Hi Eddie,
we receive a lot of SPAM from Korea. For this reason we have set up a filter
by charset and assign this mails a high weight. This works very good for us.
Following is the context of the korea.txt file.
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS big5
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS euc-kr
HEADERS 15 CONTAINS gb2312
Thank you, Very very much!!!
I've been bashing my head trying to get this to work...
Sincerely,
Eddie :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Heinrich Richter
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
You might try adding a value to the myfilter.txt
MYFILTER filter c:\imail\declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0
It might think that the value of zero is telling it to bypass
myfilter.txt
Jim Rooth
KLOTRON,INC.
Office: 817.654.3018.103
Home: 972.606.6341
Mobile: 214.244.0979
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
David,
You'll also have to put a line in your $default$.junkmail (and
GLOBAL.CFG for outgoing) if you want to see the test result in the
headers.
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David
Lewis-Waller
Sent: Thursday, November 28,
David,
It would have been nice if I mentioned that the line to be added is:
MYFILTERWARN
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David
Lewis-Waller
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have added MYFILTER WARN to $default$.junkmail.txt and removed the
double quotes around the text file leaving
MYFILTERfilter c:\imail\declude\myfilter.txt x 0 0
In global.cfg
I'm sent a few more test emails and the MYFILTER test isn't appearing in
the headers
I am quite
David,
Thursday, November 28, 2002 you wrote:
I have added MYFILTER WARN to $default$.junkmail.txt and removed the
double quotes around the text file leaving
MYFILTERfilter c:\imail\declude\myfilter.txt x 0 0
The format appears to be correct.
I'm sent a few more test
Ah. Well, there it is.
My opinion still stands. If clients are on the blacklists, there is no
point in receiving mail from them AT ALL.
Screw em till they remove themselves... Just my opinion.
Regards,
Phillip B. Holmes
Media Resolutions Inc.
Macromedia Alliance Partner
http://www.mediares.com
Ah. Well, there it is.
My opinion still stands. If clients are on the blacklists, there is no
point in receiving mail from them AT ALL.
Screw em till they remove themselves... Just my opinion.
I am sorry you feel that way.
What about the new mail admin at a company taking over a g*d awfull mess
John - Great quote!
John has provided great examples why we give these two items super low
weight values.
Michael Jaworski
Puget Sound Network, Inc.
Seattle, WA
http://www.psni.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent:
John..
I commented on blacklists only.. i.e. spamcop, open relay db, etc... NOT
badheaders, revdns etc.
I do not kill email based on REVDNS or badheaders.. I hold mail based on
weight 20 (based on those criteria).
Bottom line:
If you have earned a place on the blacklists, you wont be sending
Scott, do you recommend using both BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS? I use both,
along with the LOOSENSPAMHEADERS directive, and I'm wondering if SPAMHEADERS
incorporates BADHEADERS... It seems that when I see SPAMHEADERS, I very
often see BADHEADERS.
On the other hand, maybe I'm just getting used to
This may be interesting (forwarded from an anti-spam mailing list):
-Scott
I recently received a spam where the sender left a javascript hit counter
which my pine kindly ignored. It did, however, give the URL where he, and
you, can watch the hits
ORDB is not going to put a server on the blacklist unless they have
tested successfully for an open relay.
BTW: I was only making a comment about the abuse account and
just stating that it could benefit some poor soul that
was hacked or had an open relay without knowing it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
