Hi;
I could not find
in the manual the details on how to set the following- I finally found it in the
sample Global.cfg:
STOPPROCESSINGONFIRSTDELETE
ONCOPYFILEACTIONWITHHEADERS
ONADJUSTFORLOADON
But I can't
find anything on how to set the following and it is not in the sample
On 11 Apr 2005 at 20:44, Barry Simpson wrote:
Declude Version 2.0.6 was posted to www.declude.com earlier today.
Updated Release Notes and Documentation are also available.
How is the ProcessCounter invoked? I see it in the docs but that is
it -
Is any kind of logical processing avail or
On 12 Apr 2005 at 4:23, Kami Razvan wrote:
Hi Kami
STOPPROCESSINGONFIRSTDELETE ON
COPYFILEACTIONWITHHEADERS ON
ADJUSTFORLOADON
CONCATENATELOGSTHRESHOLD
Some of these explanations are at the bottom of the junkmail manual.
[To find the manual I did a google site search for manual.. ]
I think
You can use weightrange to define your own test/action to delete on an exact
weight of 36.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.0.6
On 11 Apr 2005 at
Kami,
If you follow the link to the "JunkMail Manual" from the "Tech Support"
page on the Declude site, you will find documentation for these
features. I suppose that it is possible that they didn't update the
old manual.htm redirects, but going through the site in this way does
work. They
On 12 Apr 2005 at 10:51, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Darin -
You can use weightrange to define your own test/action to delete on an
exact weight of 36.
Understood. Thanks for the reply But I was just using the DELETE
action as an example. I am looking for IF - ELSE CASE functionality -
-Nick
---
Gotcha. I don't believe that currently exists, but many have found
workarounds by defining a test and checking for it in a filter file (Pro
version required).
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:10
WOW, Declude 4.0.6. I must have overslept a bit.
;)
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc:
Good catch :) Where were you the moment before I sent the message :)
Darrell
John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes:
WOW, Declude 4.0.6. I must have overslept a bit.
;)
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
To be more specific. I call declude and windows runs it with NTDVM
and the message isn't processed. After awhile, I stop the SMTP server and
all the messagesare processed but still leaves the NTDVM that was created
behind. What I'm doing is reading in the command line argument and then
when
CONCATENATELOGSTHRESHOLD
should there be a number in front of this?
CONCATENATELOGSTHRESHOLD 10
I think it will be a good feature if you provide an example after each
description on how to use the feature. A single example can go a long
Those directives go in the declude.cfg file as they
DLAnalyzer 4.1.0 has been released. Version 4.1.0 is compatible with the
enhanced logging changes introduced with Declude version 4.0.6.
DLAnalyzer is a comprehensive reporting tool that integrates both Junkmail
and Virus statistics into one report. Some of the features require the
Title: Message
Comment on STOPPROCESSINGONFIRSTDELETE
ON
It does what it says.
We installed the
upgrade last night and found this little gem has reduced our cpu load
dramatically since weusethe delete action
extensively.
Nice work Barry and
the Declude team!
Michael JaworskiPuget
Is anyone using the DYNHELO test in Declude - if so do you have any
information on it? What specifically is it looking for? False positive
rate?I found it in the new global.cfg file, but did not see any
references to it in the manual.
Also, for the BCC test any thoughts on what the
the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
__ NOD32 1.1058 (20050412) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system
Alright, I've run a few tests, and much of it seems to be working.
However, when I look at the headers, it says X-Note: This E-mail was
scanned by Declude JunkMail for spam. but I'm not seeing
X-Spam-Tests-Failed or any of the other headers. I do have a
directory set up in the declude
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:16, David Barker wrote:
Hi David,
BCC bcc 10 x 5 0
This test type, checks to see if there are more than X known BCC:'s
I think Darrell's question was related to optimum setting rather
than functionality.
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the
Is this for a local domain or a store and forward domain. If its for a
store and forward domain did you create the domain folder for it under
Declude?
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is this for a local domain or a store and forward domain. If its for a
store and forward domain did you create the domain folder for it under
Declude?
Darrell
It's a store-and-forward domain, and I did create a domain folder under
the Declude directory. So
Darrell..
The BCC test to me is scary if used by itself- I can see it being used as a
combo test but alone with any weight is not something I would use. We have
clients that use their outlook and send 50+ people in a single BCC ..
Emails to boards and volunteer groups in nonprofits and
defaulting to the global.cfg settings.
--
A. Clausen
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
__ NOD32 1.1058 (20050412
functionality.
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
__ NOD32 1.1058 (20050412) Information
Hi:
I hold at 10:
BCC4bcc 4 x 2 0
BCC6bcc 6 x 2 0
BCC8bcc 8 x 2 0
I whitelist SMTP AUTH.
So - based on this, I'm really only effecting INCOMING emails where an
outside
David Barker wrote:
If you are forwarding mail to another server in other words using Declude
for OUTBOUND scanning the Actions are defined in the global.cfg also
consider it will be using the xoutheaders in your global.cfg.
Okay, I'm a little confused here, but if what you say is right, then it
Quick follow-up did you put a $default$.junkmail file under that domain. if
you could bump your logs up to HIGH and post a snippet of that to the list
for us to see.
Darrell
A. Clausen writes:
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is this for a local domain or a store and forward domain. If
A. Clausen wrote:
David Barker wrote:
If you are forwarding mail to another server in other words using Declude
for OUTBOUND scanning the Actions are defined in the global.cfg also
consider it will be using the xoutheaders in your global.cfg.
Okay, I'm a little confused here, but if what you
For the domains we store and forward for all we did is the following.
1.) Create a folder for the domain under the declude folder. example:
domain.com
2.) Drop in a $default$.junkmail file.
In the logs you will see this (under log level high).
04/12/2005 01:22:59 Q5AEE30FF023260B2 Using
Hi Darrell:
I have a number tests like the following:
==
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS [MULTIPLE.COMBO.
MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 4
MAXWEIGHT4
TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS [COMBO.AHBL]
TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS [COMBO.RFC-IGNORANT]
I
just found out that our mail server has been blacklisted by spamcop, apparently
for "Misdirected bounces" which seems to be nothing more than bouncing a message
after first accepting it (I pasted Spamcop's explanation below).
I'm running
Imail v8.05 with declude v1.82, and I'm not sure
Kami, the BCC test will probably be a good marriage with any DYNA or DUL
tests.
In general, I think that the BCC test will be of most use to people who
run a gateway scenario, where they don't have envelope rejection of
addresses.
Since I have that configuration, I can offer the observation that
-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
__ NOD32 1.1058 (20050412) Information __
This message was checked
I use these settings fior BCC:
BCC-5 bcc 5 x 15 0
BCC-10 bcc 10 x 10 0
subject tag at 100, hold at 200, delete at 300.
March (BCC5 7177 spam, 268 ham)
March (BCC5 2418 spam, 87 ham)
Since the overwhelming majority of my foreign BCC's are spam (this April
2219/2200 are spam), I also have a filter:
On 12 Apr 2005 at 11:38, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
I've found the new DYNHELO test to be quite useful and I've
subsequently stopped using Bud's free external tool (HELOisIP from
http://bud.thedurlands.com/ ).
Thanks Andrew - [sorry Bud} I will follow your lead and do the same -
-Nick
---
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For the domains we store and forward for all we did is the following.
1.) Create a folder for the domain under the declude folder. example:
domain.com
2.) Drop in a $default$.junkmail file.
In the logs you will see this (under log level high).
04/12/2005
Let me guess, you are using the evil
BOUNCEIFYOUMUST action in Declude JM?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Technical Support
Sent: Tuesday, April
12, 2005 11:34 AM
To:
on 4/12/05 2:33 PM, Technical Support wrote:
Has anyone else had this issue before,
and if so, what can be done to fix it?
Yes, one of my servers is listed somewhere (sorbs I think).
Setup an outbound rule in IMail, any message from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of undeliverable mail gets
For the domains that I store and forward I only scan their mail when it
comes into the server. The way it works is that even though the mail is
coming into your server it is treated as outgoing unless you setup the per
domain configuration (like you did creating the folder). Once you set the
This can also come aboutthrough use
of a mail gateway. I used a Symantec SMTP
virus gateway for a while. I stopped using it because I couldn't turn off the
bounce messages.
When I
askedSymantec how to stop the bounces, they said they never even
consideredmaking that possiblebecause it
Hm -
I looked at http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/2.0.6.asp - but don't
find any DYNHELO?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL
I noted in in the global.cfg file for 2.06. I believe these tests to be new:
DYNHELO dynhelo x x 7 0
ENCODEDURL encodedurl x x 1 0
IPURL ipurl x x 2 0
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:35 PM
Title: Message
Hi,
I
downloaded 2.06, ran the manual install - but ProcessCounter.exe is not
included!?
Refer
to:
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
Title: Message
We discovered that omission this morning and it has
been corrected.
- Original Message -
From:
Andy Schmidt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:00
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
ProcessCounter missing from manual
I'm surprised the encodedURL is ranked to low?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 04:01 PM
To:
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=151
Regards,
- Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:35 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Hm -
I looked
What is the v2.0.6 ProcessCounter application? On a manual install, the
only applications expanded are:
deccon.exe 10/01/2004
Declude for IMail.exe 04/11/2005
Declude for SmarterMail.exe 04/11/2005
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Title: Message
Hm, I
only downloaded minutes ago - and if it was corrected, it has NOT been updated
on your SERVER.
Best
RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
On 12 Apr 2005 at 16:09, David Franco-Rocha wrote:
We discovered that omission this morning and it has been corrected.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt
I'll tell ya. they like you Andy. I get no respect :)
I told them this am this was missing and never heard a peep...
Title: Message
I think that's an area where when an
omission/problem/etc. is discovered it would be nice if it were posted to the
list. That way we don't waste downloading and asking about
it.
Same applies to updates.
Posting to the list when an issue is found, and
when it's been
On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:14, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
I just went through the wizard manual install again.. and the
processCounter app is no where to be found..
-Nick
What is the v2.0.6 ProcessCounter application? On a manual install,
the only applications expanded are:
deccon.exe 10/01/2004
It is in
C:\Program Files\Computerized Horizons\Declude
Ralph
-- -Original Message-
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
-- Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:25 PM
-- To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
-- Subject: Re:
Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Probably meant not available (at the time).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 05:09 PM
To:
Is it available now? Is it working in 2.0.6?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
Probably meant not available
On the surface it appears as if it should be
5. However, you will need to pull the logs to check this one.
Darrell
---Try invURIBL - an advanced
URI filtering test that will block more than 85% of all SPAM with the default
configuration? Try it for
That is correct, these two tests were among several tests added to the
global.cfg file, as they were documented by Scott, however they are not
available in the current declude.exe as we move forward with adding
additional tests these will very likely be activated in future releases.
David B
It could be the line:
HIDETESTSCATCHALLMAILS IPNOTINMX
NOLEGITCONTENT
which hides these tests which normally carry a
negative weight.
Also Matt @ Mailpure has newer filters. I believe
the anti-y!directed is pretty old and isn't used anymore.
- Original Message -
From:
Evans
Since I upgraded to v 2.0.6
from 2.0.5 I am getting the below header info included in the body of emails
that are being forwarded.
Any ideas.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight: SNIFFERZERO [0], FILTER-MAILFROM
[5]X-Spam-Time:00:00:12X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is
5X-Note: This
57 matches
Mail list logo
