Am 2006-09-05 01:04:38, schrieb s. keeling:
mutt has no trouble reading gzipped mboxes. :-)
I am using courier-imap AND mutt
It would be the hell, ich you have 200.000 messages from debian-user
or over 350.000 messages from linux-kernel in a MAILBOX.
Such things can only handled by Maildir
Am 2006-09-05 09:37:57, schrieb Ismael Valladolid Torres:
Ron Johnson escribe:
Good to know. For *big* .mbox.gz files, though, I'd still wonder
about it's practicality.
For me, mutt is as good reading big .mboz.gz files as reading big mbox
files. Don't know what are you considering *big*
Hello Dimitry,
Am 2006-09-01 15:09:07, schrieb Dmitri Minaev:
Dear Michelle,
Still, there are some unpleasant problems I couldn't solve. The worst
one was that Mutt downloads the whole message. That is, it does not
support selective retrieval of MIME parts, AFAIU.
I do not know one single
Am 2006-09-04 11:00:45, schrieb Ron Johnson:
I think I'd roll those *old* messages into gzipped mbox files and
install grepmail if I really needed to search them.
Generaly I have only the last 12 Month im my mailfolders and then I
move it into my PostgreSQL... Only one Table for better to
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still, there are some unpleasant problems I couldn't solve. The worst
one was that Mutt downloads the whole message. That is, it does not
support selective retrieval of MIME parts, AFAIU.
I do not know one single IMAP client which can do this...
On 9/6/06, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, there are some unpleasant problems I couldn't solve. The worst
one was that Mutt downloads the whole message. That is, it does not
support selective retrieval of MIME parts, AFAIU.
I do not know one single IMAP client which can do
Ron Johnson escribe:
Good to know. For *big* .mbox.gz files, though, I'd still wonder
about it's practicality.
For me, mutt is as good reading big .mboz.gz files as reading big mbox
files. Don't know what are you considering *big* of course... :)
Cordially, Ismael
--
Ismael Valladolid Torres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
Ron Johnson escribe:
Good to know. For *big* .mbox.gz files, though, I'd still wonder
about it's practicality.
For me, mutt is as good reading big .mboz.gz files as reading big mbox
files. Don't know what are
Am 2006-08-31 01:16:02, schrieb Micha Feigin:
I don't know how you do it.
AFAIK unless something changed, it has no knowledge of RTL text and thus it
renders it LTR and counts on the terminal to do all the rest. I can see the
hebrew text but I need to read it in the wrong direction.
Try:
Am 2006-08-30 18:03:45, schrieb Steve Lamb:
What about it? Oh, I see, too complicated for mutt authors to make a
simple SMTP interface so they can do away with the command line altogether.
^
Simpel with TLS1, SSL, asmtp, ...?
Multiple Server?
Exactly. They have
Am 2006-08-31 08:56:17, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:20:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Besides, how does one manage a 2*10^6 email folder? My 21 monitor
running at 1280x1024 can only display 45 email subjects. That would
be *44,445* screens of emails. Totally
Am 2006-08-31 06:59:33, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
I've yet to fathom a need for a 2 million message mailbox. Not to
mention
the support structure behind it since 2 million would break or strain both
maildir and mbox.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-31 08:56:17, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:20:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Besides, how does one manage a 2*10^6 email folder? My 21 monitor
running at 1280x1024 can only display 45
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-31 08:56:17, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:20:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Besides, how does one manage a 2*10^6 email folder? My 21 monitor
In sumary I have 1592 folders and subfolders...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-31 08:56:17, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:20:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Besides, how does one manage a 2*10^6 email folder? My 21
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:28:24AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
Right now, on my system, t-bird is using 76MB RES 200MB VIRT
memory. :(
And I thought that sylpheed-claws-gtk2 is using too much at 17MB
resources and 38MB virtual. Reminds me why I stopped using T-bird
and a bunch of others.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:15:25PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
You read more then One message at a time?
Yes. Person A says Person B said something important while talking
to Person C. So you have Message A open so you can find what is
referenced in Message B. Hell,
Derek Martin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:28:24AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
Right now, on my system, t-bird is using 76MB RES 200MB VIRT
memory. :(
And I thought that sylpheed-claws-gtk2 is using too much at 17MB
resources and 38MB virtual. Reminds me why I stopped using
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:16:02AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
Also, how do you set the encoding of the message, as otherwise it gets mangled
along the way.
Normally this is handled automatically by your terminal ($LANG)
settings. If your environment is not configured properly you may have
a
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I send E-mails via smtp... = set sendmail=sendmail -oi
No, that is via command line. If sendmail were not there how would
you get mail out?
But it IS there... so what's the problem? A simple minimal
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 07:44:00AM +0100, Wulfy wrote:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
18782 foo 15 0 3360 3356 1704 S 0.0 2.6 0:04 0 mutt
This is one huge advantage of Mutt. The memory footprint is
unbelievably small,
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:00:18 -0400
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I send E-mails via smtp... = set sendmail=sendmail -oi
No, that is via command line. If sendmail were not there how would
you
On 8/31/06, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2006-08-29 16:13:05, schrieb Dmitri Minaev:
If you pardon my jumping in, gentlemen, I would say that Mutt does not
work with IMAP.
False
Dear Michelle,
Sorry, I was wrong. Two days ago I configured Mutt to work with my
IMAP server
On 8/30/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. IMAP has (afaik) no support for such filtering
Strictly speaking, no. Still, there is RFC 3028 which allows mail
clients to control mail filtering remotely.
--
With best regards,
Dmitri Minaev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
And Mutt's address book really depressed me :/
If this helps: back in the days when I used mutt as my main MUA
(before moving to Thunderbird on my GUI desktops :-p) I used the
'abook' package with mutt for all of my address book needs.
Abook is easily configured to be
Derek Martin wrote:
But it IS there... so what's the problem?
The presumption that it is.
A simple minimal ESMTP
engine might be more convenient -- and numerous solutions for that are
available for mutt -- but being able to choose to use a full-fledged
MTA like sendmail offers the user
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:44:00 +0100
Wulfy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Martin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:28:24AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
Right now, on my system, t-bird is using 76MB RES 200MB VIRT
memory. :(
And I thought that sylpheed-claws-gtk2 is using too
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
I've yet to fathom a need for a 2 million message mailbox. Not to mention
the support structure behind it since 2 million would break or strain both
maildir and mbox.
Perhaps reiserfs?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
I've yet to fathom a need for a 2 million message mailbox. Not to
mention
the support structure behind it since 2 million would break or strain both
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:20:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:51:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
I've yet to fathom a need for a 2 million message mailbox. Not to
mention
the support
Am 2006-08-29 16:13:05, schrieb Dmitri Minaev:
If you pardon my jumping in, gentlemen, I would say that Mutt does not
work with IMAP.
False
Mutt can read mail stored in IMAP folders, but working with IMAP takes
more than that. Folder manipulation (create/share/delete), moving
Mutt create
Michelle Konzack wrote:
You read more then One message at a time?
Yes. Person A says Person B said something important while talking
to Person C. So you have Message A open so you can find what is referenced in
Message B. Hell, I do it all the time just on debian-user. Surely you with
Derek Martin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:49:32PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
No... the rules are static, and there are exactly two of them. The
user can only change the limits of the rules, not the rules
themselves.
Changing means they are flexible. Inflexible would be no changes.
It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified
POP.
On 8/28/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I use mutt with imap and I don't have problems wiht it. What IMAP
features do you miss?
On 29.08.06 16:13, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
If you pardon my
On 8/29/06, Dmitri Minaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a window shot of how I configured Edit-Account Settings:
That's exactly what I used to do :( I'll try and switch to 'Other',
as Steve has advised. Hope, that'll help.
Nope, didn't help... Two messages were successfully copied to
Micha Feigin wrote:
Looks nice, not too heavy, although it also doesn't support hebrew (can't
even see the text not to mention right to left), and it always segfaults
on exit.
Aside from top-posting (please, don't), I am not sure what it is in your
message -- kmail, sylpheed, or mulberry? And
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Thanks, Derek, for a refreshing and informative post in this mostly
dreary and argumentative thread.
Being a heavy user of XEmacs for composition of documents, I have been
handling mail with Gnus (which runs under XEmacs), and enjoy the ability
to
Am 2006-08-25 03:40:08, schrieb s. keeling:
I'm a mutt user myself, but balsa's not bad if you insist on a GUI
MUA. I'm not very knowledgable about what it really can do (verify
gpg, thread, etc), but it was relatively usable when I found myself
forced to use it. I agree with your other
Am 2006-08-25 10:35:16, schrieb Matej Cepl:
I have used mutt for couple of years and found it lacking so I switched to
kmail, which is much powerful for my purposes. Aside from being troll and
self-promoting ass, what do you know about these other MUAs that you can
talk about them so
Am 2006-08-26 11:30:33, schrieb Wulfy:
It does lack a decent GUI... runs and hides
Oh yes, running BALSA, KMAIL and such in a ssh terminal and a 486dx40/12MB
=8O
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux
Am 2006-08-26 03:55:55, schrieb Steve Lamb:
Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
:-P
It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
restricted to the command line to get the job done.
I send E-mails via smtp... = set sendmail=sendmail -oi
Am 2006-08-26 13:25:46, schrieb Matej Cepl:
mutt was never intended to be MUA -- it's like a kit with which you can
???
built your own MUA. You have to add SMTP server, filtering, IMAP
SMTP: sendmail, exim, postfic, courier-mta, ssmtp, msmtp
filtering: procmail, maildrop
Am 2006-08-27 22:31:18, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
But mutt-ng, which includes the folder pane patch lets you see visually
which folders have new mail and how much. If you set your poll interval
suitably low, like 60 seconds, then it works quite nicely, is similar
to the t-bird layout and
Am 2006-08-27 19:15:07, schrieb Ron Johnson:
If, for example, Tbird is your standard MUA, using it's mbox files,
is there a way to tell Mutt to use .mozilla/firefox/$WHATEVER/ and
for it to know what messages are read/unread, etc?
Tbird/Mozilla is using a proprietary format (the mbox wile
Am 2006-08-26 17:14:27, schrieb Steve Lamb:
Exactly. I would love to but it can't.
set sendmail=sendmail -oi
Yet filtering belongs in the client, especially if that client has
multiple accounts since one wouldn't want the same filters to apply to all
accounts.
in procmail:
:0
Am 2006-08-28 12:23:19, schrieb Micha Feigin:
It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
Hmmm, I can have farsi and arabic so it support jewish too.
(I have some friends in IL which use mutt)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan
Am 2006-08-28 06:52:46, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez:
Not sure about Hebrew and other non-Latin-character languages, but the
folder column is available in mutt-ng. Unfortunately there are many
nifty patches out there which have necessitated a fork because of the
upstream developers'
Am 2006-08-28 00:15:54, schrieb Steve Lamb:
Wanna know the sad part. Give most people the piece-together-email system
that some die-hards around here insist is the
ONE-AND-TRUE-WAY-EMAIL-*MUST-BE-USED(C) and X, OOo, KDE/Gnome and Cups, both
fresh off the install, I'd bet cold hard cash
Am 2006-08-28 07:30:12, schrieb Raquel:
I don't know what your requirements are, but I've used Sylpheed for
years ... since I switched to Linux 7-1/2 years ago.
But it does not work with UTF-8 since it is compiled against GTK1.2
I have allready tried it to use GTK+2.0 but failed.
The
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-25 03:40:08, schrieb s. keeling:
I'm a mutt user myself, but balsa's not bad if you insist on a GUI
MUA. I'm not very knowledgable about what it really can do (verify
gpg, thread, etc), but it was relatively usable when I found myself
forced to use it.
On (30/08/06 08:27), Marc Shapiro wrote:
Ah! Another straight fvwm user. I have been devising plans to
completely rid myself of the last vestiges of gnome and KDE (neither of
which I ever used) that remain on my system. I finally decided that the
best way was to do a clean install of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:26:05 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2006-08-28 07:30:12, schrieb Raquel:
I don't know what your requirements are, but I've used Sylpheed for
years ... since I switched to Linux 7-1/2 years ago.
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2006-08-28 07:30:12, schrieb Raquel:
I don't know what your requirements are, but I've used Sylpheed for
years ... since I switched to Linux 7-1/2 years ago.
But it does not work with UTF-8 since it is compiled against GTK1.2
I have allready
Hi Micha,
Am 2006-08-28 22:17:17, schrieb Micha Feigin:
I use gtk2 since that adds hebrew support which I can't do without.
Nice, if it support hebrew, it support farsi and arabic too...
But what about IMAP(S)?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Am 2006-08-28 11:11:22, schrieb Marc Wilson:
Mutt can't directly show you new mail in an IMAP store. True enough. It
has no trouble at all, however, with identifying new mail in a local
mbox/maildir/what_have_you store.
Whenever *I* go back to my folder list, new is clearly marked.
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (30/08/06 08:27), Marc Shapiro wrote:
Ah! Another straight fvwm user. I have been devising plans to
completely rid myself of the last vestiges of gnome and KDE (neither of
which I ever used) that remain on my system. I finally decided that the
best way was to do
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-26 11:30:33, schrieb Wulfy:
It does lack a decent GUI... runs and hides
Oh yes, running BALSA, KMAIL and such in a ssh terminal and a 486dx40/12MB
=8O
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
I don't use ssh. My box is a K7, not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-28 00:15:54, schrieb Steve Lamb:
[snip]
This ist the problem of a High-Power MTA like courier-mta, exim
or postfix which can handel 1000 messages per minute.
My courier-mta in Paris is transfering each day over
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:06:03AM EDT, Russell L. Harris wrote:
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...
Thanks, Derek, for a refreshing and informative post in this mostly
dreary and argumentative thread.
I'll second that.
Being a heavy user of XEmacs for composition of documents, I
I don't know how you do it.
AFAIK unless something changed, it has no knowledge of RTL text and thus it
renders it LTR and counts on the terminal to do all the rest. I can see the
hebrew text but I need to read it in the wrong direction.
As for composing, there is no half decent editor that can
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:26:05 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2006-08-28 07:30:12, schrieb Raquel:
I don't know what your requirements are, but I've used Sylpheed for
years ... since I switched to Linux 7-1/2 years ago.
But it does not work with UTF-8 since it is
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:24:40 -0400
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
Looks nice, not too heavy, although it also doesn't support hebrew (can't
even see the text not to mention right to left), and it always segfaults
on exit.
Aside from top-posting (please, don't),
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:34:45 +0200
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Micha,
Am 2006-08-28 22:17:17, schrieb Micha Feigin:
I use gtk2 since that adds hebrew support which I can't do without.
Nice, if it support hebrew, it support farsi and arabic too...
But what about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:24:40 -0400 Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
[snip]
mail? I don't see what a simple mail program requires a memory
footprint of 80MB and a bunch of daemons running in the
Right
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:51:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:24:40 -0400 Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
[snip]
mail? I don't see what a simple mail program
Michelle Konzack wrote:
I send E-mails via smtp... = set sendmail=sendmail -oi
No, that is via command line. If sendmail were not there how would you
get mail out? Or, more importantly, which is easier to set up, sendmail
(exim, postfix, qmail) or a single configuration option which
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-08-26 17:14:27, schrieb Steve Lamb:
Exactly. I would love to but it can't.
set sendmail=sendmail -oi
As mentioned before this is not the same and you know it.
Yet filtering belongs in the client, especially if that client has
multiple
On 08/28/2006 10:09 PM, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Oddly enough I open up Thunderbird which connects to my IMAP store and it
knows how much new mail is in each folder without me going into them.
Of course this process works *so* well in
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
1.5.0.5 thanks to the TB package maintainers.
Oh my, Mathias, thank you for mentioning this. 10 seconds later and one
less wart on Thunderbird.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
1.5.0.5 thanks to the TB package maintainers.
Oh my, Mathias, thank you for mentioning this. 10 seconds later and one
less wart
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
Whenever *I* go back to my folder list, new is clearly marked.
Just wait, it won't.
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine
Hello Marc.
[…] the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
the TB package maintainers.
And what arcana are necessary to make it *work*, other than installing
Enigmail and Reply-To-List? All of Debian's mailing lists include
List-Post:, but none of them are apparently
CJ van den Berg wrote:
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox files
contain new mail.
Uh, since mutt's main display never updated when I was on that screen the
display never updated when new
On 8/28/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified POP.
I know, I use mutt with imap and I don't have problems wiht it. What IMAP
features do you miss?
If you pardon my jumping in, gentlemen, I would say that Mutt
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP folder (recent
messages at mozillazine forums show that the problem still
persists...)
On 8/29/06, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP folder (recent
messages at mozillazine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
CJ van den Berg wrote:
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox files
contain new mail.
Uh, since mutt's main display never
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
If I don't trust my own eyes, what else do I have to believe? :) I
experienced this problem and this experience was the reason to drop
(reluctantly, though) Firefox. And I see
(http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2451257) that other
people have this problem,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
On 8/28/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too
annoyed by its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP
folder (recent messages at
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
CJ van den Berg wrote:
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
On 8/29/06, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
its' inability to
I did not know Mulberry was still around. I thought it was no longer under
development. I was a Sylpheed Claws user until I began using IMAP, then it
no longer worked for me, but fortunately kmail has developed into a nice
mailer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CJ van den Berg wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
CJ van den Berg wrote:
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
On 8/29/06, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? I've been doing that ever since I started using Tbird.
Here's a window shot of how I configured Edit-Account Settings:
That's exactly what I used to do :( I'll try and switch to 'Other',
as Steve has advised. Hope, that'll help.
--
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:10:34AM +0200 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hello Marc.
1) when will thunderbird finally gain reply to list? I could have sworn
I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
Hello Stephen.
But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
the TB package maintainers.
It is ? I have that version and I don't see any button to 'reply to
list'. What am I missing ?
The extension[0].
Regards, Mathias
[0]
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:36:55PM +0200 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hello Stephen.
But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
the TB package maintainers.
It is ? I have that version and I don't see any button to 'reply to
list'. What am I missing ?
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
For all you thunderbird users...
My own TB pet-peeve -- when will TB be able to filter with RegExps? (at
least plugin would help)
Matěj
--
GPG
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:36:55PM +0200 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala
wrote:
Hello Stephen.
But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
the TB package maintainers.
It is ? I have that version and I don't see any button
Marc Wilson wrote:
I'm still trying to figure this one out. You think filtering belongs on
the client, yet you read mail from multiple locations and use IMAP. How
do you reconcile the two? Use offlineimap everywhere?
Take a look at imapfilter.
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
For all you thunderbird users...
My own TB pet-peeve -- when will TB be able to
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:25:17PM +0300 or thereabouts, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:36:55PM +0200 or thereabouts, Mathias Brodala
wrote:
Hello Stephen.
But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
the TB
Ron Johnson wrote:
maildrop is your friend!! (procmail is your enemy.)
But of course it presumes an MTA (and usually fetchmail).
No, of course, when I need MUT with regexps I have my kmail, but sometimes
it could be handy (when Windows happen for example).
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6
Stephen wrote:
It is ? I have that version and I don't see any button to 'reply to
list'. What am I missing ?
Well, the only thing I could ever surmise from the bugzilla discussion
about the feature is that they could never decide on exactly how to do it. A
button on its own? A drop down
Steve Lamb wrote:
Other than those pesky privacy issues.
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I don't want Google, or
anyone else for that matter, storing my documents. I'll keep them
on my
own disk, Thank you, very much.
Well at this rate if you live in the US, you won't have to worry
about privacy
Looks nice, not too heavy, although it also doesn't support hebrew (can't even
see the text not to mention right to left), and it always segfaults on exit.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:18:38 +
Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not know Mulberry was still around. I thought it was no longer
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Steve Lamb wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:24:00 -0700
From: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Email programs that work.
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:24:13 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Dmitri Minaev
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Steve Lamb wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:53:31 -0700
From: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Email programs that work.
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:53:38 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Dmitri Minaev
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:27:21 +0500
From: Dmitri Minaev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Email programs that work.
Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:27:25 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 8/29/06
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:13:05PM +0500, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
Actually, considering the number of tools Mutt uses for work, I
suspect that it 'sucks less' just because it does less. You retrieve
mail with fetchmail or isync, filter it with procmail, write new
messages with vim and send them
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
