Re: GR: Declassification of debian-private, First call for votes (with reply to)

2005-12-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
a6Jn65knqn9C > v2coS6HOlDVn1BmZpyd1f1i4fyZ/1TPZnZUJHQGOxlTVB8UQreSSywAP5GhPA+eB > HH77ex2bN36oM8SZbk5p6Tp4C9ddWq/xqUXgAvVbw/IFRZM9YzPtD6vGh6srj7uZ > tx+ITwQYEQIADwUCQ6AuvQIbDAUJACowAAAKCRBALF9IO07gYQf3AJ0f71K/UL9/ > bY5wDgfehFJzZ+8KowCdHTS3BUcGhJ3UNpd3ucdhlSphojg= > =xSWE > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com "Stealing logics from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "Necessity is the mother of invention." pgp2LmP2rO2no.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
iggering the General Resolution override > clause in the TC's resolution of the 11th of February. > > The TC's decision on the default init system for Linux in jessie > stands undisturbed. > > However, the TC resolution is altered to add the additional text > in sections (1) and (2) above. > > ** End Proposal ** I second this proposal. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ss we have one libc because it also serves our other ports. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
hich has had a fixed date for nearly a year now) was the > right time to raise this. It was not intentional. Ian asked, and I expressed my opinion. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
hould be things which are wide enough to embrace all our sub projects. Why didn't we do the same with network-manager ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
bug. That is a big part of what makes a > distribution. This simply adds - "must be able to work with any init > system running at PID 1" to those requirements. Seconded. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ific* init system shouldn't be systemd, in my opinion, given the breadth of sub projects we have. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
st of an alternate neutral option. Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 17 October 2014 06:27 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> > Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well >> > for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice. > Please do not con

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

2014-10-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
care for > it's users": You're free to make your case. Convince others. > That'll probably be appreciated way more than negativity. What was wrong with Svante's post ? He was just giving an example, quoting Gnome. I'd give a similar example for KDE.

Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

2014-10-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
--# > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/CABpYwDWTeyfD2PixwTSOy5VW4sXhkq=36rmpfxhjaizd7mq...@mail.gmail.com > > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2015: Correct ballot

2015-04-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e7/mcfsiI/kYemmys4VfYMr8j9RnqZa3STkH2oU1N+ZlCjcyh9YpAdm > MnZo25v/iWQQLNkg5xndiuSBr3D7jGrVNUukIwwAgx+KACspYNo6/RjmH+3VYJ/k > s5wHdkV/rZrszpLe60QyleQJyRekeIRKFtKWvikNAbmto5Ya27QpLXqJ2pd50FcK > k6OsBAUG5jsyiG+fkTUf822H/aVhnrlzUpIwPIgh3FItjrCe6BAj69CLtK1fWNAD > 1uXY3MDM4pYlZ0cWYb/lM+geeBtMLgKbdWE+uqnYwyx34c7iXl5GH9995ryg1eUB > RLMfgvTkK43XasvLZjcvrrRpp+Ti6cTcF9U4Og/OT7I6SlOHyTPyQlXl63ay/W6G > 917KTZDp23hMDytejJZUl0Fp56Ea5+acYMNrZT5H4Cr9xvVu1ZiM77jUQqkWONZW > oePNMUjsILDtW0rgOamlANWrgY7zCsBzURYsVakC+G4bQMYIGPQpLNDIXiaEKvYk > 132qYsyIomiGOxL4/j7LcRyEFCDGKlCXMBFxgFgeUhixLIYR2MDQSgeDX5ICidkp > 8XmoXft0//xb4zgVWnjvDaA36ZrOxZKpPdETUGGphm+eXMR5 > =BNHi > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Iain Lane's proposal

2016-09-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the >  material being declassified. >   3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary. > > ============ > > Thanks, > -Steve > > - -- Ritesh Ra

Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels

2017-03-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e, is good enough ? Do we need (or have room for) a different approach ? Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels

2017-03-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
for Debian. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Hardware/ShippingWithDebian [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-enterprise/ * Non Commercial as in not backed by a profit making organization -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels

2017-04-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
SoC and come up with something tailored to the projects scope. But, the biggest question is if we all (as project members) see, in unison, the need for such a certification list. I think this question and the subject fits in in the broader topic of "universality". -- Ritesh Raj Sa

Re: Questions for DPL candidates: Support channels

2017-04-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 23:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Would this count as a HCL for your $work? > >  > > https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn > > I don't think any data, fed in good faith, could be termed as an HCL input. > We should eye for certifi