Re: Impossible to give "write" permission on a sub folder

Hello David, really thank you for your reply. I'll try to explain my needs and all info that I can have in order to answer your questions the best way I can: First I will explain my goal: I have always been a Windows user, but for a while I've been thinking in changing to Linux. Last month I

le changement de stable a oldstable bloque les mises a jour automatiques

Salut. J'ai installé debian 10 a plusieurs personnes. Dans le lot il y en a évidamment plusieurs qui sont totalement incapables de se servir de la ligne de commande. J'ai configuré unattended-upgrades pour qu'il fasse les mises a jour de sécurité automatiquement tous les jours, sans rien

Re: Apt pinning.

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, The Wanderer wrote: Is there a reason you're using '+' as your separator? Yes - because, for example, squid I'm building with extra settings so I want my version to be higher than the corresponding buster/bullseye version. There is no backporting involved. I think this

Re: Thunderbird en firefox-esr

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:50:10 +0100 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > De belangrijkste wijziging in Thunderbird is voor mij het herschreven > adresboek. Het ondersteund nu carddav zonder plugin. En caldav? -- richard lucassen http://contact.xaq.nl/

Re: le changement de stable a oldstable bloque les mises a jour automatiques

Bonsoir, apt-get update --allow-releaseinfo-change Benoit message d'origine- De: hamster [hams...@suna.fdn.fr] Pour: debian-user-french [debian-user-french@lists.debian.org] Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:11:37 +0100 -

Re: Thunderbird en firefox-esr

Op 29-11-2021 om 21:12 schreef Richard Lucassen: On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:50:10 +0100 Paul van der Vlis wrote: De belangrijkste wijziging in Thunderbird is voor mij het herschreven adresboek. Het ondersteund nu carddav zonder plugin. En caldav? Caldav ondersteund Thunderbird al langer.

Re: Off Topic: Firefox and Duckduckgo Failure

Please try new profile. firefox-esr -P is the command to run. Usually everything works on clean, new profile. When you confirm that, you can concentrate to restore your old profile to working order. On 29/11/2021 09:43, Terence wrote: Thank you, all. I'm not running NoScript but thank you for

Re: Off Topic: Firefox and Duckduckgo Failure

Thank you, all. I'm not running NoScript but thank you for the suggestion. It does seem strange as I'v e used it for years with no problem. On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 19:31, Hans wrote: > Am Sonntag, 28. November 2021, 20:22:25 CET schrieb > harrywea...@tutanota.com: > > Running debian/stable,

Re: Off Topic: Firefox and Duckduckgo Failure

Many thanks - now it's back to normal! (whatever that is in these Covid days!) On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 12:17, piorunz wrote: > On 29/11/2021 12:02, Terence wrote: > > Many thanks, Piotr, that's done it. Since the early 1990s I have always > > been impressed by the support given on the Debian

Re: Off Topic: Firefox and Duckduckgo Failure

Many thanks, Piotr, that's done it. Since the early 1990s I have always been impressed by the support given on the Debian lists - wonderful! On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 11:03, piorunz wrote: > Please try new profile. > > firefox-esr -P > > is the command to run. Usually everything works on clean,

Re: Off Topic: Firefox and Duckduckgo Failure

On 29/11/2021 12:02, Terence wrote: Many thanks, Piotr, that's done it. Since the early 1990s I have always been impressed by the support given on the Debian lists - wonderful! You are most welcome! Now as you have working firefox, you can import everything from old profile if you are using

Re: Problème avec umask dans fstab sur un sous-dossier

On 2021-11-28 3:25 p.m., lists.deb...@netc.eu wrote: > Merci du retour Didier,  > > Je vais essayer de voir tout ça pendant la semaine.  > > Entre-temps ce que je n'arrive pas trop à comprendre est-ce pourquoi 2 > dossiers similaires (User1 et User2) finissent par avoir des permissions >

Re: Apt pinning.

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, David Wright wrote: I envisaged that what you wanted was: Debian ver. Task Your ver.Installed (highest) ver. 1.0 1.0 1.0 ? 1.0 1.0 patch 1.0 1.0 ? 5:1.0

Re: Apt pinning.

On 2021-11-29 at 11:08, Tim Woodall wrote: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, David Wright wrote: > >> I envisaged that what you wanted was: >> >> Debian ver. Task Your ver.Installed (highest) ver. >> 1.0 1.0 >> 1.0 ? 1.0 >> 1.0

Re: Don't try this at home kids

Hi, On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:50 PM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > > Hello, > > Bob Bernstein wrote on 29/11/2021 at 23:25:52+0100: > > > How do I tell sudo not to ask me for my password? > > > > It's me. I'm on my computer. I already logged in with my password. No > > one else is logged on. >

Bug report help

I am having audio problems in Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid running on a Raspberry Pi 4. Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-1-arm64 I don't know that it is an issue with a package unless it is a firmware package. Some of the audio devices cause applications to freeze or will play at a slower than normal

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On 30/11/21 6:25 am, Bob Bernstein wrote: How do I tell sudo not to ask me for my password? It's me. I'm on my computer. I already logged in with my password. No one else is logged on. I know all you purists out there are rending your garments if not your flesh. but c'mon sudo! Can't a

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On 29/11/2021 22:41, Jeremy Ardley wrote: > > On 30/11/21 6:25 am, Bob Bernstein wrote: >> How do I tell sudo not to ask me for my password? >> >> It's me. I'm on my computer. I already logged in with my password. No >> one else is logged on. >> >> I know all you purists out there are rending

Re: Don't try this at home kids

Hello, Bob Bernstein wrote on 29/11/2021 at 23:25:52+0100: > How do I tell sudo not to ask me for my password? > > It's me. I'm on my computer. I already logged in with my password. No > one else is logged on. > > I know all you purists out there are rending your garments if not your > flesh.

Re: Don't try this at home kids

Jeremy Ardley wrote: > P.P.S The conventional instruction is to use visudo to do the > edits. Which means using Vi, which is another anachronism that should > be humanely put down. Visudo will use whatever editor you configure it to use. Read the visudo man page. -- John Hasler

Re: Don't try this at home kids

David Wright writes: > On Mon 29 Nov 2021 at 17:47:24 (-0500), Jude DaShiell wrote: >> sudo doesn't ask me for my password and I didn't even touch /etc/sudoers >> to do it. A file placed in /etc/sudoers.d with permissions of 0440 having >> any name you choose and contents like: >> user

Don't try this at home kids

How do I tell sudo not to ask me for my password? It's me. I'm on my computer. I already logged in with my password. No one else is logged on. I know all you purists out there are rending your garments if not your flesh. but c'mon sudo! Can't a brother catch a break around here? Thank

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On 30/11/21 7:14 am, James H. H. Lampert wrote: I have access to a number of Amazon Linux virtual boxes, that don't like password authentication in general (preferring certificate authentication . . . which authenticates the BOX that is ssh-ing in, but not the WARM BODY between the chair

Re: Thunderbird en firefox-esr

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 22:05:32 +0100 Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >> De belangrijkste wijziging in Thunderbird is voor mij het > >> herschreven adresboek. Het ondersteund nu carddav zonder plugin. > > > > En caldav? > > Caldav ondersteund Thunderbird al langer. Eerst met een plugin > genaamd

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, James H. H. Lampert wrote: And the only reason ROOT access is more dangerous than, say, QSECOFR access on OS/400 (or whatever IBM is calling it this week) is because there's nothing stopping a Linux ROOT from doing things *nobody* should be allowed to do without putting

Re: Don't try this at home kids

sudo doesn't ask me for my password and I didn't even touch /etc/sudoers to do it. A file placed in /etc/sudoers.d with permissions of 0440 having any name you choose and contents like: user ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL in it with user being the account name will do it. On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Jeremy

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On 11/29/21 2:41 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote: P.S. I am totally unconvinced about the arguments for using sudo rather than running as root. You can do exactly the same damage with sudo as being root user. P.P.S The conventional instruction is to use visudo to do the edits. Which means using Vi,

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On 11/29/21 17:19, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 5:14 PM James H. H. Lampert > wrote: > >  And the only > reason ROOT access is more dangerous than, say, QSECOFR access on OS/400 > (or whatever IBM is calling it this week) is

Re: Apt pinning.

On Mon 29 Nov 2021 at 17:33:35 (+), Tim Woodall wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, The Wanderer wrote: > > > > Is there a reason you're using '+' as your separator? > > > Yes - because, for example, squid I'm building with extra settings so I > want my version to be higher than the corresponding

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On Mon 29 Nov 2021 at 17:47:24 (-0500), Jude DaShiell wrote: > sudo doesn't ask me for my password and I didn't even touch /etc/sudoers > to do it. A file placed in /etc/sudoers.d with permissions of 0440 having > any name you choose and contents like: > user ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL > in it with

Re: Impossible to give "write" permission on a sub folder

On Mon 29 Nov 2021 at 23:26:53 (+0100), lists.deb...@netc.eu wrote: > [ … ] I have always been a Windows user, but for a while I've been thinking > in changing to Linux. Last month I decided to do the change, but as we are 2 > people at home (me and my wife), I've decided to do a dual boot while

Re: where to find wifi card info in linux-doc

On Mon 29 Nov 2021 at 01:50:24 (-0500), lou wrote: > > Thank David, you have better memory than i > > my memory is poor because of insomnia Extracted from the Guix Reference Manual: § 3.2 Hardware Considerations GNU Guix focuses on respecting the user’s computing freedom. It builds around the

Re: Don't try this at home kids

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 5:14 PM James H. H. Lampert wrote: > And the only > reason ROOT access is more dangerous than, say, QSECOFR access on OS/400 > (or whatever IBM is calling it this week) is because there's nothing > stopping a Linux ROOT from doing things *nobody* should be allowed to

Non-working CPU cores showing up

Folks: Here's a curious thing. I have a 10th gen Intel i3 CPU with four cores. When I look at /proc/cpuinfo, it actually shows eight cores. There's a line in the output of each core which is cpu cores : 4 But there are outputs for each of eight cores, numbered 0 through 7. Is it

Re: Non-working CPU cores showing up

On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 02:30 -0500, Paul M. Foster wrote: > Folks: > > Here's a curious thing. I have a 10th gen Intel i3 CPU with four cores. > When I look at /proc/cpuinfo, it actually shows eight cores. There's a > line in the output of each core which is > > cpu cores : 4 > > But

Re: Non-working CPU cores showing up

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, 2:30 AM Paul M. Foster wrote: > Folks: > > Here's a curious thing. I have a 10th gen Intel i3 CPU with four cores. > When I look at /proc/cpuinfo, it actually shows eight cores. There's a > line in the output of each core which is > > cpu cores : 4 > > But there are