: what's the best html wordprocessor?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:55:42 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Paul Puri wrote:
StarWriter is the best I've seen so far for Linux. The memory needs
for this thing can be a bit too high for most users though. I can't
wait to check out what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:11:47 -0600, Stephen Pitts wrote:
vi works best. There are few things worse than editing WSIWYG produced html.
Then you've been using the wrong tools. Macromedia's Dreamweaver (yeah,
I know, Windows, but hear me out) is a
Yeah, I know about (and use dreamweaver and fireworks); My question is
more about linux based stuff. In addition, my focus simply about which
app works more like a standard wordprocessor.
Dreamweaver is a heavyduty web design tool. I mean basic text document
formatting (in html).
But
: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:55:42 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Paul Puri wrote:
StarWriter is the best I've seen so far for Linux. The memory needs
for this thing can be a bit too high for most users though. I
Steve Lamb wrote:
Then you've been using the wrong tools. Macromedia's Dreamweaver (yeah,
I know, Windows, but hear me out) is a WYSIWYG HTML editor that doesn't
You are right Dreamweaver, Coldfusion (the one I use for HTML and Perl) are
great
products. I play with the page in
Paul
I don't intend to debate the pros and cons of editors v/ wysiwyg.
There are pros and con's here wysiyg get one into more trouble than it can be
worth.
processor (i.e., wp8) but save in as clean an html format as possible.
I personal don't like WP HTML it put hard spaces into your
vi works best. There are few things worse than editing WSIWYG produced
html.
From: George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:55:42 -0800
Paul Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've used netscape composer, amaya, emacs (which is more of an html
code editor), I'm looking for wysiwyg (word processor type).
Now I think soffice's StarWriter is the best around. It acts just
like a word processor, it has footnotes, doublespace,
I've used netscape composer, amaya, emacs (which is more of an html
code editor), I'm looking for wysiwyg (word processor type).
Now I think soffice's StarWriter is the best around. It acts just
like a word processor, it has footnotes, doublespace, etc. It also
uses good html. I checked my
Original Message
On 3/9/99, 11:55:42 PM, George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
regarding Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?:
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Paul Puri wrote:
StarWriter is the best I've seen so far for Linux. The memory needs
for this thing can be a bit too high for most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:55:56 GMT, Paul Puri wrote:
In all honesty, on all platforms, Macromedia's DreamWeaver is the best
HTML WYSIWYG editor I've seen, hands down. Of course, it is Windows and
~$300 so I don't think that is exactly what you
11 matches
Mail list logo
