Now one of our customers send a legit message trough our mailserver.
Your use of legit is confusing. Rephrased, an SPF TXT
record _is_ a legitimate use policy. For the purposes of an
SPF check, there is no greater arbiter of legitimacy than that record.
I specified legit in this case
No backup software, no on access scanning. I am having some other problems
with the machine - I'm about to nuke it regardless - I just wanted to make
sure that declude was still being called to scan for viruses until I get
this box formatted... ugh
Unfortunately, if the files can't be locked by
Thanks -
It looks as if it was an aberration. I've checked a few different day's
logs and didn't see could not lock file in any other log. Something must
have been up. Maybe I should look through the logs more thouroughly and
more often : )
Anything out there that could alert me to the fact
I am using the ATTACH command with the default spamattach.eml file. Is
there a method to specify a different .eml file? I would like to have
one per domain or for testing etc.
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott,
This may be very minor and possibly just cosmetic, I have found that
some messages will have a %WEIGHT% variable returned for a WARN action
that is -100 when such a score is impossible on our system. The
example below is from a message that scored 0 in the logs (seemingly
correct), but
I have created a similar test that you pass teh %HELO% variable to here is
my setup. I have 0 0 for the weights because I am still testing.
I have found 1 false positive classmates.com has the ip
xx-xx-xx-xx.classmates.com in their helo string. I have also seen a few of
our customers sendign
Wouldn't be possible to let declude check for SPF-Records only
for incomming
messages?
Not on version 7. decluse does not know if it is a local or remote user
until Imail 8 and SMTP auth. Imail 8 indicates in the Q file it the user
authed or not not if the user is local or remote.
Kevin
Hi All,
What app are you using to view emails that have been held by Junkmail?
TIA,
Patrick
Patrick Allison
Information Technology System Specialist III
Technology and Computer Service
Centralia College
Centralia, WA
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Try SpamReview...
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Email viewer
Hi All,
What app are you using to view emails that have
Wouldn't be possible to let declude check for SPF-Records only for
incomming messages?
Not on version 7. decluse does not know if it is a local or
remote user until Imail 8 and SMTP auth. Imail 8 indicates in
the Q file it the user authed or not not if the user is local
or remote.
Good question I did not think of that. Scott will have to answer.
I beleive that all message are incomming at one point.
1) User sends a message from client
2) the message is oncomming to SMTP
3) SMTP determines that it is for another server
4) It then becomes an outgoing message???
My Best
I am using the ATTACH command with the default spamattach.eml file. Is
there a method to specify a different .eml file? I would like to have
one per domain or for testing etc.
No, only the \IMail\Declude\spamattach.eml file can be used with the ATTACH
action.
Not on version 7. decluse does not know if it is a local or
remote user until Imail 8 and SMTP auth. Imail 8 indicates in
the Q file it the user authed or not not if the user is local
or remote.
And why we can specify separate XINHEADER and XOUTHEADER lines?
That's different.
And why we can specify separate XINHEADER and XOUTHEADER lines?
That's different. XINHEADER/XOUTHEADER looks to see whether
the E-mail is incoming or outgoing (based on the
recipient(s), which is never forged). All spam is incoming;
the problem with SPF is determining if it is a local
Scott,
Then let me add that to the request for enhancement pile.
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL
This may be very minor and possibly just cosmetic, I have found that some
messages will have a %WEIGHT% variable returned for a WARN action that is
-100 when such a score is impossible on our system. The example below is
from a message that scored 0 in the logs (seemingly correct), but shows
Scott,
Sorry, it wasn't the WARN action, it's coming from the XOUTHEADER
(gatewayed client in this example):
XOUTHEADERX-MailPure: Spam Score: %WEIGHT%
- or -
XINHEADERX-MailPure: Spam Score: %WEIGHT%
1.79i6 is the version that I am running presently. Following are some
This is a thank you to Scott and his team for all
of the great features in JM.
We havea few customers who relay all of their mail to a AOL accounts,
insist onnobody aliases,and don't want filtering. One of these
hadn't checked email in months and started today, clicking the AOL SPAM button
1.79i6 is the version that I am running presently. Following are some
other examples, with the first appearance in my inbox being April 12th
which happens to be less than a week after you added the weight variable
to the external tests, and just after you resolved the issue where the
weights
19 matches
Mail list logo
