Sandy,
Thanks for the reply.
But if I changed the name to mail.prudentialrand.com - wouldn't that cause
any other domain name on the server to fail a HELO-PTR-A roundtrip test?
If you don't mind, what would you need to see in the logs and or headers to
see if there is an issue?
Up until now I
Hi Dave,
I have one of these that will do what you want I believe. - I've moved
on to a Packeteer and a large Catalyst. If you are interested let me know.
http://www.netsys-direct.com/proddetail.php?prod=NS-2024Scat=12
-Nick
Dave Doherty wrote:
Hi, all-
I'll be providing VOIP and Internet
Is anyone dropping the smtp connection on the first invalid user? Anyone
see a downside to this? If the message has multiple recipients (even ones
that are valid) they will receive a notice saying the message was not
delivered.
Thoughts?
Darrell
Are you importing from an IMail installation? My experience with that was
very good, except they forgot to do the domain aliases. I didn't try
autoresponders, but that should be minimal. It brought over all the mail as
well.
Most of the time I spent on the project was in configruing add-ons
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Darrell
(([EMAIL PROTECTED])) wrote:
Is anyone dropping the smtp connection on the first invalid user?
Anyone see a downside to this? If the message has multiple
recipients (even ones that are valid) they will receive a notice
saying the message was not
This is a bug SmarterMail they need to do the replacements when displaying a
plaintext email. Or switch the view automatically if there is only a
plaintext portion of the email.
Does the origional email have a plaintext and html portion???
If it does and the HTML portion is blank then they are
Here my two cents:
15 Min: Agree and make sure on where to install (d or c), where the domains
info and emails are going to held at (d: c:, network), where the spool and
logs are going to be held etc
15 Min (optional): coordinating everything in your mind and on paper to make
sure all steps are
No import. Brand New box. They are migrating from a Open Source Mail
Solution to Windows 2003/SmarterMail. I'm assuming we'll have to enter
every user by hand.
I'm trying to get a feel for how much time I should reasonably quote.
When I say reasonable, I mean that I don't want to bill the client
We are currently working on a SmarterMail version of iPlus Info Browser and have been researching the SmarterMail webservices rather extensively. We should be able to write you a tool to do bulk imports of users into SmarterMail. If you are interested, please contact me off list.Thanks,Evans
The original message had no HTML part. You probably have a copy of it, it was
Dave Doherty's message to this list dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:49:42 -0500
with a subject line of Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: port forwarding.
SmarterMail's web mail interpreted the META tag Dave illustrated in his
Hi Kevin-
My original message was text-only. I just checked to be sure.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: port forwarding
This is a bug SmarterMail
Then I would suggest making a feature enhance ment to SmarterTools.
If a message has not HTML part then default to displaying the plain text.
It sounds to me that SmarterMail defaults to an HTML view of a message. They
do not see this as a bug so it must be a feature!!
Kevin Bilbee
I just checked it again. The message is plain text. The default display in
SM is HTML. If you select plain text, the tag shows up fine. If you select
HTML, the tag disappears from view and the refresh occurs.
I placed the code in the body of a standard HTML page on my website, and the
refresh
Dave,
We have been using Compex switchs at end users locations with very good luck
(vlan trucking and bandwidth control). I ask the regional rep if they had a
switch made for your need his answer is below. Priced well under $200 for
isps.
If you want his contact number email off list, they
Gary,
I've had some issues getting them past the part where they assume "user
error" or something else that is outside of their immediate control so
that they can actually look at the issue at hand. It may be just
simply an issue of them not listening/reading carefully enough.
All I can say
Matt,
I tried all that. It seemed like they didn't want to listen, or that the whole
concept was just foreign to them. It's like the support people are
multitasking and are unwilling to take the time to properly listen to the
customer and dissect the problem.
I've had very strange results
I have had similar experiences with them right back to the beginning. I
think the quality of the service you get varies greatly with the individual.
If they get it the response is usually pretty good. It does not always
seem easy to get them to get it though...
I held off deploying SM in my
Dave,
I agree, the product is definitely continuing to evolve and they are
pretty good at doing a lot of things, but they aren't good at handling
support issues, especially from power users with an eye for detail.
They didn't get the issues with auth-only port 587 until that exploded
on
18 matches
Mail list logo
