On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Here's a generalized example:
* Q-1 (or fewer) of the voters vote C as the only acceptable option:
C = 1
D = 2 default
A = 3
B = 3
* Slightly less than one-half of the remaining voters vote like you.
* Slightly more
Anthony Towns said:
excellent analysis snipped
Fundamentally, what it requires is for very few people to express
full preferences. There're only two reasons for this: one is that most
people don't understand the issue, which isn't what happens in Debian;
Or at least if people don't understand the
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* Q-1 (or fewer) of the voters vote C as the only acceptable option:
[see below]
* Slightly less than one-half of the remaining voters vote
[ A=1, B=4, C= 2, D=2]
* Slightly more than one-half of the remaining voters
Anthony Towns said:
excellent analysis snipped
Fundamentally, what it requires is for very few people to express
full preferences. There're only two reasons for this: one is that most
people don't understand the issue, which isn't what happens in Debian;
Or at least if people don't understand
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
* Q-1 (or fewer) of the voters vote C as the only acceptable option:
[see below]
* Slightly less than one-half of the remaining voters vote
[ A=1, B=4, C= 2, D=2]
* Slightly more than one-half of the remaining voters
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Do all these perverse cases also require less than 2Q votes to
be cast?
Sadly, no. They do require less than Q votes to be cast with A above
the default, and nearly all of the other votes to be cast with A equal
to
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Do all these perverse cases also require less than 2Q votes to
be cast?
Sadly, no. They do require less than Q votes to be cast with A above
the default, and nearly all of the other votes to be cast with A equal
to
On Tue, 27 May 2003 14:02:19 -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been trying to construct an example of perverse results of the
sort I want (where A beats D, B beats D, A beats B, and B wins
because of quorum). All the correct examples (which I can find,
anyway) depend on
Manoj said:
On Tue, 27 May 2003 14:02:19 -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been trying to construct an example of perverse results of the
sort I want (where A beats D, B beats D, A beats B, and B wins
because of quorum). All the correct examples (which I can find,
anyway)
On Tue, 27 May 2003 14:02:19 -0400, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been trying to construct an example of perverse results of the
sort I want (where A beats D, B beats D, A beats B, and B wins
because of quorum). All the correct examples (which I can find,
anyway) depend on
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 06:31:22PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Here's a generalized example:
* Q-1 (or fewer) of the voters vote C as the only acceptable option:
C = 1
D = 2 default
A = 3
B = 3
* Slightly less than one-half of the remaining voters vote like you.
* Slightly
11 matches
Mail list logo
