While going through my filtered e-mail, I always see multiple e-mails from
the same persons with the same ad but am amazed by how 1 has a weight of
29 - ROUTE, and 1 has a weight of 21 - COPY -
That's actually fairly common -- and why the weighting system works so
well. :)
Most spam tests
I had a similar situation with a client who uses VPop to pop a common mail
box and sort it localy, not only that, their email, which he says is very
critical, is running on a 486 (and he is very proud of that fact)... well
anyway... I disabled the filtering for his domain, he called the next day
I'm running Declude 1.60.
I've had exactly one message flagged by HELOBOGUS - I'll take a look at the
DNS-based tests and pick this thread up in the morning.
Thanks,
-Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
I've had declude junkmail pro running well for a few months now...Just
bumped up declude.exe to 1.60 last night. Seemed to be receiving things
normally and didn't notice an immediate change in filter
characteristics. But just this morning, round 11:00, noticed most if
not all messages started
OK, well, not 'all messages' but many legit messages which had not previously been
caught. Perhaps the version I had in place previously didn't support this test? (was
using previous release, not beta) I'll dig through the release notes.
Thanks.
-- Original Message
This is a little off topic, but related to a customer service question concerning
declude.
What I have is one client out of about 80 that swears that declude is a piece of junk
and does not work.
In trying to explain to this client how declude works and the weighting system I run
into a
How would one setup this type of scenario with the PRO version ?
You could accomplish this by having a
\IMail\Declude\example.com\$default$.JunkMail file with all tests set to
use the IGNORE action, and then a \IMail\Declude\example.com\jdoe.JunkMail
file for the user who wants their mail
WHITELIST TODOMAIN @example.com in the global.cfg file will let all spam go through to
any email address at domain example.com.
So if you create a subdirectory off of declude named example.com and in the
subdirectory example.com have a file named jdoe.JunkMail with configurations for jdoe
in
The header info you requested is listed below.
Received: from declude.com [66.189.58.123] by mail.jamesoninns.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A01E19250134; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:38:38 -0400
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.189.58.123]
These two headers show that Declude did use the
We do not have a backup mailserver or gateway - any other ideas?
Could you post the complete headers of this E-mail? That may provide some
clues.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
We do not have a backup mailserver or gateway - any other ideas?
-Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
I've just recently put junkmail into a test phase on my server and have
noticed that I am getting almost no hits on the HELOBOGUS test -
specifically one hit over a three day/10,000 message period.
From what I've been reading on this forum, I'd expect more than that and was
wondering what might
I use the following line in my $default$.junkmail to change the subject for
quick testing and demos to customers. Once they decide they like what they
see it can be changed to delete or left for them to use email client rules.
WEIGHT18 SUBJECT SPAM[%WEIGHT%-%TESTSFAILED%]:
Darin.
- Original
I've just recently put junkmail into a test phase on my server and have
noticed that I am getting almost no hits on the HELOBOGUS test -
specifically one hit over a three day/10,000 message period.
From what I've been reading on this forum, I'd expect more than that and was
wondering what might
At 02:44 PM 10/24/2002 -0500, grb wrote:
What I have is one client out of about 80 that swears that declude is a
piece of junk and does not work.
I don't have a client that uses that software, but I do have one that
insisted the filtering was bad and they were getting more Spam then ever
Just a note of appreciation.
I want to thank everyone for their suggestionsand they were all great and I will
use them to illustrate the effectiveness of the software
Over the last nine years of web development, hosting, etcI have been subscribed to
many lists for support. Cold
Hey Rich,
Not sure I understand you correctly, are you offering a system in which a client can
adjust their weighting on their own? If so, do you have an example of this feature of
your service? This sounds great.
After reading this, you got me thinking, I could write a Cold Fusion
Thats correct...It reads it each time a message is received. We plan to work on a
similar tool using ASP here in the next month or two.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: grb
Sent: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:54:47 -0500
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] client Question
Hey Rich,
Not sure I
Yup, very typical in MS exchange setups where the Exchange server is running on a
Win2K box with some internal naming convention or the like. Thanks, Declude's working
just fineand I actually read the release notes now! ;)
-- Original Message --
19 matches
Mail list logo
