts has the following lines:
 127.0.0.1   localhost
 127.0.0.1   litshi.luna.local   litshi
 (I know pointing hostname to 127.0.0.1 is not advised, but its a
 laptop and has several possible IPs).
 
 Any ideas?
 

right you are getting me puzzled now :-)
I suppose a bit of fishing is in order
what's in /etc/host.conf, it should say 
'order hosts,bind'
that file tells the sys how to resolve hosts in the network, you want it
to check the local hosts file before going to bind
also whats in /etc/hostname? It should, at least on my sys, have the
hostname of the sys, not the fqdn, just the hostid.If It doesnt use 
'hostname litshi' to set it, ignore the fqdn for now, just try with that.
If that doesnt work, have you looked at m$ windows recently ;-)
If even that doesnt work you could try (dont tell anyone I said this) a
reboot, after setting the hostname and entering it into /etc/hosts, the
files may just need to be re-read


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



problem starting x

2004-02-23 Thread Sandip P Deshmukh
hello all

firstly, i am not a member of the group. so, may i request you to send 
your replies to my e-mail address also?

i have a hp pc running win xp. it has an hp72 monitor.

from control panel - device managers following information is available.

monitor - hp d 8904

display adapter - rage 128 pro gl

i have made the system a double boot one by installing debian 3.0. the 
installation went on without any problem. however, now x refuses to start.

i have attached the error file as well as the config file. could someone 
help me in setting it right?

thanks in advance,

sandip
### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell prompt.)
#
# If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make changes
# before the ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION line above, and/or after the
# ### END DEBCONF SECTION line below.
#
# To change things within the debconf section, run the command:
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
# as root.  Also see How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated
# XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file? in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.

Section Files
FontPathunix/:7100# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
EndSection

Section Module
LoadGLcore
Loadbitmap
Loaddbe
Loadddc
Loaddri
Loadextmod
Loadfreetype
Loadglx
Loadint10
Loadpex5
Loadrecord
Loadspeedo
Loadtype1
Loadvbe
Loadxie
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Keyboard
Driver  keyboard
Option  CoreKeyboard
Option  XkbRules  xfree86
Option  XkbModel  pc104
Option  XkbLayout us
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Configured Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  CorePointer
Option  Device/dev/psaux
Option  Protocol  PS/2
Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  SendCoreEventstrue
Option  Device/dev/input/mice
Option  Protocol  ImPS/2
Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  Generic Video Card
Driver  i810
VideoRam8192
Option  UseFBDev  true
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier  Generic Monitor
HorizSync   30-54
VertRefresh 50-85
Option  DPMS
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Default Screen
Device  Generic Video Card
Monitor Generic Monitor
DefaultDepth24
SubSection Display
Depth   1
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   4
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   8
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   15
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   16
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   24
Modes   800x600 640x480
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Default Layout
Screen  Default Screen
InputDevice Generic Keyboard
InputDevice Configured Mouse
InputDevice Generic Mouse
EndSection

Section DRI
Mode0666
EndSection

### END DEBCONF SECTION

This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way.  Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted

Re: problem starting x

2004-02-23 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello

Sandip P Deshmukh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 firstly, i am not a member of the group. so, may i request you to send
 your replies to my e-mail address also?
 
 [XFree does not start with ATI rage 128 pr GL]

(II) I810: Driver for Intel i810 chipset: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815 
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
(EE) No devices detected.

You try to use the wrong driver. I think you need to change it to ATI,
you can check on xfree86.org under Support and Documentation. Run
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 and change the driver. Also try to set
Use Kernel Framebuffer to no if still won't work with the correct
driver.

best regards
Andreas Janssen

-- 
Andreas Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: problem starting x

2004-02-23 Thread Kent West
Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:

What you told us you have . . .

display adapter - rage 128 pro gl

What you've told X you have . . .

Section Device
	Identifier	Generic Video Card
	Driver		i810
	VideoRam	8192
	Option		UseFBDev		true
EndSection
 

What does lspci say you have?

You might try running dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 and tell X to 
use ati or r128 (I'm not sure which you'll want).

--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: problems starting x

2003-11-19 Thread navaja
Which XF86config file?  When dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 is
run, it writes to /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
You'll also notice that in /etc/X11/XF86Config there is only one
entry, regarding naming the input device, but in
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 there exists all the conf info that was
written by dpkg-reconfigure.
i dont appear to have /etc/X11/XF86Config, only a /etc/X11/XF86Config-4

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



another problem starting X with sarge-install

2003-11-19 Thread Tom Allison
I did an install using the sarge install cd last night.

Initially I was working on a very small installation because of my plans 
on setting up LVM.

I installed the minimum software necessary.
installed lvm10 using 'apt-get install lvm10'
set up lvm disks.
This went fine.
Then I ran TaskSel and selected only the X-Window-Server.

An interesting note to make here is that the installation and 
configuration was extremely fast and simple.  However, there was one 
oddity in the X-Window-Server set-up that I didn't expect.

Initially there was an autodetect made of my hardware, including my 
video card, all of which went fine.  It completely recognized my video 
card and the memory available on my Matrox G400.  At what I expect was 
the completion of the process, it started over again at the beginning 
asking me about my Geniric Video Card and how much memory it had.

I assume this is an installation bug of the sarge-install process.

Installed and configured all of those packages and tested X.
X worked for both root and regular users.
I was able to login using xdm and get to a twm (default) desktop as root 
and non-root users.

I then ran dselect, which selected a number of files by default.
I selected no other packages for installation except the package for 
msft fonts and continued with the install.

After this completed, I rebooted (new kernel) and was able to start up 
xdm (did not start automatically).

I could login using XDM to the WindowMaker desktop as root.
As a non-root user, my login failed and I was sent back to the XDM login 
screen.

Something was introduced of the MANY packages that has severely broken 
the X-Windows installation in a way that are a little difficult to debug 
because there are so many and I'm unable to find any specific errors 
that really have meaning.

In every case there was an error about not being able to find mga_hal 
driver, but since it worked initially with this error I don't think it 
really matters and the 'EE' statement in XFree86.0.log is superficial.

The only other 'EE' statement found was about a generic mouse 
configuration.  Again, removing that configuration option in 
XF86Config-4 did nothing to fix the problem.

At this point I will retry installation of Debian using only -stable 
packages to see if this can be set up correctly with those packages.  I 
used this exact hardware for 4 years with Debian on it and only recently 
removed the installation.  But now I'm unable to get back.  ugh!

I'm not sure where to go next.  But I've been running without a 
workstation for almost two weeks and kind of need something.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: another problem starting X with sarge-install

2003-11-19 Thread Kent West
Tom Allison wrote:
I did an install using the sarge install cd last night. I installed
the minimum software necessary. This went fine.
Then I ran TaskSel and selected only the X-Window-Server.

Initially there was an autodetect made of my hardware, including my 
video card, all of which went fine.  It completely recognized my
video card and the memory available on my Matrox G400.  At what I
expect was the completion of the process, it started over again at
the beginning asking me about my Geniric Video Card and how much
memory it had.
Do you perhaps have two video cards in the system? Or is the G400
dual-headed?
I assume this is an installation bug of the sarge-install process.

Installed and configured all of those packages and tested X. X worked
for both root and regular users.
I was able to login using xdm and get to a twm (default) desktop as
root and non-root users.
I then ran dselect, which selected a number of files by default. I
selected no other packages for installation except the package for 
msft fonts and continued with the install.

After this completed, I rebooted (new kernel) and was able to start
up xdm (did not start automatically).
Odd that it did not start automatically.


I could login using XDM to the WindowMaker desktop as root. As a
non-root user, my login failed and I was sent back to the XDM login 
screen.
Instead of using XDM, can you start X as a normal user with just the
startx command?
My first suspicion would be /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config having the line
allowed_users=root instead of allowed_users=console. If so, you can
change it manually or run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common and properly
answer the question about who can run X.

At this point I will retry installation of Debian using only -stable 
packages to see if this can be set up correctly with those packages.
Yikes! No need to reinstall. This is just an X issue, not an OS issue.

--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: another problem starting X with sarge-install

2003-11-19 Thread tallison
 Tom Allison wrote:
 Do you perhaps have two video cards in the system? Or is the G400
 dual-headed?


No...  Just one G400, single head.


 After this completed, I rebooted (new kernel) and was able to start up
 xdm (did not start automatically).

 Odd that it did not start automatically.


Yes... it is.

 I could login using XDM to the WindowMaker desktop as root. As a
 non-root user, my login failed and I was sent back to the XDM login
 screen.

 Instead of using XDM, can you start X as a normal user with just the
 startx command?


No I cannot run startx as normal user.

 My first suspicion would be /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config having the line
 allowed_users=root instead of allowed_users=console. If so, you can
 change it manually or run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common and properly
 answer the question about who can run X.


I was never asked, under Medium dialog, who could run this.
I will check it when I get in front of my computer.
If this does solve the matter, then I will consider filing a bugreport
against the installation.

Thanks for the suggestion.


 At this point I will retry installation of Debian using only -stable
 packages to see if this can be set up correctly with those packages.

 Yikes! No need to reinstall. This is just an X issue, not an OS issue.


Normally true.  But when I run into goofy stuff that I can't seem to
identify after the experience overall and time on this one...  It's faster
to reinstall sometimes.  This is a very new setup.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: problems starting x

2003-11-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:53:42PM +, navaja wrote:
 
 i noticed that dpkg-reconfigure didnt seem to update
 the XF86config file, even though i ran it several times, thats why this 
 error
 kept showing up.
 
 any ideas why it wasnt overwritten by the dpkg-reconfigure program?

Which package were you attempting to reconfigure? It might be that
dexconf is invoked for xserver-xfree86 and you were trying to
reconfigure x-window-system, for example.

-- 
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



virtual terminals become unusable when starting x on sid

2003-11-17 Thread navaja
hi,

i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals. 
then i start x, with startx (with login manager i get the same 
problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all 
i see is messed up lines going down my screen.

thanks



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: virtual terminals become unusable when starting x on sid

2003-11-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +, navaja wrote:
 hi,
 
 i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals. 
 then i start x, with startx (with login manager i get the same 
 problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all 
 i see is messed up lines going down my screen.

video driver? kernel module(s) where applicable? framebuffer for vts?

-- 
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: virtual terminals become unusable when starting x on sid

2003-11-17 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
navaja wrote:
hi,

i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals. 
then i start x, with startx (with login manager i get the same 
problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all 
i see is messed up lines going down my screen.

thanks



And what happens if you then go back to X (alt-ctrl-F7) and back again 
to the virtual terminal?

Hugo.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: virtual terminals become unusable when starting x on sid

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +, navaja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 hi,
 
 i boot up, and get command prompt login. can use all vitual termninals. 
 then i start x, with startx (with login manager i get the same 
 problem). x starts, then i try to go back to a virtual terminal, and all 
 i see is messed up lines going down my screen.

You need to provide more information.


I'd very strongly recommend you read the following excellent essay by
Simon Tatham, How to Report Bugs Effectively:

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html


The essay How To Ask Questions The Smart Way by Eric S. Raymond and
Rick Moen essay is is also good:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Please note that you are the person in the best position to know what
you're trying to do, what you've done, how the system's responded, and
generally how it's configured.  It's very helpful if you can post:

  - *Exact* commands or steps tried.
  - *Exact* error output or log messages.

Often, entering the error messages into a good search engine such as
AlltheWeb (http://www.alltheweb.com/) or Google (http://www.google.com/)
will help set you on the road to resolving your problems.

While others can offer suggestions, guidance, and experience, we cannot
see into either your mind or your machine's state.  This is very much a
case of you have to help us help you.

Good luck.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of Gestalt don't you understand?
The truth behind the H-1B IT indentured servant scam:
http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/itaa.real.html


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


  1   2   3   >