on 7/25/05 5:11 PM, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Any ideas?
Add this line
sizelimit -1
to the OpenLDAP slapd.conf.
Excellent idea!
Thanks,
Greg
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Richard,
The problem here is, first of all, that Declude
does not look at the cc: or bcc: in the headers. It deals with recipients of the
email solely on the basis of what is in the message envelope (q*.smd file),
which is discarded by IMail after processing; all you eventually see is the
Any word on the fix to stop the errors that have been cropping up with 2.0.6
and beta .16 with the latest Imail versions ?
Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses
I'm trying to start the ldap service on another imail server (win2000) and
it won't start (I'd like to run ldap2aliases on it). Changing the ldap port
in imail to 1389 allows the ldap service to start. Port scanning, I see ldap
(port 389) is running, so something else must be using it. Anyone have
Bill wrote:
We had the same problem last year. It was a bug in one of the
releases of Imail and was latter fixed. I am not sure what version had
the problem but the latest version (8.20 with hotfix 2) works correctly.
Thanks. It appears we stumped Declude with this one. I was going to
on 7/26/05 11:49 AM, System Administrator wrote:
I'm trying to start the ldap service on another imail server (win2000) and
it won't start (I'd like to run ldap2aliases on it).
For those following along -
I've discovered that Active Directory uses port 389 in Win2000. I haven't
located any
Hi David,
Are you aware of any bugs with the CONTAINS filter statement?
Thanks!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Kevin,
After reviewing your files you had sent me this is the problem you are
having:
1. The email you received was encoded in BASE64 (Msg failed BASE64)
2. In your global.cfg you
Kevin,
After reviewing your files you had sent me this is the problem you are
having:
1. The email you received was encoded in BASE64 (Msg failed BASE64)
2. In your global.cfg you have the following directive:
DECODE OFF
Therefore your STOCKFILTER did not trigger - as nowhere in the
Nick,
I am not aware of any bugs with the CONTAINS filter statement.
However there are some items on our wish list, currently CONTAINS searches
for a string eg. ABC
So this will trigger XXXABCXXX
Currently there is not a way to use CONTAINS with SPACEABC as the config
file does not see the
I've discovered that Active Directory uses port 389 in Win2000.
Indeed it does!
I haven't located any way to change that port yet. . .
Don't try.
. . . so hopefully Sandy can tell me how to allow ldap2aliases to
reference another port.
When using the -s option to specify the LDAP
Then may I ask why prior to 2.0.6.12(or so) did the following work
HEADER 1 CONTAINS gfsinc.com against the header information of:
Received: from mail.gfsinc.com [206.165.223.43] by bobcat.jcjc.edu
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A9D24988001E; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:23:30 -0600
Now to catch this, I have to
In the last several months we have seen large quantity of spam coming from
IP blocks that never seem to get listed on any RBL. Spamcop is about the
only one that picks some of them up and once in awhile spamhaus. There was
a block last night that sent several hundred and sendbase.org showed they
Chuck,
Agreeded. This is why URI filtering is essential now. From the SURBL site.
[URI Filtering] We feel this is a promising approach since it addresses
the core problem of spam most directly: the sites advertised in the spams.
Spammers have found ways to get around conventional RBLs by
Agreed. I had to take my INV URI filtering offline for a few days for
some testing. Upon looking back at my kill stats I was intrigued by how
much is actually missed by RBL but is caught by INV URI.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I use this method in one of my external programs to look for a space.
Working this way would mean no existing filters would need to be changed.
Different characters could be used as a space substitute, which means no
character would be locked out of being used in filters. I'd hate to see a
Chuck,
Send me your global.cfg and $default$.junkmail that I can have a look to see
if there are additional tests that we can use, to help increase scoring on
spam.
David B
dbarker @ declude.com
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We have identified compatibility issues with Imail version 8.20 and all
versions of Declude. A new release of Declude is in the works and we are
currently entering into volume testing. This release is our highest
priority.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Oops,. bummer. Sucks to be him
Jeff Kratka
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
I'll third the URIBL filtering.
Darrell has a free trial of the product.
And the price is $30. Pretty affordable.
I've been using it happily all year.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005
URI blacklists are certainly making up the difference on my system.
But far more important, Sniffer from SortMonster.com is making the
biggest difference on my network.
Sniffer has the advantage of both URI filtering and traditional content
filters because Sniffer is picking up the content that
Less if you buy through Declude :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:56 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RBL's becoming worthless...
URI blacklists are
Umm... Sucked to be him, actually...
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kratka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How they deal w/ Spammers in Russia
Oops,. bummer. Sucks to be him
Jeff Kratka
Yesterday I complained about the lack of participation on this list from
Declude. Today alone there have been over a half a dozen posts. This has
not gone unnoticed.
Keep up the good work!
Don
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
Chuck,
Here some numbers from my side:
100k messages in the last 7 days
50.5% identified as legit, 49.5% as spam (viruses was filtered out before)
The best IP4R-based tests was
CBL (21%, 0.37%FP), SPAMCOP (21%, 0.47%FP) and XBL-DYNA (19%, 0.27%FP)
So they catch less then 50% of incoming spam
I've been kind of half following the discussions about declude and
smartermail and I'm hoping I can get an update from some of you.
How is declude working with smartermail now? As I recall, I believe some
folks had some problems? Have they been resolved?
Also, I'm loathe to put declude on the
Does this only apply to IMail 8.20? Are there any known issues with 2.0.6
and IMail 8.05 or 8.15?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Fix/Update
26 matches
Mail list logo
