RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-13 Thread Uhte, Russ
We thought about that, but our users don't want it.. Period... (So they say) -Russ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jcochran;naplesgov.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence That

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-13 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just intended recipients like you mentioned? Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Kemp
I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and the other Tech on this project. I don't think that they should give up on this yet...but they think otherwise. If I can manage to convince them to go forward, I will take you up on your offer. If, in fact, they do choose to give it another

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just intended recipients like you mentioned? Yes, in the next release, the ALLRECIPS filter option will work on both the intended recipient and actual recipient, so you won't have to have the account created on the server.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread paul
found: 26 ID-20021112-000700 @boing.azoogle.com curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct? That's the problem I have on deciding this stuff, if you say .azoogle alone, ANYTHING from azoogle will be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude

2002-11-13 Thread Sean Fahey
Hello Tom - I'm a recent addition to the Declude group and I don't usually endorse products or go out of my way to provide testimonials but... I think it's worthwhile to continue your trial. Most of the problems I've encountered have been, well, self-inflicted in nature. I've picked up a lot

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EzMTS

2002-11-13 Thread David Stavert
Scott This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude. David I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware mailserver. When ever a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] EzMTS

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude. Ah, I see. It probably is a problem with EzMTS, where the E-mail headers and the body can't be distinguished. Do you happen to have a sample of one of these E-mails in an IMail .mbx file? That would be the best way

[Declude.JunkMail] Countrychain

2002-11-13 Thread Douglas Hardison
I've just upgraded to 1.62 and now I'm attempting to configure the country test. I've downloaded the dat file from http://www.declude.com/release/162/all_list.dat and placed it in the Declude folder. In global.cfg I have: XINHEADER X-Country-Chain: %COUNTRYCHAIN% and COUNTRY filter

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Tom, I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop, OSSRC, and OSSOFT Tests

2002-11-13 Thread Ron Harris
Thanks John and Terry. I think I have a very good plan of attack. Both of your replies were very insightful. Ron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com] On Behalf Of Smart Business Lists Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:39 AM To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Countrychain

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've just upgraded to 1.62 and now I'm attempting to configure the country test. I've downloaded the dat file from http://www.declude.com/release/162/all_list.dat and placed it in the Declude folder. Are you sure that it is located in the declude folder and named correctly

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Are the messages from this particular thread getting caught by sniffer for everyone else? How does sniffer work and why is it catching this email? Something with the wide variety of domains listed? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread John Tolmachoff
LOL It got caught by CYBERsitter too. Look at the list of the domains. The body filters picked up on words in the list of domain names. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Tom
@boing.azoogle.com curious, but would having .azoogle be better than boing.azoogle? if they change boing to boing2 the mail would get through correct? I also have .azoogle.com listed. This will catch almost anything from them except for @azoogle.com - Using both these methods will allow

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Tom
Any particular reason you are blocking o u t p o s t.com? Although I am blocking it, does not mean you have to. I don't remember every reason for each site added to the list, however, more than likely they were sending us junk mail without permission. If you feel that for some reason I am

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Tom
LOL You know what is even more laughable is that I am the one who posted the list and it got caught by my own spam traps. Regards, Tom Image`fx --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread John Tolmachoff
You know what is even more laughable is that I am the one who posted the list and it got caught by my own spam traps. At least we all know it works. :)) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Bill Newberg
I wanted to thank you for your time and effort that you have put into posting and keeping up to date a file that I can use to help guard against spam. I know how busy life and work can be and wanted to thank you for your diligence in providing a service (free) to me as well as this

[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:CYBERsitter NoXMail List

2002-11-13 Thread Brian Milburn
I want to thank everyone who requested a beta copy of CYBERsitter NoXMail. There were quite a few requests and we received a lot of positive feedback and a couple of good suggestions. One user requested that we set up a mailing list so that beta users can ask questions, and also so that I can

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting To address

2002-11-13 Thread John Tolmachoff
A clarification on this post: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail;declude.com/msg04189.html Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster, correct? Is there another way to whitelist a to address? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting To address

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
A clarification on this post: http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail;declude.com/msg04189.html Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster, correct? That is correct. Is there another way to whitelist a to address? Yes -- by upgrading to Declude JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread eddie pang
If you feel that for some reason I am wrong for placing them into the list then I would like to here it. I am only human and un-like a computer I do make mistakes and unlike a computer I try to rectify them. I hope Spews is listening... Sorry i just could not resist... eddie :) --- [This