Re: seg fault on many applets

[Bhasker C V]

Hurray !
Thanks to all
Just today morning got the updates on stretch ! things are back to
normal now. What a relief !
Thanks all again


On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Frank McCormick  wrote:
> On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>> Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
>> anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
>> My sources.list is
>> deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
>> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
>> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main
>>
>> Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
>> success and I am missing something.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Hi all,

 About mate again.
 As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
 Sept the packages must get fixed.
 I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
 file/folder manager.
 and many other applets too are crashing.
 Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick

  wrote:
>
>
> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Frank
>> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
>> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
>> some other disastrous consequence.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:




 Hi,
  I am on
 $ lsb_release -a
 No LSB modules are available.
 Distributor ID:Debian
 Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
 Release:testing
 Codename:stretch

 Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


 [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
 f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
 libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
 [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb
 sp
 ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


 Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
 causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file
 manager.

>>>
>>>
>>>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
>>> It
>>> was
>>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
>>> everything
>>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it
>>> may
>>> take
>>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
>>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
>>> than it's worth.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>
>

>>>
>>> I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the
>>> packages
>>> have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
>>> day or two.
>>>
>
>
>The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know how
> long it will be until they get into Stretch.
>
>
>
>

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Frank McCormick]

On 08/10/16 12:49 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi all
Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
My sources.list is
deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main

Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
success and I am missing something.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick  wrote:

On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick

 wrote:


On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:



Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:



On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:




Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
It
was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.






   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)






I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages
have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
day or two.




   The updated packages are in Sid which I am now running. I don't know 
how long it will be until they get into Stretch.

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Bhasker C V]

Hi all
Sorry to get back to you all on this again. Its now nearly 4 days. Has
anybody had success in getting the packages of mate updated ?
My sources.list is
deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch main
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ stretch-backports main

Hopefully I have got things right. I am wondering if others had
success and I am missing something.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Frank McCormick  wrote:
> On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> About mate again.
>> As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
>> Sept the packages must get fixed.
>> I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
>> file/folder manager.
>> and many other applets too are crashing.
>> Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
>>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Thank you Frank
 I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
 will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
 some other disastrous consequence.


 On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
  wrote:
>
>
> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I am on
>> $ lsb_release -a
>> No LSB modules are available.
>> Distributor ID:Debian
>> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
>> Release:testing
>> Codename:stretch
>>
>> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)
>>
>>
>> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
>> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
>> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
>> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
>> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]
>>
>>
>> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
>> causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.
>>
>
>
>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment.
> It
> was
> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
> everything
> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
> take
> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
> than it's worth.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
>>> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the packages
> have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a
> day or two.
>
>
>
>

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Frank McCormick]

On 04/10/16 11:15 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:

On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:


On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:



Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It
was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.






   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)






I received mail today from the Mate maintainer indicating the 
packages have been updated to 1.16. They should pop up in updates in a

day or two.

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Bhasker C V]

Hi all,

About mate again.
As per this https://sunweavers.net/blog/node/45 is says that ebnd of
Sept the packages must get fixed.
I however still find it difficult to run caja which is primary
file/folder manager.
and many other applets too are crashing.
Is there any schedule update which I can look forward to ?


On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:
> On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Frank
>> I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
>> will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
>> some other disastrous consequence.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:


 Hi,
  I am on
 $ lsb_release -a
 No LSB modules are available.
 Distributor ID:Debian
 Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
 Release:testing
 Codename:stretch

 Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


 [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
 f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
 libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
 [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
 ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


 Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
 causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.

>>>
>>>
>>>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It
>>> was
>>> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of
>>> everything
>>> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may
>>> take
>>> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
>>> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
>>> than it's worth.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be
> updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)
>
>

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Frank McCormick]

On 23/09/16 07:30 AM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:

On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:


Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was
caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything
are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take
a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
than it's worth.









   I'm told (take it for what's it worth) that the Mate desktop will be 
updated to 1.16 by the end of the month. I too are waiting anxiously :)

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Bhasker C V]

Thank you Frank
I am doing a daily update on my debian system in a hope some day it
will pickup the fix and also under a fear that every update may bring
some other disastrous consequence.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Frank McCormick
 wrote:
> On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I am on
>> $ lsb_release -a
>> No LSB modules are available.
>> Distributor ID:Debian
>> Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
>> Release:testing
>> Codename:stretch
>>
>> Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)
>>
>>
>> [ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
>> f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
>> libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
>> [ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
>> ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]
>>
>>
>> Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
>> causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.
>>
>
>
>   The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. It was
> caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of everything
> are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon but it may take
> a little while before they make it into Debian. A temporary fix is to
> downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble
> than it's worth.
>
>
>
>

Re: seg fault on many applets

[Frank McCormick]

On 20/09/16 09:32 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:

Hi,
 I am on
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch)
Release:testing
Codename:stretch

Many of my applets (mate) are doing an sigsevg after an update)


[ 1147.639760] mate-power-mana[5487]: segfault at ff6e3ef8 ip
f63afadb sp ff6e3ee0 error 6 in
libc-2.23.so[f637b000+1ad000]
[ 1171.935436] caja[3057]: segfault at ff1c6fa8 ip f60eaadb sp
ff1c6f90 error 6 in libc-2.23.so[f60b6000+1ad000]


Is there anything to be setup locally or anything missing which is
causing this SIGSEGV ?  I am unable to even use the caja file manager.




  The mate desktop on Stretch/Sid is completely borked at the moment. 
It was caused by the latest update to GTK 3.0. Fixed newer versions of 
everything are expected to be released from mate's GIT repository soon 
but it may take a little while before they make it into Debian. A 
temporary fix is to downgrade GTK but that may be more trouble

than it's worth.

Re: Seg fault

[Andrew Sackville-West]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault  
 running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

 Where to start looking ??

have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even
restarted the machine yet? 

that's where I'd start. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Seg fault

[Frank]

Frank wrote:
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??




  I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

Cheers


Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Kent West]

Frank wrote:

Frank wrote:
After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??




  I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.





FYI: I'm seeing similar problems with Iceweasel. I can run it as root, 
or I can run it from within Icewm, but I can not run it as normal user 
from within KDE.


--
Kent


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Andrew Sackville-West]

please reply to the list instead of to me directly.

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:22:24PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:10:08PM -0400, Frank wrote:
 After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault   
 running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

 Where to start looking ??

 have you logged out and back in yet? restarted X yet? maybe even
 restarted the machine yet? 


   Yup. Machine has been restarted - but as I just noted, Sylpheed runs
 as root, just not as a user. 

hmmm... permissions issue that causes a segfault? that's ugly. you
might look at the last few lines of an strace to see what it's trying
to access that cuases the segfault. 

that's all I got.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Seg fault

[Damon L. Chesser]

On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote:
 Frank wrote:
  After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault
  running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.
 
  Where to start looking ??

I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

 Cheers


 Frank

Frank,

I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term 
and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws.  What does that 
exit message say?

if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look 
through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed.

HTH

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Seg fault

[Frank]

Damon L. Chesser wrote:

On Sunday 20 July 2008 04:19:09 pm Frank wrote:

Frank wrote:

After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.

Where to start looking ??

   I have since discovered I can run Sylpheed as root.

Cheers


Frank


Frank,

I can't tell if you still have the issue or not, but if you do, open a term 
and type sylpheed or claws-mail if you are running claws.  What does that 
exit message say?


if it only shows segmentation fault, then issue strace sylpheed then look 
through the last part of strace to see what is killing slypheed.


HTH



strace output:


open(/usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/xterm, O_RDONLY) = 8
fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=15776, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 
0) = 0xb6d39000
read(8, 
Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 
..., 4096) = 4096

_llseek(8, 0, [0], SEEK_SET)= 0
read(8, 
Xcur\20\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\3\0\0\0\2\0\375\377\30\0\0\0004\0\0\0\2\0\375\377 
..., 4096) = 4096

close(8)= 0
munmap(0xb6d39000, 4096)= 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++


Cheers

Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Frank]

Anders Lagerås wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:20:20 +0200
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

After the latest upgrades to Sid. I am getting a segmentation fault 
running (or trying to run) my mail reader Sylpheed.


Where to start looking ??

Use reportbug to report the bug.

Then downgrade libgkt2.0 to 2.12.10-2 that will solve the problem for
now.




  Bug report on it's way

  What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.


Cheers


Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Anders Lagerås]

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Anders Lagerås wrote:
Bug report on it's way
 
What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
Using aptitude is the easiest way.
If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
to select it and then g to install.
= to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
useful.

-- 
Mvh Anders Lagerås


pgpjPHwuyoUOo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Seg fault

[Frank McCormick]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anders Lagerås wrote:
| On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
| Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Anders Lagerås wrote:
|Bug report on it's way
|
|What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
| Using aptitude is the easiest way.
| If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
| up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
| Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
| to select it and then g to install.
| = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
| useful.
|

~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

Cheers

Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiDuP8ACgkQnQV1aTcQlJuIHACfUzpQYK0pE/XZ2PFiQh6B1Ppf
968AnRIGwtxstwf6rb8YwsThV22NV1co
=ImGL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Frank McCormick]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400
Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
 | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
 | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
 | to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
 | useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

 Got around it by dl'ing from lenny repository and installing using
dpkg. Seems to work - writing this using Sylpheed.

cheers

Frank
- -- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiDvJAACgkQnQV1aTcQlJvjfwCfZbZ4dqf1epJfcndzamXhTy+B
t8kAoJbwdKyzdcsMVchxfjGxeAAEDjtq
=yft1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seg fault

[Andrew Sackville-West]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:15:27PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description show
 | up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk listed.
 | Select the row of the version you want and use + on the numeric keypad
 | to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can also be
 | useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.

enable the lenny repos.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Seg fault

[Anders Lagerås]

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:27 -0400
Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Anders Lagerås wrote:
 | On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:23:17 -0400
 | Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 |
 | Anders Lagerås wrote:
 |Bug report on it's way
 |
 |What's the easiest way to downgrade? I have never had to do
 | this.
 | Using aptitude is the easiest way.
 | If you select the libgtk row and press enter will the description
 | show up. At the bottom of the page are the Versions of libgtk
 | listed. Select the row of the version you want and use + on the
 | numeric keypad to select it and then g to install.
 | = to put packets on hold to prevent them from being updated can
 | also be useful.
 |
 
 ~  Doesn't work here. The ONLY version shown is the current one.
ok
that is probably since you have only repositories for one version
in /etc/apt/sources.list
or maybe by your /etc/apt/preferences settings

To be able to downgrade to get around problems like this do I have
both stable testing and unstable repositories in sources.list

You can also download from here:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
and use dpkg -i to install.

But if you don't have a sources.list with the corresponding
repositories can you get problem with dependencies.

-- 

Mvh Anders Lagerås


pgpJVjoKb1hYP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Mumia W.. wrote:
 On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)

 Not particularly.  The choice there was:

 1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
 2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

 Which would you rather have?

 
 Wasn't there another option?
 
 3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.

And then Firefox is not part of Debian and cannot be shipped on official Debian 
CDs or any
other media...

- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIYf+1chorMMFUmYwRArfgAKCKqfMFl/vSSYFYeEN8zRow+mI03gCglpM8
pfuw+x6TUaAoR44j8mJ2n1g=
=M04m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Andrei Popescu]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:

  What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
  is in one of your extensions.
 
 Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add them 
 one 
 by one.  Thanks!

As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade 
to IW3) I have documented the procedure here.

http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Damon L. Chesser]

On Wednesday 25 June 2008 06:44:24 am Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:27:20PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
   What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the
   problem is in one of your extensions.
 
  Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add
  them one by one.  Thanks!

 As this seems to happen pretty often lately (probably due to the upgrade
 to IW3) I have documented the procedure here.

 http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#package-iceweasel-crash

 Regards,
 Andrei

Andrei,

removing the .mozilla dir did the trick.  Thanks!

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)

Not particularly.  The choice there was:

1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

Which would you rather have?

-- 
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 24/06/2008, Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 when ever I run [firesomething] I get a segfault.

Strange, I've gotten segfaults too, but it doesn't seem to affect anything.

- Jordi G. H.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Kamaraju S Kusumanchi]

Damon L. Chesser wrote:

 when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg
 fault.
 
 == messages ==
 Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]:
 segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in
 libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000]
 
 and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works.  I only know
 about the segfault because I am monitoring messages.
 
 Any ideas?
 

What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
is in one of your extensions.

raju
-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Damon L. Chesser]

On Tuesday 24 June 2008 05:08:23 pm Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
 Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!) I get a seg
  fault.
 
  == messages ==
  Jun 24 13:08:03 dam-main kernel: [59583.098628] firefox-bin[3836]:
  segfault at 7fc9a0d0d21b ip 7fc9a2136160 sp 7fffaad49d70 error 4 in
  libc-2.7.so[7fc9a20c2000+14a000]
 
  and iceweasle opens as I would expect and everything works.  I only know
  about the segfault because I am monitoring messages.
 
  Any ideas?

 What happens if you run iceweasel -safe-mode? If it works, then the problem
 is in one of your extensions.

 raju
 --
 Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
 http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
 http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/

Works fine in -safe-mode.  I will now uninstall my extensions and add them one 
by one.  Thanks!

-- 
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Mumia W..]

On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:

when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)


Not particularly.  The choice there was:

1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
2) Not distribute Firefox at all.

Which would you rather have?



Wasn't there another option?

3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.

After all, wasn't the closed-source Netscape 4.77 once distributed with 
Debian Potato?





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault Firefox

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 24/06/2008, Mumia W.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 06/24/2008 03:40 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 
   On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 13:11 -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
  
when ever I run firefox (aka iceweasle, how stupid is that!)
   
  
   Not particularly.  The choice there was:
  
   1) Redistribute Firefox without the trademarks.
   2) Not distribute Firefox at all.
  
   Which would you rather have?
  
  
 
   Wasn't there another option?
 
   3) Keep the Firefox trademarks and put the browser into non-free.


Ugh. I prefer the Iceweasel route. I like having it on the install CDs.

 By the way, one thing I don't understand is why Ubuntu still uses the
 Firefox logo and branding, especially regarding Mike Connor's comment
 that

 I have actually been asked recently by another distro
 maintainer whether everyone is on a fair playing field.  Right now, it
 seems to others as if Debian has a special deal, which isn't fair, and
 it needs to change.

 regarding why Debian was still using the Firefox name. Now it seems to
 me that Ubuntu has that special deal. Whenever I ask about, it seems
 that nobody knows, and makes me think that Shuttleworth must have
 signed off some secret deal with Mozilla in order to be allowed to
 keep using the logo and name, even though their Firefox is even more
 heavily modified than Debian's!

 Please correct me if I'm wrong about these observations.

 - Jordi G. H.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

[Andrew Sackville-West]

On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
 I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out of
 disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to 

you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition?
maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order?

A


 build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.
 
 It is running package apt 0.6.45.
 
 I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
 the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.
 
 Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?
 
 David
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: seg fault in apt-get after disk filled up

[David Goodenough]

On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:51, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:03:28PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
  I have a small machine that I keep completely up to date.  It ran out of
  disk space in the middle of an update and now every time it tries to

 you mean completely out of disk space? or just your /var partition?
 maybe apt-get clean or auto-clean might be in order?
There is only one partition, and it ran out of space completely (its
only 4GB).  apt-get autoclean segfaults just like the rest of apt-get.

I have now cleared some space.

David

 A

  build its dependancy tree it gets to about 50% and then seg faults.
 
  It is running package apt 0.6.45.
 
  I have copied the old available and status files in /var/lib/dpkg over
  the current version, and that has not fixed the problem.
 
  Short of a reinstall, any idea how to proceed?
 
  David
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg Fault bei ps fax

[Gerhard Brauer]

Gruesse!
* Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [03.04.05 18:04]:

 Hallo List,
 
 
 ich habe ein seltsames Phänomen.
 Seit einiger Zeit schmiert mein Rechner immer wieder ab.
 Debian /sarge Kernel 2.4.27-2-k7
 In den Logs ist nichts zu finden.
 Das letzte mal war er nur per ping erreichbar
 aber sonst hat keine Service reagiert.(smtp,http,ftp,pop)
 Ich bekomme seit neuestem bei `ps fax` ein:
 
   PID   TTY   STAT  TIME COMMAND
 Segmentation fault
 ---
 ps aux kann ich ohne Probleme ausführen
 

Vielleicht kann du mit
strace ps fax
sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat.

 Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist
 der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt.
 laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal.

Wenn
echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max
nicht bedenklich in der Nähe deines Wertes ist sollte das nicht die
Ursache sein.

 Ein netstat -at bringt den Rechner auf einen Load von über 200.
 Firewall ist keine am laufen.

Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen?
Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für
solch einen einfachen Vorgang.

 Wo kann ich den mit der Fehlersuche beginnen ?

Filesystem-Check(s)
Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist,
kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und
ausführen?

Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede
beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen),
IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,...

Evtl. alle nicht benötigte Hardware ausbauen und selektiv testen.

 danke.luke

Gruß
Gerhard

-- 
HAL is running Windows...

(fwd) Re: seg Fault bei ps fax [lukas@netskip.net]

[Gerhard Brauer]

Bitte keine Mails an mich privat.
Bitte an die Liste antworten.


- Forwarded message from Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Lukas Pataki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:25:58 +0200
Subject: Re: seg Fault bei ps fax
To: Gerhard Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: at kis.te

Hi,



Vielleicht kann du mit
strace ps fax
sehen, an welcher Stelle und warum er einen segfault hat.
das hatte ich schon durch.
z.b. bekomme ich ein segfault (ab) wenn ich bind starte.
aber laut strace bleibt es immer bei mysql hängen.

..  na ok wenn ich mysql stoppe ist es ok.



Im exim4/mainlog stand mal was von to many open files, da ist
der Rechner aber nicht abgestürzt.
laut lsof sind um di 4-6 tausend files immer offen. -scheint mir normal.

Wenn
echo /proc/sys/fs/file-max

cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
25388
--sollte passen




Auch bei netstat -nat, also ohne Namens-Auflösung der IP-Adressen?
Ansonsten käme die Load vom DNS. Allerdings ist 200 erheblich hoch für
solch einen einfachen Vorgang.
`netstat -na`

sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable

...
nirvana...

auch bei gestoppten bind...
Load über 300


Filesystem-Check(s)
Wenn dieser Rechner (ohne Firewall) mit dem Internet verbunden ist,
kannst du einen Einbruch ausschließen? chkrootkit installieren und
ausführen?

Ansonsten, wenn der Rechner einfach so stehenbleibt kann es IMHO jede
beteiligte Hardware sein: RAM (memtest laufen lassen),
IDE-BUS/KABEL/Festplatten, Netzteil,...
Ram wurde getauscht.
laut smart ist alles rellativ


Gruß
   Gerhard

danke.luke




- End forwarded message -

Die sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Meldung deutet auf
einen vollen Prozeß-Table hin. Wieviele Prozesse laufen auf dem Rechner?

Beim strace: Gibt es auch diese Probleme, wenn du mysql stoppst?

Gruß
Gerhard

-- 
Der schwarze Ritter ist unbesiegbar...

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[CARRY émile]

Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit :
 Salut à tous,
Salut,
 Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en
 permanence.
 Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
 Voici le message que cela me donne:
 
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 
 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était
rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire
pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur.

 Merci d'avance.

Bon courage

 Didier
Émile
-- 
Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui aura a
le murmurer plus tard.
Barbey D'Aurevilly

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[Jean-Michel OLTRA]

Le mercredi 25 décembre 2002, Didier Conchaudron a écrit...
bonjour,


 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault

 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Utiliser strace et gdb pour voir où ça plante ?
-- 
jean-michel

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[Philippe Monroux]

Le mer 25 déc 2002, à 02 h 28 min 46 s  (UTC +0100),
Didier Conchaudron a écrit :

 Depuis que j'ai installé une  woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault
 en permanence.  Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
 Voici  le message  que  cela me  donne:  E: Sub-process  /usr/bin/dpkg
 received a segmentation fault Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle
 est fraiche!)?  Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Tiens ?  Hier j'ai  fait l'installation indiquée sur MAINTENANCE FACILE
ETSÉCURISÉED'UNSYSTÈMEDEBIAN   GNU/LINUXAVECAPT
(http://free2.org/d/) et  quand j'ai  fait apt-get install  shorewall ça
m'a donné le même message (segmentation fault)...Alors j'ai abandonné.

Si cela peut aider...

ph
-- 
Depuis que j'utilise les logiciels libres
suis scotché à mon écran =:P

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[Lucas Moulin]

On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:28:46 +0100
Didier Conchaudron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
 Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

Deux solutions : un problème avec une barrette de RAM, ou le processeur
qui fait des siennes. Pour le premier, tu peux tester avec memtest86, et
pour le second, il faut changer de processeur...

-- 
Lucas Moulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wish I had a shilling for every senseless killing, I'd buy a
government -- NOFX


pgpFxT96UOfqm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[Didier Conchaudron]

Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma
foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-)
J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres
du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu...
Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage
pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault
pourraient venir de là?

Didier

- Original Message -
From: CARRY émile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg


 Le mer 25/12/2002 à 02:28, Didier Conchaudron a écrit :
  Salut à tous,
 Salut,
  Depuis que j'ai installé une woody/testing dpkg me fait des seg fault en
  permanence.
  Cela intervient pendant des mises à jour avec apt-get:
  Voici le message que cela me donne:
 
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault
 
  Est-ce que ma libc est HS (pourtant elle est fraiche!)?
  Sinon avez-vous d'autres idées?

 La dernière fois que j'ai eu ça, c'était une barette de 128 Mo qui était
 rapée. un petit coup de memtest86 (paquet hwtools avec le readme à lire
 pour faire une disquette de boot spéciale) pour être sur.

  Merci d'avance.

 Bon courage

  Didier
 Émile
 --
 Avant de choisir le prénom d'un garçon, pensez toujours à la femme qui
aura a
 le murmurer plus tard.
 Barbey D'Aurevilly


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault intempestive avec dpkg

[Jeremie Koenig]

On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Didier Conchaudron wrote:
 Je suis en train de réaliser le test de la mémoire avec memtest86 qui, ma
 foi, n'a l'air pas mal du tout ;-)
 J'ai eu une nouvelle erreur ce matin: ça ressemble à un dump des registres
 du processeur, ce qui me fait craindre un problème hard avec mon cpu...

Tu veux dire un Ooops du noyeau ?
C'est exactement le genre de truc, avec les segfaults intempestives, qui
arrive :
- Si ta RAM est moisie
- Si ton proce chauffe trop (attention overclock)

Tu peux essayer de ralentir la RAM dans le BIOS, ou de ralentir ton
proce, et voire ce que ca donne (le probleme etant que tu ne saura pas
tout de suite si ca va mieux... Il faut voire a la longue si tu as
encore des histoire dans ce genre ou si ca disparait completement.)

 Et là je me dis qu'il chauffe peut etre un peu trop: 64 degrés au démarrage
 pour un Duron 800 ça me parait beaucoup...Est-ce que mes seg fault
 pourraient venir de là?

on dirait que oui...

-- 
Jeremie Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: seg fault

[Andrew Chung]

 With my current installation of Corel Linux, I am getting more
 segmentation faults, and they are with programs that did not have this
 problem with my previous install (Adobe Acrobat, for one).
 
 I don't see segmentation in the indices of the Running Linux or
 Learning Debian/GNU Linux books.

This usually means that the program expects library versions that are not
binary compatible with what you have. Check the system requirements for the
programs.

If you have access to the source code, a simple recompilation should do the 
trick. Otherwise install an older version of whatever library is needed.

Andrew
-- 
Don't let your sanity stand in your way

Andrew Chung -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://anderoo.dhs.org/~anderoo/