Bug#877337: single-page html of debian-policy to be revived?

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: > ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed > usable these days ... I think it is. > > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if > > this should be published again? > > At

Bug#872944: #872944 www.debian.org: Remove JavaScript from Policy Manual published on web mirrors

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:18:06AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote: > A single page html may be an additional option but there's already the > single page txt version and the PDF. That's sufficient and I see no > need in providing more formats of this manual. > > Therefore we can close this and I will

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 10:56:56PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > > what do we need to do instead? :) > Nothing in the webwml repository. > The list of recent advisories on the web pages is now automatically > generated from the data from the security tracker. > It's important that the

Re: upcoming changes of the web pages /security and /lts/security

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:14:51PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote: > Now the security team and the LTS team do not need to manually prepare > a .wml and .data file for each advisory. > Please stop creating those files for new advisories. what do we need to do instead? :) -- cheers, Holger

Bug#1032440: closed by Laura Arjona Reina (Bug#1032440 fixed in www.debian.org)

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:09:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Bug #1032440 in www.debian.org reported by you has been fixed in the Git > repository. > You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: > >

Bug#1032440: www.d.o: please link to single html page version of developers-reference

package: www.debian.org severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org hi, On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:46:43PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > [...], there's a single page HTML version available again, eg on > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/deve

Re: sources.list 4 bullseye-security

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 04:52:26PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Besides, I believe end users are not supposed to know deb-src line for > security repos. sure, they do! and of course we provide source for our security updates! > Adding such info provides zero benefit except for confusing > users.

Bug#948969: webwml | #948969: Creates a pdo link for each package instead of an ALL-IN-ONE link which is broken (!546)

hi Laura, On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 07:17:21AM +, victory wrote: > victory pushed new commits to merge request !546 > Merge Request URL: > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/546 I've cherry-picked this as 6ffd214be07576841d2409865733011635e61cb5 into the master

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

Hi Brian, On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 05:09:42PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Brian May writes: > > Is it OK if we simply delete this line? > Done by https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/298 awesome, merged, thank you! Do you think we can close this bug now? -- cheers,

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

control: retitle -1 1 DLA missing from the website (or not) thanks Hi Brian, On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:38:18PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:16:50AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml$ ../cron/parts/10-check-advisories --mode DLA

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:38:18PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > I believe all of these have now been resolved. and YAY! (& sorry I forgot that in my previous mail!) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

Hi Brian, thanks for caring about this old information! On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:31:51PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Where to from here? Should I invent an appropriate DLA-145-2 based on > the information above? yes, that seems very reasonable. -- tschau, cheers, Holger

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

Hi Brian, On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 05:16:46PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:06:35PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > many thanks for all your fixes on this bug! > Can you please rerun the command: > ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml$ ../cron/parts/10-check-adviso

Re: Bug#931548: Migration to Sphinx -- developers-reference

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 11:51:32PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > I saw you uploaded a new version. Thanks. most changes were from you, so thank you very much too! > As I see this package, remaining tasks are: this list looks good to me. highest prio for me is getting

Re: Bug#931548: Migration to Sphinx -- developers-reference

Hi, On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:36:25PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > With today's commit, pull-down language selection seems to work for > package installed files. Also now we have Gnome desktop icon ;-) great! > It is usable, I think. I think so too! :) > > yeah, I also strongly prefer option

Re: Bug#931548: Migration to Sphinx

hi, On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:22:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > -- I'm afraid I wasn't involved other than reporting problems with the > > > published version of Policy, and I don't think we made changes to our > > > package in response to any requests from the www-team. > > Am I correct to

Re: Bug#931548: Migration to Sphinx

hi, dear debian-www people: src:developers-reference was just switched to use sphinx, just like src:debian-policy. However, no upload to unstable has been made yet... On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:13:50AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Mon 22 Jul 2019 at 09:22pm +00, Holger Levsen wrote: &g

Bug#932252: cleanup of intro/organisation: comment from myself

5b104d3 Holger Levsen english/intro/organization.data * https://deb.li/3stRR - KGB-0- | (#debian-www) drop Ronny Aasen from -edu as sadly he is MIA since 2012. Thanks for all your work, Ronny | Mrfai: would be fine with me e.g. debian.lex has it's own page with the last entry from 2005 I

Bug#922246: #821096 is very much related

hi, Debian#821096: filenames of generated by parse-advisory.pl and parse-dls.pl files should include the revision number - https://bugs.debian.org/821096 -- tschau, Holger ---

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

control: retitle -1 7 DLAs missing from the website (or not) thanks Hi Brian, many thanks for all your fixes on this bug! On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:03:25PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1130-1 > > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 719-1 > >

Re: DLAs in the website: some updates and issues

Dear Laura, thanks for your feedback and your help along the way! On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I have created an usertag to group the bugs related to the "lts" section of > the website: >

Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website

control: tags -1 - patch control: retitle -1 31 DLAs missing from the website thanks Hi, due to the work of mostly Antoine and Laura, over 1600 DLAs are now visible on www.debian.org/lts - this is pretty awesome IMO! A few are still missing however: ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml$

Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:51:07PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > -> this script is incorrect/broken for DLAs it seems, as > > https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ does list the DLAs 1677-1681, > > just DLAs 1682-1685 are missing. And they are called DLA-1234 there, > > not "DLA 1234-1"... >

Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

Hi Antoine, On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > But my little finger tells me there are many DLAs still missing from the > website. So even if/when the above MR does get merged, more entries will > be missing. So someone will need to make sure to run the check

Re: heads up: DLA should now be published on the website

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:10:47PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > can you please put that on wiki.d.o/LTS/Development?! > This is now done. I added a new section to the wiki awesome, thank you! > I've done one more mass import, hopefully the last: >

Bug#859122: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > It's true there's a lot of junk in there... I suspect most of the `.pl` > scripts in there could actually be symlink to the main secteam scripts, > because they are basically the same. > > I also suspect most of the stuff is

Bug#922246: www/lts: if DLA-1234-1 and DLA-1234-2 exist, only that last one shows up in indexes

package: www.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi, this is a bug to track fixing this small glitch in the new /lts/security/ area: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > >> *

Bug#859122: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:26:38PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > I think we want the other DLAs linked from the indexes as well. > > shall we file a bug to not forget this? > I looked into this, and couldn't figure it out. > Please do file a bug for now, I have no idea how to fix this...

Bug#859122: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Hi Laura, many many thanks for your work on this, including and especially this writeup! some comments below, where I dont say anything I mean 'yay"! :) On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 03:55:44AM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > * The /lts/security//index.*.html files show the last advisory for >

Re: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Hi Antoine, On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:08:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Thanks for working on this. indeed! > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:44:10PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > On 2018-12-19 18:05:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > > The DLAs are visible here: > > >

Re: automating process for publishing DLAs on the website

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:58:04PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I'm looking at the update process for DLAs on the main website again. \o/ > In > #859122, I've mentioned that I have, again, updated the MR to include > all DLAs up to DLA-1657-1. The www team folks tell me they will review >

Bug#859123: automating process for publishing DLAs on the website

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'. > fixed. :) > >> I've requested access as an individual, for what that's worth. > > you were given access a week ago, too. \o/ > yup. I guess I could just merge my own patches now...

Bug#859123: automating process for publishing DLAs on the website

Hi Antoine, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:15:15AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> How does that sound? > > sounds very good to me. thanks for your work on this so far! > Right, agreed. :) I guess the script could both parse previous emails > and future ones quite easily. yup, that would be

Bug#859123: automating process for publishing DLAs on the website

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:07:26PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > The process broke down a while back, and reasons don't matter. We need > to figure out how to fix this. > > So I opened #859122 to import the missing DLAs and I've made good > progress. > > But I've opened this bug report

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

Hi, thanks for your work on documenting how to install jessie these days! On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:23:45PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I assume this is going to appear at > . That seems > a fairly prominent place, though the errata

Re: Documenting installer issues for jessie LTS

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 01:50:48AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I have updated the wiki LTS/Installing page and added post-installation > steps to install the missed upgrades. However, I wonder whether it > would be helpful and possible to update the release notes or other > official

Bug#887992: closed by Rhonda D'Vine (filelist working again)

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:51:22PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > sorry for the large delay in addressing this. This seems to be an > issue since the change of the Contents files to by-hash symlinks, which > seems to have been done July 2017 because the filelists db files got > last

Bug#900421: improve "wiki account creation delayed" message

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:08:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >"Account creation *delayed*: to prevent spam, this wiki requires additional > >information from some people. Please contact w...@debian.org and describe > >what you want to do in the wiki. To repeat: please mail us if you need >

Bug#900421: improve "wiki account creation delayed" message

package: wiki.debian.org severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: debian-backports.lists.debian.org Dear wiki admins, On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:24:20PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:57:26PM +, Christian Heutger wrote: > > I now uploaded to

Re: Bug#845297: Migration to Salsa - reorganization of webmaster-team and repos

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 09:08:51AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Thanks for dealing with the migration, it is much appreciated. $(figlet "+1") -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#898258: www: please document the exact red color for the debian logo

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, https://www.debian.org/logos/ describes how the Debian logo looks like, but unfortuantly it doesnt include a Pantone or HKS color value for proper printing. However, as documented on https://wiki.debian.org/DebianLogo the red used in

Bug#887992: debian-www: filelist misses files: debian-edu-config contains bogus file /usr/share/man/man1/.1.gz

package: www.debian.org Hi, I've filed this as #887990 (against debian-edu-config) and now I'm filing this bug against www.debian.org as https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/debian-edu-config/filelist should show all files... On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:53:59PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Interesting data points. thanks. > Can you get these related data points too? I dont, sorry, etoobusy. > - relevant for those with > limited internet bandwidth (as is the case for some translators): > > * amount of data

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

Hi Laura, thanks *a lot* for leading this migration! Much much appreciated! On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:21:08PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I have setup this git repo: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/webwml/webwml2git.git > for me and the people interested to work on the migration.

Bug#824834: outdated info on www: Debian GNU/hurd probably not planned for wheezy anymore…

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:01:55AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Fixed, thanks :) Thank you for fixing this so quickly too! :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#824834: outdated info on www: Debian GNU/hurd probably not planned for wheezy anymore…

package: www.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Hi, https://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/ contains the following: "We hope to be able to release Debian GNU/Hurd for wheezy." As you might be aware, wheezy has been released and so has jessie, so you might want to update the text

Bug#813341: Please update the debian logo of your service

Hi, first of all: dear publicity team, thanks for handling this so very well. Even though these are very sad circumstances, I was proud and happy being part of Debian when I read Laura's mail here yesterday. Same goes for Ian's memorial event at FOSDEM. Thank you. On Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016,

Bug#804659: points to long gone patch-tracker.debian.org

package: www.debian.org Hi, Thanks for maintaining the Debian webpages! https://packages.debian.org/sid/irssi has a link labeled "Debian Patch Tracker" in the navigation on the right, pointing to http://patch- tracker.debian.org/package/irssi/0.8.17-1 but patch-tracker.debian.org is gone

Bug#773660: dsa-3108 returns 404, I think that explains...

Hi Andrei, On Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Du, 21 dec 14, 19:05:37, Holger Levsen wrote: http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3108 returns a page not found error, I guess that explains... now why is this DSA missing? Could it be... http://www.debian.org/security

Bug#773660: dsa-3108 returns 404, I think that explains...

many thanks, Andreas! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#773660: www.debian.org(/security) misses critical information

package: www.debian.org severity: important x-debbugs-cc: t...@security.debian.org Hi, verbatin from #debian-security: h01ger | the german version of http://www.debian.org/ only show dsa-3091 from december 7 as latest h01ger | oh, same for http://www.debian.org/index.en.html h01ger |

Bug#773660: dsa-3108 returns 404, I think that explains...

http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3108 returns a page not found error, I guess that explains... now why is this DSA missing? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#762255: please also mention SUAs on www.debian.org

clone 762255 -1 retitle -1 please also mention SUAs and d-s-a@l.d.o on .debian.org thanks Hi, since 2009 clamav (security) updates have been pushed via (what is now) stable-updates and thus SUAs have been sent to https://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce and (AFAIK) this is not

Bug#710704: fixed is not a severity.

package: bugs.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org Hi, http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard.en.html claims Severities are critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist, fixed. which is wrong, fixed is not a severity. cheers, Holger signature.asc

Bug#703237: why wontfix

Hi Martin, why did you tag this bug wontfix? I think it's rather bad style to do so without explaination. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

armhf missing on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

Hi, armhf is completly missing on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ while eg http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-armhf/current/images/ does exist, just like the rest. Makes testing the efika support kind of hard :) cheers, Holger -- To

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf11: please add sponsorship logo in debian.org site

Hi Simon, On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011, Simon Paillard wrote: Just FTR for those whose homepage is not www.debian.org, debconf 11 logo has been added, before we have a I'm going to debconf logo that fit. nice! thank you (all involved)! cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf11: please add sponsorship logo in debian.org site

On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On the other hand, considering the short time frame from now to the conference, I'd have no problem in having a DebConf link (not mentioning sponsoring) pointing to the DebConf website. full ack on everything you wrote here. a prominent

Re: debianuserforums.org - new debian support forum

Hi Markus, this is probably becoming off-topic for debian-www@ but... (feel free to reply privatly.) On Samstag, 12. März 2011, markus tornow wrote: The main idea of that board, debianuserforums.org, is that it is run by its users. To make it short: it is supposed to be run fully democratic.

Bug#515257: mention debian-live: bugs can be closed

On Mittwoch, 9. März 2011, David Prévot wrote: http://www.debian.org/CD/live/ and http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-live/ have also recently been added (and are in actively maintained by Ben Armstrong), thus closing, thanks for the follow up. Yay! Thanks! signature.asc Description: This is

Re: Fwd: [Debconf-video] Announcing debian/watch, the Debian Miro Community

Hi, On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, Fernando C. Estrada wrote: Can anyone help on this item: * use something like watch.debian.net to point to our miro website I'm not sure we should have video.d.n and watch.d.n point to the same content but different presentation of it. UPDATE: Miro

Bug#612444: peoples names on planet hard to read

package: www.debian.org severity: minor Hi, did i say thank you to you for the new planet.d.o. layout already? Thank you! * broonie finds the rendering of people's names on planet very hard to read. (above the individual posts) * h01ger agrees with broonie - those used to be more readable

Bug#612469: wiki: leftsidemenu layout

package: www.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, do you plan to provide other designs for the wiki? I used to use rightsidebar style but the new default is so much nicer (thanks again!!! :), but i miss my menu on the side (I use widescreens only...) - and I would actually prefer it on the left

woot! finally a fresh website layout in production! Re: proposed banner for homepage, release squeeze.

Hi, On Montag, 31. Januar 2011, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: This is the look of www.debian.org starting from squeeze release: http://www.deb.at/ wow! finally a new look! Now I'm even more looking forward to the squeeze release in 5 days! cheers, Holger, who hopes the new look will

Re: Comment HP entry on http://www.debian.org/partners/

Hi, On Sonntag, 16. Januar 2011, Steffen Möller wrote: the links to HP's web pages are completely avoid of the notion of Debian. I suggest to add a pointer to http://h71028.www7.hp.com/services/us/en/consolidated/os-debian.html http://hp.com/go/debian seems even better to me. cheers,

Bug#605893: please state that mails will be publically archived

package: www.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, please state on http://www.debian.org/intro/organization that mails to several addresses will be archived publically. Thanks, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

wiki change

Hi, something broke wiki.debian.org for stable konqueror users. i only get a blank page. works fine with w3m though... I'm fairly sure yesterday it was still working with konqueror, might have been sunday when I checked last... cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: wiki change

Hi, On Dienstag, 14. September 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: there was a routing issue at the hoster last night, which has been fixed ~11:00 UTC. now it works again here. Guess konqueror did more caching than w3m :) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

Hi, (as my last post on this subject accidently only went to -www@) On Samstag, 21. August 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Anyway, Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conference in news page is wrong, please remove tenth or change it to Eleventh. Yup. We have discussed this almost every

Re: [Debconf-team] debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

Hi, On Sonntag, 22. August 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: To clarify a bit about that (and some comments on irc:): It was neither a typo, nor written in a hurry. I got that text from the debconf team, when I read the text, I asked on the #debconf-team channel (see

Re: debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference

Hi, On Sonntag, 15. August 2010, David Prévot wrote: Agreed. What about using a non-problematic phrase instead like (please correct in proper English): The 2010 Annual Debian Developer Conference and drop any mention of `tenth' or `eleventh' in order not to introduce a false

Bug#592170: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation

package: www.debian.org severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: debconf-t...@lists.debconf.org, d...@debian.org, a...@azure.humbug.org.au Hi, please add DebConf and its Debian delegates somehow to http://www.debian.org/intro/organization It's currently a bit unclear who the delegates are (and the

Re: Using Flattr to donate to Debian?

Hi, On Samstag, 24. Juli 2010, Holger Levsen wrote: as I understood it, a flattr button will also cause traffic to flattr from each visitor, which - even though very common today - has privacy issues we might want to avoid. well, forget that. It's of course possible to serve that image from

Re: Using Flattr to donate to Debian?

Hi, On Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: In general it looks reasonable but it has implications: as I understood it, a flattr button will also cause traffic to flattr from each visitor, which - even though very common today - has privacy issues we might want to avoid.

Re: First Debian Installation: totally brain-dead. Where do I go from here?

Hi Keith, please note that debian-www@ is about the debian website. You want to use debian-u...@lists.debian.org... That said... On Freitag, 2. Juli 2010, Keith Mitchell wrote: 3. There is no gcc compiler. There is no Firefox web browser. run as root: apt-get install gcc apt-get install

Re: XSS vulnerability in debian.org

Hi David, ow...@bugs.debian.org is the right address for such reports. On Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2010, David Shaw wrote: Hello, My name is David Shaw, and I am a security engineer with Redspin, Inc. While browsing debian.org today, I noticed that some of the fields were not correctly

Bug#558752: www.debian.org: Too many Alpha porters on intro/organization

On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: the Alpha port has actually already been dropped: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg0.html thats exactly why I wrote what I wrote signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: About consultants page management: email and other compulsory fields

Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: What about NMMN? It is already listed without email address. Should we delete this entry as well? NMMN afaik hosts at least one .debian.org machine plus two m68k debian.net machines, so I assume they'd like to stay listed. BCC:ing

Bug#272335: [rt.debian.org #1298] Bug#272335: www.debian.org do not support mod_gzip

Hi, On Montag, 20. April 2009, Stephen Gran via RT wrote: A quick look at the munin stats suggests we don't use all that much bandwidth at present (or cpu, for that matter) so maybe it doesn't matter either way? ain't there are third factor to consider: the bandwidth(+cpu) used on the user

Bug#272335: [rt.debian.org #1298] Bug#272335: www.debian.org do not support mod_gzip

Hi, On Montag, 20. April 2009, Stephen Gran via RT wrote: A quick look at the munin stats suggests we don't use all that much bandwidth at present (or cpu, for that matter) so maybe it doesn't matter either way? ain't there are third factor to consider: the bandwidth(+cpu) used on the user

why dont new wiki pages default to gpl2 (was Re: User and groups justification (was Re: group nvram)

Hi, (taking a thread from -devel) On Freitag, 20. März 2009, Jon Dowland wrote: If you do so please bear in mind that doc/* in the base-passwd package is licensed GPL-2 and Debian wiki pages have no automatic explicit copyright exceptions (i.e. default to all rights reserved). See

Bug#512368: DebianWiki migrated

Hi, On Montag, 16. März 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: If I remember right, the GUI editor messed up several pages, so it was recommended not to use it (and I always hated it with a passion) Quite a few users choose moinmoin because it have a gui editor. Fair enough.. so the question is

Re: Debian Wiki and wikihomepages

Hi, On Samstag, 7. März 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: There are lots of ISP/associations/companies that offer website/homepage/blog hosting for free. I suppose we can expect contributors to be able to get one. wiki.debian-community.org is one. regards, Holger signature.asc

Bug#516977: please mention debian-live

Hi, On Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: debian-live (images) is (are) part of the official lenny release, yet they are not mentioned on http://www.debian.org/CD/torrent-cd/ - please fix this! :) same on http://www.de.debian.org/CD/ Thanks, Holger signature.asc

Bug#516977: please mention debian-live

package: www.debian.org Hi, debian-live (images) is (are) part of the official lenny release, yet they are not mentioned on http://www.debian.org/CD/torrent-cd/ - please fix this! :) Thanks, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#516607: etch is not obsolete yet

package: www.debian.org Hi, h01ger http://www.debian.org/releases/ says etch is obsolete. shouldnt that say its current oldstable release and changed to obsolete stable once security support is ceased? luk__ very probably, please be so kind to update it :-) ~/Projects/debian-www/webwml$ cvs

Re: Is anyone there

Hi, On Freitag, 20. Februar 2009, Ionel Mugurel Ciobica wrote: Is anyone there? Did you actually read one word from debian web site to see in fact what are you asking? No, he didnt. And you didnt notice this was just some clever new kind of spam to promote his domain. By replying you

Bug#512368: please disable the gui editor

package: wiki.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, reading the diff of edits done by the gui editor is terribly, as it adds random linebreaks and other changes, making spotting the real diff really hard. Please disable the GUI editor completly or provide a way to disable it for certain pages,

move skolelinux.es to skolelinux foundation? Re: skolelinux.es don't exist.

Hi, On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: [www.skolelinux.es seems to be taken by a squatter] I am forwarding this mail to debian-edu and to the owner of the skolelinux.es website. Strangely according to www.nic.es skolelinux.es belongs to Pablo: Nombre del dominio

Re: Generating pdfs out of moinmoin/debian wiki

Hi Lukas, On Thursday 04 December 2008 01:04, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: And how is this one generated? What tool, how you get the images in? I answered that question a little way down: apt-get source debian-edu-doc for the source code, the wiki pages are at

Re: Generating pdfs out of moinmoin/debian wiki

Hi, On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:28, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: http://wiki.debian.org/MoinMoin/GeneratePdf I was surprised by the quality of that pdf. Here is a sample: here is another, with translated images even: :) http://maintainer.skolelinux.org/debian-edu-doc/de/release-manual.pdf

Re: DebianWiki: Draft of a new frontpage [RFC]

Hi, On Friday 28 November 2008 14:23, Franklin PIAT wrote: I would like to get more feed-back (even from people that aren't involved in the wiki.) I liked the sidebar on the left, though I think some of the links should point to www.d.o instead of wiki.d.o regards, Holger

Re: DebianWiki: Draft of a new frontpage [RFC]

Hi, dropping -publicity@ On Saturday 29 November 2008 01:52, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: I have dropped the News entry. (Since I rewrote the News page, I have noticed that the wiki contains no single news feed). Documentations and InstallDebian are merely placeholders that points to official

Re: css compliance

Hi, On Friday 21 November 2008 17:43, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: We have this kind of reports from time to time, but that is a false negative. http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/10/msg00283.html Maybe this can be put as a comment into the css file, next to the property -moz-border-radius

Bug#504613: please create a buildd.d.o pseudo-package for bug-tracking

package: bugs.debian.org severity: wishlist x-debbugs-cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org On Wednesday 05 November 2008 17:25, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hmm, I'm not too sure if there is a (pseudo) package that this bug could get cloned to for that As several people have stated that such a

Bug#501954: use ikiwiki instead of MediaWiki or MoinMoin

Hi, I'm tempted to open a bug report with this subject (use ikiwiki instead...) and the same wording as 501954. IOW: I think this bug is quite useless. regards, Holger P.S.: I also do think that switching to ikiwiki is more worthwhile than switching to mediawiki... mediawiki

Re: Clarify squeak status on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package ?

Hi Ben, thanks for bringing this up. On Thursday 03 July 2008 16:28, Ben Armstrong wrote: I see squeak on: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package * squeak -- license issues. Maybe this should be clarified, now that squeak-vm is in Debian? (There are still license issues with

Re: wiki : experimenting moinmoin 1.7

Hi Franklin, On Monday 23 June 2008 01:16, Franklin PIAT wrote: Jonas Smedegaard has released the version 1.7 of moinmoin. I've setup an experimental copy[1] of wiki.debian.org, so we can detect bugs. Let me know if you need to enable some extra features. Could you please enable docbook

Re: Timeline of the Debian project

Hi Chris, On Saturday 12 April 2008 14:51, Chris Lamb wrote: Oh, that's a shame. I've tried Epiphany 2.20.3 and Iceweasel 2.0.0.3 (from unstable). I know there are some problems with Konqueror too, but I don't have enough error messages to go on. Try it yourself with konqueror? :) Could

Bug#388141: Discussions elsewhere

Hi, On Wednesday 12 March 2008 16:51, MJ Ray wrote: Can we reach broad consensus on 2-clause-BSD-style as default with other DFSG licences like GPLv2 being allowed? I'd prefer it vice versa. After all its Debian GNU/Linux, not BSD ;) regards, Holger pgpzMuhwji1vR.pgp Description:

  1   2   >