Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

2006-05-03 Thread Christian Perrier
Sweet! Let's just kill it then. I'll add some code to the postinst to remove the questions all together. Christian, let's just make it dead and give the translators a little rest :-) Ack. They will love this..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#337692: libx11-dev: encounter same error when trying to compile different X dependant software

2006-05-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 23:55 +0200, Daniel Baulig wrote: Package: libx11-dev Version: 2:1.0.0-6 Followup-For: Bug #337692 I tried to compile different software using X headers (eg wmxmms, wmpower and the dri radeon drivers) and encountered the same problem in each of the compilation

Bug#365134: upgraded xdm not starting

2006-05-03 Thread Jiann-Ming Su
Followup-For: Bug #365134 Package: xdm Version: 1:1.0.1-6 *** Please type your report below this line *** After doing an apt-get dist-upgrade, the new xdm package no longer starts. I've had this happen on two systems. It may be related to the fact that some scripts aren't looking for binaries

Bug#365831: xserver-xorg: uninstallable on clean system, preinst exit status 10

2006-05-03 Thread Richard Burton
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.0.15 Severity: grave xserver-xorg cannot be installed on a clean system. clean system was created using DFS cd to bootstrap unstable. Previously I would have installed xwindows-system-core gnome-desktop-environment to get my desktop. I wasn't totally sure

Bug#365765: xserver-xorg-video-ati

2006-05-03 Thread curt manucredo (hansycm)
a nice guy told me that the issue with the resume/suspend has been fixed in the new ati-xorg-driver. it was a bug and did not only aply to 0x5462 as i thought. so there is only the issue with the unknown chip-id 0x5462. i belive that it will be add soon! i guess the kernel-drm guys and the

Bug#337692: libx11-dev: encounter same error when trying to compile different X dependant software

2006-05-03 Thread Daniel Baulig
Hoi! Michel Dänzer wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 23:55 +0200, Daniel Baulig wrote: Package: libx11-dev Version: 2:1.0.0-6 Followup-For: Bug #337692 I tried to compile different software using X headers (eg wmxmms, wmpower and the dri radeon drivers) and encountered the same problem in each

Bug#365831: marked as done (xserver-xorg: uninstallable on clean system, preinst exit status 10)

2006-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 02:21:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365831: xserver-xorg: uninstallable on clean system, preinst exit status 10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#365837: xserver-xorg: Debconf questions use cryptic Accept/Decline when refering to user interface items

2006-05-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.0.15 Severity: minor Hello all, First of all, thanks for the packaging of xorg, I upgraded today and it was relatively seemless, nothing that I couldn't solve in 2 minutes. Great work, thanks! The bug concerns the following. When upgrading, I got questions

Bug#337692: marked as done (need x-dev = 6.8.2 for an Xfuncproto.h with _X_SENTINEL)

2006-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:44:38 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line not a bug in libx11-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 362782

2006-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 tags 362782 + fixed-upstream Bug#362782: Broken manpages There were no tags set. Bug#356539: xbase-clients: same manpages refer to incorrect location (.so man1x/manpage.1x)

Bug#365831: xserver-xorg: uninstallable on clean system, preinst exit status

2006-05-03 Thread Richard Burton
This is fixed in version 1:7.0.16 of xserver-xorg in incoming. Confirmed fixed. Sorry for the dupe (I did check, but somehow missed it). Richard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365837: xserver-xorg: Debconf questions use cryptic Accept/Decline when refering to user interface items

2006-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2006/05/msg00183.html or http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365837 asked: Autodetect keyboard layout? Yes No The text uses a cryptic way to, I guess, refer to the buttons at the bottom (Accept refers to Yes and Decline to No?). . ...

Bug#365879: xserver-xorg uninstallable, X not working even on new system

2006-05-03 Thread Bhaskar Manda
Subject: xserver-xorg uninstallable, X not working even on new system Package: xserver-xorg Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** xserver-xorg in not installable because preconfigure fails. This bug was apaprently fixed in 7.0.14,

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

2006-05-03 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:00:50PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: Right, I'm not really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu stuff. I'll look in to it

Bug#365885: video playback on X.org 7 fails

2006-05-03 Thread Toufeeq Hussain
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.0.15 Severity: normal Hi, While playing video files using totem/xine/mplayer the following error occurs. The program 'totem' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for

Bug#365888: libxvmc1: Looks for config file in wrong place and doesn't document it AT ALL

2006-05-03 Thread John Goerzen
Package: libxvmc1 Version: 1:1.0.1-4 Severity: serious Upon trying to use an XVMC-using app, I see: XvMCWrapper: Could not open config file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XvMCConfig. XvMCWrapper: No such file or directory Several problems with this: 1) That file does not exist 2) That location for config

Bug#365879: marked as done (xserver-xorg uninstallable, X not working even on new system)

2006-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 12:45:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Re: Bug#365837: xserver-xorg: Debconf questions use cryptic Accept/Decline when refering to user interface items

2006-05-03 Thread Christian Perrier
I seem to recall that Joey Hess once filed a bug against one of my packages (xprint-common probably, though I can't confirm it) addressing this kind of question. I think there's a debconf best practice which he wanted me to adhere to, something along the lines of not explicitly mentioning yes

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

2006-05-03 Thread Christian Perrier
Emphasis there on 'should'. Fabio found some problems so ended up adding the default ZAM back, but I don't know whether or not that's resolved in current CVS. OK. Well, in case the template is re-added, I suggest pinging me or grabbed the old translations from the PO files in the 6.9 branch:

Bug#365837: xserver-xorg: Debconf questions use cryptic Accept/Decline when refering to user interface items

2006-05-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-05-03 Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The bug concerns the following. When upgrading, I got questions like this one: The default keyboard layout selection for the Xorg server will be based on a combination of the language and the keyboard layout selected in the

Bug#365913: twm: unpacks files in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 on upgrade

2006-05-03 Thread Vasilis Vasaitis
Package: twm Version: 1:1.0.1-3 Severity: normal Hello, This package contains files in /usr/lib/X11, without containing the directory itself and without pre-depending on x11-common (= 1:7.0.0). The result is that, when upgrading from X11R6, said files get unpacked in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11

Bug#365917: xutils-dev: unpacks files in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 on upgrade

2006-05-03 Thread Vasilis Vasaitis
Package: xutils-dev Version: 1:1.0.2-3 Severity: normal Hello, This package contains files in /usr/lib/X11, without containing the directory itself and without pre-depending on x11-common (= 1:7.0.0). The result is that, when upgrading from X11R6, said files get unpacked in

Bug#365914: xutils: unpacks files in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 on upgrade

2006-05-03 Thread Vasilis Vasaitis
Package: xutils Version: 1:7.0.0-3 Severity: normal Hello, This package contains files in /usr/lib/X11, without containing the directory itself and without pre-depending on x11-common (= 1:7.0.0). The result is that, when upgrading from X11R6, said files get unpacked in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2001 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-03 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, because we really just want to get rid of these things. They're functionally replicated in x11-common anyway now. Sure, but in that case you shouldn't be testing $1 for purge, as the postinst will never be invoked that way. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC

xutils-dev 1:1.0.2-3 MIGRATED to testing

2006-05-03 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xutils-dev source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1:1.0.2-3 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

xtrans 1.0.0-5 MIGRATED to testing

2006-05-03 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xtrans source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.0.0-5 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

Bug#365947: x11-common wrongly depends on transitional package xfree86-common

2006-05-03 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.16 Severity: normal x11-common has a wrong dependency on xfree86-common, which is a transitional package. The dependency should most likely be the other way around (xfree86-common depending on x11-common) Cheers, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#365948: x11-common: broken depends on compat package xfree86-common

2006-05-03 Thread Ray Kohler
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.16 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version 7.0.16 of x11-common depends on xfree86-common, which is a useless compatibility package. Making things worse is that xfree86-common conflicts with x11-common. This prevents x11-common from being

Bug#365948: x11-common: broken depends on compat package xfree86-common

2006-05-03 Thread Ray Kohler
I screwed this up. It installs fine if I do it right. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Bug#363529: xserver-xorg-input-wacom: No wacom driver for xorg 7.0

2006-05-03 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El miércoles, 19 de abril de 2006 19:58, David Martínez Moreno escribió: I know, I know. I just received my new Graphire2 a week ago, and I am having problems with my USB ports. I hope to work on it the next week. :-) Hello, Jean Marie. A bit later than expected, but I have

Bug#365948: x11-common: broken depends on compat package xfree86-common

2006-05-03 Thread Haifeng Chen
The installation is not clean. You can find the following script in the xfree86-common.postinst. # Just move the Xsession file if it's still around if [ -f /etc/X11/Xsession ]; then mv /etc/X11/Xsession /etc/X11/Xsession.xfree86 fi This action makes a big broken in my system. I can't use

Bug#365967: x11-common: unnecessary use of pre-depends (354146)

2006-05-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.16 Severity: important The latest version of x11-common now pre-depends on xfree86-common, nominally in order to fix bug #354146. The rationale given for the pre-depends in that bug is incorrect: Hmm, then x11-common Pre-Depends: xfree86-common to make sure